General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Perry Douglas
Candace Owens
comments

Comments by "Perry Douglas" (@PerryDouglas-v5h) on "Candace Owens" channel.

He’s not black at all! His father was Indonesian, but not Lolo.
11
1st Asian & Whyte mixed President
10
I have a copy of John Eastman’s Newsweek essay challenging her eligibility in 2020. As well as an appeal for a hearing that was taken to the D.C. Court of Appeals in August 2020, which the individual wasn’t even heard out because of being a private citizen, the Chief Judge of the court is an Indian immigrant that Obama appointed, and both Barr and Roberts ignored this man’s requests to get him a hearing!
10
@BrownBrown270 Yeah, like the U.S.A. was really overthrown by GB with theor infiltrator Arthur in 1881 deep!
6
@SharylHopper Look up SUBUD. It’s founder was his real father. They still have temples in Hawaii today. Both the names Stanley Ann Dunham and Loretta Fuddy are in records of this cult.
6
@briandaly7236 A big problem is you are all on a platform that makes sure a lot of truth and facts are shut up and unseen!
6
@NomiVou They succeeded in 1881! POTUS 21 was a Brit born in Canada!
5
Should have voted for the real American black in 2008. Alan Keyes.
4
I have a copy of John Eastman’s Newsweek essay challenging her eligibility in 2020. As well as an appeal for a hearing that was taken to the D.C. Court of Appeals in August 2020, which the individual wasn’t even heard out because of being a private citizen, the Chief Judge of the court is an Indian immigrant that Obama appointed, and both Barr and Roberts ignored this man’s requests to get him a hearing!
4
@AshleyChen-q1t Question! Do you think that guy whose name could be misspelled Cruise by ppl who don’t any better, is eligible? A lot of citizens do! BUT! He was born in Canada. And ever since the Naturalization Act of 1795, the natural-born birthright citizen can not be born outside the U.S.A..
4
@susannemac2800 Muhammad was an Indonesian Muslim and and 60 when his son was born. His father was NOT Barack, or Lolo!
4
Clues! Jacob Leon Rubenstein. Mickey Cohen. Meyer Lansky. Barry Goldwater.
3
@AshleyChen-q1t We have 3 level or tiers of citizenship since 1790 and if accepting a specific fraudulent decision made in 1898. They are… “naturalized” citizen - someone who is naturalized as a citizen “native born” citizen - someone who is born in the country, or someone who is born abroad of at least one citizen “natural-born” citizen - born in the country and of parents who are citizens
3
@Nomadic9900 American History 101 The “natural-born, or native citizen, are the child born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”. - The Law of Nations (1758) 👈 The origin and the definition! The U.S. Constitution. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 requires one is a “natural born Citizen” to be President. The 12th Amendment holds the VP to the same requirement. Our true laws were being upheld in 1961 and 1964!
3
@NomiVou VP 20 & POTUS 21 was really born a William C.A. Arthur. He was born of a British citizen father and British subject mother, which would have left him born a British subject even IF he had been born in VT U.S.A.. But he wasn’t! He was born in Dunham, Quebec. Arthur is 1 of only 3 ppl to occupy both of those offices since 1850 that wasn’t born of 2 U.S. citizen. Now read the above part again!
3
@G.G.C. Resources on the web show they were considered citizens from 1948 until 1963 with the Kenya Independence Act of 1963. But this is all irrelevant anyway. Barack Obama wasn’t the father and Mr, Soebarkah, son of Sumohadiwidjojo, was born in Hawaii. But not of 2 citizens and under very taboo circumstances!
3
A certain cult have temples in Hawaii. His long deceased Indonesian father founded this cult. He was 60 when his son was born. S.A. Dunham and L. Fuddy are in records of this cult. Personally I think Fuddy was the true mother. She would have been 47 years younger than the father at the time!
2
@Tammy-v9f Tammy, let me give you a big hint! I guarantee if there was a survey of native citizens born in the country up until the late 2000s, it would be only those born in the country of 2 citizens that have a legitimate birth certificate!
2
She wasn’t born of 2 citizens. She would not have been treated as a “natural born Citizen” and would not have been issued a birth certificate in 1964. In addition to this, as the claimed parents were in the county on temporary student visas, she would not have even of been eligible to be a “native born Citizen”. The only way she could have become a citizen is if she had been naturalized as a “naturalized Citizen”, but that would have required at least one parent being naturalized beforehand.
2
@ Thank you! My father was a devout Christian and I recall him mentioning that to me at one time.
2
@Nomadic9900 He was born in Hawaii, but that’s not the real issue and there’s a lot more to it. I’m a bit of a historian of the history of our citizenship laws.
2
@Nomadic9900 Chief, the lie that anyone born on our soil are born the level of citizenship eligible to be President and Vice President, seriously began in 2008! I’m 9th generation American and deal with it, I know more about American History than most citizens today!
2
Facts! That will probably get my comment deleted, despite their being 100% verifiable facts and undeniable! Only 2 Presidents since 1838 weren’t born of 2 U.S. citizens and in the country. Only 3 people in both offices since 1850 weren’t born of 2 U.S. citizens, and 2 of these 3 weren’t born of a citizen at all. The 1st was VP #20 and POTUS #21. Born of a British citizen father and British subject mother at a time when children born outside GB of British citizen fathers alone, were 100% born British subjects and within allegiance owed to GB, no matter where they were born!
2
@ It shouldn’t be hard for you to figure out. Also this! The original U.S. Constitution clearly states one must have been a Citizen before the Adoption of the Constitution, or a natural born Citizen to be President. The 12th Amendment holds the VP to the same requirement. President Zachary Taylor who passed in 1850 was the last who was a citizen before the adoption of the Constitution.
2
It depends on the woman. I also don’t respect Kamala or Hillary.
2
@ Yeah, sure, thanks for now 16 years of being called crazy and told I don’t know what I’m talking about by a bunch of people who don’t know a damn thing real about American History, because all they do is read bullshit on the web!
2
HIS FATHER WASN’T BARACK! Get it through your thick skulls. His real father was an Indonesian Muslim named Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo! You can find a lot of info about him on the web. But take it with a grain of salt.
