Comments by "Aaron Okeanos" (@AaronOkeanos) on "David Pakman Show" channel.

  1. 315
  2. 304
  3. 171
  4. 162
  5. 101
  6. 97
  7. 92
  8. 88
  9. 85
  10. 84
  11. 83
  12. 81
  13. 79
  14. 79
  15. 78
  16. 76
  17. 76
  18. 75
  19. 62
  20. 59
  21. 59
  22. 58
  23. 52
  24. 50
  25. 50
  26. 50
  27. 48
  28. 48
  29. 45
  30. 44
  31. 42
  32. 40
  33. 40
  34. 38
  35. 38
  36. 36
  37. 35
  38. 35
  39. 34
  40. 34
  41. 34
  42. 27
  43. 26
  44. 26
  45. 25
  46. 25
  47. 24
  48. 24
  49. 23
  50. 22
  51. 21
  52. 21
  53. 21
  54. 20
  55. 18
  56. Why don't you have a look at Germany. Germanys democracy was heavily influenced by the american democracy as one of the victors of the 2nd world war. However the Germans not just copied the American constitution they incorporated the experiences made during the Weimar Republic (Germanys first version of a democracy) and how Hitler was able to get into power. So they made an improved version which covered a lot of "bad experiences" made by the power grab of Hitler and mistakes which were made in Germany's 1st democracy. Germany has a very strict seperation of powers and numerous unchangable laws which protects the democracy and the constitution from changes andd prevent powergrabs. This includes a high-court like the Supreme Court who watches as the 3rd power over what executive and legislislative are doing. It also ensures nothing can be totally centralized by watching over federalism as well. It also ensures the base rights formulated in the constitution are not improperly changed or even abolished and protects human rights. However the Bundesverfassungsgericht (that it's name roughly translated the "federal constitutional court") is not political. It remains strictly a legal watchdog and it does not involve itself in the legislation as the supreme court does unless legislation infringes on the constitutional rights or human rights. It proved to be very useful and necesarry and overall relative robust but above all it's not politicised quite the contrary every politican tries to avoid situations which makes the involvement of this court necesarry because it complicates things. So law-making tends to be within the confines of the constitution and never be so extreme that it allows grounds of involving this court. ... As it should be. Intresting side-remark. Germany also removed the election of the leader of government (the chancelor) to be directly voted by the population. The parliament is voting on the chancelor. The people just vote the parliament. It prevents that leaders can fool the population by charm or personality or by lies because members of parliaments vote and they can detect lies a little earlier than normal people usually. It's another protection made in view of the Weimar Republic and Hitler.
    17
  57. 17
  58. 17
  59. 16
  60. 15
  61. 15
  62. 15
  63. 15
  64. 14
  65. 14
  66. 13
  67. 13
  68. 13
  69. 13
  70. 12
  71. 12
  72. 12
  73. 12
  74. 12
  75. 12
  76. 11
  77. 11
  78. 11
  79. 11
  80. 11
  81. 11
  82. 11
  83. 11
  84. 10
  85. 10
  86. 10
  87. 10
  88. 10
  89. 10
  90. 10
  91. 10
  92. 10
  93. 9
  94. 9
  95. 9
  96. 9
  97. 9
  98. 9
  99. 9
  100. 8
  101. 8
  102. Don't call them stupid. It only pushes them further away. Don't try to ague with them based on facts. It pushes them only further away. They can't defend themselves against you that's why you only push people further away. If you make a mistake and argue wrong you can even make it worse. If you really must than argue from yourself by explaining why you think what you think and how you come to this conclusion. That way you do not attack those people directly with arguments and appear less aggressive you open up a way for them to understand you without being coerced into it. Try to make a connection on the emotional level. It's the only way to get through to them. This is especially successful when you are family, related or friends. Make them understand what effects their thinking, saying and actions have on you and your relationship with this person. To most persons family or friendship are more important than political opinion. If you can try to avoid political subjects, again try to connect on personal, emotional or family level. Try to seperate people from political media but carefully not by forcefully taking it away. Offer them something else to engage them in something more intresting for them. The longer you can keep affected people away from any political news and opinions for a while the better people change and even might lose interest. If you yourself are affected by this. Just try to ignore all political media for 2 weeks. Just shut it all off and do something else the world can and will continue without you. You lose this feeling of "missing something important" this strong hunger for more input after some days and you have a chance to go back to a normal level. And be absolutly honest to them. Don't try to hide things or even lie it can destroy every progress you made if you are found out. If you don't know anything be honest and tell them. People can understand that you don't know things but making something up or lie can make it worse than before.
