Comments by "abyfkk" (@abyfkk) on "Tucker Carlson and Chris Cuomo Debate Trump, Abortion, and COVID Lies" video.

  1.  @Mark-zx2bq  no, he doesn't laugh at him or mock him, even where he openly laughed at Tucker when they remembered the past just because it was really easy and fun for Tucker)) they have completely different weights, different levels of intelligence and understanding, it was then, it is now he doesn't even understand why he chose him, Cuomo probably tried to stand out in that TV company and considered himself one of the central ones there, and doesn't understand why))
    1
  2. I think Tucker needs to stop doing this kind of charity)) I will share my thoughts and what I say may seem strange I'll say right away that I'm from Russia)) Tucker always repeats that Russians are very complicated, but they are not. He just likes to demonize the image of Russians)))) It's a very strange conversation, the first part is like a girl was dumped by a guy and she came to her friend to talk about it, she needs to talk it out. It's no coincidence that Cuomo himself mentioned a personal therapist, I even wondered if he thought that maybe Tucker could replace him when he was busy)) It will be interesting that when the girl calms down a little and speaks out, her tears will dry up, she herself will try to teach Tucker journalism, for example, what questions should have been asked to Putin, and even try to switch roles with Tucker and Cuomo will already be a psychotherapist, which of course is funny in itself, and these attempts will look ridiculous
    1
  3. All the presenters who talk to Tucker remember his interview with Putin)) And I remember the words of one of our most famous propagandist and presenter said casually about this, he is a propagandist with all the essential things, but he is not very stupid and has known this kitchen for a long time. So he said that it would cause the envy of all his colleagues, and many would like to do this interview themselves. He did not focus on this issue at the time, it flew by in one sentence. But it seemed accurate to me)) We look at it differently, someone liked something that they didn't like.... and these are the ones who are doing the same thing as Tucker, and would like to do it themselves. Therefore, their claims are of a slightly different nature and look different))) - Why didn't you ask about Navalny ...... but in general, when it's a lecture for half an hour out of 2 hours, you have to ask Greshkovich twice, and your interlocutor gives detailed answers and it takes more than one minute, it's impossible to ask all the questions (moreover, a good question would sound like this - why didn't you put Navalny in jail earlier))) Did you support him? What happened that they decided to plant it only later It's generally tired of anyone who comes asking about Navalny, even Merkel in the Kremlin asked)) I understand it's cool for the West, it's important, not asking is like forgetting to say hello And do you know how these questions sound to those who know a little that in Russia who is Navalny and about his real popularity here, not in your place, which is reprinted by the media, but the real one here? If you think that this is the same thing, then you are very mistaken))) And so a professional presenter comes to him and asks .... in America about Navalny from Tucker , he mocked him a little before, pitied him))))
    1
  4. I think Cuomo is very insincere in general, it can be seen from the outside He wants to be his boyfriend, and Tucker, he got my number and called me, I'm a good person, how can I refuse... I understand, it's all familiar)) But it's better to refuse bad people right away))) And it's impossible not to make excuses for the past, it's impossible to listen to it... yes, because it happens everywhere, it's common, if there are different media companies, and they hold different positions, as a rule, not on the same issue, it's inevitable that someone will say something to someone, to another presenter, and not once mention What is there to make excuses for? For being a presenter? Or for being a more professional presenter and smarter than him? But he doesn't make excuses that he is physically stronger than Tucker, he tells him so directly, even in this conversation, without apologies, that he would easily twist him And actually, the profession of a presenter presupposes the presence of intelligence in the first place, and not physical strength))) In general, some kind of strange country The girl came to talk to her friend, cry in her vest, and the girlfriend..... He also starts to justify himself as if the guy had gone to her Or is it customary for you to remember something from the past on purpose, and the other should start apologizing and talking about me awkwardly.... come on, Tucker, apologize for the two of you that you were both presenters in different information campaigns then, of course .... Apologize for not working in one, and not together))) Tucker is to blame.... He says Russian is difficult , isn't it?))))
    1
  5. And if they write here that he recently spoke and supported voting without an identity card, why sit and laugh He's going to sit with you and talk, so Tucker and I are what friends, and tomorrow we'll be able to say what Tucker doesn't support Does Tucker need this? Maybe Tucker doesn't care)) If he supports uncontrolled voting and a mess in the elections, he came to you - broke his face in a discussion, and let him go back)) nothing complicated)))
    1