2
Many believe the U.S.A. was completely destroyed and secretly absorbed into the Commonwealth of Nations in the 1930s. Although the U.S.A. took a massive blow to its independence and sovereignty in 1881 when a British subject born in Canada named William C.A. Arthur took office as VP and had Garfield taken out so he could be Prez.
2
These are the 3 levels or tiers of U.S. citizenship since naturalization laws began in 1790 and if accepting a fraudulent decision made in 1898. “naturalized” Citizen - someone naturalized as a naturalized Citizen “native born” Citizen - a child born in the country and this is if accepting the fraudulent decision made in 1898, or a child born of at least one citizen parent abroad “natural born Citizen” - born in the county of parents who are citizens If you believe anything other than this, you’re wrong!
2
That’s his real dad! 👉 https://youtu.be/XkcaQLoz2ps?si=PsIDSlSFA4oqgSi5
1
@Tammy-v9f The long from certificate he was supplied with in April 2011. Are you familiar with the investigation that was launched on this certificate? If not, you can find videos of the investigation here! Two things to keep in mind here. It was supplied to him by that L. Fuddy, and Stanley Ann’s name on it was determined to be pieced together, forged.
1
@Tammy-v9f I wish I could give you more, but this platform are deleting and hiding most of my comments.
1
It’s this simple, Candace. A 14th Amendment “Citizen” is not the same level as a natural born Citizen. Making it impossible she was born one! Also making it impossible Vivek and Nikki were born one! But no one will ever see this, if it’s not deleted right away!
1
@GettingSchwiftyy The U.S. Constitution took a critical hit in Nov of 2009 with a 100% fraudulent decision made at one court of appeals. McCain, Obama, Harris and Newsom are all tied to this!
1
@ This platform make it impossible to tell all the truth about VP 20 & POTUS 21, Arthur. But for starters, British law in the early 1800s was that children born of fathers who were British citizens or subjects in itself and abroad, were born 100% entirely British subjects and subject to the jurisdiction of Great Britain, no matter where they were born. Meaning all of the Arthur children were born British subject, whether in Canada, or the states.
1
Most citizens today are so enormously ignorant that they seriously believe our birthright citizenship laws are the same as Great Britain’s, because of fake stuff made up since 2008. That nothing in America’s recorded history predating it, backs up at all! In fact everything in the 1800s reaffirmed the child can not be born of foreigners!!!
1
It was and maybe still is in the Wikipedia page about Shyamala, a claim that she was an instrumental figure in the creation of the Black Panther Party in 1960s Oakland. If it’s true!
1
Use all of your brain power here! You can figure it out, I believe in you!!! U.S. Constitution Article II “natural born Citizen” 14th Amendment “Citizens” These are different levels of citizenship! Yet you most likely believe the amendment means anyone born in the country are born the latter. But how could this be when they’re not the same level of citizenship!?
1
Only 3 people to occupy both of those offices since 1837 were not born of 2 U.S. citizens. The 1st of these 3 was President Arthur (1881-1885). In reality he was born a British subject named William Chester Alan Arthur, of 2 British parents, in a place called Dunham Flats, in what is now Dunham, Quebec. Now something else is, even if he had been born in VT U.S.A., U.S. law at the time was children were born the nationality of their father, and British law was children born of Brit were born entirely subject to the jurisdiction of Great Britain, no matter where they were born. Now who are the other 2? Well 1 was supposedly the child of a Stanley Ann… You know the other!
1
Only 3 people to occupy both of those offices since 1837 were not born of 2 U.S. citizens. The 1st of these 3 was President Arthur (1881-1885). In reality he was born a British subject named William Chester Alan Arthur, of 2 British parents, in a place called Dunham Flats, in what is now Dunham, Quebec. Now something else is, even if he had been born in VT U.S.A., U.S. law at the time was children were born the nationality of their father, and British law was children born of Brit were born entirely subject to the jurisdiction of Great Britain, no matter where they were born. Now who are the other 2? Well 1 was supposedly the child of a Stanley Ann… You know the other!
1
The “natural-born”, the framers took it from The Law of Nations. Vattel, 1758. Where the initial definition is! The Law of Nations, that is given inclusion within the original Constitution!!!
1
@justanobserver5079 Let me help you. Here’s all the proof you need. The 14th Amendment “Citizen” is not the same as a natural born Citizen and hasn’t been since the founding of the nation in 1776. The “Citizen” in America’s history, is the shortened form of “native born Citizen”, and you will see usage of both in America’s recorded history. These are the 2 earliest of our 3 levels of citizenship, pre-1790 naturalization. This makes it impossible she was born a natural born!
1
@justanobserver5079 Late 2009. A falsehood was created with 1 fraudulent decision at 1 court. In late 2009. A falsehood was created about a specific historical decision made in 1898. The falsehood created is that he was granted natural born status, so that the falsehood could be created that anyone born in the country were and are. This falsehood is not backed by the recorded history of the 1898 decision, or anything else predating it and up until the founding of the country. This falsehood also was not present and relevant in 1961 or 1964. The falsehood is only 15 years old.
1
True story. From 1789 until 2008 it was acknowledged and upheld that us natural born birthright citizens are born of 2 U.S. citizens. Nothing valid and legal has ever changed these requirements and you’ve been lead to believe lies created since 2008!
1
@ Not sure. Maybe you shouldn’t have removed my comment, then I could know what it was.
1
@Felinefobia It was probably the platform, or CO’s channel operator then.
1
@ If you want a simple answer, here. All records predating 2008 prove that children had to be born in the country of parents who are citizens. Plural! As I am stating all records predating 2008, you can assume this would have been upheld in 1964!
1
@Tia.0721 Tia, here’s the skinny. A lot of corrupt started making a lot of stuff up in 2008 and our citizenship laws were corrupted. This corruption didn’t exist when she was born in ‘64!
1
Fact. If you believe anyone born in the country are a natural born birthright citizen, it IS because you are brainwashed to believe stuff made up since the late 2000s! Stuff that nothing in America’s recorded history predating it, backs up at all.
1
The “natural-born” comes from The Law of Nations (Vattel, 1758). This is where the framers of the Constitution took it from. The definition of one of us is in it, and she’s not one of us!!!