    8
  103. 8
  104. 8
  105. 8
  106. 8
  107. 8
  108. 8
  109. 8
  110. 7
  111. 7
  112. 7
  113. 7
  114. 7
  115. 7
  116. 7
  117. 7
  118. 7
  119. 7
  120. 6
  121. 6
  122. 6
  123. 6
  124. 6
  125. 6
  126. 6
  127. 6
  128. 6
  129. 6
  130. 6
  131. 6
  132. 6
  133. 6
  134. 6
  135. 6
  136. 6
  137. 6
  138. 5
  139. 5
  140. 5
  141. 5
  142. 5
  143. 5
  144. 5
  145. 5
  146. 5
  147. 5
  148. 5
  149. 5
  150. 5
  151. 5
  152. 5
  153. 5
  154. 5
  155. 5
  156. 5
  157. 5
  158. Compare this with a diagramm of Income Inequality in America and you will find they coalesce. The next thing socially on this compare the numbers of low-, middle- and upper-class households and you will find, that over the decades the middle-class diminshed significantly. Why is this important? Republicans get their donations from super-rich in exchange for tax-reductions for them and to ensure minimum wage and minimum worker rights so their profits max out. And Republicans get their money from the middle-class which gets smaller and smaller who fears to lose what they have achieved and because they think voting Conservatives would "conserve" their wealth and status as middle class (status quo, they want to maintain what they have). And this fear of losing your status creates fear and anger over time when the situation does not get better. They look for a reason for that and a direction to where to direct the anger. And to prevent the middle-class from seeing the truth that the anger should go to the people who sits in government they preemtive give them another target to make sure people never find out the Republicans are actually the source of all problems. And suddenly immigrants and illegals are made public enemy no 1 as well as all people who are not white. And since Republicans cannot make people vote on the basis of good policies anymore (all policies are not for the middle-class anymore but for the super-rich because they donate the most to the Republicans) the only way to keep getting elected is to fuel this anger-directing at "people who are different" and saying "They make the problems. We get rid of them if you elect us." But it's a lie. That THOSE people are the problem in the first place and that they actually want to end the problems. Without problems no anger, without anger you need another reason to still being elected. That's also why Republicans always and only talk about the future. The only thing they can do is promising about tomorrow, but they never deliver. They cannot deliver because as soon as people have no problems they no longer have anger and without anger they no longer need a target to put the anger at. And without that Republicans cannot win elections anymore because their policies are actually against the middle and low-class own interests but people ignore this because "they are on my side" or so they think. It's a vile cycle of lies and blame-gaming. And people continue to fall for it thanks to so called "News Channel" (actually Opinion-channels) owned by the super-rich to ensure Republicans are still voted and to "form" and "direct" public opinion and especially to make sure the anger of the people is not directed at Republicans. And this is also the explanation why those Opinion-Channels try to direct anger at intellectuals as well and all people who are able to make things better and especially all News-Channels and people who would be able to tell people the truth about all of this. Because if the people ever found out how far they have been betrayed by their own kin they will probably end the GOP instantly and never vote them again.
    5
  159. 5
  160. 5
  161. 5
  162. 5
  163. European here. The Brits currently tend to drift away especially conservatives there. He is a typical Tory Brit nowadays: Long Long Long Windy Talking ... no substance and not able to focus on the question and not able to admit that Johnson pushed the Brit Conservatives extremly to the right since 2016 (the Brexit Referendum) and completly changed the Conservatives to something barely resembling what Conservatism was. The good conservatives - the ones people voted for 70 years - are gone. Expelled from the party last year while placing country before career in preventing a so called No Deal Brexit (Leaving the EU without any agreement which has serious economically consequences). If you think you get a European average opinion from a Brit especially a conservative you couldn't be more wrong. The fact of the matter is, the so called Brexiteers in the UK are strong Trump fans because he allows them to live out publicly their racism and hate for foreigners because they think they are ones why the country has so many problems and getting rid of them somehow makes their lifes better and moreso Trump as President in a way allow them to live out their ignorance as well like: He is ignorant in public and he has power so I can be and have too. He somehow gave them a freepass to spread around their bullshit so society is more and more drowing in ignorance and it deepens the divide in society and ignorance as always creates all kind of problems especially with Corona around because ignorance cannot solve problems it only creates them. There is support for Trump across the continent, but almost exclusively from extreme right parties because they hitchhike to grab power. However since most of the continent has proportional voting (not the UK ... yet) the political spectrum is full of all kinds of parties from the left to the right. People have much more choice. But the most right ones of them are the only ones who would vote for Trump the rest not so much not even the Conservatives. Mrs. Merkel from Germany for example actually is a Conservative.
    5
  164. 5
  165. 4
  166. 4
  167. 4
  168. 4
  169. 4
  170. 4
  171. 4
  172. 4
  173. 4
  174. 4
  175. 4
  176. 4
  177. 4
  178. 4
  179. 4
  180. 4
  181. 4
  182. 4
  183. 4
  184. 4
  185. 4
  186. 4
  187. 4
  188. 4
  189. 4
  190. 4
  191. 4
  192. 4
  193. 4
  194. 4
  195. 4
  196. 4
  197. 4
  198. 4
  199. 4
  200. 4
  201. 4
  202. 4
  203. 4
  204. 4
  205. 4
  206. 4
  207. 4
  208. 4
  209. 4
  210. 4
  211. 4
  212. 4
  213. 3
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. 3
  219. 3
  220. 3
  221. 3
  222. 3
  223. 3
  224. 3
  225. 3
  226. 3
  227. 3
  228. 3
  229. 3
  230. 3
  231. 3
  232. 3
  233. 3
  234. 3
  235. 3
  236. 3
  237. 3
  238. 3
  239. 3
  240. 3
  241. 3
  242. 3
  243. 3
  244. 3
  245. 3
  246. 3
  247. 3
  248. 3
  249. 3
  250. 3
  251. 3
  252. 3
  253. 3
  254. 3
  255. 3
  256. 3
  257. 3
  258. 3
  259. 3
  260. 3
  261. 3
  262. 3
  263. 3
  264. 3
  265. 3
  266. 3
  267. 3
  268. 3
  269. 3
  270. 3
  271. 3
  272. 3
  273. 3
  274. 3
  275. 3
  276. 3
  277. 3
  278. 3
  279. 3
  280. 3
  281. 3
  282. 3
  283. 3
  284. 3
  285. 3
  286. 3
  287. People blame Biden for Inflation while the Corporations doing this to increase their profits. (Prove: Corporations have higher Profit meaning the costs have not increased meaning they exploit the market. People blame Biden for the higher gas prices. While Biden has no control over the OPEC which increased their prices to offset losses on income in 2020 and 2021 due to Covid. People blame Biden for Shortage of Goods, Trade Problems and Higher Prices. But the problem comes from greedy See-Transport Corporations who created an artifically bottleneck on the logistics chain. People blame Biden for not Delivering on his agenda and worse for not even trying. See Build Back Better Bill. Problem: Corporate Democrats are bribed by Corporations to pass as little as possible at best nothing because everything more could lead to increase in Corporation Tax and lower profit margins for the Corporations. People blame Biden for leaving Afghanistan while Trump negotiated this and not complying would have meant war with the Taliban and the US staying in Afghanistan. People blame Biden for opening up new Oil-Fields for investors. But Biden is not at fault here, Trump made this deal Biden is now legally bound to do them but the media is blaming him. People blame Biden for making an Open-Border Policy to Mexico. But in reality he didn't changed a law of Trump although people on the left want him to. Result: The Right don't like him because of a lie, the left don't like him because he did not change anything since Trump. The list goes on and on.
