Comments by "Perry Douglas" (@PerryDouglas-v5h) on "Steve Bannon Declares WAR On Elon u0026 Vivek!" video.

Nikki and Kamala too.
2
@kapilsethia9284 A lot of Indians are white. Coming from different ancestors than those considered truly Asian.
1
The born Brit impostor, President Arthur, screwed black Americans hard just 14 year after the 14th Amendment, with the unconstitutional Immigration Act of 1882. Before that we only had constitutional naturalization laws!
1
@ Percentage of the population is one thing. Who is at the top in terms of wealth, prosperity and growth is another thing, and the last I checked, this is the Jewish and Indian ethnic communities.
1
@ Prohibited by the U.S. Constitution since the Constitutional Convention in 1787. No Constitutional amendment has ever altered the Constitution to give inclusion of the act of immigration into its confines, no immigration law are a constitutional amendment that does so either. Only naturalization is constitutional and the U.S.A. operated under exclusively naturalization laws until 1882, until under the corrupt administration in 1882 things were altered to unconstitutional immigration laws, beginning with the Immigration Act of 1882.
1
@ In case this platform are still screwing with me, FYI, we didn’t have unconstitutional immigration laws until the first in 1882.
1
@KatWells-b6z Black Americans first got the shaft just 14 years after the 14th Amendment in 1882. Until 1882 we operated by exclusively constitutional naturalization laws. These were replaced by unconstitutional immigration laws, beginning with the Immigration Act of 1882. Now today most believe immigration is constitutional and that anyone from anywhere in the world has a right to come here to live and everything else here, by our Constitution. When it never has been constitutional at all and they have no right to anything here, by our Constitution. In fact only citizens have a right to anything here, by Our Constitution!
1
@alexgreen6678 Yeah, not even Mexicans were in the U.S.A. in the beginning.
1
@ Immigration has been prohibited by the U.S. Constitution since the Constitutional Convention in 1787. Only the act of naturalization is given inclusion within the Constitution and backed by it. Also keep in mind here that the real U.S.A. is an intended independent and sovereign nation for its citizens. This has play in why only naturalization was given inclusion.
1
@KatWells-b6z In case you can’t see my last reply, I’ll try this. The act has been prohibited by the Constitution since the convention in 1787. Only naturalization was given inclusion because it didn’t, in a nutshell, set anything in stone as to immigration being any constitutional right of others of the world, which it’s not by our Constitution. The U.S.A. is an intended independent and sovereign nation for its citizens.
1
@KatWells-b6z This platform are real touchy about discussing the truth about the U.S. Constitution and immigration, so I’ll give you some hints. The Naturalization Act of 1790. The Naturalization Act of 1795. The Naturalization Act of 1798. The Naturalization Act of 1802. The Naturalization Act of 1855. The Naturalization Act of 1870. All backed by the Constitution!
1