Comments by "childofthe60s100" (@childofthe60s100) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. WOW - what a massive over-interpretation of the scientific and medical (and NOT mythological or theistic) information discussed on John's videos!!!
    1
  2. Smug 20:20 hindsight vision. Totally lacking in empathy and no pretense at sympathy I bet you are great fun to be with!
    1
  3. That very sentence makes no sense! Common sense cannot make that sort of determination.
    1
  4. What a stupid comment "couldn't care less about what is being injected into them"!!!! At the time, the available evidence demonstrated the danger of the virus and that had to be balanced by the possible risks of the vaccine - WHICH WE KNOW KNOW WERE NOT REVEALED. Everyone cared!!!! People did what they felt was right, based on available evidence, at a very scary time.
    1
  5. The issue regarding "co-morbidities" influences opinion in so many ways - even to the point of people dismissing the influence of the virus. Many people have AND LIVE LONG LIVES, whilst coping with morbidities. If Covid then infects them and due to an inherent weakness in their system, caused by their "co-morbidity", the virus does great damage, they can become very ill or die DUE to the Covid. Correctly then, Covid is reported on the death certificate. If they had not contracted Covid, they would still be alive and living - with their "co-morbidity". No Covid - no death!
    1
  6.  @Jo-sp5cp  RIDICULOUS COMMENT!!!! People were ill, people were dying - JUST not "around you"! If you were a Covid denier - you WERE and STILL ARE a conspiracy nut!!! Covid was and is real. WE lost two friends to Covid - they obviously just did not live "around you"!!!!
    1
  7.  @tomwinterfishing9065  Smug 20:20 hindsight. Do you ALWAYS insist on "being right"????
    1
  8.  @moonman2022  Is there anything (in your elevated world) worse than pseudo intellectualism???
    1
  9. So YOU - KNEW - it was experimental????? Only.....it wasn't - it was the production vaccine. Watch the video again!
    1
  10.  @andrewyeager9786  Tell that to the people of Florida, Gaza, Israel!!!!
    1
  11.  @rebeccadanvers884  ????????????????????????????
    1
  12. John - typing error at 5:07 D= Delta (Not X) F=Delta.
    1
  13. John - can you advise please?? We are being "pushed towards" the RSV vaccine, later this month. AS it seems to be an mRNA based jab - does it make sense (particularly as it is "new") to risk it? If you could please give your comments on this, it would be much appreciated.
    1
  14. Terrifying! Is it the "government" the NHS, or maybe Pfizer??????????? WHO is pressurising the statisticians to present such obvious and blatant lies? The updated figures would be comical - if this weren't such a serious issue! The "new", revised data would not even be plausible on Fantasy Island. The government and the NHS obviously want to detach themselves from any blame or responsibility (as ever!) - but if it's Pfizer.....who do they "own" - to force them to make the ridiculously, unrealistic data changes? Whoever or whatever is applying the pressure, it seems that the statisticians are saying "lets make the changes so ridiculous that everyone will be able to see what's going on"....... 59,344 "corrected" to 344???? NOBODY could possibly believe that an "error" of 59,000 is an.......error. The statisticians are warning us about the sinister intent behind their revisions. And - since the data published went back as far as 2018 - has the data for 18, 19, 20 been SO wrong , for so long AND the error has gone unnoticed all this time? What a crude attempt to fool the public. The application for a "freedom of information request" seems to be nothing other than an alarm bell for somebody to be pressured, to start fudging the figures again. Is there ANYTHING "official", that can be trusted anymore?
    1
  15. Correlation maybe - but causation is the ONLY important issue here!
    1
  16. The criminals were NOT the "inventors" - the criminals were the people who made the product using a very different process. They assumed that their quicker process would produce an identical vaccine - which it did not! It was to produce a batch product quickly - and before the rival companies. Watch the video again - you have COMPLETELY misunderstood what was being said!
    1
  17. "I live"????????????? @johnqpublic407 
    1
  18. Which is what you were! It just turned out that your natural obstinacy caused you to make a LUCKY (not educated!) choice!
    1
  19. BUT - you did not make an educated choice. Your choice was based on biased emotions. The fact that you use the word "shit" reveals that you were just a militant ant-vax.
