General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Sergei
Daily Mail World
comments
Comments by "Sergei" (@sergeikhripun) on "Kyiv defenders FIGHT BACK with new weapons: 'They are going to burn'" video.
Just more canon fodder. The outcome of this war was decided as soon as it started. There's no way Ukraine can win but the US/NATO would fight to the last Ukrainian. It reminds me the Fall of the Ancient Rome when Romans didn't want to fight the Barbarians, instead they bribed some barbarians tribes to fight against other barbarian tribes. The US/NATO never GAF about Ukraine, they just wanted to use them as useful idiots, as pawns and as canon fodder in a proxy war against Russia.
2
"Glory to Ukraine," and "Glory to Heroes" are Ukrainian Nazis slogan during WW2.
2
Just more canon fodder. The outcome of this war was decided as soon as it started. There's no way Ukraine can win but the US/NATO would fight to the last Ukrainian. It reminds me the Fall of the Ancient Rome when Romans didn't want to fight the Barbarians, instead they bribed some barbarians tribes to fight against other barbarian tribes. The US/NATO never GAF about Ukraine, they just wanted to use them as useful idiots, as pawns and as canon fodder in a proxy war against Russia.
1
Glory to Ukraine is a Ukrainian Nazi slogan during WW2.
1
Just more canon fodder. The outcome of this war was decided as soon as it started. There's no way Ukraine can win but the US/NATO would fight to the last Ukrainian. It reminds me the Fall of the Ancient Rome when Romans didn't want to fight the Barbarians, instead they bribed some barbarians tribes to fight against other barbarian tribes. The US/NATO never GAF about Ukraine, they just wanted to use them as useful idiots, as pawns and as canon fodder in a proxy war against Russia.
1
Just more canon fodder. The outcome of this war was decided as soon as it started. There's no way Ukraine can win but the US/NATO would fight to the last Ukrainian. It reminds me the Fall of the Ancient Rome when Romans didn't want to fight the Barbarians, instead they bribed some barbarians tribes to fight against other barbarian tribes. The US/NATO never GAF about Ukraine, they just wanted to use them as useful idiots, as pawns and as canon fodder in a proxy war against Russia.
1
Just more canon fodder. The outcome of this war was decided as soon as it started. There's no way Ukraine can win but the US/NATO would fight to the last Ukrainian. It reminds me the Fall of the Ancient Rome when Romans didn't want to fight the Barbarians, instead they bribed some barbarians tribes to fight against other barbarian tribes. The US/NATO never GAF about Ukraine, they just wanted to use them as useful idiots, as pawns and as canon fodder in a proxy war against Russia.
1
Just more canon fodder. The outcome of this war was decided as soon as it started. There's no way Ukraine can win but the US/NATO would fight to the last Ukrainian. It reminds me the Fall of the Ancient Rome when Romans didn't want to fight the Barbarians, instead they bribed some barbarians tribes to fight against other barbarian tribes. The US/NATO never GAF about Ukraine, they just wanted to use them as useful idiots, as pawns and as canon fodder in a proxy war against Russia.
1
Just more canon fodder. The outcome of this war was decided as soon as it started. There's no way Ukraine can win but the US/NATO would fight to the last Ukrainian. It reminds me the Fall of the Ancient Rome when Romans didn't want to fight the Barbarians, instead they bribed some barbarians tribes to fight against other barbarian tribes. The US/NATO never GAF about Ukraine, they just wanted to use them as useful idiots, as pawns and as canon fodder in a proxy war against Russia.
1
@burtvhulberthyhbn7583 The Ukraine/Russia conflict started when the US/NATO lied to Gorbachev not to expand an inch closer to the Russian border in exchange to German re-unification in 1990s. Since then there were 5 waves of NATO expansion. The US unilaterally withdrew from ABM treaty, INF treaty, Open Skies treaty, Iran Nuclear Deal, Paris Climate accord. Signing an agreement with the US is not worth the paper it's written on - just ask Native Americans.
1
@burtvhulberthyhbn7583 Finland has fought with Nazi Germany against the Soviet Union in WW2 and by the end of the war, they signed a treaty about being a neutral country which they will now be violating. Again the US/NATO lied to Gorbachev not to expand an inch closer to the Russian border in exchange to German reunification in the 1990s. Since then there were 5 waves of NATO expansion. The US unilaterally withdrew from the ABM treaty, INF treaty, Open Skies treaty, Iran Nuclear Deal, and Paris Climate accord.
1
@burtvhulberthyhbn7583 WTF would Russia want to invade the former Soviet block countries? I would need to be in a psycho brain of an American or British neocon to think that way. The conflict in Ukraine didn't start when Putin woke up one day and decided to bomb Ukraine. This conflict started when NATO decided to move closer to the Russian border. Brandon himself admitted that was a problem back in the 1990s when they invited Baltic Republics into NATO. And what is the purpose of NATO after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw pact? WTF was NATO doing in Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria? Why is Columbia a NATO member? This is not a war between Ukraine and Russia but between Russia and NATO. The US/NATO never GAF about Ukrainians, they just used them as useful idiots and cannon fodder in a proxy war with Russia. Ukraine was already de factor NATO country without its membership - it had thousands of NATO instructions and the country was flooded with weapons. The US and NATO are running out of weapons they send to Ukrainians and it makes absolutely no difference. The Russians are capturing and killing tons of mercenaries from the West. Some British soldiers are training Ukrainians on their new weapons that have been delivered from the US and other NATO countries in the western party of the country. Technically they are not mercenaries they are soldiers of the enemy army and technically we are in the middle of WW3 but neither side wants to call it this because of political reasons and implications.
1
Just more canon fodder. The outcome of this war was decided as soon as it started. There's no way Ukraine can win but the US/NATO would fight to the last Ukrainian. It reminds me the Fall of the Ancient Rome when Romans didn't want to fight the Barbarians, instead they bribed some barbarians tribes to fight against other barbarian tribes. The US/NATO never GAF about Ukraine, they just wanted to use them as useful idiots, as pawns and as canon fodder in a proxy war against Russia.
1
Just more canon fodder. The outcome of this war was decided as soon as it started. There's no way Ukraine can win but the US/NATO would fight to the last Ukrainian. It reminds me the Fall of the Ancient Rome when Romans didn't want to fight the Barbarians, instead they bribed some barbarians tribes to fight against other barbarian tribes. The US/NATO never GAF about Ukraine, they just wanted to use them as useful idiots, as pawns and as canon fodder in a proxy war against Russia.
1
Just more canon fodder. The outcome of this war was decided as soon as it started. There's no way Ukraine can win but the US/NATO would fight to the last Ukrainian. It reminds me the Fall of the Ancient Rome when Romans didn't want to fight the Barbarians, instead they bribed some barbarians tribes to fight against other barbarian tribes. The US/NATO never GAF about Ukraine, they just wanted to use them as useful idiots, as pawns and as canon fodder in a proxy war against Russia.
1