1
Don and Don Jr. both were tweeting about her not really being black and not really being an American in 2020. If you do enough digging you should be able to find what the tweets started.
1
Aren’t the Ashkenazi referred to as impostors somewhere in the Bible?
1
JFK, RFK, Malcolm X and MLK Jr. were all done by the J mob at the top of the chain. The FBI were involved. A couple J bosses had dirt on J. Edgar.
1
Lies began in 2008. He was born in Hawaii, but us NBC’s have to be born of 2 U.S. citizens. You are all believing a lie that began in 2008! It was also kept hush, hush, because of who the real father and mother were and some freaky stuff surrounding that.
1
@BeeinOz Yes he was, but he wasn’t born of 2 citizens to be born the level of citizen who have constitutional birthright to those offices and he would not have been issued a birth certificate. On top of this neither Barack or Stanley were his real biological parents! They were a Muhammad and Loretta!
1
Contact Dinesh D’Souza
1
This was his biological father! https://youtu.be/XkcaQLoz2ps?si=PsIDSlSFA4oqgSi5
1
In reality the true requirements are still the child is born of 2 citizens and in the country. A fraudulent decision made at 1 court in November of 2009 created the lie most of you believe today. Except absolutely nothing in America’s history predating this 100% fraudulent decision made in November of 2009, backs it up at all! So nothing valid and legal has ever been done to alter the requirements of being born of 2 citizens and in the country. Lies are lies. What was made up in 2009 is a lie! Also they sure as hell weren’t born what you’ve all been brainwashed to believe they were!
1
I guarantee if there was a survey of native citizens born in the country up until the late 2000s, you will find only those born in the country of 2 citizens have a legitimate birth certificate!
1
@missym4167 I guarantee if there was a survey of native citizens born in the country up until the late 2000s, you will find only those born in the country of 2 citizens have a legitimate birth certificate!
1
@ I’m 9th gen and you’re all brainwashed to believe BS made up since 2008! We have 3 levels of citizenship since naturalization laws began in 1790 and if accepting a fraudulent SC decision in 1898 San Francisco. These are the 3 levels and the breakdown of each! “naturalized” Citizen - someone who is naturalized as a naturalized Citizen “native born” Citizen - a child born in the country, or a child born of at least one citizen abroad “natural born Citizen” - born in the country of parents who are citizens The U.S. Constitution requires one being a natural born Citizen to be eligible for those offices!
1
@ 233 years of historical records predating 2008 prove that the “natural born Citizen” must be born in the country of parents who are citizens. And everything in the 1800s including the 14th reaffirmed that we can not be born of foreigners at all!
1
@ The freed slaves were born on this soil, yet they were only granted “native born” Citizen level citizenship with no need of naturalization and Limited Birthright of only soil rights. They never could have been President or Vice President. This is not the same level as a natural born Citizen and no the 14th Amendment has never meant anyone born on our soil can be this level of citizenship! The 14th is only capable of being utilized to grant one “native born” level citizen!!!
1
@ Candace is keeping you all stupid! The real truth will get out one day, and hopefully the real U.S.A. will truly exist again one day! I’m sick of these lying global elites and the rest of you should be too!
1
@ Wrong!
1
@ How much do you get paid to be a lying shill? NO his real biological father was NOT Barack and he doesn’t even look a damn thing like him. His real father WAS an Indonesian named Muhammad. Shit the hell up and go away!
1
@karene9402 His real father Indonesian, but it wasn’t Lolo.
1
@stripmakah215610 His real father WAS Indonesian, but it wasn’t Lolo. It WAS a Muhammad who he absolutely looks like the son of, unlike Barack who he looks NOTHING LIKE AT ALL!
1
Candice, this is intended for you specifically. Find out what November of 2009 decision has been being used in defense of her’s and others eligibility since 2009. This decision was a 100% fraudulent con-job that hit the U.S. Constitution at its most critical level. Created with this decision was a big lie about that specific historical decision made in 1898 San Francisco. Harris and Newsom were DA and Mayor of San Francisco in 2009. McCain and Obama were directly involved in this case in Indiana.
1
natural born Citizen 1. Born in the country 2. Both parents are citizens 3. Nothing valid and legal has altered these requirements since 1795 4. Yea the lies and corruption, and the number of people complicit in all of it and just how widespread it is, is larger than you can possibly imagine
1
Muhammad was also 59 when he got 12 year old Loretta pregnant. Then later the boy was called “Barack Jr.”, and later “Barry”.
1
👉 I guarantee if there was a survey of native citizens born in the country up until the late 2000s, you will find only those born in the country of 2 citizens have a legitimate birth certificate!
1
👉 I guarantee if there was a survey of native citizens born in the country up until the late 2000s, you will find only those born in the country of 2 citizens have a legitimate birth certificate!
1
@ Even if she was born in CA, she was not born of 2 citizens and she would not have been treated as a natural born Citizen and would not have been issued a birth certificate. I order to know what all is going on here, you have to know what lies and corruption began in 2008.
1
@ Also by India’s and Jamaica’s laws in 1964 and with birthright inherited through blood rights regardless of where the child of their citizens was born with both countries, she would have been born a citizen of both India and Jamaica.
1
Pay attention! 👉 The 14th Amendment “Citizen” and the Article II “natural born Citizen” are two separate levels of citizenship. The “Citizen” is also given as and referred to as the “native born Citizen” in our recorded history, historical records and documents. These predate the naturalized Citizen that came with naturalization beginning in 1790. Now read that all again. Because it’s impossible she was born a natural born by using that amendment. Not even the freed it historically was for, were!
1
Pay attention! 👉 The 14th Amendment “Citizen” and the Article II “natural born Citizen” are two separate levels of citizenship. The “Citizen” is also given as and referred to as the “native born Citizen” in our recorded history, historical records and documents. These predate the naturalized Citizen that came with naturalization beginning in 1790. Now read that all again. Because it’s impossible she was born a natural born by using that amendment. Not even the freed it historically was for, were!
1
@paigetersavich8149 The freed the 14th Amendment historically was for were not granted natural born Citizen level citizenship. This makes it impossible she was born one! The amendment is completely incapable of being interpreted to clam anyone to be a natural born!!! It would have to state natural born Citizen. It doesn’t!
