Comments by "Roger Scott Cathey" (@rogerscottcathey) on "Astrum" channel.

  1. Dark matter and energies have failed every test of scientific validation. They both have disproven themselves as conceived by the primary proponents. They arent there and were never needed. Only popular science mouthpieces insist on their necessity and it is very difficult to extract their excuses for doing so -- despite not a shred of supporting evidentiary observations -- from their fundings and endowments. The latter are huge, the former are lame.
    7
  2. "attempting to revert to gravitational equilibrium"? So, sorta like what the surface of the water does from a drop eh?
    5
  3. pity party!! yeah! woe is i . . . too! yay! 🙄🤔😨
    4
  4. Heat without atoms? Hot space eh? If a tree falls . . .
    4
  5. Be interesting to see a figure eight orbit.
    4
  6. I just want to know why no film footage of the star-field while on the dark side orbit. Ideal opportunity for a spectacular shot.
    3
  7.  @0779risingsun  : yer not allowed in the pity party!! boo! 😣😫😥😜
    3
  8. The doable project is to put a manned telescope base on the moon.
    3
  9. So at some point focal size space looks like a giant mass of white light, no?
    2
  10. but what if there were a very gradual slope? eh, what then? . . . actually, that would be a cool thing to put on very tall buildings, a gradual slope with water running over it so after some free fall, gently slide the rest of . . .
    2
  11. Nebular disc hypothesis doesnt explain planet formation or moon formation, it is just the most popular model.
    2
  12. looking at the solar system from the South pole, as towards polaris in the animation. ok
    1
  13. Embarassing. Talking so glibly about a debunked hypothesis. As if they existed. Fantasy land. Its a mind f**k and they font even know it.
    1
  14.  @htos1av  : No one from Apollo missions mentions stars seen on dark side.
    1
  15.  @daveg2104  : So you think seeing a brilliant, unobstructed star-field from the far side of the moon is nothing to write home about hunh? Not even worth mentioning hunh? Collins remarked never having seen star-light the entire time. Youre rationalising about something that has a scientific explanation having to do with how atmosphere affects star-light frequency. Reducing it into the range visible to the naked eye.
    1
  16.  @daveg2104  : Yes I do know about the IR optics. And have enjoyed night sky away from the city. It is a dazzling wonder. How much more so from capsule while in the lunar umbra. Thanks for your post.
    1
  17.  @morskojvolk  : Why are you shaking your head? All I asked was why no photos? Even just an open shutter shot to show the streaks. And recall, Armstrong said they never saw any stars except through the uv equipment, but did say they saw planets.
    1
  18. If pluto was once a moon of uranus, it would be a mooned moon.
    1
  19. Neil Armstrong said they never saw stars on the way, on the far side or sun lee side, i.e. utter dark side, or moon surface. They could see planets reflecting light but stars only by the instrument that could detect ultraviolet spectrum. The physicist O.C. Hilgenberg predicted that outside the atmosphere star light would be outside the visible spectrum. The atmosphere transduces these to visible wavlengths.
    1
  20. Scroll down the pages is all you need to do, as moving via left-right arrows will not show full page.
    1
  21. Dr. Peratt and others inform us the most salient information about everything from atomic physics to lunar and planetary physics is kept secret, due in part to defensive and offensive strategics and fears about international espionage. The economic impact is probably the greatest concern. Universities and institutions get only the barest facts and cannot apply their current understanding to the cosmos effectively because they are kept in the dark. Look how long people have adhered to the Penzias and Wilson cosmic background temperature data that was firmly disproven by Prof. Herouni decades ago. And yet even before Herouni this was probably known at Brookhaven, Los Alamos, etc. among the secret think tanks. It is maddening to think we've been feeding on day old bread for years.
    1
  22. The spiral arms emanate outwardly from the central sun, they are not falling into it. Similar trails can be visualized for the planets, seen as lone atoms spewed from our sun. Moons are spewed from within planets. Just a hypothesis. But it explains a lot.
