Youtube comments of (@Gurzil-).
-
133
-
84
-
82
-
62
-
51
-
43
-
35
-
33
-
33
-
31
-
31
-
26
-
25
-
20
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@DamianWayne-h7p You have a point, there is some cultural aspect to it like topless African tribes, but these tribes are the exception, not the rule, most people around the world developed levels of modesty in their cultures because this cultural aspect is a result of the biological differences, and humans have a higher self awareness that separates us from animals. We don't want to see other men look at our mothers naked, or little boys looking at naked women. Like if you're a grown adult, are you ok with little boys looking at you topless?
I think there is a difference between "racism" and "modesty", it's about what is right and what is wrong, like hating and attacking other humans just the way they look is wrong regardless if it's biological or not, on the other hand, modesty is accepted because it is right since it's not from a place of hate but an aspect of interacting with other humans in society, even those topless African tribes still hide their lower private parts which show they still have developed some of that natural human sense of modesty that separates them from animals.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sabomarov7279 The oligarch existed way before 1918 they were ruling from Fes they just did not rule all moroccan tribes, they brought french protection to protect them against the Berber tribes. Whether they speak french or arabic that does not matter, the ones in control are the french who created moroccan flag and traced the borders and started to call morocco an 'arabic country' all of this is still used to this day, nothing major has changed. The Arabisation of the country is a way to get rid of indigenous people and create a fake identity not just in morocco but in all North Africa. This was beneficial to the french and to the arabs nationalists loyal to the middle east and not to their homeland. After the French were gone, the moroccan authorities enforced Arabization of the educational system and of public life that transformed more than half of moroccan and made them think they are arabs and eliminated Amazigh for too long. This is not something you can deny it is known even Oxford university talked about this Arabisation problem. Below is an excerpt of the research that was published in English on the Oxford university's official website:
"Berbers actively participated in the struggles for independence in both Algeria and Morocco, often in leadership roles. This pattern would continue during the decades after independence, even as both the Algerian and Moroccan states placed supreme value on the Arabization of the educational system, and of public life in general. The state’s overall view of Berber identity was that it should be consigned to the realm of folklore. However, even as the number of Berber speakers continued to decline (because of Arabisation), there arose a modern Berber (Amazigh) identity movement that demanded a reexamination of the underlying premises of their countries’ collective identities, one that would bring the Berber language and culture to center stage. It also demanded genuine amelioration of the dire conditions of poverty that characterized much of the rural Berber world. As ruling regimes struggled to maintain their legitimacy after a half century of independence, the Berber “question” now took on a new salience in North Africa’s increasingly contested political space." Source: Oxford Research Encyclopedias.
Back then (1600s to 1956), Berber tribes were independent from the central government of Fes. Arabic was only used in education and religion, not in public life. Darija is not arabic, it's a mixt language of Amazigh, Arabic, French and Spanish, it is based on Amazigh language and have Amazigh conjugation verbs and words, and is influenced to a lesser extent by French and Spanish, real Arabs in the middle east do not understand it, it is invented by Berbers and was spoken by less than 10% of moroccans mainly in Fes and Rabat, 90% of moroccan spoke Tamazight.
Also, I want to add that 'genetic studies on Moroccans' that is published on Wikipedia show that all moroccan are of Berber origin, those moroccan who speak Darija are Arabised Berbers (Berbers who lost their Amazigh mother tongue language and think they are arabs). The Arabs from Arabia who invaded North Africa in the 7th century did not contribute to the gene pool because they did not last, they were defeated by Berbers and kicked out from North Africa.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Wony_Mei I see, so at this logic, they will have to remove all the words in the dictionary, like "Japanese" which was once used in dehumanizing ways and "Chinese", "Vietnamese", "Irish" and others, maybe they will replace them with numbers instead, "people from country 1, country 2, country 3...". Also, terms like chocolate, it wasn't used in the past but it's also associated with black color so they will also remove if it offend someone? I think this is a childish mindset that develops in Western countries where they have a high standard of living and freedom that they don't know what real discrimination looks like.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@BradleyPhaeton
Bradley: Yasuke was a Samurai
Me: Show me proof
Bradley: "Trust me, bro"
So you're doubling down on your claims without providing proof. It's a waste of time and energy responding to your claims without providing proof as you are using emotions over facts, and trying to assume things. You saying it's "written that he was a samurai" when it's not, it's written he was a servant and retainer, not a samurai big difference. If you don't have proof of where it's written "he was a samurai" then you're dishonest for using that word to describe him. It does not matter if some Asians think he was a samurai, if they don't provide proof then I will not believe them.
And no, if there was no proof of William Adams I would not automatically believe it, I believe in facts, and I'm not even of European origin so you wouldn't say I'm biased or something. William Adams is a well-documented historical figure, he was given the title of "hatamoto," a high-ranking samurai who directly served the shogun. He spent the remainder of his life in Japan and died there, 20 years. On the other hand, Yasuke only spent like two or three years in Japan before he was sent back to the Jesuits and never passed the servant statue, that's what is in the records, no emotions just facts.