1
In 1960 a 59 y.o. Indonesian man named Muhammad got a 12 y.o. American girl from Hawaii named Loretta pregnant. Then sometime in 1961 a boy was born who would later be President. I doubt the birthdate of Aug 4, 1961, as the certificate is fabricated. She was an American girl, but she was born in Hawaii over a decade before it became a state.
1
In 1960 a 59 y.o. Indonesian man named Muhammad got a 12 y.o. American girl from Hawaii named Loretta pregnant. Then sometime in 1961 a boy was born who would later be President. I doubt the birthdate of Aug 4, 1961, as the certificate is fabricated. She was an American girl, but she was born in Hawaii over a decade before it became a state.
1
This big lie was seriously created in November of 2009 at one court of appeals in IN. Yes I am being 100% serious, this one was created in 2009! That anyone born on our soil are a natural-born birthright citizen, regardless of the citizenship status of their parents when they are born.
1
Reality! 👉 3 levels of U.S. citizenship since naturalization laws began in 1790 and if accepting one fraudulent SC decision in 1898. These are the 3 and the details of each! “naturalized” Citizen - someone naturalized as a naturalized Citizen “native born” Citizen - a child born in the country and if accepting the fraudulent 1898 decision, or a child born abroad of at least one citizen parent “natural born Citizen” - a child born in the country of parents who are citizens Stop believing lies created since 2008. Nothing valid and legal was ever done to change those requirements!
1
She also was not born so and is not a constitutional Article II “natural born Citizen” and was involved in critical (but reversible) corruption of the U.S. Constitution that occurred in November 2009 with a 100% fraudulent decision made at the Indiana COA!
1
Everyone who have been complicit and covered up the truth about him can also be charged with a whole lot. Putting an impostor and infiltrator in those offices is like the greatest sin that can be committed in the Constitutional Republic. It essentially amounts to destroying the U.S.A.!
1
What are the chances only 3 ppl in both of those offices since 1850 weren’t born of 2 U.S. citizens including her and BO, while the 1st President Arthur was really a Brit born in Canada.
1
What are the chances only 3 ppl in both of those offices since 1850 weren’t born of 2 U.S. citizens including her and BO, while the 1st President Arthur was really a Brit born in Canada.
1
He tried to expose her in 2020, as well as tried to stop her in the courts. Those like Barr and Roberts threw him under the bus!
1
He tried to expose her in 2020, as well as tried to stop her in the courts. Those like Barr and Roberts threw him under the bus!
1
@Nomadic9900 Y’all really need to get past the lies created since 2008. It is still law that the “natural born Citizen” are born of 2 U.S. citizens. Nothing valid and legal ever changed this! What all of you are reading on the web today is the lies created since 2008! He was born in Hawaii. But In 1961 a child born of a 60 year old Indonesian and a 13 year old American girl would not have been treated as a “natural born Citizen” and would not have been issued a birth certificate.
1
@Nomadic9900 I believe what’s in the actual historical records that I’ve studied since the 1980s. You believe disinformation created since 2008 and not backed up by 233 years of historical records predating 2008.
1
@Nomadic9900 A child born of 1 citizen in 1964 Hawaii only would have been treated as a “native born” citizen and would not have been issued a birth certificate. There was also crazy shit surrounding who his real biological father and mother were, and the circumstances of how he was conceived. The type of stuff that people would want to hide and bury. Like an old man and cult leader impregnating a kid!
1
@ Literally a 100% fraudulent decision made at one court in Indiana in November of ‘09 created the lie within the courts that anyone born on our soil are a “natural born” birthright citizen, regardless of the citizenship status of their parents. Ever since, this fraudulent decision made in 2009 had been being used to shut down those trying to expose and stop her and others. This con-job in 2009 created a lie about a specific historical ruling in 1898. However the actual records of this case in 1898 do not back up the lie created in 2009. Nothing in our historical records predating 2009 do! Meaning it is a lie. Nothing valid and legal has been done to alter that the “natural born Citizen” must be born of 2 U.S. citizens. It is still law in reality today!
1
@danafran07 All except 3 Presidents and Vice Presidents since 1789 were either a citizen before the adoption of the Constitution, OR WERE BORN OF 2 U.S. CITIZENS. All except 3 since 1789! The 1st of these 3 was born a Brit in Canada, historical criminals President Arthur. The other 2 are…
1
@ She wasn’t born of 2 U.S. citizens and most of our citizens todays are believing lies created since just 2008!
1
@danafran07 Think about this. I was issued a birth certificate in 1975 because I was born in a state and of 2 citizens. I would not have been issued a birth certificate if I had only been born of 1, or none!
1
@thomasguitarman9025 Trump is the only one who ever tried to expose the truth about all frauds, and impostors since 2008. He was always telling the truth about McCain and almost all since. Just not Vivek for some reason!?
1
NO! She’s doesn’t even have one drop!
1
@ She shouldn’t have been allowed to steal the office of Vice President either. All of you are believing lies that began in 2008. It is still law that the “natural born Citizen” are born of two U.S. citizens and in a state. If you believe anything other than this, then you are believing lies created since 2008. Nothing valid and legal ever changed these requirements! She was not born one, she is not one!
1
1. Born in the country 2. Both parents must be citizens 3. Nothing valid and legal has altered these requirements since 1795 4. You’ve been lied to and lead to believe B.S. made up in recent decades 5. CO isn’t going to tell you the actual truth, because it exposes far more than just her and people of both majority parties
1
The U.S. Constitution since 1837 has required one is a “natural born Citizen”. Jackson who left office in 1837, was the intended last of the native born Citizens (aka Citizens) born on the soil, but not of citizens, to be a Citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution in 1788. Both of Jackson’s VP’s, Calhoun and Van Buren, were born natural born Citizens. They were born in the country. Both parents were citizens. I’m throwing you some big hints here! One born native of the soil, but not of citizens. Others born native of the soil and of citizens. Since 1992 the people have been dumbed down to think there are only 2 levels of American citizenship, and since 2008 the people have been dumbed down or believe our birthright citizenship laws are the same as Great Britain’s!
