Comments by "DankEngine" (@dankengine5304) on "Russian Armored Columns STEAMROLL North of Avdiivka" video.

  1. Bit of a late post since the offensive was already stopped. They also took massive casualties.
    13
  2. Because most of it is propaganda lmao
    12
  3. Yeah, this is blatant propaganda lmao. There were little to no Ukrainian tanks present here in this battle and the Russian advance was stopped.
    9
  4. Glory to Ukraine!
    8
  5. You say that like its Ukraine’s fault for being invaded
    4
  6. Well, they are. Russians have lost countless soldiers and over a hundred vehicles already.
    4
  7.  @juryfilatov4520  - Its quite literally the other way around. Ukraine wont stop fighting. Russia can’t say the same. Not to mention Russia’s massive casualties they’ve taken here. Ukraine’s response is defense. Their whole offensive was a charge into enemy territory and then stop after only 2.5 kilometers? This is the most cope I’ve ever heard. Russia cant fight a long war. Ukraine can.
    3
  8.  @worfoz  - Russian propaganda makes people think Russia has endless manpower and equipment, which just isn’t true, but even government officials believe it so they just throw everything they have at Ukraine. They don’t think about winning. They think about glory.
    2
  9.  @wanderingson  - Yes. Russia is losing.
    2
  10.  @Warren_Peace  - baseless? There are massive partisan movements across the occupied territories. There was one in Kherson as there is in Melitopol. Russia cannot occupy a country as large as Ukraine. Manpower is also not a problem for either side. Neither side is losing enough soldiers for it to matter. NATO has a stronger and better economy than Russia and has significantly better equipment and more of it than Russia. Russia cannot hold up this war.
    2
  11.  @juryfilatov4520  - This just isn’t true. Prigozhin admitted to having 20,000 killed soldiers. That means more wounded. So an educated answer would be 80-100 thousand casualties. Ukraine would not have taken more. That would mean a quarter of Ukraine’s army would have been destroyed in ONE CITY. These numbers are unrealistic. You’re being ridiculous lmao
    2
  12.  @juryfilatov4520  - They dont allow it. We’ve seen such things with Mariupol. Civilians couldn’t flee because the city was encircled and dead civilians scattered the streets. Not to mention the Bucha massacre. Russia flattened Bakhmut and Mariupol because its easier to flatten people’s homes rather than fight house to house. Its barbaric. The US does no such thing.
    2
  13.  @Disorder2312  - It needs a lot more than one. Avdivka isn’t one of them either.
    1
  14. Lower than Russia’s. Not by much though.
    1
  15. Good excuse for why Russia cant encircle anything
    1
  16.  @nielsdejong  - It is propaganda. He says “steamroll” like it didn’t take them a week to go 2-3 km with hundreds of dead soldiers and dozens of destroyed vehicles. Not to mention the leopards that he claims were destroyed which weren’t even present at the battle. He’s a Russian shill. He isn’t unbiased in any way.
    1
  17.  @dylanskrzypek5397  - Who knows if he's paid by the Russian government. But the truth is that he's a Russian shill with Russian bias. Then you call him a genius and an analyst? Really dude? He is neither of these things. He is nowhere near qualified enough to be making these videos with confidence. Western media propaganda is based on political parties. In the end, there really isn't "propaganda". Just points of view. This guy is just spewing actual Russian government propaganda. There is nothing but lies in what he says.
    1
  18.  @JonHeillaender  - Then prove me wrong. Prove to me that Russia is winning. Because they’re not.
    1
  19.  @wanderingson  - Wow bro good argument. Too bad for you that its wrong.
    1
  20.  @arsenasvarov1400  - Oh lord you must be clueless to how Russia fights. Not only is the frontline in a stalemate, but Russia’s attack as shown in this video was actually a colossal failure.
    1
  21. ​ @arsenasvarov1400  - Well you're wrong. This isn't WW2 lmao. Although Russia will compare it to that. Russia loses men at a faster rate than Ukraine, which leaves gaps in their lines. They've lost more men, but not by much. And not nearly enough soldiers have died on either side for overall manpower to matter.
    1
  22.  @arsenasvarov1400  - If Russia was winning, sure it'd be scary.
    1
  23.  @arsenasvarov1400  - Except it's not. This is not what winning looks like. Sending waves of men to die in the mouth of the enemy defenses. Losing hundreds of vehicles. Aircraft cannot get anywhere near the frontline because there are so many anti air defense systems, and the frontline hasn't moved anywhere strategic in any way for months. You call that winning?
    1
  24.  @arsenasvarov1400  - God you sound like a child. You're literally just denying everything that we've all seen and saying that it just happens to the other side when it's simply not true. Why hasn't Russia advanced anywhere strategic in months? Jesus Christ dude. Get a grip on reality.
    1
  25. The offensive was already stopped lmao
    1
  26.  user-ct9sj3rh8p  - Russia also thought they'd take Sumy, Kyiv, Kharkiv, Kherson, and Zap but instead got their teeth kicked in.
    1
  27.  user-ct9sj3rh8p  - It’s hilariously ironic that you say that I live in the past, then proceed to criticize me for saying the cold war is over (it is over). You are the one still living in the past. LGBTQ shit isn’t actually a problem in the US. The internet and media make it seem like it is but it’s not. I live here so I would fucking know lmao
    1
  28.  @ragnarlmao9511  - the “winter is coming” claim is fucking ridiculous because both Ukraine and Russia fight in the same climate lmao
    1
  29. The offensive was already stopped my man
    1
  30.  @krhml3092  - The US has sent 5% if its military budget lmao. If you think the west cant handle this you’d be wrong. Russia’s economy is not stable or strong enough to maintain this war. Its just not possible.
    1
  31.  @adrianosverko6601  - Yes because it’s true lmao. What are you smoking?
    1
  32.  @nobody-y7i1r  - Copium of what? That Russia gained a 2.5 kilometers of land in 3 days then stopped advancing at the cost of dozens of vehicles and hundreds of lives? Oh how tragic for Ukraine! Get a fucking grip dude. This assault was a failure.
    1
  33.  @Warren_Peace  - That’s just not true at all lmao are you on drugs? There are large partisan groups inside these occupied regions. You really fell for the Russian propaganda.
    1
  34.  @juryfilatov4520  - Its hilarious how you fell for Russian propaganda. It’s not even good. Casualty rates that high should mean Russia is advancing, but they’re not. They’re losing. Casualty rates on both sides are damn near equal. The fact that Ukraine is defending has lead to Russia having more casualties. Why? Because Russia failed their initial offensive with armor and immediately resorted to Soviet tactics of human wave tactics, but not like WW1. Also, NATO has only sent surplus. The US is only running out of equipment that they CAN send. They have a law where stockpiles need to have a certain amount of something at all times. Equipment that cannot be given away. Ukraine hasn’t received anything “new” that the US has. Russia is losing bro
    1
  35.  @juryfilatov4520  - There are plenty of American companies that can do that job lmao
    1
  36.  @juryfilatov4520  - Because Western projectiles are just better lmao
    1
  37.  @juryfilatov4520  - Alright, this comment has no connection to what I said before. What the hell are you talking about?
    1
  38.  @aleksandrsereda3125  - They actually did break the first line, but yes the offensive was a failure. This does not make Russia’s attempts at attacking any more valid, because they went even worse.
    1