Comments by "Roger Scott Cathey" (@rogerscottcathey) on "To Be Frank"
channel.
-
28
-
24
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
The current lockdowns and compulsory masking are not based on science. Even the term "social distancing" is not science terminology, it is psy-op terminology.
Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation and ostracization, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically loaded and tactical term.
The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. Serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile, i.e. un-sterile, OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. (links below). Still, an obviously problematic area for controlled study.
We dont need any vaccine for this politically exacerbated and stimulated scourge anyway.
The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease.
I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine.
Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak. Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 outbreak in the rest home. As a result of their use of Ivermectin, No resident became seriously ill.
And yet! the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! All residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived.
The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine.
Dr. Hibberd:
https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI
Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy.
https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA
Re: Mask, respirators, etc. Shows how equivocal the evidence is.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/
Another link resource pointed to more for article links than over-all opinion. One must know the range of data and draw personal opinion. It is quite obvious home made cloth masks are merely appearances, need to be washed daily at least, optimally several times a day.
https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy
Mask redux 3:
I have expanded links below in my comment for further scholarly articles.
I have pointed out science literature to show, just as Fauci showed by his initial position, there is scientific uncertainty regarding this issue. If you read the following papers, you'll realize that studies and articles are plentiful.
Mask wearing is not on the same level of science as sterile hand contact with internals, as in a delivery, a laparotomy or even excision of a mole. Laymen can be forgiven for ignorance of this topic and this issue, but scientists should know better. The public servants have chosen to ignore it evidently out of liability concerns more than anything else. Only it may actually do the reverse of what they expect.
As for why masks are still worn in surgeries: liability issues, whether or not the operating room, instruments or personnel had anything to do with a post-op infection, the effectiveness or not of masks is irrelevant, but exists as a weak point in a defense against a tort. Here is a relevant quote:
"Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/
Well other more rigorous studies were done.
The Studies of Surgical Mask Efficacy -- Arthur Firstenberg
http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739:BlogPost:2035264
https://muchadoaboutcorona.ca/face-masks-cause-wound-infection/
The following provide links to download pdfs of articles, no fee.
Neil W.M. Orr, Six month study of maskless surgery
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/
PubMed Orr article:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19310816/
Goggles more important than masks
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964349/
Springer open source article
on mask study -- Tunevall
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736
Most medical journals now provide scholarly articles relating to covid free of charge at the present time.
We conceived a simple way to dispense with the issue by operating with an air hose over the back through silver ion sterilizing filters, an adaptation of the solution C.L. Kervran developed for reducing carbon monoxide poisoning to welders by breathing heated air while annealing iron plates.
As to double blind, placebo controlled studies, this is not needed with Ivermectin, with a proven history of effectiveness, known LD50s, optimal dosages, etc. To say nothing of the immorality of such time wasting efforts. Dr. Borody compares that to the ridiculousness of such study on parachutes. Dead weight studies were sufficient to prove efficacy. First human tests were always done with safety protocols, over water, nets, etc. None were done for some jumping with, some jumping without parachutes or different parachutes. Linear comparatives or longitudinal studies were done of course, and improvements adopted.
Regarding Ivermectin Prophylaxis, i.e. preventive efficacy:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04422561
White Board Channel re above study:
https://youtu.be/TmzvDa9Un44
https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteboardDoctor
Dr. Borody re: controlled study of Ivermectin:
https://youtu.be/POfIMGS2D6A
The British Medical Journal on Randomized, controlled study of Parachutes to prevent death and injury. Seriously, not an April 1st release!
https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094
10
-
@jimmorrison4163 :
The current lockdowns and compulsory masking are not based on science. Even the term "social distancing" is not science terminology, it is psy-op terminology.
Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation and ostracization, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically loaded and tactical term.
The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. Serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile, i.e. un-sterile, OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. (links below). Still, an obviously problematic area for controlled study.
