Comments by "abyfkk" (@abyfkk) on "Люк Громен: Почему они не хотят, чтобы вы владели золотом и новой глобальной финансовой системой" video.
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
@Greg-Horne It's not so untrue))
And I said it just like that, I admit without even thinking))
But being sure that he was right.
There was no industry then, because gold has been valuable for a very long time.
It is not needed in the manufacture of shields or swords.
For feeding horses too.
It's not even necessary to create forges.
In jewelry, it is used because of its already recognized value, and jewelry can be made from any "valuable" material, and worn))
The amount of gold.... anything with ten times the quantity or less would be suitable, the only question would be the price and the rate per gram.
I understand that once a hard currency was needed, universal and universally recognized, which would be accepted by different countries and tribes as payment in addition to money.
For a number of reasons, gold was chosen by someone, and the rest accepted and confirmed the value.
("the first bitcoin")))
**although you can slice as many bitcoins as you want, unlike gold, as long as it doesn't collapse because there will be a lot of it)))
1
-
@Greg-Horne it's all about our consciousness, and the fact that gold has been objectively considered a valuable metal for a long time, for centuries, and now
(as opposed to conscience and honor))))
or kindness)))
for example, if you selectively offer many people to become hired killers and commit several murders at once for little money, how many people do you think would agree if such an experiment were conducted?)))
and now look at the many wars and soldiers....)))
I think somewhere, maybe a little bit, but I'm right about the gold, at least a little bit))))
After all, they can't heat a city for 10 years
, or feed an entire city
, or water an entire city.
(when there is nothing, and the value of a golden stone is the same as any other, only it is yellow)))
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@righteousmammon9011 What exactly is ridiculous?
do you have any objections to any part of what I have told you, but in the end, I do not even know if Germany returned the gold, I only told the part of the story that I knew, and which makes it clear that Germany's gold was not just lying in the USA - it was used
it's ridiculous for Germany to send its gold to the USA for some reason, for some reason that is not clear, or for some "reasonable" reason - "what if the Russians attack", that's definitely ridiculous
and they got it after long attempts or just looked that there was another gold of the same amount on the spot and left, I don't know
, but for some reason you decided to tell it, although it doesn't relate to the topic in any way, that's definitely ridiculous
1
-
1