Comments by "John P" (@johnp139) on "The New York Times" channel.

  1. Vaccines are to protect those that get vaccinated. Do you think that people got polio an small pox vaccines to protect OTHERS? FOOL!!!
    7
  2. Because anything antivax is banned.
    2
  3. Polio was on its way out when the vaccines were developed.
    2
  4. Yeah, how is Israel doing?
    2
  5. Who are “those people“? It’s always been important to me.
    2
  6. No, and learn how to write.
    2
  7.  @johnsingleton393  too bad.
    2
  8.  @gardenswithsoul  the point is that it should be a CHOICE based on informed consent, not propaganda!
    2
  9. What’s even worse is that effective treatment wasn’t provided.
    2
  10. Perhaps you should produce a more balanced video showing both sides and let the viewers decide for themselves.
    2
  11. Different sciences.
    2
  12. Wrong
    1
  13. How about all of the people that died FROM the vaccines?
    1
  14. What’s it to you? It is THEIR CHOICE!
    1
  15.  @joesmith3908  on Facebook in particular.
    1
  16.  @wickedshadesproductions5254  it’s about doing your own research and determining what is best for your personal situation.
    1
  17. Too bad that the FDA is banning effective treatments.
    1
  18. And how about the people that decide “therefore I WILL get the vaccine”?
    1
  19. There are effective treatments that have been banned by the FDA.
    1
  20. Actually, they were on the way out prior to that due to better treatment options.
    1
  21. What’s wrong with that? Stop being so SELFISH!!!
    1
  22. And no vaccine is 100% SAFE!
    1
  23. Exactly, they refused to provide effective treatment.
    1
  24. Two totally different things. My doctor doesn’t recommend the vaccine, but he does recommend proven treatments that have been banned by the FDA.
    1
  25. Except it doesn’t.
    1
  26. So you have a hard time breathing and you DIDN’T SMOKE? Contradicting argument.
    1
  27. Not all doctors believe in the vaccines.
    1
  28. Vaccines messed up survival of the fittest. Now we have a bunch of weak people propagating their weak genes due to medical intervention! Moron
    1
  29. Right, so vaccines should be banned.
    1
  30. We’ll see the I’ll-effects of the vaccines in 5-10 years.
    1
  31. Darwinian selection is based on survival of the fittest, not survival of the vaccinated. Vaccines totally contradict Darwinism.
    1
  32. Is everyone being forced to get a rabies vaccine? NO, when you MAY HAVE CONTRACTED rabies, THEN you seek treatment!
    1
  33. Then you should stay home.
    1
  34. Depends on the risk.
    1
  35. And if you die from the vaccine, that is also your choice.
    1
  36. Why?
    1
  37.  @wrathoftheflyingspaghettim850  it’s not a life, IT’S A FETUS!
    1
  38. Treatment would have improved and the virus would have been extinguished.
    1
  39. Perfect!
    1
  40. We’ll see what happens to you in 5-10 years.
    1
  41. Darwinism is about survival of the FITTEST, not survival of the weak that need medical intervention in order to survive!!!!
    1
  42. People that get vaccinated, because they are not the fittest!
    1
  43. And there is a good reason for that.
    1
  44. Only to some, everyone is different.
    1
  45. Like the people that blindly got vaccinated?
    1
  46. So you are laughing at the US because so many people are getting vaccinated?
    1
  47. Then they should quit because that’s not what they signed up to do.
    1
  48. Then what’s the problem? Of course, that’s not how it really works.
    1
  49. The vaccinated people shouldn’t be affected unless the vaccines don’t work.
    1
  50. Half of the people are more intelligent than the other half. Maybe they are smart enough to think for themselves.
    1