We dont need any vaccine for this politically exacerbated and stimulated scourge anyway.
The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease.
I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine.
Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak. Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 outbreak in the rest home. As a result of their use of Ivermectin, No resident became seriously ill.
And yet! the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! All residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived.
The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine.
Dr. Hibberd:
https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI
Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy.
https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA
Re: Mask, respirators, etc. Shows how equivocal the evidence is.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/
Another link resource pointed to more for article links than over-all opinion. One must know the range of data and draw personal opinion. It is quite obvious home made cloth masks are merely appearances, need to be washed daily at least, optimally several times a day.
https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy
Mask redux 3:
I have expanded links below in my comment for further scholarly articles.
I have pointed out science literature to show, just as Fauci showed by his initial position, there is scientific uncertainty regarding this issue. If you read the following papers, you'll realize that studies and articles are plentiful.
Mask wearing is not on the same level of science as sterile hand contact with internals, as in a delivery, a laparotomy or even excision of a mole. Laymen can be forgiven for ignorance of this topic and this issue, but scientists should know better. The public servants have chosen to ignore it evidently out of liability concerns more than anything else. Only it may actually do the reverse of what they expect.
As for why masks are still worn in surgeries: liability issues, whether or not the operating room, instruments or personnel had anything to do with a post-op infection, the effectiveness or not of masks is irrelevant, but exists as a weak point in a defense against a tort. Here is a relevant quote:
"Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/
Well other more rigorous studies were done.
The Studies of Surgical Mask Efficacy -- Arthur Firstenberg
http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739:BlogPost:2035264
https://muchadoaboutcorona.ca/face-masks-cause-wound-infection/
The following provide links to download pdfs of articles, no fee.
Neil W.M. Orr, Six month study of maskless surgery
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/
PubMed Orr article:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19310816/
Goggles more important than masks
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964349/
Springer open source article
on mask study -- Tunevall
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736
Most medical journals now provide scholarly articles relating to covid free of charge at the present time.
We conceived a simple way to dispense with the issue by operating with an air hose over the back through silver ion sterilizing filters, an adaptation of the solution C.L. Kervran developed for reducing carbon monoxide poisoning to welders by breathing heated air while annealing iron plates.
As to double blind, placebo controlled studies, this is not needed with Ivermectin, with a proven history of effectiveness, known LD50s, optimal dosages, etc. To say nothing of the immorality of such time wasting efforts. Dr. Borody compares that to the ridiculousness of such study on parachutes. Dead weight studies were sufficient to prove efficacy. First human tests were always done with safety protocols, over water, nets, etc. None were done for some jumping with, some jumping without parachutes or different parachutes. Linear comparatives or longitudinal studies were done of course, and improvements adopted.
Regarding Ivermectin Prophylaxis, i.e. preventive efficacy:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04422561
White Board Channel re above study:
https://youtu.be/TmzvDa9Un44
https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteboardDoctor
Dr. Borody re: controlled study of Ivermectin:
https://youtu.be/POfIMGS2D6A
The British Medical Journal on Randomized, controlled study of Parachutes to prevent death and injury. Seriously, not an April 1st release!
https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@sueyoung2115 : At the risk of harping, I'll add a comment to the news release yesterday by the President.
The President had to take the position he did regarding the vaccines, but it is a political sop, to appease the maniacal, dogma ridden, hypnotized press and so-called "health authorities", who have brow beat and cowered anyone with questions as to the probity of their approach, the way they calculate statistics or interpret their testing methodology.
We have seen big and small pharma rushing towards bankruptcy since 2008 according to my research terms. This pandemic is seen as a life saver to pfizer, moderna and other vaccination pushers. The big snag for them now is the fantastic success of combination and nutritional component therapies like Borody's ivermectin, zinc, doxycycline, vit. D and C. These protocols will see big pharma either changing their tactics or going bankrupt as well.
https://biopharmguy.com/links/company-by-name-defunct.php
The results thus far show conclusively that IVM outperforms all other non-vaccine therapies hands down. This video from White Board Doctor, (WBDR) a resident physician, details IVM studies to date. You can update your IVM data pretty well via his channel and Trial Site News as well.
