Comments by "" (@GlynJONES-e5m) on "“How Long Can Starmer Go On Like This?” | Jeremy Kyle | Isabel Oakeshott" video.
-
1
-
Carl Emmerson, deputy director at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said: “Reform UK proposes tax cuts that it estimates would cost nearly £90 billion per year, and spending increases of £50 billion per year. It claims that it would pay for these through £150 billion per year of reductions in other spending, covering public services, debt interest and working-age benefits.
This would represent a big cut to the size of the state. Regardless of the pros and cons of shrinking the state, or of any of their specific measures, the package as a whole is problematic. Spending reductions would save less than stated, and the tax cuts would cost more than stated, by a margin of tens of billions of pounds per year.
Even with the extremely optimistic assumptions about how much economic growth would increase, the sums in this manifesto do not add up. Whilst Reform’s manifesto gives a clear sense of priority, a government could only implement parts of this package, or would need to find other ways to help pay for it, which would mean losers not specified.”
They also propose the ban of "QUANTITIVE EASING" THAT WOULD DESTROY THE COUNTRY IF THE BANKING OR COVID CRISIS EVER HAPPENNED AGAIN.
TRULY IT LOOKS LIKE REFORMS FASCIST MADTETS WANT THEIR REVENGE FOR TWO WORLD WARS!
VOTE LABOUR TO SAVE OUR BEAUTIFUL COUNTRY.
1
-
1