Comments by "abyfkk" (@abyfkk) on "Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker Chris Josephs: word rijk door te investeren als een politicus" video.

I haven't looked, I think they explain it for an hour and a half, and everyone already knows the word "insider" and its practical application (for example, bloggers use it to appear as predictors)) I think everyone understands how to use it on the stock exchange.
2
I also know that about 3 years ago there was information about this in some program (in Russia), but it wasn't Nancy Pelosi who was doing this...... And her husband , the transactions were conducted through her husband. (is this really the only thing being talked about in America right now?) and to be honest, in the beginning, when I saw Pelosi and the guest, I thought that this was the blogger who was or was being prosecuted at that time, he often made fun of Nancy Pelosi, on which platform I don't remember. and here they tell you how to boil an egg hard, and that top-level politicians don't really live on a salary (Tucker, stop mocking your audience by making a sensation and a "hot report" out of everything)
2
To be honest, against the background of what is happening with you, I think that it's not worth talking about such small things as using insider information for personal enrichment, don't be hypocrites , it's really a small thing. it may be terrible to hear, but I think even this is natural and I'm horrified to think that you don't know and can't even imagine.
2
I wasn't even surprised that they wanted to jail the blogger because he repeatedly mentioned Pelosi in his jokes . Why? because there was a story about Hillary Clinton, two journalists (I don't remember which newspaper, but it's not a small town for sure, one of the largest)))), were just going to collect material on Hillary Clinton - they were fired right away, right away!! instantly and you're discussing the use of inside information...... yes, you're kidding me, sometimes I don't understand your America at all. usually, the insider itself costs a lot of money, and if they conduct transactions on the stock exchange themselves, this means only one thing........... this narrow circle is very wide!! everyone is doing it there!! and it cannot be sold for a lot of money A narrow circle of politicians gives up their inside information to a narrow circle of stockbrokers, and they always do!! This is a system that works like a clock If the boy didn't say anything about it , then I don't know what he's talking about for an hour and a half.
1
@t-dog8528 If Matt Gaetz couldn't prove anything, it doesn't mean it's legal. (or he didn't want to prove it, and it doesn't matter for what reasons, but I admit this option as well) You can even find out how legal it is in America from the American TV series "Billions", just on this topic)) With closed eyes, despite looking, we can say that Nancy Pelosi is related, and that the trader whom Tucker invited tells us reliable information and different cases. I just don't think it's important to get Nancy involved in this.
1
@t-dog8528 There are a lot of transactions going through the exchange, every day, I don't see the point in chasing Nancy. And the inside has always been used and will always be used. And usually everyone thinks that the decision of politicians affects big capital (let's call it that). In practice, most often the scheme looks like this: big capital ------> politicians and politicians are just pawns And big capital earns fortunes from this, or to be more precise, adds whole fortunes, very huge amounts of money, to the fortunes they are already making. and I don't see any point in chasing after some little Nancy who got something through the stock exchange, ridiculous money for big players.
1