1
The U.S. Constitution since 1837 has required one is a “natural born Citizen”. Jackson who left office in 1837, was the intended last of the native born Citizens (aka Citizens) born on the soil, but not of citizens, to be a Citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution in 1788. Both of Jackson’s VP’s, Calhoun and Van Buren, were born natural born Citizens. They were born in the country. Both parents were citizens. I’m throwing you some big hints here! One born native of the soil, but not of citizens. Others born native of the soil and of citizens. Since 1992 the people have been dumbed down to think there are only 2 levels of American citizenship, and since 2008 the people have been dumbed down or believe our birthright citizenship laws are the same as Great Britain’s!
1
@ Here’s some of the history of the American “Citizen”, which was also the “native born Citizen” at special points in our history. It’s not the same as a natural born Citizen! The earliest “Citizens” of the nation, such as most of the founding fathers and many others, were considered to be “native born Citizens”, as despite their not being born of citizens and obviously because the U.S.A. didn’t exist yet, they were still “native born” residents of the soil, born in soil that became the U.S.A.. Now upon adoption of the Constitution in 1788 and a few years before naturalization laws began in 1790, those who had been born “native born” residents of the soil in what by then was the dissolved British colonies, were Granted citizenship with no need of naturalization, because naturalization did not exist yet. They were Granted citizenship as “Citizens” and retroactively dating back to the founding of the nation in 1776. Those who weren’t born of citizens, but had been born on soil that became the U.S.A.! Whereas only those who had been born in the country since July 4, 1776, and of parents who were considered to be citizens since, were considered to be and granted the “natural born Citizen” level of citizenship. Examples. George Washington and Andrew Jackson were “native born Citizens”. Whereas John C. Calhoun and Martin Van Buren were born “natural born Citizens”. Now fast forwarding to that Amendment in 1868, again we have a special instance of people born of non-citizens, but who are “native born” residents of the soil and were previously held in captivity and denied rights and citizenship, being treated as “native born Citizens” and Granted citizenship as “Citizens” retroactively and with no need of naturalization. They were not granted the natural born Citizen level of citizenship because they weren’t born of citizens and didn’t meet the requirements! And because that’s not what the amendment’s “Citizens” is. The amendment does not state natural born Citizen, it states “Citizens”. Not the same level of citizenship! Finally the original Constitution states one must have been a “Citizen” at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, or are a “natural born Citizen”. The 12th Amendment holds the VP to the same requirement. Andrew Jackson in 1837 was the last who was a Citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution in 1788! Meaning all in both offices since should be born in the country, of parents who are citizens!!!
1
@ It’s nothing easy to explain and this platform make it real difficult to get a lot of facts out. They are facts. They’re in our actual historical records! Thinks about this. George Washington was considered to be and retroactively granted citizenship as a “native born Citizen” (aka Citizen) since July 4, 1776, upon adoption of the Constitution in 1789. How could this be when he wasn’t born of citizens and wasn’t born in the country, because the U.S.A. did not exist when he was born? All the answers are in our historical records, and that 1868 amendments “Citizens” were treated the same way! But here’s the thing. The original Constitution and 12th Amendment require one was either a “Citizen” at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, or are a “natural born Citizen”. That certain 1868 amendment’s “Citizens” weren’t natural born! Making it impossible she was born one!!!
1
@mommatina8295 Long story short, the Article II “natural born Citizen” and that 1898 amendment’s “Citizens” aren’t the same level of citizenship. It is absolutely impossible she was born the former. That 1868 amendment is completely incapable of being interpreted to make such a claim and decision.
1
@mommatina8295 The 1868 amendment “Citizens” were treated the same way as the earliest “Citizens”‘ of the nation before naturalization began in 1790. They were considered native born Citizens because they had been born on the soil, but weren’t born of citizens, and were specially Granted citizenship as “Citizens” with no need of naturalization by the amendment, and Limited Birthright of “right of the soil” (Jus Soli in Latin). Now because the Constitution states one must have been a “Citizen” at the time of the adoption of the Constitution (1788), this does mean that no one granted citizenship by the 1868 amendment, were eligible. In order for the 1868 amendments to make this possible, it would have to state and give inclusion of the natural born Citizen. But this isn’t what the amendment states. It only states “Citizens”. Leaving the amendment completely incapable of being interpreted to claim anyone born in the country to be a natural born Citizen!
1
Real father, an Indonesian man named Muhammad. Real mother, a Loretta, was born in Hawaii 11 years before it became a state, its impossible to know if she became a citizen at anytime prior to his birth, or much about her at all. Then there’s this! He was 59, she was 47 years younger. He was a cult founder and leader, the cult did and still do have temples in Hawaii.
1
Real father, an Indonesian man named Muhammad. Real mother, a Loretta, was born in Hawaii 11 years before it became a state, its impossible to know if she became a citizen at anytime prior to his birth, or much about her at all. Then there’s this! He was 59, she was 47 years younger. He was a cult founder and leader, the cult did and still do have temples in Hawaii.
1
Muhammad and Loretta. He was 59, she was 12.
1
Lolo wasn’t his real dad. Neither was Barack. It was a Muhammad. Indonesian.
1
Facts! That will probably get my comment deleted, despite their being 100% verifiable facts and undeniable! Only 2 Presidents since 1838 weren’t born of 2 U.S. citizens and in the country. Only 3 people in both offices since 1850 weren’t born of 2 U.S. citizens, and 2 of these 3 weren’t born of a citizen at all. The 1st was VP #20 and POTUS #21. Born of a British citizen father and British subject mother at a time when children born outside GB of British citizen fathers alone, were 100% born British subjects and within allegiance owed to GB, no matter where they were born!
1
@AtHomeTacticalDefense The problem isn’t Trump. The problem is the Democrats and RINOS want you all believing a lie created in 2008 that anyone born on our soil are born the level of citizenship eligible, while the GOP want you all believing a different lie that anyone born of legal permanent residents including foreigners in the country on green cards, are born the level of citizenship eligible. Yet neither of them are upholding our actual laws and nothing valid and legal has ever been done to alter the requirements the child is born in the country of parents who are citizens! Candace also will never tell you this, because she has to cover for the lying frauds on the other ‘side’!