    3
  288. Don't underestimate the opportunity. For Chinese People "face" and money are two of the most important topics. And the absence of the US because of the Uguire-topics, the lack of Human Rights, Democratical Principals, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Press and the Rule of Law would be major embarassement maybe even insult for the CCP in view of the hole world. They will distort the olympics to a major propaganda event for the Chinese Government that is absolutely sure. To show the world how "advanced" how "good" they are. The Chinese Government is paying billions every year in Softpower measures around the globe to actively influence the worlds opinion about the Chinese Government (they will say about China, but this is only about the government not the people). And they will place their glory and prestige AND power over the intent and spirit of this event. In a way they even corrupt the purpose of this event: Peaceful, equal, open and fair competition. [Open (T...wan?), Fair competition? (IP Theft, Destruction of the Biosphere for Profit, Exploitation of humans and nature for profit) Don't make me laught.] The more I think about it, the more the world has the duty to not take part not with diplomats and not with athlets. Western Democracies would like to continue to trade and cooperate with China but only under one condition: That China starts following the rules the rest of the world operates under and stop cheating for profit. At least Human Rights, the Uigure-issue and the Rule of Law should be uphold. Asking for Democracy might be too much at this point. It might be good for the Chinese People but never for the Chinese Government as it would end their grip on the people.
    3
  289. 3
  290. 3
  291. 3
  292. 3
  293. 3
  294. 3
  295. 3
  296. 3
  297. 3
  298. 3
  299. Maybe you should re-read how Hitler get into power in the 1930'ties. There are some similarities and noone could ever imagine before what would happen later. If you want advice. Start to see Trump as a child and treat him like that. Noone really recognises this but most of his popularity comes from exactly this without people noticing or only unconciously. Ask geriatic experts (experts for old people) they will confirm you that old people mentally start turning into children at some point and the best way is to start treating them like that again. It turns out they even like it. That's why Trump admires strong-arm/authoritarian political figures like Putin, Erdogan like some fathers would be to his kids. However the danger is if you treat someone like that as an adult or if you give him to much power. Now add one element to it: Trump is a spoiled brat, pampered all his life. What happens when you have a child like that? The funny thing is, the evidence is right before us, the way he speaks, thinks, deals with rivals, deal with friends, ex-friends and experts telling him what to do and like he deals with problems is exactly that of a child. Look closer and you will find the child in all of it. Hitler was also a child but was not recognised or treated as such with devestating results. You should ask youself do you want the most powerful man in America, maybe even in the world, who is actually a child, having so much power without any feeling for responsibility? And there is another danger. This mental condition makes him prone to outside manipulation especially from people in his personal surroundings. I especially think about e.g. Kushner here a psychopath if I have ever seen one but I bet there is a long line of people trying to manipulate him in their favor. If I were Biden I would strongly react to Trump. Confront him. Try to intimidate him. Acting like a adult would with a naughty child. This would not only help with Trump, but also with his supporters because they suffer from a similar problem being childs needing strong leadership and a direction. They think Trump is this, but don't recognize that he turned into a kid already. Their subconcious have recognized this that's why he gets extra sympathy because their subconcious tells them "he is just a kid". A deadly combination (political speaking).
    3
  300. 3
  301. * You cannot convince them with facts or reason. Don't even try, it's making it worse. * You may be able to connect with emotions but only if they really like or even love you. Show them how you worry for them, how their position is affecting you emotionally. And what might happen to your relation with them when this continues. * If can try to cut off those people from political media for 10 to 14 days ... everything. Maybe a shared holiday or a deal with them (if you shut off your phone and computer for 2 weeks I will xyz) or something. But they need a break and come down from their angry level and eventually even addiction to news and anger which media especially Fox and Co is maintaining. Eventually their anger-level subside enough so that their reasoning sets in again and you can talk with them ... carefully. In best case they reflect and look back and start feeling shame for before. * I don't recommend it, but if you really want to talk to them based on facts, reasoning and logic than don't push it. Explain to them how you got to your personal opinion you now have. Explain/Show/Demonstrate how and from where you got your opinion so they can check this and go the same way if they want. Don't force anything on them, they must come to the conclusion on their own. So make it easier for them to find their way but don't push them or force them or even present them only with the final conclusion without the way there or this fails and may push them even further away because they think you want to manipulate them.