    1
  23. In other words they dont KNOW, it's a guess.
    1
  24.  Fred Cink  : "utter ignorance" no less. My, my. Listen to your own words of advice. I call em as I see em and am fully conversant with the methodology. It is a guess. A logical inference, but still a guess. The circumstances obviate the possibility of the scientific method's requirement of experimental confirmation. It is a guess. Period. No shame in it, but pretending to know and be certain is how this era of science got stymied in black holes and bending space. So spare me your condescensions and presumptions. Good day.
    1
  25.  @GoSlash27  : nah, less dust issues there than Mars.
    1
  26. our local newspaper must have buried this story. first heard of this here. tx
    1
  27. Had to watch most of this upside down. People are too arcto-centric.
    1
  28.  @toni4729  : it was right side up when it was upside down for us normal folk. South is up.
    1
  29.  @toni4729  : Australians
    1
  30.  @toni4729  :just look up alternative maps south up fgs
    1
  31.  @toni4729  : Everyone is out of step but Johnny. It was a lighthearted comment and you, evidently, get your jollies trying to nominalize and dis it stuff not to your liking. Restricted minds are a real joy to engage. Not.
    1
  32.  @toni4729  : Go away.
    1
  33. Giant hermetically sealed domes constructed in space will be sent first.
    1
  34.  @karenpojar2514  : Rife claimed he found tb stored virii in cysts which they would release when the cells died. The virus then would induce a series, of polymorphism eventually evolving new tb.
    1
  35. How hard would it have been to mount a plasma strobe on that sat? Those shadows are hiding stuff.
    1
  36.  @sailorman8668  : stuff that's there.
    1
  37. I watched this full screen upside down.
    1
  38. Should mixing scalars and vectorals be allowed? To think time can vibrate forwards and backwards and space alternate between nothing and everything? What madness
    1
  39. It would be interesting to know if dust catching high altitude sonds have found virii in the highest altitudes.
    1
  40. How would an utterly sterile fly-paper be created? Still, it would be interesting if the ISS had a port that could stick out some fly paper to see what is caught in the vacuum.
    1
  41. Tardigrades can live in space.
    1
  42. Absurd. Heat without atoms, they must vibrate these imaginary massless, "hot" subatomic particles, yes? So space has to exist. What heats them? Why are they all in zero space, if that makes any sense. They heat themselves then did they start out cold? What do you know that is cold that can suddenly explode? What made these particles? Are these proto particles mutually attractive or repulsive? What experiments yield understanding of how these non-atomic items behave? The fantasy of all this is patently absurd.
    1
  43.  @life_archive7840  : Sure, we can fantasize all kinds of things. Experiment eliminates them as having any possibility of reality, to say nothing of pure reason. Big bang, dark matter, dark energy are all ptolemaic stratagems in attempts to save a model and defunct paradigm.
    1
  44. What I wrote is what it is. Going down that road has yielded nothing but rewrites and regrouping. And rather than seeing the fruit of a fallow field is nothing and turning to a better, they try one patch after another.
    1
  45. So that's a new term to me: perijove. Is there a perimars or periares? Why not stick to common parlance to a planet. Apogee, perigee, apsis, etc?
    1
  46. Flux tube are Birkeland currents, no?
    1
  47. someday, extreme sand surfers will board down those slopes.
    1
  48. Is Pluto going away? How pessimistic is that title yo?
    1
  49. Carnegie Inst. for Sci. states: "Seventeen of (the moons) orbit the planet backwards, or in a retrograde direction, meaning their movement is opposite of the planet's rotation around its axis. The other three moons orbit in the prograde—the same direction as Saturn rotates." Wasn't sure if view plane at about 2 minutes was from Southern or Northern polar orientation.
    1
  50. Couldn't explain why what happened? Did I sleep through that part?
    1