WBDR
https://youtu.be/C0pCz3NrlBc
https://youtu.be/2LjIMX_qwZ0
Covexit News:
https://youtu.be/6R-FtOK7JKo
Trial Site News on Israel ivermectin study:
https://youtu.be/rrlS1Mt8rQ8
Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy.
https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA
And the most convincing fact, an entire nursing home saved by ivermectin alone.
https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI
Author contact:
https://m.facebook.com/rogerscottcatheyii
reply here to request email.
5
-
4
-
@nickv1008 : No evidence for that happening in the US where docs are at wits end and doing anything that works for the pandemic. None that I know or am aware of by word of mouth or in print. AMA is not in charge of local medical licensing or ethic boards. State boards often ignore AMA recommendations. Here in Portland, Oregon no one is in lock step with AMA at OHSU, or we would not have seen the innovations instituted from here, including proper ER protocols for the proper treatment of head injury, which began in Portland under the auspices of our Medical school of my grandfather's day, who was the top neurosurgeon in Oregon . . in the US. His recommendation for treatment of Head Injury was published in the Oregon Medical Record, not JAMA, even if they had wanted him to. They got an abstract.
OHSU's Dr. Drucker thinks outside the box and we have the wonder drug Gleevec thanks to him, and not the AMA.
OHSU was the primary center for therapeutic uses for DMSO research. The AMA sure did not like that, but the local board said, 'So what? Stay out of our business.'
Dont give power to anyone just because they assume they have power or posture as if they do.
People would not use prescriptive ivermectin if it was dangerous. It isnt. Dont make a problem where there isnt one.
4
-
4
-
Monopolists is the more accurate term for the cartel membership. "Capitalist" is an intentionally hazy term meant as a pejorative, but it is actually a behaviour communists ply just as fiercely as the so called "enemies of the people". Both terms, capitalist and communist are shadow terms covering the honest appraisal of methods of slavery, manipulation, and garnering the bulk of wealth and luxury to an tiny fraction of the people of Earth. Farmers selling and trading goods are not "capitalists". Cartelism describes the actions of both the Russian, Chinese and internationalists better than either capitalist/communist. Ivy Ledbetter Lee taught the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and Stalin that free speech, a free, independent press and reserved power of a Constituency or Electorate are their enemies. It's hogism, to coin a term. Much to the few, little to the many.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
@1chickenpig : Sure, relatively available by diet alone. Green tea, and coffee, berries, nuts, flax, buckwheat polyphenols generally act as such. The zinc2+ acts like a weak chelator, transport alpha-2-macroglobulin will glom onto chelates, until some stronger conjugator comes along with less lability. Calcium inhibits zn absorption, straight coffee, tea is better than creamed.
Dietary factors influencing zinc absorption
B Lönnerdal. J Nutr. 2000 May.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10801947/
Polyphenols of Grains
Functional Properties of Polyphenols in Grains and Effects of Physicochemical Processing on Polyphenols
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jfq/2019/2793973/
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This surgical gymnastics sounds like a good alternative for now from cut, burn and poison alright. But it is akin to "fecal transplant". There HAS to be a better way.
For cancer there is the much simpler Lambelle treatment of IM injection of amylase and trypsin. The cancer cell is protected from white blood cells by electronegative sialylated proteins. The glycoprotein is well known: chorionic gonadotrophins, or hCG. White blood cells carry the same charge, they cannot approach. However amylase immediately deactivates hCG by direct digestion or hydrolyzation of the sialylated carbohydrate moiety of hCG. Trypsin, tryptase and RNAse also set to work thereafter.