    3
  302. 3
  303. 3
  304. 3
  305. 3
  306. 3
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. 2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. 2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408. 2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 2
  412. US citizens trust in government is the least among all modern democracies I noticed of all major modern democracies the US has the least trust on the government. People in the US always assume the worst motives from the government. That's why they want to keep their guns, that's why they mistrust any actions concering the wider public even if it's in order to protect people from a pandemic or other threats and that's why they want the government to be small and not involving ("regulating"). In other countries this is totally different. Scandinavia, Taiwan, South-Korea, Japan, Lituania and Germany for example show an implicit trust to what the government is asking the citizens to do. And sometimes this mean even things people may not like but which are necessary. Sure this also has cultural reasons and for sure historical background but the baseline is, the better the government the more trusted it is. And here is where I come back to the US. Because US Citizens have more than enough reason to mistrust the government in the US. They give them constantly reason for this, especially during Republicans presidencies. There is corruption, greed and opportunism in all areas. Member of Congress seem to vote differently than what they say and actually vote even against the public interest. Add to this Insider trade, Bribery ... I mean "Donations" and in-party fighting. And the country is stagnating in the status quo of corporate exploitating not matter of Democrats or Republicans are in power and hardly anything ever changes. So this becomes a self-sustaining cycle. Bad Government -> No Trust -> Less Government -> Even worse government rinse and repeat.
    2
  413. 2
  414. 2
  415. 2
  416. 2
  417. 2
  418. 2
  419. 2
  420. 2
  421. 2
  422. 2
  423. 2
  424. 2
  425. 2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428. 2
  429. 2
  430. 2
  431. 2
  432. 2
  433. 2
  434. 2
  435. 2
  436. 2
  437. 2
  438. 2
  439. 2
  440. 2
  441. 2
  442. 2
  443. 2
  444. 2
  445. 2
  446. 2
  447. 2
  448. 2
  449. 2
  450. 2
  451. 2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 2
  462. 2
  463. 2
  464. 2
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. 2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483. 2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502. 2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 2
  507. 2
  508. 2
  509. 2
  510. 2
  511. 2
  512. 2
  513. 2
  514. 2
  515. 2
  516. 2
  517. 2
  518. 2
  519. 2
  520. 2
  521. 2
  522. 2
  523. 2
  524. 2
  525. 2
  526. 2
  527. 2
  528. 2
  529. 2
  530. 2
  531. 2
  532. 2
  533. 2
  534. 2
  535. 2
  536. 2
  537. 2
  538. 2
  539. 2
  540. 2
  541. 2
  542. 2
  543. 2
  544. 2
  545. 2
  546. 2
  547. 2
  548. 2
  549. 2
  550. 2
  551. 2
  552. 2
  553. 2
  554. 2
  555. 2
  556. 2
  557. 2
  558. 2
  559. 2
  560. 2
  561. 2
  562. 2
  563. 2
  564. 2
  565. 2
  566. 2
  567. 2
  568. 2
  569. 2
  570. 2
  571. 2
  572. 2
  573. 2
  574. 2
  575. 2
  576. 2
  577. 2
  578. 2
  579. 2
  580. 2
  581. 2
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. You just need to name "Defund the police" to show how terrible Democrats are. A 3-word slogan which need 3 paragraphs and a "but" to not be misunderstood. Ridiculous stupid decission it should never have been used. Republicans are very good at campaigning with more or less nothing. They either have no policies to work with or their policies are so terrible that everyone actually reading it will vote against it. Republicans also never talk about the past and about their achievements because there is nothing or it's so bad that it's better to not talk about it anymore. Nerver noticed, but Republicans always talk about tomorrow, they promise the world for you and the pot of gold is always behind the next hill at the end of the rainbow. But they never deliver it's a lie, an illusion. Republians also like to campaign on fear and anger. It's their most successfull strategy for elections. Make an enemy (trans, culture war, woke people) or exaggerate an existing enemy or prejudice (immigrants, "metropolitan elite", The Swamp, socialists/communists) and promise "to deal with it" and to protect voters from it. Do they ever? No ... or lets say they make it appear like that. Solving it means you cannot use it for the next election. Despite all those negatives and more or less nothing substantive (and real/truthful) to campaign on Republicans manage to get elected quite successfully by appealing to emotions, especially anger, hate and fear. They have a short direct language mostly short 3 word slogans people can remember and use even if they might not fully grasp the meaning. And the Democrats could learn a lesson or two. And this is the what Democrats need to change. Appeal to emotions. People like hope, passion, empathy more than hate, anger and fear. Point out achievements people liked or even loved. Keep reminding them of the good stuff. And use the policies you plan to introduce to work for you most of the policies the left suggested are liked even by Right-Wing voters.
    1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. About the Inflation Argument - The Stimulus checks are not new money pumped into the system. It's money the tax-payer payed into the system and are now just payed out again. See it as a payout from a long-term investment-plan. It's your money you get back nothing more, not new money which wasn't there before. The money payed out is also not available for the government to spend somewhere else. So the hole system has not become "havier" so to speak. And if it helps prevents that some people go hungry, ill, bankcrupt, homeless and preserves the status quo a little while longer it does more good than bad for the economy in the future. This is the very thing people tend to forget. The 400.000 excess deaths by Covid Trump could have been prevented will have opportunity costs for the US in the future. Those are people from all age groups now missing from the system. Humanists don't like it very much but it can't be denied that everyone of us is helping the GDP in one way or another. So yes you can place a value on every citizen how much every contributes to society at least on average. And this makes the economic damage of dead people calculateable. A sell for one is a purchase for another. And now 550.000 potential cpnsumers and workers are gone within 12 months. It WILL have an impact, especially if experts and high-qualified personel is among them. But even if not companies starting up again now need to find new suitable workers and it will disrupt chains and well oil machinery of economics to a degress and create costs. And the simulus helps to mitigate this loss somewhat.