1
Historical Fact: The freed granted citizenship by the 14th Amendment were granted “native born” Citizen level citizenship with Limited Birthright of “right of the soil” (Jus Soli). This is NOT a Constitutional Article II “natural born Citizen” born with Total and Complete Birthright of both “right of the soil” (Jus Soli), and “right of the blood” (Jus Sanguinis) that can only be inherited by being born of parents who are citizens! They never could have been Vice President or President. The 14th Amendment is completely incapable of being interpreted to claim anyone to be any more than a “native born” Citizen. So to all of you who are foolish enough to believe the 14th means anyone born on our soil can be Vice President and President, GET EDUCATED FFS!
1
I guarantee if there was a survey of native citizens born in the country up until the late 2000s, it would be only those born in the country of 2 citizens who have a legitimate birth certificate!
1
You believe anyone born in the country are something they weren’t born and are not. Because you believe a lie that is only 15 years old! This lie did not exist in 1964!! She was not born of American citizens. She is not what you believe because of a lie that is only 15 years old, and I’m getting real sick of people like Candace!!!
1
You most likely believe anyone born in the country are eligible and haven’t bothered to research the centuries and decades of historical records predating the late 2000s that prove this false. Also in 1964 this corruption didn’t exist.
1
The real requirements were corrupted in 2008 and most citizens today believe fake stuff created since. This corruption didn’t exist in 1964. I highly suggest if you’re going to study anything about the history of American citizenship, you do so through the actual historical records and old books. You’ll learn things like, it’s absolutely impossible she was born the level of citizenship eligible, because the 14th Amendment “Citizen” isn’t the same as a natural born. Not since July 4, 1776!
1
Have you ever considered you’re been being lied to about what the requirements are to be born the level of citizenship eligible since the late 2000s, and lied to that many people were born so and are so? Because it’s all true!
1
🇨🇳 👉 🇮🇳 first in early 2020
1
She’s always looked Asian & White mixed to me
1
ONLY 3 ppl in both of those offices since 1850 weren’t born of 2 U.S. citizens. 2 of them weren’t born of a citizen at all. The 1st was really a William C.A. Arthur born a Brit of a British citizen father and British subject mother in Dunham, Quebec, Canada. He was VP 20, but became POTUS 21 by having President Garfield eliminated from living! 😉
1
1. Born in the country 2. Both parents must be citizens 3. Nothing valid and legal has altered these requirements since 1795 4. You’ve been lied to and lead to believe B.S. made up in recent decades 5. CO isn’t going to tell you the actual truth, because it exposes far more than just her and people of both majority parties
1
1. Born in the country 2. Both parents must be citizens 3. Nothing valid and legal has altered these requirements since 1795 4. You’ve been lied to and lead to believe B.S. made up in recent decades 5. CO isn’t going to tell you the actual truth, because it exposes far more than just her and people of both majority parties
1
Here’s the thing. Candace is not exposing the most important things that need exposed about her and others. Everything in the 1800s reaffirmed that the NBC born with birthright to those offices can not be born of foreigners at all, and this was being upheld in 1961 and 1964. This was being upheld until 2008. And nothing valid and legal has altered this requirement. People have simply been lead to believe lies created since ‘08.
1
Three historical records alone can prove the truth about her and many others. I can mention the 14th Amendment here, but I can’t mention a specific historical fraudulent SC decision in 1898, or another specific fraudulent decision made at one court of appeals in 2009 that created a lie about the SC decision in 1898. That’s not supported by the actual historical records of the 14th or the decision made in 1898!
1
@ I had a LOT of comments detailing the actual truth about Harris deleted and made invisible on this channel. Because the details also gives away the truth about Barack, Vivek, Nikki, Ted, Marco and so many other people!!!
1
@Rowfiftyfour The annoying lowlife pests of Great Britain were successful in overthrowing the country in 1881. They had their Trojan horse, William Chester Alan Arthur, born a British subject in Canada. Who you may know as VP #20 and POTUS #21, “Chester A. Arthur”. The one who had a lead round put in President Garfield so he could be President.
1
@ Born in the country, of parents who are citizens. Nothing valid and legal has altered these requirements since 1795. So why isn’t Candace mentioning any of this??? Probably because the real about KH, will expose a whole lot more people than just her, including Republicans!
1
@Rowfiftyfour She does seem to support the lies began in 2008 and that our birthright citizenship laws are the same as Great Britain’s.
1
Raised? Or groomed?
1
Look up Muhammad Su-buh Sumo-had-iwid-jojo. Without the hyphens. Then question why Barry looks nothing like Barack Obama did, but does look like Muhammad did. A lot!
1
Barack wasn’t his father. Neither was Lolo. It is also still law that the American “natural born Citizen” are born in the country of parents who are citizens. Just because a 100% fraudulent decision was made in 2009, does not mean it validly and legally changed the laws! Because it was 100% fraudulent bullshit!
1
Barack wasn’t his father. Neither was Lolo. It is also still law that the American “natural born Citizen” are born in the country of parents who are citizens. Just because a 100% fraudulent decision was made in 2009, does not mean it validly and legally changed the laws! Because it was 100% fraudulent bullshit!
1
@SilviaF-e7qLolo WAS NOT his father! It WAS an Indonesian Muslim named Muhammad who was 60 when he was born. A cult leader!
1
@susannemac2800 S U B U D
1
@SilviaF-e7q Muhammad Sub-uh Sumo-had-iwid-jojo
1
@patrickbarrett5650 Y’all are never going to learn the actual truth on this platform! All comments revealing who his real father was are deleted and shadow banned. Lots of people in the comments are lying shills telling you it was Barack, or it was Lolo to keep you all distracted!
1
@aprilgordon6104 Go all the way back to 2001. Indonesia, India, Pakistan, Iran and China were all threatening us, including with 🍄 and 🐞! Biden even spoke about issues with India, Pakistan on and China September 10, 2001.
1
@aprilgordon6104 Nothing was done? Start with this! If you heavily research all of the BS in this Wikipedia subpage, you’ll know that every person in the list were/are frauds and traitors, or impostors and infiltrators. It began with President Arthur who was truly born a Brit in Canada! Wikipedia > Natural-born Citizen clause > Eligibility Challenges
1
@G.G.C. From 1948 until 1963! Look up the Kenya Independence Act of 1963. But he wasn’t born there.
