Comments by "abyfkk" (@abyfkk) on "Tucker Carlson Speech: Most Important Lesson From Teddy Roosevelt" video.

  1. This is very controversial) Now they don't write texts to him, he doesn't read from the screen, a whole group doesn't work for him like on Fox News, and it's always interesting when he's alone, we see the real Tucker And what kind of real Tucker is he? And this is considering that he thinks in advance what he will say, how and about what, given that he was trained to become a TV presenter from childhood Let's hear it, and we will evaluate it calmly and objectively)
    1
  2. The theme of nature, the theme of the most beloved pets in America - dogs, it's all good and wonderful to buy an audience cheaply, he's good, he needs to dream up something like this, because everyone uses it all over the world and no one has a patent, but everyone considers himself the only inventor and genius)) But he spoke for more than one minute, and this is his big mistake) The fact that he believes that dogs have traditionally become pets due to the fact that they were used for hunting shows only how Tucker's consciousness is arranged, very narrow and primitive, corridor, tunnel, without light at the end)) Dogs helped graze livestock, guarded like an alarm system, warn in advance that strangers are coming, they can protect the owner by attacking someone who poses a danger.... not only were they used on hunting, I understand that Tucker likes to play the role of a predator) But you can't make your tunnel of consciousness so aggressive and narrow))
    1
  3. I used to think that the mentality of Americans is really different, actually not)) People are the same everywhere, and everyone is different)) Here are those cases in a New York park when Tucker went fishing, and so strongly and vividly remembered by him, and it was more than once that he told) And it was between an American and other Americans. But it is not customary to fish in such places, it is considered a bad thing. In the Soviet Union, they liked to make all sorts of small ponds in holiday homes, including for summer ones for children, they were made in buildings with small concrete blocks, they were in some shopping centers, these fish are right in the fountains that were made in these shopping centers. And so I imagined - a shopping center, a fountain, there are fish swimming and..... Tucker is standing next to the fountain with a fishing rod))) He does not understand that some places are made for recreation, or for some other purpose. The horror is that he did not understand it then for a long time, and he does not understand it now)
    1
  4. I was also pleased that anyone who sits next to Tucker in the same room is dumber than a pig)) He does not say that he is dumber than a pig, mind you, no, but others are) All the others who are in the same room with him, they may be his acquaintances, relatives, work colleagues.. They are dumber than pigs)) And he's smart But does this apply to those who are sitting in the hall? I don't know English well, but according to the interpretation of this expression, I can confidently say that it also applies))) Everyone who is in the room with Tucker is dumber than a pig, and those who are in the same room with him are dumber than a pig. (but due to the fact that the room is bigger and there are more people, people won't get smarter from this, no, it doesn't work that way)) Everything is dumber than a pig in principle, we are all commentators here, as it were, in the same virtual room with takre here))
    1
  5. I accidentally learned from some Russian information sources that it turns out that the interview with Durov was done back in February, and it was published recently, but cut 3 times 3 times!))) it lasted 3 hours If you interview someone, if you position yourself as an absolutely independent journalist (which Tucker has never been), but he positions himself as the most passionate fighter for freedom of speech how can you think for so long to publish an interview or not, and then cut it 3 times ? This is Tucker's decision to do an interview and his desire was not forced by anyone, his choice and his decision, but if the interview is done, it seems to me from this moment on it imposes some obligations on the other - to publish it, uncut it's not about whether Putin is good or bad, but the fact that one of the reasons why there have not been meetings with Western journalists of this format since some point is that they then published only, figuratively speaking, 5 seconds, a short excerpt that they chose themselves, so Tucker's interview was somewhat sensational as an event (in itself it was gray and boring And it's entirely Tucker's fault) But why was Putin's interview published in full, and the interview with Durov with a squeak, but still published and even cut so badly Putin has a higher status, he is a more significant person and influential Is it possible to deal with Durov like this? (it's about harmony in nature, beauty)) and that all dumb pigs except Tucker))
    1