    1
  20. Gross generalization!
    1
  21. Instincts do not "trump" scientific evidence. At the time, the best evidence (as we thought it was!) said get vaccinated. You were not right then and subsequent revelations do not mean that you are right now. The message was to protect yourselves and to protect others and arrest the spread of the virus. You decided to go "out on a limb" - so your actions, at the time, were selfish and irrational.
    1
  22. Because of your ignorance AT THE TIME, or your refusal to protect your self and others - BY IGNORING THE ADVICE AT THE TIME?????
    1
  23. The point is, that you were refusing, on your own terms and against the advice that people were trusting and following, at that time. The advice was to be vaccinated and so, protect your health - AND THAT OF OTHERS. People, therefore, quite reasonably, saw you as a risk to the general health of the population. You had no evidence, to contradict the "official evidence", so you were acting out of ignorance (at the time!). The fact that the generally available advice now appears to have been badly flawed, does not make your refusal (at the time) any more valid - because you did not have that information, then. Nobody had that information -except for Pfizer - so you WERE, in people's mind's posing a deliberate health risk, to them. You won't receive an apology because - as you had no evidence to justify your actions - you were not right to refuse.
    1
  24.  @mythtree6348  You have an appropriate "nom de plume"! The jabs were recommended by the government the NHS and many other organisations and individuals. THAT was the advice that was trusted. THAT was because the drug companies published info and data that has, recently, been shown to be untrue. Campbell recognises this and has said that his advice was based on the lies from the drug companies, that we did NOT know were lies at the time. Your surreal comment is based on you cherry picking one video - if you had watched all of his videos, then you would understand the situation. 1000's of honest doctors??????????????????????????
    1
  25. Suppose we will just have to wait until more leaks, from Hancock's emails turn up? Surely, somewhere in the publisher's premises there will be files/memory modules, with drafts from the book. Publisher: Please leak the missing information - it is in the public interest.
    1
  26. You seem to be implying causality - without ANY firm evidence. You don't even present any circumstantial evidence - just misguided suspicions? You don't even mention the outcome, of the two women?? Does their survival not fit your agenda? This is how dangerous rumours started, during the pandemic - and YOU are still doing it!!!! Why? Speculation, of the type that you are indulging in, is of no value and your comment and opinions need taking with a very large pinch of salt.
    1
  27.  @henrywolf5332  You certainly clear up why people are leaving organised religion, in their droves!!!
    1
  28. This is a serious channel!!! Please respect that fact and keep your blinkered conspiracy theories out of this.
    1
  29. Hello John - do you think there's any substance to this or is it merely speculation and opinion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jNo0on8vhg
    1
  30. SMUG with 0 intelligence.
    1
  31. Your hindsight is a wonderful thing. Vax refusers AT THE TIME had no more information, than those who were vaccinated. You tried to convince others, based on a no-knowledge feeling, that was not able to be substantiated.
    1
  32. SINGAPORE - YOU HAVE GOT IT RIGHT!!!!! IF PEOPLE SEE VACCINATION AS THEIR CHOICE - THEN THEY SHOULD ALSO REGARD TREATMENT AS A MATTER OF CHOICE. IF THEY CHOOSE TO BE TREATED - THEIR CHOICE - THEN THEY PAY!! NOBODY IS FORCING THEM TO AGREE TO BE MADE BETTER.
    1
  33. Science did NOT show that the vaccine wasn't going to stop the pandemic. Your information and subsequent assumption is totally wrong. You may imply NOW (with badly focused hindsight), that it did not stop the pandemic (and AT THE TIME nobody knew whether it would or not- it was an attempt to deal with an unknown situation - and worth trying!) The evidence showed, quite early on, that it DID reduce the mortality rate and reduce the probability of long-term hospitalisation. What enabled it to continue to spread were people who, when infected, passed it on to others. This isn't rocket science!
    1
  34. People did NOT "fall for it" - it was recommended by people that we should not have trusted. YOU smug obstinate people could have died from Covid, but you did not and now feign sympathy for people damaged by the vaccine. How wonderful is 20/20 hindsight!!!
