Comments by "John P" (@johnp139) on "New study shows COVID-19 vaccines reduce risk of severe illness, death l GMA" video.

  1.  @Voxicide-RDO  but how many vaccines are like this one which is like 30% effective and FOURTH doses are required in ONE YEAR?!?
    10
  2. That actually requires some effort by people rather than gust getting a half dozen shots.
    4
  3. If you have been vaccinated, then you should have no worries.
    2
  4. Considering that there didn’t seem to be a control group to compare to, this “study” is meaningless.
    2
  5. What exactly is a “theses”?
    1
  6. Ever hear of a PERIOD?!? Moron! Learn how to write !
    1
  7. “You’re”, which means “you are” versus “your” which means something that you own or possess. Learn how to write if you want anyone to seriously consider YOUR (not “you’re”) comment!
    1
  8. Except that this “study” had no control group (unvaccinated people) which shows that it is wrong, so intelligent people know this.
    1
  9. Only you
    1
  10. It’s actually the vaccinated that are transmitting the virus.
    1
  11. Try using punctuation! Idiot!
    1
  12.  @vaporrub3480  if you truly believe that the vaccine reduces symptoms, then maybe you should get a brain and release that since they don’t know that they have the virus, they will continue to go out and spread it to others!!!
    1
  13. Considering how many vaccinated people STILL GOT THE VIRUS?!?
    1
  14. Learn how to write.
    1
  15. So vaccines are supposed to allow people to still catch the virus? Seriously?
    1
  16. Why? They don’t work and you have NO IDEA of the long term effects. Idiot.
    1
  17. What baffles me the most is how MUCH WORSE his opponent was!!!!
    1
  18. What do you mean? Is 20% effective what they are supposed to do? How does this compare to the unvaccinated?!? Idiot.
    1
  19. So if the “study” only looked at VACCINATED PEOPLE, how the F can they say that the vaccine REDUCES the severity and deaths?!? What are the statistics for the UNVACCINATED?!?
    1
  20. It’s more like a survey
    1
  21. You mean that a study needs a control group? Go figure.
    1
  22. Because the vaccines OBVIOUSLY AREN’T WORKING!!!!
    1
  23. Crap
    1
  24. Why is no one asking for the same statistics for the unvaccinated? Probably because they are about the same.
    1
  25. “You’re”, so you are also obviously a MORON!!!
    1
  26. And everyone else needs to get vaccinated to protect the already vaccinated people.
    1
  27. So what are the rates for the unvaccinated? How can the “study” show how much better being vaccinated is if it doesn’t compare the data against the non-vaccinated?
    1
  28.  @provocativeproductions  but there was no control group, it’s quite possible that the non-vaccinated people had fewer symptoms.
    1
  29. But they have been saying this before the vaccines.
    1
  30. It’s about reducing TOTAL EXPOSURE, idiot!!! The point is that the virus isn’t intelligent (just like you), but the LONGER people are in an area where others may have the virus, the greater the PROBABILITY is that others catch the virus. And what sporting events are you talking about? Outdoors? In red states?
    1
  31. @Eidelweiss Lemonade exposure is also determined by density and time.
    1
  32. @Eidelweiss Lemonade stupid thing won’t let me
    1
  33.  @tomill1085  it’s not working
    1
  34.  @provocativeproductions  you obviously don’t understand science. This “study” didn’t compare these rates to the unvaccinated.
    1
  35. Based on WHAT? Propaganda? You have NO IDEA how severe it would have been without a “vaccine”, ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA!!!!
    1
  36. Or none of the above.
    1
  37.  @noelfuentes2165  yet this “study” failed to mention the same rates for the unvaccinated, which means that it is worthless. You ALWAYS need a control group!!!!
    1
  38. So why are there so many “break through” cases?
    1
  39. Unfortunately this “study” didn’t compare vaccinated people with unvaccinated people, so there is no evidence that the vaccines help at all.
    1
  40. The title is a lie. Worthless study if they didn’t have a control group to compare to. This is NOT SCIENCE!!!!!
    1
  41. Damn, learn how to write!!!
    1
  42. You are delusional if you can’t comprehend that there WAS NO CONTROL GROUP (unvaccinated) in this “study”! Stupididiotmoron
    1
  43. It’s “allowed”, idiot
    1
  44. Only that is irrelevant in this case. The vaccinated people are spreading the virus more than the vaccinated are.
    1
  45. For no reason
    1
  46.  @christopherhucik9550  they also didn’t compare this to the people who weren’t vaccinated.
    1
  47.  @provocativeproductions  the fact that the “study” didn’t compare the results to a control group (unvaccinated) is all that I need to say that this is total BS!!!
    1
  48. Smart people actually think for themselves based on reliable and UNBIASED data.
    1