1
@ It’s a long story. Start here. The lie that anyone born on our soil are a “natural born” birthright citizen with Constitutional birthright to those offices, is a lie that began in 2008. Nothing in America’s history predating 2008 supports this lie! It is still law that us “natural born” must be born of 2 U.S. citizens. Which he wasn’t even if he was born in Hawaii, and he would not have been treated as a “natural born” and would not have been issues a birth certificate!
1
@NEILANIL1 In 2008 began the lie that anyone born on U.S. soil are a “natural born Citizen”, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Then in Nov of 2009 a fraudulent decision was made at one court which created a big lie about a specific historical 1898 decision surrounding the 14th Amendment. This fraudulent decision made on Nov of 2009 has been used to shut down all coming after him, her and others ever since. But the actual historical records of this 1898 decision prove that the individual was DENIED being a “natural born Citizen” and was only granted “native born” citizen level citizenship, the same as the freed the 14th Amendment historically was for!
1
@ Nah, Lolo wasn’t his father. Neither was Barack.
1
@midmomom2490 Mr. Soebarkah is the son of Sumohadiwidjojo. An Indonesian Muslim and cult founder. This cult have temples in Hawaii still today and at least 10,000 members globally.
1
So-called KDH is 1 of only 2 people to occupy both offices since 1789 who weren’t a citizen before the adoption of the Constitution (obviously) and weren’t born of a citizen at all! Zachary Taylor was the last who was a citizen before the adoption of the Constitution, and also she is 1 of only 3 after him who were not born of two U.S. citizen parents. But again as stated above, 1 of only 2 not born of a citizen at all. The only other who wasn’t born of a citizen at all was really born a British subject named William Chester Alan Arthur, in Canada. It was his younger brother Chester Abel (A.) Arthur who passed away in early adolescence that was born in VT U.S.A.. Also all of the Arthur children, as the father was a British citizen, were all born British subjects and within allegiance owed to the Crown, regardless of if in Canada or the U.S.A.. Children born of a British citizen father at the time never would have been treated as “native born” citizens, let alone “natural-born”. They only would have been eligible to be naturalized as citizens IF the father was naturalized beforehand. He was born long, long before the 14th and the corruption of WKA in 1898!
1
Think about this. She’s 1 of only 2 ppl in both offices since 1850 that was not born of a citizen at all. Just 2. President Arthur is a historical criminal that was born a Brit in Canada. His allegiance was to the Crown!
1
Time for others to step up and take care of the Sudanese. It is not the responsibility of American citizens to float the bill, and you must be confused as to what the U.S.A. is and have missed the independent and sovereign nation for its people parts!
1
Time for others to step up and take care of the Sudanese. It is not the responsibility of American citizens to float the bill, and you must be confused as to what the U.S.A. is and have missed the independent and sovereign nation for its people parts!
1
Late 2000s. Our birthright citizenship laws were corrupted to be like Great Britain’s. This corruption didn’t exist in 1964. Meaning she wasn’t born what you’re being lied to that she was, and she isn’t what you’re being lied to that she is.
1
234 years of historical records predating 2009 prove she’s an ineligible impostors and infiltrator. I am a bit of historian on the history of our citizenship laws. It is still law that we are born of two U.S. citizens. A 100% BS fraudulent decision made in 2009 did not change this!
1
234 years of historical records predating 2009 prove she’s an ineligible impostors and infiltrator. I am a bit of historian on the history of our citizenship laws. It is still law that we are born of two U.S. citizens. A 100% BS fraudulent decision made in 2009 did not change this!
1
She’s still holding back, because the whole truth would expose others like Haley and Ramaswamy too!
1
Snopes is the actual disinfo!
1
@ It’s this simple. It’s impossible she was born a natural born Citizen. Why? Because that specific 1868 Amendment’s “Citizens” is a different level of citizenship. And in regards to Citizens specifically, the Constitution states this level were only eligible if they were one before the adoption of the Constitution. That was in 1788!
1
@ Clue #1. Does that specific 1868 amendment state Citizens or natural born Citizens?
1
@ The “natural-born, or native citizen, are the child born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” - The Law of Nations (Vattel, 1758) 👈 That’s where the framers of the Constitution took it from!!!
1
This platform block me from mentioning a specific Constitutional amendment in 1868 by title, but you should be able to figure out which one was in 1868. Now if you look at and read the amendment, you will see only inclusion of “Citizens” is given. Then if you look at Article II of original Constitution, you will see it states one must have been a “Citizen” at the time of the adoption of the Constitution (1788), or are a “natural born Citizen”. Yet the 1868 amendment at the most is only capable of being interpreted to claim one a “Citizen”, also referred to as the “native born Citizen” at specific times in our history, such as with the 1868 amendment. The 1868 amendment “Citizens” were not granted natural born Citizen level citizenship. The last of them who were a Citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution to legitimately occupy those offices, was Andrew Jackson in 1837! And as the amendment is incapable of interpretation to claim anyone born in the country to be a natural born Citizen, you should be able to figure out that you’re being lied to and she was not born, and is not what you’ve been lead to believe she is!!!
1
Until 2008 it was still acknowledged that the natural-born citizen are born of 2 citizens and in the country. Only we were issued birth certificates!
1
Until 2008 it was still acknowledged that the natural-born citizen are born of 2 citizens and in the country. Only we were issued birth certificates!
1
There are three tiers or levels of American citizenship since the third came with naturalization beginning in 1790. They are… “naturalized” citizen - someone who is naturalized as a citizen “native born” citizen - a child born in the country, or a child born in some of our territories or even in a foreign country, of at least one citizen “natural-born” citizen - born of 2 citizens and in the country, this includes only some territories today A big problem is most of you today don’t know anything about what all corruption began in 2008.
1
@kellyjean788 So-called Obama, so-called Harris, Cruz, Rubio, Haley and Ramaswamy all have something in common. You’re watching fake conservative media!
1
Like with most others, your biggest obstacle is that you believe lies made up since 2008. Born in the country of 2 citizens ARE the real requirements and this was being upheld in 1961!