    1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. People have been told about a terrible thing in a box. They plastered the box with labels to stay away from it, to never dare open it and about dangers in it but noone actually know what's in it. Maybe "socialist" should first describe what they are aiming for. The goal, the world and ways how humans would live in it because noone actually knows this people have only been told it's awful but if you ask them about it they don't know. Having said that I'm not a friend of extreme socialism. I like some of it and society need some of it, but not all of it. Socialism as a system especially as a political system is not compatible with the human nature (not as much as Communism). Why repeating history? Look at Germany after WW2 meaning 40 years long until the iron curtain fell. East Germany tried real socialism as Marx and Engels postulated (not Communism like in the USSR) and West Germany sticked to social democracy. Germany until this day is trying to revert the mismanagement of those 40 years and although 30 years have passed there are still some things no yet normalized. Learn from it. Take the best things of market economy/capitalism and the best things of socialism and you get social market economy, the thing Germany is running now for 70 years and altough it's far from perfect it's much better than what the US having right now in some kind of elbow-society where your worth and living-standard is based on how good you can exploit others, hurt your rivals and lie to your benefit instead of truth, honesty, dialog, cooperation and consensus to work for the greater good.
    1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. There is a fix to this situation. A fix which does not require years of education or even starting from scratch. But it's currently impossible to implement because "the well is still poisoned every day". The solution is to stop the lies or better to implement more protections for the Truth in our society. Even people with low education can make good decissions when they are only confronted with truths. Best example for this are court cases as jury. The people listening all day to truthfull statements (mostly). It's enough so even their limited critical thinking is able to make good decissions. But as long as people lie without anyone pointing it out, as long as political opinion channels like Fox, Newsmax and OAN poisining the environment with lies there is only a little chance of this fixing itself. Mostly in cases when those channels go too far and people realize something is off. What we actually would need is some kind of guarantee that we are not being lied to and that people who do lie are responsible for the use and all consequences. Sadly at the moment this only happens when someone has a financial disadvantage through lies. We call this defamation. But we would actually need something better, something more general, something a little like in courts where intendly lying can bring you in serious jeopardy. And it would need something which is limiting Freedom of Speech. And since the only rights which can limit other human rights like Freedom of Speech have to be human rights as well my suggestion would be to implement a new human right a "Right for Truth" alongside "Freedom of Speech". Legally it creates a basis, a framework to make liars responsible for their lies. It will not end lying, but people who do better have a good explanation why and are in any case responsible for their lies.
    1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. Careful. This is tested in the UK for half a year now. Something new from the right-wing. It's called "saying Heads and Tails". The source is saying both things shortly after each other. It creates chaos and undermines trust. It's much more destructable than it seems. On first view it's harmless because 50% of the time they say what you think, but on second view it leaves the viewer more unsure than ever before and forces them to trust nothing and noone. And the source can later say: "It wasn't them" (because they said both) or they say "We were right" (50% of the time). It's a way to be right if it's a success and escape responsibility if it goes wrong at the same time. It's the material to destabilize a country even faster than always lying. Not only incites this heated discussions between viewers about what is true and what is not, the chaos also makes people less confident and unsure of themselves and humans starts to trust only themselves and their own potentially distorted views and beliefs in those cases (Humans prefer a comfortable and/or exciting lie over hard or boring truth). The only known remedies are critical thinking skills, self-confidence and truth and all 3 are treated badly in the US for decades. In this case it may also be designed to encourage Trumpists to go even deeper into social media to potentially reach even more problematic channels than before. Don't think for a second this is accidental. The channel owner holding the reigns at all times. For Trumpists this is also playing with fire. Because they not only destabilize moderate people with not enough critical thinking skills, but they also destabilize themselves with this potentially to a point of no return even for them.
    1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. There was once a guy in a prison who thought about this: "How could people become like that." And he was executed shortly after for conspiring to assassinate Hitler. But managed to smuggle out his notes. His name was Dietrich Bonhoeffer he called it the "Theory of Stupidity" You cannot reach people like that with facts, reasoning or logic. They think on emotions alone thats why even otherwise intelligent people can be like that. Arguing with them can even make it worse and they might include you as part of the conspiracy. You may reach those people on the emotional level if you have a strong connection to them and they realize how their behaviour is hurting you. But this only works when the connection to you is more important to them than the topic of debate. And even if you manage to reach them emotionally than ask them only to suspend political news and commentary for 2 weeks or more. Maybe a vacation or holiday with no internet or newspapers and TV, or a deal in which they let it go just for this time. The idea is to cool them down from the anger and hate and break the addiction to news and even to anger. If you think they are somewhat reachable sit down with them and explain how it comes that you think as you do, where you got your information from and how but leave them otherwise alone and not force anything. Do not talk about their opinion and do not argue about their opinion just your own. Let them come to their own conclusions. And react only if they come to you and ask questions that's a sign that they are willing to listen. This is my personal strategy on this assembled over a couple years. I'm not an expert.
