Comments by "John P" (@johnp139) on "Mentour Now!" channel.

  1. I’ve been hearing about this for FOURTY YEARS!!!
    14
  2. Stupid commercial!!!
    4
  3. EXACTLY!!!
    3
  4. It would have to land after a few days anyway due to engine oil requirements.
    3
  5. Which ones? The only one that I know of is the C-5. And there aren’t even windows on the deck where the seats are. Many other military aircraft have crappy webbed seats facing the center of the aircraft which is awful. Others have palletized seating that faces forward.
    3
  6. @ Right, the other thing with professional racing is that the seats are often customized specifically for the individual drivers which also improves the level of impact protection.
    3
  7. No, ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!
    3
  8. They weren’t manufactured in the US and Airbus didn’t submit a proposal.
    2
  9. They aren’t “wasteful” with respect to travelers’ time.
    2
  10. Those have less occupiable space than a 757!
    2
  11. No. That’s not STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT!!!!
    2
  12. Only THEY DIDN’T!!!!!!!!!! Boeing was the ONLY CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL!!!!!
    2
  13. Fewer than a B-52 or C-5.
    2
  14. Only none of this is STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT!!!
    2
  15.  @jeffberner8206  BS!!!!
    2
  16. Fruitcake One.
    2
  17. First of all they didn’t submit a proposal, most likely because they weren’t building them in the US.
    2
  18. What?!?
    2
  19. Right, I know the pilot who was in the E-4B at WPAFB on 9/11.
    2
  20. For good reason.
    2
  21. Airbus didn’t submit a proposal, probably because they weren’t being produced in the US!!!!
    2
  22. Yes it is, and don’t call me Shirley.
    2
  23. Only Boeing has to cover all of the cost overruns (for now) since it was a firm fixed price contract.
    2
  24. Because none of those met the requirements.
    2
  25. Only Airbus didn’t submit a proposal.
    2
  26. No
    2
  27. You can thank Dump for that!
    2
  28. The PROGRAM OFFICE!!!!
    2
  29. It’s a Firm Fixed Price contract!!!!
    2
  30. You are WRONG!!!!
    2
  31. Perhaps Airbus should have submitted a proposal and built the proposed aircraft in the US.
    2
  32. That’s classified!!!!
    2
  33. Stuff like this was incorporated into the KC-46.
    2
  34. It doesn’t work that way.
    1
  35. Not if they are going to execute missions.
    1
  36. The FAA FREQUENTLY is used by the DoD for CDA!!!
    1
  37. Then why didn’t they submit a proposal?
    1
  38. Check out PNS for a strange mix. Mostly RJs but also 319/320 and 737, the weird one is the Delta flight to/from ATL that flies a 757-200. I only counted 142 on the incoming flight today.
    1
  39. He’s no longer president.
    1
  40. Blame Dump for that.
    1
  41. Right, he probably got a lot of kick-backs from Boeing.
    1
  42. Larger thermal load.
    1
  43. Stick to flying. You missed so much on this. Don’t you realize that the major airline pilots are all about to go on strike if they don’t get higher pay? There will ALWAYS be a significant difference in pay with the RJs.
    1
  44. More like bullied and threatened.
    1
  45. There are NO REQUIREMENTS for four engines, but OTHER REQUIREMENTS resulted in the NEED for four engines!!!!
    1
  46. What does that mean?
    1
  47. He is no longer president
    1
  48. Army typically flies helicopters, but the Marines have that role for VIP flights. There has been a Navy - 1 flight when Bush landed on an aircraft carrier.
    1
  49. Learn how to write!!!!
    1
  50. Learn how to write!
    1