Comments by "" (@AdamBladeTaylor) on "Upper Echelon" channel.

You will never see any actual evidence from the right wing. Because they never have any, for ANYTHING they claim. Hell, they're still claiming (for over 60 years) that Democrats are going to take everyone's guns away. Even though that's never even once been proposed. Dems have had countless opportunities to do so if they wanted, but never even tried. But Republicans know their voters will react to their lies as if they were true, without any evidence or facts to back them up.
2
There's never been any evidence to back up any of the claims that the election was stolen. Of any of the idiotic conspiracies on how it was done, most of which are literal impossibilities.
1
@yannickfinesaute1521 It was in absolutely no way stolen. That's been irrefutably proven. It was in fact the most safe and secure election in American history, even with Republicans trying to cheat. It's not up to the left to prove that Biden one. The literal ELECTION did that. It's up to the right to prove that any of their claims of fraud were true. Which they've not been able to do because there isn't a single shred of evidence to support ANY of their thoroughly debunked lies. And there are no documentaries showing the election was stolen. There are fascist, anti-American propaganda pieces, which again, have been 100% debunked and proven to be nothing but lies. Which have no right to be aired anywhere. Nothing to do with free speech.
1
This is a sad truth about journalism today. I used to work for an outlet that frequently gave me instructions on what to write when it came to reviews and "opinion" pieces. Many times being given pretty much a pre-written article (from either the company behind the game or the competition) which I was essentially told to put into my own words. There were often specific things that I was supposed to mention, key phrases that some PR person obviously came up with, that I would notice came up in a lot of other articles at the same time. While this isn't ethical journalism my any means, it's also not something people can just accuse specific journalists of doing. Much like the issues with "crunch time" in the video game industry that have been coming to light, this "canned journalism" is a do or die situation for many journalists. They're basically told what to write, and if they refuse, then they're out of a job for not towing the line. And while many find it distasteful to be made to write such articles, the sad truth is that most (myself included) simply don't have a choice because they have bills to pay, and being fired (and knowing your former employers will do what they can to make sure you don't get hired by other outlets) is not an option many people have. Again, as you said, it all comes down to the money. There are millionaires out there who want to make sure they can scrape a few more pennies out of sources by basically controlling the narrative. It's capitalism at work.
1