Comments by "Roger Scott Cathey" (@rogerscottcathey) on "Curious Droid" channel.

  1. Your space knowledge is vast.
    16
  2. try to get the flatards and moon hoax crowd to watch this tho . . . not likely. willful ignorance.
    3
  3. like i said, willful ignorance.
    3
  4. Someone playing Tetris in the background?:-) Great stuff.
    3
  5. Have always been curious about the camera feeds to underground A bomb tests.
    3
  6. must come from Missouri, the "show me state".
    2
  7. "To a Mouse,” by Robert Burns : “The best laid schemes o' mice an' men / Gang aft a-gley.”
    2
  8. well did they really film that being released into space? how? the most interesting aspect.
    2
  9. The enormous amount of work and research that went into this project became evident to me when I discovered a barrel full of paper back issues of the Annuls of the New York Academy of Sciences behind our old medical school library. There was article after article covering the tiniest details of the project. There was even an article discussing possible signs of life in rocks from Mars found in Antarctica. This was in the 60s or 70s. The story was revived many years later, but people seem to think the work done was all sham and movie sets. They dont bother to dig into the past, just armchair debunkery. Shore captains who think the ocean ends at the horizon. To explore space, all these people have to do is push a ship off the edge of the earth, if they can get past the "ice wall". Right . . .
    2
  10. The footage of landing on the moon wasnt done in a studio. The footage done with the ultraviolet telescope can be examined and it wasnt made on earth. That telescope didnt get positioned by robots.
    2
  11.  @justanotherguy469  : superbly interesting web site.
    2
  12. Yes, it appears that stars spit out planets that eventually become stars.
    2
  13. great.tx
    1
  14. At least youtube gave a notice of Encyclopedia Brittanica instead of that insidious garbage of wikipedia.
    1
  15. Billionaires have had thousands and thousands of opportunities to gift the world with universally appreciated boons. Yet their mind sets limit their heart set. Returns vision doesnt compute mere gratitude.
    1
  16. they better boost it. that thing was built by hard earned tax payer bucks.
    1
  17. The future people will look back on us and wonder at our utter stupidity. If we survive.
    1
  18. nuclear tests are proof that military and government people are basically retarded. no sane person trusts any of them.
    1
  19. Have you covered, or will you cover the MOL programme?
    1
  20. like the posts, but the background "music" is more than just a little annoying.
    1
  21. a twelve minute rebuttal is not going to be enough. Please put an hour into it. There is more to the science of why no stars than washout. Some believe atmosphere is needed to shift starlight from ultraviolet to visible range. Please find a witness of stars seen from the dark side of the moon.
    1
  22. I have a question for you that search engines seem unable to answer with regard to the largest cathode ray tube monitors used by NASA. The search engines keep returning data on a large TV set by Sony . . . What is the largest cathode ray tube used by NASA to display either data, radar or images from space missions? Even on Doctor Who we've seen CRTs shown that are evidently four by six feet relaying radar blips. There's no question they were glass. I saw several PDF files offered by NASA on CRTs, but I cannot access them currently using a limited memory hand held device. Thank you for your attention to my question.
    1
  23. Im always disappointed by the renditions of facial reconstructionists when it comes to ancient humanoids. It's always of a rather stupid looking brute. If I had a shot at it, I try ivory white skin, due to the possibility they lived when the skies were mostly overcast, whether by vulcanic activity or just a natural condition. As we know the moon didnt enter lore for quite some time. Rather than supposing it wasnt there, I presume it wasnt seen. And when it was first reported, it was noted as red or orange. Hence the pale skin. I'd give them bright, piercing eyes, signifying alertness and good vision as a requisite characteristic for survival and thriving. The hair could be any of the extant types from frizzy black to strawberry blond. Why not? Blue eyes are seen in all races, though rarer in some. Just saying.
    1
  24. So the stories we were told in the sixties of satellites photographing a license plate of resolving a dollar bill or a nickel even were all lies??? Why? why!!!?!!? . . . never mind. On a more serious note, please do one on the manned orbiting space spy ships.
    1
  25. I know it is a little off your primary focus, but it would be great if you could talk about the camera set ups for underground nuclear tests.
    1
  26. I notice one anomaly area lies roughly over the so-call zone of silence in Mexico, or The Mapimí Silent Zone, La Zona del Silencio.
    1
  27. How much power existed before there were atoms and junk? What time was that? And where?
    1
  28. Turned off the detectors eh? Voluntarily tuned them off... No explanation, just,, beep! Don't need em. No fun anymore. Buh bye
    1
  29. This is the only channel I dont have to maximise my phone volume to hear.
    1
  30. Do you know if any of the lunar missions included a stereo camera?
    1
  31. can you show more footage of the rover unfolding.
    1
  32. Image at 6:55 or 6:56 precisely is very interesting.
    1
  33. I have a question for you that search engines seem unable to answer with regard to cathode ray tube monitors used by NASA. They all revert to a large TV set by Sony. What is the largest cathode ray tube used by NASA to display either data or images from space missions? Even on Doctor Who we've seen CRTs shown that are evidently four by six feet relaying radar blips. There's no question they were glass. I saw several PDF files offered by NASA on CRTs, but I cannot access them currently using a limited memory hand held device. Thank you for your attention to my question.
    1
  34. Why are space cameras alway distortional? Pincushion or barrel lenses?
    1
  35. when did that camera stop working? does it work now?
    1
  36. hard to find anything more entertaining than to listen to flat earthers being confused by level flight of an airplane. "if it was flying straight, wouldnt it end up in space?" so, their doubts of moon landing, distant stars and gravity! no less, quite amusing.
    1
  37. you can still buy the fisher space pen. about $30 for a chrome model.
    1
  38. I wonder if you could do a video on JFK's Sept. 20, 1963 proposal of a joint US-Soviet manned mission to the moon. What became of it?
    1
  39.  @TheEvilmooseofdoom  : To each their own. Most stars are binary
    1
  40.  @zounds010  : You only know theory. There is no experimental basis for the nebular hypothesis.
    1
  41. astronomicalologicalityistness is more fitting, i think.
    1
  42. Alex Green: someone makes up a word and hopes it gains a foothold or get cache. It's a silly and unnecessary word.
    1
  43. easier?
    1