Comments by "childofthe60s100" (@childofthe60s100) on "Veritasium" channel.

  1. Since this video, these models have been proven to be unrealistic, unreliable and have been largely discredited......as was suspected, originally, by the majority of open-minded NON-BIASED observers.
    7
  2.  A Z  I share the same feelings, except the guy isn't an idiot - he just, on this occasion, was totally biased, yet presented the issue as if he was being balanced. He must have fooled - and disappointed - a lot of people with this poor effort! So - I don't like what he's doing either. Political motivation????
    4
  3. YOU DON'T. Propaganda! Look up the Michael Mann debacle and the University Of East Anglia "Climategate" email leaks. It's a political agenda - nothing else. I'm VERY surprised to find this particular video poster subscribing to the "common consensus" - he is usually very balanced, but it seems that he in the "in-group"?
    3
  4. Not "probable", just statistically "possible". Like an infinite number of monkeys typing Shakespeare, given infinite time. It's nothing to put a month's wages on!
    2
  5. Indeed yes - it's STILL just a political agenda. Climate change is a feature of our planet/our atmosphere and has been for millions of years.
    2
  6. OURS WORKS - IT PRODUCES A NICE "HOMELY GLOW", IN THE CORNER OF THE ROOM. THERE WERE NO CLAIMS MADE ABOUT IT, ON THE BOX, IN THE INSTRUCTIONS - OTHER THAN IT WAS INTENDED TO PROVIDE LIGHT AND LOOK ATTRACTIVE. BOTH BOXES TICKED - YOU HAVE WASTED A LOT OF TIME, MAKING THIS VIDEO?
    1
  7. Indeed - because he tends to deal with matters outside of, or too advanced for the school curriculum. OR Maybe you were not a very engaged pupil/student or maybe you are a late developer?
    1
  8. Michelson Morley?????????
    1
  9. Religion and spirituality are man-made concepts. They don't tie in with scientific investigation which deals in testable hypotheses. No religious doctrine would yield the sort of thinking required to produce the theory of the quantum because as such, it takes several steps further than the thinking for science in the "macro world". Much of it is unexplained and unexplainable - but it works - which is why technology has advanced to the degree, that it has. No aspect of religion has any relevance, at all.
    1
  10. No - you are (disappointingly) on the nail! The parallel worlds idea (it's not a theory - it isn't falsifiable) is really statistical possibility and certainly not a probability.
    1
  11. THE SIMPLE ANSWER IS - THE MASONS DO NOT USE THIS METHOD OF SELECTION, ANYMORE!
    1
  12.  @nerdingout3560  NOT in the English language it isn't!!! Believing someone's viewpoint is "trust". Sheep - a domesticated ruminant animal - kept for it's wool and for food.
    1