    1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. There are only two options here: 1) Continue as it was. Meaning McConnel only passes what his donors want to pass. Meaning tax-cuts for the rich, deregulations of banks, finances, industry, dismantling of consumer rights and protections and worker rights and protections in order to maximize his donors profits. And of course no 15$ minimum wage. So the same which happened for 70 years now in the US and which is holding the US back from getting better. 2) Getting rid of the Filibuster or at least restrict it make it painful for lawmaker who use it to delay or block new laws and changes to existing laws. McConnel lose his only weapon his only power, the power of blocking and delaying. I think the decission is simple. The only reason why he is threatening now is because the Democrats are about to put him back to his place amongst the mortal. His current behaviour was showing he as a single senator of 2 senators from one single state in the US ... was able to stall the hole country and brought only problems and misery in his 50 years in politics. And he is not the only Republican Senator doing that. It shows the hole system of lawmaking in the US is seriously flawed. No wonder the people getting angry at politicians that "nothing gets done" with people like McConnel working as a roadblock with more influence than the House, more than the President even. Put him back where he belongs as 1 of 2 senators of 1 state from the US ... and not even the one with the largest population nothing more nothing less. The Senate should only confirm and Review what the House is doing but they currently have more power than anybody else in the US including the president.
    1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. What we see here is called "Devotion". You can describe it as unconditional and blind following. It overwrites reasoning and logic and makes you only want to get attention from that person by any means necessary so you do almost everything for this person even if its damaging or dangerous for yourself, even the personal life is sometimes offered as you can see in religious motivated attacks. In my opinion the only way to sever this connection is to somehow show the victim that it never will get any attention so the person loses interest. But with reasoning, facts/truth you have no chances to convince those people. You might even make it worse because the person thinks you want to remove the chance for attention by your interference. You might be able to do something on the emotional level but this only works when you have a strong emotional connection to this person or the person to you. And the victim is not willing to sever your connection for the connection with the devoted person. Alternatively you can remove the person who is devoted. Turn off social media, TV. Go to holidays for 10 days or more. Twitter removing Trump in that regard was extremly helpful because people tried to get attention via Twitter and Trump kept the connection alive via Twitter. That's why for Trump the Rallys were extremly important to hold and constantly being on the mainstream media with "bad news" or "outrage" was also helpful for him, as well as Twitter of course. That is how Trump managed to maintain the hold over people and even expanded it. It's ironic, but by reporting news about Trumps newest mistakes, behaviour and whatever the mainstream news actually helped him without realizing. There is a saying: People who desperatly seek attention are best be ignored.
    1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. Boris Johnson did the same last december to get elected in the UK. Although he is a Tory (Conservative) and the Tories are more than 10 years in government already they gave the electoral the impression "He is the new thing" and not in government although he was even before the election. And I also have to warn you: It works a lot of voters fall for it. The best thing you can do is: Point out the lies. As often as you possibly can. People must realize that they are beeing manipulated and being lied to. And try to appear as impartial as you can, if you appear too partisan those voters will see it as a football match and even accept and like being lied to because it's "their side/team" of the football match doing the lying. It's a real thing at some point they don't see it as a lie to them, but as a lie to the other side as strategy and they start liking that your side get enraged about it and overlook they are being lied to as well. Lookup "Footballification" and "People like being lied to". As someone analysing the psychological reasons for Brexit for a year now I can see it all the way through the Brexit referendum of 2016. And I have another recommendation for you: Work with emotions not with reasoning on Republicans. You cannot reach them the more you try to convince them with arguments the more you lose them especially since they cannot win on arguments because they are based on lies and they are almost always not able to argue adequatly and will only block up at some point. But on the emotional level you can still reach Republicans. Trust me, Brexit teached me a lot on this.
    1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. Regarding the problem with unemployment. What America is experiencing are the negatives sides of unregulated free trade something the Republicans are very fond of because it creates them extreme gains by cheaply buying/producing outside the US and selling expensive in the US. And it's destroying jobs and the wired thing is the people buying those products in the US are indirectly financing the end of their jobs in the long term. This issue was early recognized by the EU that's why they changed their strategy. They allow extrem free even seamless trade without any tariffs or controls within their trade zone (The Single Market) with strong regulation forcing everyone to apply the to the same rules (The Level Playingfield) pushing for fair competition in the market but allow no cheating by importing cheap goods without the same regulation from the outside. And it's a sucess modell. For a lot of companies producing in the EU cost the same as producing outside (because of high tariffs) so they consider staying in the market and benefit from close/timely transprots and create jobs there and instead try to reduce costs and increase efficiencies. This helps conserving jobs to a degree. The downside. Every outside trade deal especially the free ones must carefully be negotiatiaed to not offset this balance. What I would suggest President Biden is taking one or two pages from the EU's experience with it introduce the same and arrange a Free Trade deal with the EU under those conditions. It will create the strongest and largest market on the planet and will be a new economic engine for the hole planet. The downside for the US: It must learn to introduce and live with customer protection, worker protections and worker rights, environmental protections, fair taxation and more consumer protection and regulation on the financial market to prevent new fiancial crisis like in 2008. The most difficult lesson for the US will be to learn, that not all can be let run free without sideeffects and sometimes a strong state is needed especially in areas which are or should be Non-Profit or base-needs like water, power, communication, transport (bus/rail/local transport), mail/postal, healthcare and education (schools AND universities).
