Comments by "Roger Scott Cathey" (@rogerscottcathey) on "Cool Worlds"
channel.
-
13
-
@denislemenoir : Talking about publishing, not operating equipment or treating people. smh. For example, there is an abundance of written articles in medicine that could pertain to treating this or any pandemic or other health threat. A goodly portion of that literature is closed to most the general public, or costs a pretty penny to purchase. Independent researchers, science writers, etc. No go. Who knows if we had 100 times as many people able to look at ivermectin usage and populations least affected by the pandemic, what connexions might have resulted sooner. Now it is taking the world by storm, a year later, but still studies are relatively few compared to what they might have been. Let's not forget, data going against mainstream pet hypotheses are also impetus to secrete or minimise pertinent data from general awareness. Closed guilds are protective of the guilds, not the generality.
2
-
1
-
There was a theory once that deemed all objects are merely coherent complexes of vibrations translating through relatively fixed oscillators. In other words, what makes a thing a thing, at most basic level, are oscillators fixed in space so that what vibrated as you a moment ago is not the same oscillators that vibrate as you now, and now, etc. I forget the obscure word that was invented for this theory, but it was devised by a German physicist in the late 19th century. Something of the kind is held by a branch of Shaivism and covered by the term "spanda". Making reality, essentially, a crystal lattice in which all this is "only vibration". It boggles the mind to conceive a lattice supporting so many directions, vectors, levels. Presumably the basic oscillator composing it is restricted to three dimensions of freedom. Is Aether easier to conceive? The concept evidently attributes mass as motion, ultimately in both theories.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1