1
She would not have been issued a birth certificate in 1964 even if she had been born in CA. Only natural born Citizens born of 2 citizens and in the country were issued them when our true laws were being upheld. I guarantee if there was a survey of native citizens born up until the late 2000s, only those born in the country of 2 citizens will have a legitimate birth certificate!
1
The real U.S.A. is technically a Constitutional Federal Republic with only Representative democracy to protect the citizens.
1
I can see two of them, but think there was three.
1
His real biological father was an Indonesian man with the initials M.S.S.. Muslim. A cult founder of a cult that still exists today and with temples in places like Hawaii. He was 60 when his son was born.
1
@curiousme113 Pull your heads out of your butts, people! Stop believing lies created since 2008! The natural born Citizen MUST BE BORN IN THE COUNTRY OF 2 U.S. CITIZENS! Don’t argue, juts stop being stupid and stop believing lies created since 2008!
1
@stephaniekarma3018 His real father was an Indonesian whose initials were M.S.S.. Muslim. A cult founder. He was 60 when his son was born. Get past the lies! He looks nothing like Barack or Lolo! Because they weren’t his father!
1
@curiousme113 Candace isn’t going to tell you the whole real truth, because it will expose others besides her and “Barack Jr.”. Like people with the initials VR and NH.
1
@Prythian00 You believe lies created since 2008. It is still law that us N-B C’s with Constitutional birthright to those offices, are born of 2 U.S. citizens and in a state. If you believe anything other than this, you ARE believing lies created since 2008! Nothing valid and legal ever altered those requirements! Nothing since 1795 has been done to alter the requirements!
1
@ Here’s his real biological father. https://youtu.be/XkcaQLoz2ps?si=PsIDSlSFA4oqgSi5
1
@curiousme113 Born in the country, of parents who are citizens. Nothing actually valid and legal has altered these requirements since 1795. You’ve just been lead to believe BS that began in 1992, and became much worse in 2008.
1
1. Barack was not his father! 2. Lolo was not his father! 3. His father was Indonesian though! A Muhammad. 4. In 1961 it WAS British Kenya. People were considered British citizens. So if he had been born in British Kenya, he may have been born a British citizen by being born on the soil. 5. He took on the Jr. name when he was with Barack, took on the Barry name when with Lolo. But his real surname at least at birth, was Soebarkah. 6. Stanley wasn’t his real mother! She adopted him. 7. His real mother was a Loretta.
1
HIS FATHER WASN’T BARACK! Get it through your thick skulls. His real father was an Indonesian Muslim named Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo! You can find a lot of info about him on the web. But take it with a grain of salt.
1
He wasn’t born in Kenya. Candace will learn a lot more if she contacts Dinesh D’Souza.
1
There is actual a/v recordings of George H.W. Bush speaking of the New World Order in the early 1990s and most are ignorant enough to believe it’s nonsense and not something real. I’ve been anti-establishment since I was 16 in 1991 and have been keeping an eye on who all really is in on it together behind closed doors. A lot became real obvious when certain people united against Trump.
1
You need to learn more. Things like this! The freed slaves the 14th Amendment was intended for were only granted “native born” Citizen level citizenship. This is not the same level of citizenship as a natural-born Citizen. They never could have been Vice President and President! If you seriously think she was born a natural-born, you need to keep reading the above paragraph over and over again until reality sets in!
1
You need to learn more. Things like this! The freed slaves the 14th Amendment was intended for were only granted “native born” Citizen level citizenship. This is not the same level of citizenship as a natural-born Citizen. They never could have been Vice President and President! If you seriously think she was born a natural-born, you need to keep reading the above paragraph over and over again until reality sets in!
1
Since 1789 there have been only 3 with fabricated backgrounds in both office. Just 3 since 1789! The 1st was VP 20 & POTUS 21, who was really a Brit born in Canada.
1
President Zachary Taylor was the last who was a citizen before the adoption of the U.S. Constitution. Beyond him, figure out what only President Arthur, her and Obama have in common. Of all to occupy both offices since 1850.
1
I’ve researched the history of America’s citizenship laws for decades. The freed slaves and Benny WKA never could have been President and Vice President. Article II doesn’t state native born Citizen!
1
She’s even tied to the grandson of William F. Kruse, who was a co-founder of what evolved into the Communist Party U.S.A.. Bill Kruse was a plaintiff in a fraudulent con-job that occurred in November of 2009. This con-job in 2009 created the story, fictional story, that anyone born on our soil are a “natural born” birthright citizen, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Yes this lie was seriously created at one court in 2009!
1
She’s even tied to the grandson of William F. Kruse, who was a co-founder of what evolved into the Communist Party U.S.A.. Bill Kruse was a plaintiff in a fraudulent con-job that occurred in November of 2009. This con-job in 2009 created the story, fictional story, that anyone born on our soil are a “natural born” birthright citizen, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Yes this lie was seriously created at one court in 2009!
1
I’ve known about her since 2009. The U.S. Constitution was attacked at a critical level in November of 2009 with a fraudulent decision made at the Indiana Court of Appeals. It created a lie about a specific historical decision made in 1898 San Francisco. She was DA of San Francisco in 2009, Newsom was Mayor. Directly involved in the case were McCain and Obama.
1
Stop believing lies created since 2008! It is still law that the “natural born Citizen” are born in the country of parents who are citizens. Both parents! Nothing valid and legal ever changed this!
1
Stop believing lies created since 2008! It is still law that the “natural born Citizen” are born in the country of parents who are citizens. Both parents! Nothing valid and legal ever changed this!
1
What do you believe the requirements are to be a Constitutional Article II “natural born Citizen” with eligibility to be President and Vice President? Your answer will most likely be the lie began that began in 2008.
1
President Arthur, President Obama, Vice President Harris. The only 3 since 1837 who have a specific thing in common. Then one needs of know the true history of Arthur, as it has been altered in the media in recent decades.
1
Not really. She’s not the 1st or 2nd impostor to illegally occupy those offices since 1850. She’s #3! Before her and BO, there was only President Arthur (1881-1885) who was really born a British subject named William C.A. Arthur in Dunham, Quebec.
1