    1
  35. A question comes to mind, regarding "Long Covid" - from which my wife is suffering. Is LC exclusive to those who have been vaccinated (we have both had three shots - 2 being Pfizer) and so, a possible consequence of the vaccine? Do unvaccinated people suffer LC? In other words, (my question), are the many and varied symptoms of Long Covid due to problems caused by the vaccines?
    1
  36. That is just TOO glib!
    1
  37. WHAT "was the moment"?????
    1
  38.  @charinabottae  Do you speak English, or is it just jargon, you know? kool-aid drinkers????? red pi????? slowly becomes red pilled????
    1
  39.  @iamthereforeistrive9392  There 8 is.
    1
  40. NO - this is the fault of the stubborn, unvaccinated - who mix and mingle. The NHS is overloaded. AND - if you were to go into hospital for "immediate health issues", you would be exposed to an atmosphere where the virus is more likely to affect you. This is, undeniably (from the data!) due to those foolishly resisting vaccination. It's always somebody else's fault isn't it? Easier to just blame the government than accept the reality. Your immature reference to the fuel shortage is irrelevant, to this thread. You just want to have someone to blame.
    1
  41. John - an urgent question - that YOU are the only person that can be trusted to answer honestly: Is the new RSV vaccine being offered (doctors are contacting patients?) safe? Or is it a gamble like the Covid vaccines that actually spread through the system instead of targeting the key areas? I don't know how else to contact you but as you can guess --WE have been contacted by our doctor and since Covid we are very wary of "new" vaccines. Please can you address this issue???
    1
  42. JOURNALISTS - Fact Checkers?????? Surely the job of a journalist is to INVENT "facts"???? And there is plenty of good, irrefutable evidence, for that.
    1
  43. Cannot fathom the "service closed" regarding Vit. D. Makes no sense, at all. My wife tried to order lateral flow tests and the information was that they could not supply??? Hopefully somebody "with a brain " in the government (?) is considering the Nightingale hospitals and readying them - just in case? Better to have them ready and subsequently unused (the best case scenario) than to have overflow in the NHS, that becomes unhandleable.
    1
  44. If the truth hurts - REMEMBER - this is optional, you have sought it out - you don't have to watch!
    1
  45. Watch the video again - you have misunderstood it!
    1
  46. What utter, utter, emotionally-driven nonsense! "lock down tyrants" "citizen's tribunal" "jail time"........... Did you actually WATCH the video??? Or did you just choose this channel to "have a rant". The video was about issues with the vaccine production. It was about variability between tested samples and batch produced vaccines. It was about two totally different processes being used, in an attempt to produce the same biological substance. How did your mind fit "lock down" into it??????
    1
  47. "THEY" have closed the links already!!!
    1
  48. Surely, it is time to say that we DO have data that confirms the issue - it has been produced by many independent, authoritative surgeons, doctors, clinicians and research workers. For some reason,, that data is just not data that satisfies (or even worries?) the regulators - for reasons that only THEY can explain. Is this because the regulators are "in some way" connected to the vaccine manufacturers? Is protecting their "red faces" more important than THEIR continuing to permit, the rise in numbers, of dead bodies? Nothing would be surprising, any more!
    1
  49. Don't be so silly - plain and simple!!!!
    1
  50. Lunacy on the part of the government and the unethical "scientists" brought in to develop these, now, proven toxins. Medical ethics? Ha!!!!!! Aesculapius must be turning in his tomb! An utterly immoral development - and 10 years of it and all the associated backhanders. There must be so many shareholders amongst the MPs and politicians that this kind of dangerous experiment can be not only allowed to take place but is also being incentivized? Was it coincidence that so many Tory MPs left "the chamber", when Andrew Bridgen stood up and presented parliament with FACTS???? If they weren't there, they couldn't hear it and could still receive their shareholder dividends with a clear conscience????? WHY, other than for financial reward are the government deliberately sticking their heads, in the sand? Clearly Keir Starmer genuinely hates the British people , that much, he makes very clear - but do lots of other politicians also share his hatred and want a Britain populated only by the elite and illegal immigrants? Conspiracy theorists are, in general, fantasizing lunatics but in this case, is the suggestion of "population control" i.e. reduction in the general population, too far out to believe in??? Otherwise HOW can the, government's enthusiasm for, the already proven to be contaminated and therefore risky, mRNA pathway to vaccination, be explained???
    1