The hCG cell wall motif is characteristic of only one normal cell in the life cycle: trophoblasts. That is how we know cancers are trophoblastic, as fully confirmed by thousands of biopsies and clonal cultured cell lines by flow cytometry analysis, and genotyping. See the seminal article on this by Hernan Acevedo in the 1995 issue of Cancer, if memory serves.
As all cancers, regardless of type or origin are trophoblastic, we know they have only one source: diploid totipotent cells, i.e., stem cells. Outside pregnancy, stem cells are only active in regeneration and healing. They are most active in the gut, pancreas and liver, but are obviously active wherever cancer can be observed. Even brain contain active stem cells. When trophoblastic differentiation arises normally in the life cycle, it is as placenta. It mediates the nutrition of the stem cell package. In healing it obviously must play a role in regeneration. If hayflick limited cell lines need replacing it is not enough to have cells crowd them out, the old cells need removal. White blood cells only remove dead and apoptotic signaling cells. Only trophoblasts are known to do this. They are highly mobile, invasive and thus metastatic by nature. They cannot dedifferentiate, they are the most primal differentiated cell and the least pluripotent cell. The stem cell can evoke trophoblast to accomplish its needs, but trophoblast cannot evoke stem cells. In the normal model of function, trophoblast begin to be degraded in the 8th or 9th week of pregnancy, at the onset of fetal pancreatic function. The fetal pancreas secretes no amylase, but his mother's amylase titers continuously increase until parturition. The dual action of fetal and maternal amylase and the serine proteases degrade the trophoblast hold on the syncytium in the limb of uterus until it releases. The hypoxic conditions of syncytiotrophoblasts in the interface induces anaerobic metabolites to permeate soma inducing the oxytocin cascade inducing contraction to expell. The clues to cancer resolution need only mimic the normal precedent in the cause of birth.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sonnybowman : Yes, I agree everything is worthy of getting a test. Two of my grandfathers were surgeons who treated gangrene with injections of iodine directly into bone marrow. Both cases the hospitals were all set for amputation. There are anecdotes regarding peroxide, colloidal silver . . which has been tested as an antiviral and used in fixed form at water treatment plants. I know nothing about essential oils. A fellow I know who lived through WWII told of Australian troops before sulfa using powdered sugar in wounds with good results.
As far as virus is concerned the practical utility of IVM is so great right now, OTC available right now at feed and seed stores, the research can wait. Remember, H2O2 and alcohol suspensions kill normal cells as well as germs or deactivate virus. Water suspended iodine is better. Regular use of peroxide could induce scarring, I am uncertain. The intestinal system from one end to the other has great regenerative ability and where most the immune complement, including free enzymes, is concentrated. I am personally not inclined to H. peroxide for the basic reason our body can and does produce it where needed but it is strictly controlled. And I have no appetite to speak of for it, lol. Appetite and thirst are good guides. I am curious to learn what Dr. Batmangelidj will have to say about this state of affairs, if he is still around.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@colfaxschuyler3675 : i have talked with Kory on LinkedIn, I have corresponded with Marik, Dr. Barnard, White Board Doctor, some listen, some do not. Dr.Mobeen Sayed, "Drbean" ignored our data. Thus far only Dr. Jennifer Hibberd, Dr. José Luis Abreu, Dr. Wallach and G.Edward Griffin of Red Pill University have recognised the importance of our deductions. And we are relying more on Bayesian analyses than seeking double blind, placebo controlled trials.