    1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. The simple difference between Facts (which News should be alone) and Opinion is not known to most. They don't know there is a fine but extremly important difference. 1) One is fact or reality what happened or what is - the truth for a better word - and there is only one version of it all other variations are misinformation or lies if you prefer. Informations which are not truthful or also contain "views" (see next paragraph) which were either keept secret, changed or only partial given or worse completly made up. THIS IS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION. Getting the full, unchanged, honest information without changes, additions or omissions. 2) The other is a view on those facts, an interpretation, an opinion on those facts and how to proceed from there, what to do next, how to react to it or an evaluation how bad/good this is. There is only one version of facts out there, but everyone of us can have his or her own view on this or even multiple views. And linked to this is FREEDOM OF OPINION. That noone can force their opinion on you. FREEDOM OF SPEECH. also guarantees you that you can say your opinion without getting punishment for it. But this is NOT giving you the rigth to lie or manipulate about the facts (see first paragraph). What's important here is: If you disagree with the opinion of someone else, it's a disagreement, not a lie. And since everyone is free to have his or her own opinion you can only try to argue/convince them otherwise. But lying has nothing to do with it (unless the person actually lies about the facts). And channels like Fox or Newsmax who call themselves "News"-Channels are actually Opinion-Channels. And they don't want you to know this fine difference. They want you to think both is the same and with that ... that the facts have different versions which is never the case. And to make you attack everyone who disagrees with your opinion by making you feel attacked on the facts. They want to have THEIR version of the facts ... so you get an opinion/view to THEIR liking. This is the great manipulation. And why do we know this? Well because channels like Fox have argued before courts with this excuse. They actually admitting before a judge, that they are only giving opinions (#2) not facts (#1) ... but they call it "News". Legally this get them off any kind of repercussions because well Freedom of Opinion. See how this connects now. If people don't see the difference the "News"-channels and people like Tucker Carlson got away scot free because they tell you their opinion (#2) and you think it's facts (#1). Another problem is: There are a lot of rights for opinions (#2) but there are no strong protections for facts/the truth (#1). There is no punishment for lying (besides lying to courts), there is not even a right for truth. The only point when courts make a ruling on this is when someone has a financial damage from a lie, or another disadvantage or any of the other rights is hurt. But the truth has very little protection. And I think it desperatly needs some. My suggestion is introduce a new human right: The Right for Truth Giving all people a right to know the truth and make all people responsible for the lies they tell if they lie (because they hurt the rights of other people). And with the status as human right, it can limit and override the Freedom of Speech meaning you can have any opinion you want, but you have no right to lie to others. If you do you are fully responsible for the consequences.
    1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. The Republican Party sealed it's fate the moment they acquitted Trump in the 2nd impeachment trial. They should have used the opportunity to make a final line under Trump. It might have hurt a bit, but they would have had 4 years to fix this. Now Trump will rip the party apart piece by piece in order to stay relevant and to fix his bruised ego and to try to not leave this world as a loser. Add to this the incoming generational change (retirements) and so on in the next years ... and the Republican Party will not even closely resemble what it was ... ever again. The best thing America can do now is let the current Republicans disappear split the centric wing from the Democratic Party to form the new Republican Party. They still hold the values of the Republican Party and they have no place among the Democrats anyway. I would also recommend the US to think about changing the system into proportional voting. This would allow a multi-party system and coalition governments and such things. It would improve the representation of the public according to their preferences. It would give legislation more cooperation on policy and therefore more stable lawmaking. It would end gerrymandering, disporportional represenation in the parliament and a lot of other side-effects of First Pass The Post. It would also allow the upcomming of new parties, e.g. a Green Party, a Party of Bussiness, an extreme left and right party maybe a real Trump-Party as well. And everyone can vote who they want. Vote-Splitting is not an issue anymore.
    1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. And with that you talked about one flaw of real Socialism and Communism. That people at some point had no choice anymore. Eastern Germany had real Socialism and for some years it worked well with motivation to make things better than before. But it was a one party state and absolute power corrupts absolutely. And Planning Economy the idea to control economy centrally by the party by a "plan" (hence the name) turned out to be inefficient and wasteful. Things got worse making people leave so they build a physical wall to prevent people from leaving and at some point even started shooting at people trying to leave. The dissatisfaction about things created anger and protest so they introduced an intelligence network to not only watch other countries but to watch their own dissatisfied citizens right down to the point of neighbours snitching on neighbours. To further reduce dissatisfaction they took over the little media available (pre video pre internet time) and made them party-propaganda full of misinformation to give people false impressions. And the political party involved itself the education system. Made something like the 10 Commandsments of the Bible just for the party and socialism which kids had to recite every day once. And forced all kids to join political youth groups. Religion was not forbidden but suppressed as it was seen as undermining the believe in the party and the country. This happens when you can no longer deliver and people get dissatisfied and you try all and everything to stay in power. However not all was bad. Living was relativly cheap, everyone who needed a place to live got one, healthcare was free, childcare was free and widely available, education was free and pretty good for the time and if you ignore the political indoctrination. There was some baseline luxory but not much. No travel to western counties but you could visit eastern europe but interestingly not the Sovjet Union (without permission).
    1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. The issue is those people have conflicting informations and the human brain is not very good dealing with such rifts in reality a state called Cognitive Dissonance appears. People are not rational anymore, they stop thinking and start feeling more and they are even able to say contradicting things in the same sentence. The brain just can't deal with this. What those people actually need is the truth and trust. And both are under constant attack in US media. Fox and right-wing Social Media is telling them lies and telling them not to listen to the other side anymore. They hear all day only one side which adds "Confirmation Bias" to the already bad situation. It's important to somehow stop the lies. Protect the truth somehow. Challenge all lies. Trust is more difficult to make. It cannot be attained quickly and needs time. I for one think it's time to protect the Truth more in our society. So I for one demand a new human right "The Right for Truth" parallel to "Freedom of Speech". It's the only way we can continue in the age of Social Media. Truth creates Trust and Trust creates Certainty and Safety. Even the weekest minds in our society are able to make good decissions if they are only confronted with the truth. And education. People needs to learn how to get information reliable, how to confirm information, what is a fact, what is an opinion, basic technique to filter, sort and work with information and methods to detect lies and manipulations and about critical thinking. But this takes time. Probably too late for this generation, so the at least the Truth should be protected somehow. But this is impossible with Channels likes Newsmax, OAN and Fox around throwing all off all the time.
