Comments by "abyfkk" (@abyfkk) on "Mother of Likely Murdered OpenAI Whistleblower Reveals All, Calls for Investigation of Sam Altman" video.

it turns out that someone who considered himself a genius and was professionally engaged in collecting information from the Internet did not know this, maybe he should have Googled it in his spare minute, and not signs with cats
5
And what does an informant mean? Is this the one who transmits official information to the side, or what is he doing? I understand that the English language is probably very good, but I don't quite understand what the informants are doing, maybe they are passing on official information, trying to ruin the reputation of the company... (along with the fall of, for example, stocks) it seems to me that the reason for the conflict there was completely different
4
as far as I understood from her words (through a translator)), her son was collecting information from the Internet and transferring it to a certain storage medium of the company , I'm sorry, but what kind of copyrights are we talking about here? no, maybe according to American laws he can claim copyright, I do not know , but I want to understand on what basis (I speak in a whisper so as not to be overheard - after all, all the information on the Internet is posted by someone) and Tucker's video and your comment and mine and even YouTube, it was created by someone as a website, it did not arise on its own
3
Of course, no more lies.... Come on, you'll really like it more)) let's check it out
2
and he did not want copyrights, but through them to get even more money from the company, for himself through recognition of some of his copyrights, doing the work assigned to him. He wanted to take money from them , let's be blunt.
2
I'm not a lawyer, I'm not an American lawyer, I don't want to offend anyone, but for example, if someone collects garbage and takes it to a landfill, they immediately acquire the rights to this garbage, to a garbage truck, to containers, to the way they load and unload this garbage... After all, he is also assigned to do this for work. No, I understand that he was collecting something necessary, but is the principle the same or not?
2
I also see my mother not heartbroken, after all, such memories should have been emotionally reflected , but I don't see this, such a purely business approach - my son wanted to squeeze money, and we were waiting for this money when he would squeeze it out. courts, newspapers... mm... and it was even beneficial for someone, probably, why would famous newspapers print some kind of showdown between someone and someone, you never know who didn't share something with someone in America, or are they sharing, is he a super famous person? no... so it was for someone profitable
2
further Tucker asks her directly - did you feel or thought that something was threatening your son... she evades the answer!! She didn't answer that question at all!! What kind of honesty are you talking about here
2
And our honest investigator, Tucker, should have asked where he got the gun from, and why we hear the angle of the shot, and a lot of other things, from a business mom, but we don't hear the main thing - whose gun is it and where? not a word about it at all. Wow, you've managed to get around and not touch on such an important issue at all, and you're still talking about honesty here. fake liars)))
2
where did he get all this money from? maybe he just got all this big money from this company , is this possible? why are they silent about this , and after he received this good money there, he wanted to get even more, and he sues them as a sign of gratitude))) but he thinks that they should have paid him even more, even though he did his job for a pre-agreed amount, and he didn't seem to have any complaints about it, that they cheated, didn't pay or underpaid... Am I getting this right? a separate apartment in a special house, vacation on the islands, I want to relax on the islands - where did I get the money from? it's going to be a joke that it's all from that evil bad company)))
2
I'm sorry, but I can ask a simple question , if he was such a genius, he knew this field perfectly well, why didn't he immediately stipulate the conditions - that yes, I will do this work, but I want to recognize the copyright for something ? Why? no, he worked, he worked, he worked quietly , but at one point he had a brilliant idea - they should give me even more money , but how.....? but through the recognition of some copyrights for him))) yes, my son, well done.... come on, my son , let's play big no wonder they love to go to Las Vegas with daddy so much, how did you play? and, well, we'll raise the bet from the dealer - I'll buy a whole gun and my house is guarded, not everyone will go there and now Momochka is sitting and blaming others for gambling for a lot of money to play roulette for her son's life.
2
and Tucker would like it if I said - give me my money here , I'm writing comments on you, I have some kind of copyright)))) well, he would be pleased , angry or outraged.. I would have told the newspapers what a scoundrel and asshole Tucker was, and sued him , and you would have made a fool of me. What, did you like the truth? or is it all not true?)))
2
@bhanu2248 sorry, I listened, it happens) I'm not sure what I watched from the beginning, I don't remember anymore , but what does it change anyway? it was already clear to me that his gun was, the question was why did he buy a gun and when Did Tucker ask? no I remember he asked her if something had threatened him, but instead of answering the question honestly, his mother preferred to just say words about something completely different. Don't you want to know why? The answer is obvious
2
@bhanu2248 The situation there may have been quite funny. If I'm not mistaken, he worked for a company that was created by 4-5 people who are directly related to IT technologies, including Elon Musk. Were they working on AI by any chance? That's what Tucker should have asked, too, her son did some of the work, sent the materials to the company, and then wanted the copyright recognized. What is the final product? because such a situation is possible, for example, he has done some of the work, like many others, wants to recognize the copyright for this part, and this part is part of the final product Will he be a co-author of the final product? I honestly don't know. But is this option possible?
2
when you see a stupid comment with a quote again))
2
@bhanu2248 And the company just doesn't need it so that the final product has a lot of co-authors, I'm sure it doesn't)) The story is very murky. Yes, I agree, it looks like murder, and nothing else. But it may just turn out that they deliberately took a big risk, they knew that the situation was very dangerous, hence the gun. But maybe someone else was influential on his side and interested, which he didn't worry too much about. but his mother is silent. After all, he was killed, and this is not some minor conflict over an insignificant issue. And I'm interested in how this conflict developed, when it started, when he demanded recognition of his copyrights, when he decided to leave the company..... and this chronology of events is not given at all, maybe I listened In general, such stories should be told sequentially, and not transferred back and forth in chunks, resulting in a lot of gaps and ambiguities, and what she obviously hides and does not want to say because it is not profitable for her
1
@bhanu2248 there's some kind of nonsense going on here, a programming genius, as his mother imagines him, only realizes at some stage that he has managed to do something that falls under copyright , as far as I know, programmers immediately know and understand the complexity and difficulty of some work or solving some issue and they know there is a price for this, and they either ask for good money for their work right away, or they immediately stipulate authorship and sell what they came up with for good money to someone who is interested in it, but here the genius was doing something and only then realized what, it turns out like this
1
@bhanu2248 We have also sued Trump , now we will not talk about whether he is good or bad, let's look at the situation in its purest form. He slept with some girl there..... so what? Do all the students have to file lawsuits against him now, what kind of nonsense is this?))) And on what basis at all But the funny thing is that the money they paid her under the peace agreement of the parties was simply attributed to the lawyer's expenses and they found fault with them. Is it possible to file such lawsuits here everything is fine here it is necessary to invite a decent-level programmer so that he can evaluate what her son was doing, so that he could evaluate the relationship between her son and the company. What does Tucker want to sell to the public? He was killed, he sued, so he's good, and those are bad.... excellent logic, ironclad , and when she sued, she means she's good too , based on that logic.
1
@bhanu2248 I don't even understand why Trump paid her money at all, well, he slept with a prostitute, you think sex for money.... and when they buy houses and cars and diamonds and sleep many times, and not one, it's not sex for money))) for love...... and if he this and this and this will not buy and diamonds and there will be no love.... this is sex for money, pure prastitutionality!!)))) It was only Trump who could be scared and pay, and not send an open text. And let Tucker stop making raw videos from which nothing is clear, suggesting that if he was killed and he sued, then he was right and a good guy doesn't mean anything.
1