Comments by "DankEngine" (@dankengine5304) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. No they’re not. They’re preventing citizens ages 18-60 from leaving. 1 million people have left Ukraine so far.
    24
  2. “Successful retreat” they left hundreds of men behind tf you mean
    19
  3. You're joking right?
    17
  4. Lol. Cope harder Zigger.
    17
  5. I think WW3 will have the casualties of WW2 but at the speed of just a few months to a year or two
    11
  6. Not true. The US has laser weapons which could easily take out so many missiles so quickly.
    11
  7. Yet they're holding it lmao
    10
  8. No they didn’t lol
    7
  9. Yeah we thought the same thing about Russia. Just because they have the tech doesn’t mean it’s widespread in their military.
    7
  10. There is an ad for me right now. Haven’t watched the video yet and I know it’s Texas. Edit: I was wrong.
    7
  11. Bruh China is run by man children haha
    6
  12. Russia will 100% not be sending conscripts to Ukraine. However the conscripts will probably be replacing the jobs of those who WILL be going so.
    6
  13. It's lend lease. Basically it's "Here have some weapons but give them back at the end of the war and you have to pay for their transport" Lend Lease is basically a secret way of supplying a force without being part of the war
    5
  14.  @michealbaker8216  - Assuming their nukes even work
    5
  15. Hey boys shit’s starting up again
    4
  16. LMFAO HE CHANGED THE THUMBNAIL TEXT! It was “pretty darn well” before lol
    4
  17.  @aliyangco8178  - Woooow! Vehicles can be destroyed? Whaaaaat?! No way! Nobody calls them wonder weapons and nobody expected them to not be destroyed at some point. Classic Zigger.
    4
  18. Yes because they’d be duds
    3
  19. There’s a movie like this. However, it fucking sucked.
    3
  20. No they aint lmao
    3
  21.  @GeneralChase  - How does this relate to anything about this
    3
  22.  @threestars7561  - Russia did still blow it up
    3
  23. Well everybody, so much for the USA being the strongest.
    3
  24.  @jamesgornall5731  - It doesn't matter if they take it seriously. They don't have the money to upkeep it. This isn't even something our country made as propaganda. I came to this conclusion since Russia has a corruption problem and is poor. The west assumes their missiles are fully capable. Cope
    3
  25.  @Phil-D83  - That's literally normal dude. You draft the oldest first then go to the youngest. You don't wanna send your YOUNG WORKERS to die first. The minimum conscription age in Ukraine was recently dropped from 27 to 25. Totally normal for a war.
    3
  26. The Patriot is the best the US has so that’s probably what they’ll get.
    2
  27.  @damascus1111  - It’s the best AVAILABLE one is what I mean I guess
    2
  28.  @edi9892  - Russia is poor and most of their nukes are cold war era. I guarantee a lot of em won’t even launch. They are cold war era nukes that have been sitting in silos for decades, unable to be maintained due to low funding. Then the ones that do launch, chances are a bunch will be duds. This is assuming any of them land on these cities in the first place if they aren’t shot down.
    2
  29.  @alexnderrrthewoke4479  - I did lol. Wow! Tanks can be destroyed? Whaaaaat??? Shut up man this was expected.
    2
  30.  @Crabman-nq1bb  - You're funny
    2
  31. Other way around backaroo
    2
  32. Mind you American fighters in WW2 were far cheaper and easier to make
    2
  33.  @FrankVader99  - 1 million shells a month? That's it?
    2
  34.  @edi9892  - This is assuming they don’t get shot down. Or that they even made that many.
    1
  35. Idk bro we’ll have to see how that goes. Im playing HOI4: Millennium Dawn and Isreal just declared war on Syria and Iran like a dumbass. We’ll see who wins.
    1
  36. The United States Would Like To Know Your Location
    1
  37.  @KennyNGA  - Yeah and how many carriers do they have? This isn’t WW2 anymore. Without a carrier, the fleet is useless against a fleet with more carriers.
    1
  38.  @KennyNGA  - Yeah and the USA have 11 super carriers. All nuclear powered. Floating cities. China would have NO CHANCE against the US navy
    1
  39.  @KennyNGA  - A carrier was a new fucking tactic in WW2 carriers are still essential. Hypersonic missiles mean nothing when the ship they’re trying to sink is a FLOATING CITY
    1
  40. The US will just keep giving Ukraine artillery. Russia has no hope.
    1
  41.  @michealbaker8216  - The depots they use in Ukraine retard. You know. Where they store weapons and ammunition for frontline soldiers?
    1
  42.  @mladenbro8435  - American volunteers who are vets from Iraq and Afghanistan are saying the city is so fortified that an American force 2x as big as the Russian one attacking Mariupol would take more than 2 months to fully take it. Cope.
    1
  43.  @mladenbro8435  - Yeah. The redditors making shit up to justify desertion because the Ukrainians won't give unexperienced men guns? They're cowards looking for upvotes for the trend.
    1
  44.  @martinilopez1  - They aren't payed a dime. They go there willingly.
    1
  45.  @richdobbs6595  - They’re not really even nazis anymore
    1
  46. @K - The Russians are losing to the Azov and that doesn't change anything lol
    1
  47.  @mladenbro8435  - Those are civilians. That’s different. These are volunteers who JOINED the army. They’re giving civilians the guns to protect the city in the event the Russians get in. However they’re not gonna give untrained soldiers guns. It’s a liability for themselves and others.
    1
  48.  @lLooN3y  - for real lol
    1
  49.  @Xio189  - You clearly don’t know anything about the US military
    1
  50.  @briant5685  - I don't think they will run out, but that's because they will just have to stop using as much as they were in the beginning of the war. The shelling will slow down but they won't run out I think. But the industrial capability of the US is vastly superior to Russia's in every way.
    1
  51. @6eq uj5 - yes. People always talk about new tech from other countries as if it’s gonna be better than the stuff the USA makes
    1
  52.  @wysochunky2110  - Lmfao true
    1
  53.  @craftpaint1644  - At least the US got all their soldiers out of Afghanistan. Even if the exit was sloppy and probably the worst executed retreat in American history
    1
  54.  @item6931  - Well obviously. Women cannot fight as well and just become a liability. Not saying they can't fight, but when your situation is this dire you cannot take any chances
    1
  55. Pretty sure he was talking about those 100% confirmed dead. The rest are just estimates.
    1
  56. Unrealistic numbers. They would have lost by now if that was true.
    1
  57. We all know this video was inspired by Russia’s military buildup
    1
  58. This is how world wars happen
    1
  59.  @kordellswoffer1520  - Alliances and threat of war? Yeah it is.
    1
  60.  @kordellswoffer1520  - Alliances lead to escalation which can lead to war. That is basically how WW1 started. Escalation leading to the trigger event.
    1
  61.  @kordellswoffer1520  - WW1’s main cause was not the Alliances. However they escalated everything. Do you not know that when the war began everybody started joining because they had alliances?
    1
  62.  @kordellswoffer1520  - The alliances made it a world war? They joined because they were in alliances doofus.
    1