Comments by "abyfkk" (@abyfkk) on "What Tucker Learned From Surviving a Plane Crash" video.

  1.  @reliantncc1864  To be precise, the interview began with a question that contained Tucker's false statement, and in the end I was impressed by Tucker about the 33-year-old child Gershkovich)) And the insistence and repetition that he should simply be released by making a gesture of goodwill, apparently in response to the American gesture of goodwill for the supply of weapons and hundreds of billions to Ukraine, and at the same time all imaginable and unthinkable sanctions against Russia)) Putin said that they were ready to exchange him, but the truthful Tucker ignored it)) He said how fashionable it is for Western politicians - it's different)) That they committed different acts, that one did not do what the other did. They both committed crimes according to the laws of those countries, and according to the laws of your America too, you also consider it a crime)) I don't know how in America, according to Russian law, Gershkovich's crime is not just a serious crime, but a crime of special gravity. So, is Tucker a journalist? Honest?)))
    2
  2. ну и хрен с вами, американский пафос въевшийся в менталитет неисправим))
    1
  3. 05:06 "and if it doesn't remind you.... " what kind of word or name is there, the translator "covers up" with an error that cannot be disassembled
    1
  4. 05:06 "and if it doesn't remind you.... " what kind of word or name is there, the translator "covers up" with an error that cannot be disassembled
    1
  5. I understand the meaning that you want to convey, but your message looks strange) In Russia, it is not customary to require maintaining a conversation on the proposed topic if it is not interesting or there is no mood, and the person does not want to communicate. Judging by the number of likes, everything is different in America)) Well, you should talk. And what's next? (I won't ask a rhetorical question how old are you, you are very old enough, and your grievances are childish) p.s. and yes, they correctly noticed above about the nonsense of your figures, 300 thousand per day is + 9 million per month , but Tucker's audience voted so be it)
    1
  6. 05:06 "and if it doesn't remind you.... " what kind of word or name is there, the translator "covers up" with an error that cannot be disassembled
    1
  7. A new Tucker ...?) Although he undoubtedly had something new after Fox News, he adopted the Kremlin propaganda feature about historical excursions from Putin, and symbolic comparisons on life stories that should evoke vivid images in listeners)) And here I have to say something, let me appreciate it)
    1
  8. Wrangel (oh, he shouldn't have gone into history with such admiration, especially studying it from fiction books written by someone)) And it's not just that, for example, historians would say about Tucker, some would call him a liar, others the best journalist. One of them, anyone, is writing a book So what? What is the truth? What exactly did he write? Are you serious about this?)) I didn't really understand about the cinema at all, the fact is that when complete chaos reigns in the city, mass pogroms, mass rapes.... complete chaos, you won't sit quietly in any cinema))) If this is not clear to Tucker, neither are you, nor those who sat in the hall at this meeting and listened to all this... I can't help it)) In New York, when they sit in a movie theater, crimes are also committed somewhere, and someone is raped. I'm not comparing, but you understand the principle of what I want to say. But this is not the main thing))
    1
  9. The main thing is that Wrangel was always associated with the Entente, the military bloc of Western countries that attacked Russia at that time)) They say that France was chosen as the main country, through which they concluded an agreement with Wrangel (he was not the only one who dabbled in this)). The essence of the agreement is brief without details - even if he had won, Russia would have come to an end, so greedy conditions were set and he went for them)) Why is unclear ... Unless he himself did not want to make money on it and he didn't care about everything else, or he was a madman, a psycho and a fool)) But my opinion is an ordinary mercenary, from whom they tried to make an image of a hero. Also a Russian patriot)) Carlson should stop with such literature and imitation of Putin)))
    1
  10. And the story with Stewart, so this is the usual standard scheme to calm passengers so that there is no panic. How do people behave during a panic? But for example, in crowded places, stadiums, concert halls are huge and so on, in the event of fires and other emergencies, most people die... from the crush, from the panic when some people crush others. And everyone is always silent and hiding about it. If he had told Tucker the truth, that everything was not all right, and what would have happened? Would Tucker fix the plane? Would you put out a fire in the air? What would have changed? And what everyone needs to behave calmly for is for everyone to hear a warning about the moment that the plane makes an emergency landing and take the safest places and positions. For example, with the interaction of services, the plane can be landed on the motorway by opening it, and if there is enough fuel in the tanks, then everyone should go to the front of the aircraft, because the tanks are usually located more in the rear, they can be punched and a fire will start from friction
    1
  11. and then everyone needs to leave the plane via emergency ladders, calmly and without delay, this is what will ensure a high speed of evacuation, and if everyone pushes each other away and gets in the way in the exit doorway, it can cost someone their lives, and not just one)) That's why he lied to him. And he's still thinking about it))) But he clearly did not think what to say at the meeting, especially about Wrangel))) I like this image of Tucker the righteous, preaching to the rare lucky ones at live performances... or maybe he's right that he's an artist?))) And if I like the new Tucker... I don't know)) In his Fox News programs, everything was more clear to me))
    1
  12.  @reliantncc1864  No, I don't know all the circumstances, but I'm sure they took him with ironclad evidence and there were no far-fetched accusations. You have a lot of Americans engaged in intelligence activities, starting from embassies, this is a classic))) (find out where the CIA chief Burns used to work) For all the long time they took only one. I believe more that someone could have framed one of yours for some reason than that he was taken with nothing)) You're just repeating what propaganda says)) The difference is that even we do not say that the one they wanted to exchange was detained for political reasons)) You have lies and the level of arrogance of propaganda has reached an unthinkable level)) And the funny thing is that you don't even notice it and think it's true))
    1