Comments by "John P" (@johnp139) on "Trump Admin Gave $850,000 to Anti-Vaccine Group" video.

  1. Congress set the criteria for receiving the loans, not tRump.
    2
  2. That is like saying that there are anti-life groups rather than pro-choice.
    2
  3. Constitutional
    1
  4. The vaccines have NOT YET BEEN APPROVED by the FDA.
    1
  5. Just the opposite. These applicants met the requirements for the loans based on the law that was passed. It would be criminal to deny the loans.
    1
  6. That’s against the 1st Amendment.
    1
  7. He had nothing to do with this. And they probably legally qualify for the loans.
    1
  8. That’s not what the PPP is for.
    1
  9. Why? They qualified for the loans. Idiot
    1
  10. That’s a good point. I wonder.
    1
  11. On what grounds?
    1
  12. Informed consent
    1
  13. Congress WROTE THE BILL!!!
    1
  14. If he had Covid, what does going to Walter Teed for TREATMENT have anything to do with vaccines?
    1
  15. That’s not how the law was written.
    1
  16. So you have the authority to decide which organizations are “deserving”? That wasn’t in the law.
    1
  17. Did they meet the criteria for the Payroll Protection Program? If so, you have no case.
    1
  18. Probably because they were legally eligible.
    1
  19. He didn’t approve specific loans, idiot!
    1
  20. So what other organizations that you DISAGREE WITH should be denied loans that they are qualified to get JUST BECAUSE YOU DISAGREE WITH THEIR PHILOSOPHIES?
    1
  21. It’s not ANTI vaccine, it is informed consent.
    1
  22. No one is trying to stop you from getting a vaccine. That is like saying that pro-lifers are trying to force others to have abortions.
    1
  23. What’s criminal about it? It is just the opposite since the applicants met the requirements of the law. Idiot
    1
  24. What? Banks approved the loans based on eligibility, not the tRump administration.
    1
  25. So which criteria did they NOT meet?
    1
  26. They qualified for the Li an. STFU!
    1
  27. People don’t understand how to objectively evaluate data.
    1
  28. It also is for non-profit organizations.
    1
  29. You mean pro-choice?
    1
  30. He had no part in that. The applicants met the requirements of the law.
    1
  31. Yes, and the bill was signed by Trump.
    1
  32. Stupid misleading vlog.
    1
  33. And why does it matter if they met the criteria to get the loans.
    1
  34. They are not for profit organizations and if they qualify, they are entitled to the loans.
    1
  35. Fake news.
    1
  36. Why? Did they meet the criteria for the loans?
    1
  37. Why should it be?
    1
  38. He had nothing to do with this. The applicants met the requirements laid out by Congress.
    1
  39. So who here realizes that millions of people are getting vaccines that have yet to be approved by the FDA?
    1
  40. Why is it horrible? They met the legal requirements for the loans.
    1
  41. But did they meet the criteria to get the loans?
    1
  42. Why? If they met the criteria for the PPP, then they should get it.
    1
  43. Look into the vaccine court and how much has been awarded.
    1
  44. No, because these applicants met the congressional requirements for the loans.
    1
  45. No. They didn’t commit treason. Look up that word.
    1
  46. It is because tRump had nothing to do with this. The applicants met the criteria for the loans outlined by CONGRESS!!!
    1
  47. Not all are that way. Do you call pro choice people anti-life?
    1