Comments by "Roger Scott Cathey" (@rogerscottcathey) on "Why Vaccination isn't an Ethical Duty: Bioethics Expert, Dr. Travis Rieder Discusses | Interview" video.

  1. Vaccinating is a pseudo-philosophical issue. When x-ray was being promoted as a form of medical treatment and later radioactive substances and linear accelerators, any treatment that cut into their profits was automatically attacked as quackery. It isn't even an issue of the pot calling the kettle black, because after years of these exotic treatments of burn and poison, they have zero sum effect to continue their applications, hence they were the actual quack procedures. They utilized the psychology of Rockefeller's chief PR, Ledbetter to justify bad things as actually good things, a procedure executed thoroughly via various frauds like Fetzner and Fishbein. Millions were invested in putting their "philosophy" into medical education, declearing war even on nutritional science as secondary or merely peripheral when looking to cure vitamin deficiency diseases. Mandates are crossing the boundaries of self determination and in fact are un-Constitutional. More importantly, the strict science of immunity was assaulted when the white blood cells were labeled as the primary and only form in the body, when in fact the chief component are the circulating digestive enzymes . . a finding that was broadly confirmed but castigated as "fraud" by pharma-business complex. The circulatory enzyme competency is based strictly on nutrition, and the methods of testing the health of that system aren't even among standardized processes. Yet when robust, any question of vaccine necessity becomes moot. Vaccines are not part of any evolutionary mandate. It is strictly business.
    1