Comments by "CosmoShidan" (@CosmoShidan) on "" video.

  1. +Aaron Reichert Do you know what social contract theory is?
    1
  2. Aaron Reichert Do you recognize that marriage is a type of social contract then?
    1
  3. Aaron Reichert But if it's a social social contract, then it entails an agreement between persons who wish to start a life in civil society, and to not inflict aggression on one or the other. Do you agree with that? Plus doesn't your explanation imply subjective morality? If so, how do married persons resolve conflict between themselves or live together in the absence of coercion, duress or intimidation?
    1
  4. Aaron Reichert Is that abstract happiness or happiness in the concrete sense? Also mind answering my other questions?
    1
  5. Aaron Reichert I'm trying to understand if you even sophisticated enough to back your propositions. Because when it comes to minarchist arguments, I normally find them to be lacking insofar as their rejection of the social contract goes, they end up in contradiction in that they use a social contract model. That model is the Non-aggression doctrine. Not to mention that in that same doctrine, it requires the state to enforce it. Now let's put marriage in the form of the non-aggression doctrine since it is a social contract, if one member of the married persons started to treat a partner with abuse, either battery or rape, and the abused retaliates to the abuser, and decides to take the case to court, then I do not see how you would want the state to deal with this.  I thought that in minarchism, the state is the means of upholding human rights, so is it not a human right to not have an abusive marriage?
    1