While samurais started as servants or retainers but after they became samurai they were no longer servants, they held elevated status. They became elite warriors who held positions of power and responsibility in Japanese society. Yasuke did not hold elevated status to become a samurai and since there are no records that mention he did become a samurai then we can't just assume that based on emotions like you are doing right now.
The statue you mentioned is not of Yasuke but a fictional life-sized sculpture constructed by a South African artist "Nicola Roos" in 2017 for a game series. It's an art exhibition, not an official public monument and was not displayed in Japan, it's just art, anyone anywhere can become an artist and construct a sculpture of Yasuke or any character.
I could go on on all your points but no need since they are just personal interpretations and assumptions, a waste of time. You did not provide any historical record where it clearly says "Yasuke was a samurai" because there is none. I think I'm done.
1
-
@BradleyPhaeton Where did you get this fake translation from? And where is the name of who did the translation? I have the Maeda Clan version of the Shinchōkōki online and nowhere in the book where it uses the word "samurai" to describe Yasuke. The word "samurai" in Japanese is "侍". If this word was indeed used to describe Yasuke, we would see all historians jumping around in excitement showing off this word as proof but that's not happening because there isn't any. So first provide the name of who did this English translation and the paragraph in Japanese from the Shinchōkōki and we can see if it's real or a lie.
"if you were a samurai during that time,than you are a servant bro"
Saying that "servant = samurai" is not just wrong but does not make sense and is laughable because then household servants are samurai, and artisans working, agricultural workers, to personal attendants like Yasuke, are all samurai according to your logic.
The samurai class was distinct and defined by specific social, military, and legal standards that did not apply to general servants. They were part of the ruling elite in Japan, often having considerable power, influence, and respect in society. There were also Japanese servants who performed similar roles to Yasuke but were not classified as samurai. Samurai status was not just about the duties performed, it also involved formal recognition and inclusion in the samurai class, which carried specific social privileges and responsibilities. So just saying Yasuke was a samurai because he was a servant is a wrong argument.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@skolla22 First, who said something about blood mixing is scientifically wrong? Are you just looking to read what you want to hear so you can throw the word fascist around?
Second, since you brought that up, I would say yes there are actually several scientific studies that it is not healthy. Of course, these are not featured in you're typical low IQ BBC documentaries. I can give you one study if you're willing to learn and not just here to cry.
To check this study simply copy this in Google: "J. Richard Udry, PhD, Rose Maria Li, PhD, and Janet Hendrickson-Smith, MA" The study is published in PubMed Central, National Institutes of Health (NIH) so you don't say this is fascist propaganda. There are more studies done on other related health issues.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Someone_Unknown90 Who lied to you? The CCTV was invented by Walter Bruch, a German engineer not a black woman. The other inventions you mentioned except the Caller ID which was invented by a Japanese inventor, all the rest were either by white people or a collaboration with white people and were invented in the USA. For the computer, Charles Babbage English mathematician, is the first ever to conceptualize the mechanical computer. Followed by other Europeans.
All of the main technologies were invented by white people, electricity, the phone, computer, TV, internet, washing machine, space station, car, plane etc etc. We are talking about modern complex technology not some primitive things.
The only inventors next to Whites are Asians particularly the Japanese and Chinese the rest like Arabs and Blacks are very limited, you could argue that some Arabs invented some things and contributed to some modern things but it's limited compared to Europeans or East Asians, and for the most part, they are not Arabs but Muslims from other non arab ethnicities, and most of these inventions were primitive things from middle ages. But black Subsaharan inventions are even more limited and mostly happened using already invented mechanisms and tools in Western countries.
So in conclusion, while every race has invented something and contributed to history which is something I'm not denying, but the most breakthrough complex inventions that made our life easy in modern times are Whites at the top of the pyramid followed by the Japanese and Chinese. These are the facts that you seem upset about, but you should know facts don't care about your feelings, they are just facts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stardust6870 People want their children to have a better life, like who wants their kids to live poor and miserable life? We can't blame them. Most poor women who want to settle choose financially stable men over attractive broke men. Yes, women have fun in their younger years with attractive guys, but as they get older and want to settle and have children they usually go for a financially stable man who is a few years older.
Male fertility does decline with age, but men continue to produce sperm throughout their lives. So a man over 60 can still father children. On the other hand, a woman's fertility over 40 decreases significantly that in most cases they need unnatural fertility treatments, and even then pregnancy is not guaranteed. So the comparison of fertility between the two genders is not equal.
I agree, that the small age gap of around 5 years is the most common in the US and Europe but men are usually the older. Most young women prefer to date men a few years older and that's not because of patriarchy and not just because of financial stability, women cite maturity, experience, wisdom and financial stability as reasons to date men who are older.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1