Comments by "Roger Scott Cathey" (@rogerscottcathey) on "Professor Dave Explains" channel.

This sounds more like a diatribe than any debunk. Pejoratives and snide aspersions dont equate to refutation. If you were sincere, you'd provide links to the vids whose points you dispute. Rather than that, you encourage your viewers to just ignore it all, because you've seen it, youre the self-proclaimed expert, trust you. I find this this kind of scatter-shot, "take my word for it, it's junk" vlog worse than the fake Paris channel.
2
Ian w16 : Theres just another assertion. Talk like that makes me curious what you guys are talking about and I'll look at it and judge for myself. Essentially he and now you are merely tossing out insults and mocking. Refuting nothing. Trot out your data. Show the idiocy, dont just say it's idiotic. Why should I trust him or you?
1
@ProfessorDaveExplains : How rude. I said there was no actual refutation. You get triggered evidently by criticism, but you like to dish it out. I am no fan of the transistor analogy or equivalence of the sun, so I am not defending anything. I'm looking for cool headed, reasonable critiques or explanations of all theory and hypotheses. So that's not your style. Fine.
1
@ProfessorDaveExplains : Guess I hit a nerve. I'll let you be then and leave to your very evident delusion of greatness, "professor". lol
1
@clairpahlavi : Any thoughts on Dr. Dowdye's debunk of Eddington's conclusions?
1