Where ever we see an HCN rich dietary, all other essentials being met, we see low to zero incidence of both flus and cancers, morning sickness, etc. Also, we noted that available data suggests the dispersal of small pox among Native Americans affected those Indians who had abandoned their traditional dietary, not those true to the traditional ways which would have included pemmikin, typically made with dried cherry and their HCN-rich pits, lderberry, huckleberry and their seeds ground to powder with dried meats including fatty "sweet bread" or bison pancreas and limb meat. These extrinsic or dietary enzymes afe absorbedvand conserve the intrinsic enzymes, are part and parcel to the true front line defense of the mammalian form as blood and lymph circulating, weakly inhibited surveilant digestors of invasive agents or pathogens. Cellular immunity acts last, not first. This was acknowledged by the fathers of immune theory Metchnikov and his closest associate Metalnikoff, by Bechamp and at the end Pasteur as well. Curie and Bagshawe also showed this was the case, and that typical M.O.s of pathogens is to utilize enzyme inhibitors similar to hCG, the pregnancy hormone, a glycoprotein termed a SERPIN, or serine enzyme inhibitor. The pancreatic hydrolases are serine types, yet hydrocyanic acid accelerates and reactivates amylase as well and we are preparing to run kinetic tests on RNase in the presence of HCN as well.
Such lab tests are a far cry from RCTs but alert reasonsble people realize that there can be absolutely no GOOD reason to ignore the info and even to encourage people to incorporate it in dietary.HCN is the missing, villified coenzyme, discovered by Drs Blood and Mendel in 1910.
Understabding the dietary rationales increases the respect and the degree the vitalness and importance of them are taken seriously. Our overwhelming experience has been, most MDs are flippant and dismissive. Especially American educated doctors. It has improved as many are utilizing CME with reschooling as NDs, since the population at large have lost faith and dollars going to "regular" docs. This has also seen the big pharmas tanking as well. NEJM reported these datums in the 1980s, and in 2015 all were nigh on bankrupt, especially their mother parasite, the federal reserve corp.
So resorting to the rosier picture presented by Nutritionists and Naturopathics has helped, but even these are woefully ignorant of Immuno-Enyme rationales: methods of therapy and the simple, pragmatic ways all doctors addressing such can be fired.
1
-
@colfaxschuyler3675 : Memorial Sloan-Kettering proved the ability if HCN to induce active tumor regression and remission, with our consultation Israeli researchers proved the body recycles HCN (elderberry's active coenyme component along with other synergistic components) and so for us it us not a sacrificial "hill", it is pragmatic advisory for those with ears to hear. We abandoned the evil strictures of RCTs long ago with proven-safe synergistic combos, a witness Dr. Borody for helicobacter pylori, the major inducer of ulcer world-wide. Dr. Kenneth D. Seamster, US Army Botanist, creator with L.H. Van Dyke, Jr. Of the Universal Plant Identifier and Indexing Systems, now an unattributed app at playstore, was the one showed how both Rx and OTC extant drugs could be combined and extended, and was incorporated in Ranger Field Survival Training.
We know what ae are talking about. Take it or leave it. Youve been alerted, that ends my responsibility. Be well.
1
-
Vaccinating is a pseudo-philosophical issue. When x-ray was being promoted as a form of medical treatment and later radioactive substances and linear accelerators, any treatment that cut into their profits was automatically attacked as quackery. It isn't even an issue of the pot calling the kettle black, because after years of these exotic treatments of burn and poison, they have zero sum effect to continue their applications, hence they were the actual quack procedures. They utilized the psychology of Rockefeller's chief PR, Ledbetter to justify bad things as actually good things, a procedure executed thoroughly via various frauds like Fetzner and Fishbein. Millions were invested in putting their "philosophy" into medical education, declearing war even on nutritional science as secondary or merely peripheral when looking to cure vitamin deficiency diseases.
Mandates are crossing the boundaries of self determination and in fact are un-Constitutional. More importantly, the strict science of immunity was assaulted when the white blood cells were labeled as the primary and only form in the body, when in fact the chief component are the circulating digestive enzymes . . a finding that was broadly confirmed but castigated as "fraud" by pharma-business complex. The circulatory enzyme competency is based strictly on nutrition, and the methods of testing the health of that system aren't even among standardized processes. Yet when robust, any question of vaccine necessity becomes moot. Vaccines are not part of any evolutionary mandate. It is strictly business.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1