    1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. I think Biological Evolution for humans is done. It happens in ranges of 100,000 years or so and humans are significant for this planet for only 12,000 years since we started to construct buildings. We now doing culture evolution and soon engineered evolution ... simply because humans are not patient enough to wait for nature. For humans the biological evolution was replaced by cultural evolution. The more successfull someone manages in society (mostly wealth) the more offspring they tend to create. Sadly also people who can bully, cheat and scam more successfull tend to doing better and procreate more. But it's even worse sometimes otherwise biological good genes are not given to offspring because economical and financial inequality may lead to no offspring and loss of otherwise biological good genes. People who have affinities to be geniusses or artists may go under in society simply by a lack of funding and compassion. The filter of cultural evolution is totally different to the filter of biological evolution and constantly changing. In short we created an environment in which people who adapt better to culture and better manage to exploit it for themselves with potentially problematic and weak biological genes procreate more. Selfish, criminal behaviour and greed leading to more wealth has higher chances of create offspring. And we may lose people who are intellectual, artistic, empathic or maybe good leaders because they not doing well in a society based on money. We ruining our genepool and maybe sealing the fate once culture fails and we are back to biological evolution. But something new has come up as well engineered evolution. Our scientific progress allows us to manipulate our own genes. And humans have not the patience for biological evolution so they will unavoidable start using this technology to fix and enhance things biological evolution would take millenia to do. And this will create a new form of evolution in which engineered and not engineered humans compete against each other in the environment of cultural evolution. Basically what nature done with neanderthals and homo sapians at the same time will now happen with different engineered human species. And I am not looking forward to this prospect. The potential unwanted side effects may create the end of humanity by over-engineering with unintended consequences.
    1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. The fate of the Republican Party was sealed the moment they acquitted Trump in the 2nd impeachment. The Republicans said this day there were okay with Jan-06 and it doesn't matter what they said in a speech afterwards, their vote counted and almost no Republican voted for it. I would even go so far, that the only real old-style Republicans were those who voted with the Democrats against Trump. All others are sycophants who placed career and Trump before country. And the Republicans wasted a golden opportunity to draw a final line under Trump and to finish the chapter. Now Trump is poisoning the well as long as he is there. He didn't changed and still repeat the same lies over and over again because his bruised ego is incapable to accept defeat - to accept he lost - that he is a loser. It goes against his very ego just read his history about him and his uncle to understand why Trump can't accept defeat, why for Trump only the win counts not how he gets it. So he cheated, pressured, intimiated and extorted people all his life into making sure he wins no matter the cost no matter how ergegious or even criminal he has to be. Just listen to the people golfing with him and the way he golfed was the same way he made bussiness and made politics. The Republicans now cannot get rid of Trump and they cannot further support Trump both is costing them voters because either the Trump Supporters turn against them or the moderate Republicans for whom Jan-06 and Trump was too much leave them. They are now doomed. There is no way this ends well. Unless they return to making good policies as it was before 1970. This is BTW the only way to redeem themselves. They must get rid of Trump finally and start making policies for the low-class people the ones not donating to them every single time. If not Trump will cotinnue to strangle the life out of Republican Party.
    1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. My god what's so difficult to just give it a simple slogan in 3 words? Have you learned nothing from Trumps Era. Unless you can put it in three simple words the masses are forgetting it within 3 minutes. Call it "Improve the police" or "Reform the police" to keep it simple and straight. The person first using "Defund the police" had obviously planned to manipulate the people to "fear" the people against the democrats by giving them the wrong impression or in other words lying to the people. If you not learn from the mistakes leading to Trump and the things Trump made you are doomed to repeat it and worse next time. This is what I fear now happens with Biden. Nothing was learned from Trump. They keep doing what they done before Trump as he never existed. Change nothing and keep doing what they done ... enable another Trump. If they not seriously change policy and pick up some things from the progressive left next time America will lose democracy for sure. The democracy needs more protections. The elections needs more protections. The constitution needs more protections. The presidency needs more restrictions. The emergency rigths of the president must be overthought. The impeachment of the president must be be overthought. The transition of power between presidents must be put into law. The combination of The House and the Senate must be overthought to prevent stalls like now with 600 bills in limbo. The role of the supreme court must be redefined to stay out of politics and legislature. They are the judiciary, they are watchdogs of law and democracy and the constitution not a 3rd arm of the legislature. It needs new rules for presidents usage of social media. It needs new rules for speaking the truth by legislatures in the parliament and committees. Not only the witnesses needs to be sworn in but the legislatures as well. The postal service needs stricter rules to prevent the repeating of the autums disaster. The elections laws must be partly federalized to prevent politicizing the process in favor of a certain party. The filibustering must be abandonded. The party donation system must be completly redefines to keep outside money influence out. The party financing system must be completly redefined for more balance and less outside money influence. And if you ask me. The hole election should be changed into a proptional voting scheme. Abandon the 2 party system. Allow more parties. Abandon gerrymandering and financial influence via budget. Allow coalition governments and changing the model to a cooperative and consensus based decission making to enable more stable laws and governments.
    1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1