Comments by "Roger Scott Cathey" (@rogerscottcathey) on "Lex Fridman" channel.

  1.  @ricodamore  : What did you do there, and did know Terrance Hodgins by chance?
    4
  2.  @missh1774  :😨
    2
  3.  @f.b.i.155  : "Us"? Who is "us"?
    2
  4.  @ricodamore  : I dont recall, but he said that driving out past check points entailed getting a geiger counter scan. He also mentioned working on image processing of footage taken with a special camera called a charge injection device or CID rather than CCD. That enabled capturing the frontal configuration of a beam of light, maybe of a laser. Long before the popular demonstrations you see of a beam through a coke bottle. While living there he also did some side line work in association with the guys who later became ILM. Lucas' tech group. Lazar never came up while I was associated with him, but I do recall he thought Tom Bearden was a fraud. Hodgins was a computer genius, had Sun computer processors lining his apartment. Developed a truly unique mandelbrot sequence not reproduced by anyone else. A bullseye that resolved into a figure eight ad infinitum. He had a ufo encounter with a friend in the desert and experienced something like a download of data, like a mandala. Both he and his friend were out on the deck of this place drinking beer, and saw a light approach. The friend freaked out after a beam hit them both and he ran inside. Terry however merely turned and while he did saw the aforesaid patterns and data, and the next thing he knew he was sitting in the den with his friend. They never discussed it. Not a word. He had a pretty high security classification. His dad was in the Air Force, but he took LANL rather than risk going to Nam.
    2
  5. Bully pulpit, eh David?
    1
  6. All pharmacology in the large mega corporation tier of things are recipients of a philosophy adopted by Rockefeller and incorporated into medical education endowed and basically owned by Rockefeller. Following the guidelines provided by Ivy Ledbetter Lee, all contrary modes of thought by healers and nutritionists were nominalized and given the label "quackery", and eventually prosecuted by medical licensing boards, also set up by those trained in the Standard Oil modus operandi of dealing with anyone hurting their profits. It was never, and is not now, about good science versus pseudoscience. It is profitable versus competition. Rockefeller's motto was: competition is a sin. This systematic co-opting of medical education and hospitalism required attempts at monopoly and the second best thing, cartelization. AMA, FDA, NIH, CDC, WHO, members all sitting on boards of big pharma corps., even of competitors, like the mafioso dividing up territories to minimize friction so they could all enjoy profiting on the common person's needs. And that was a key doctrine they need to install in the minds from the earliest age, that they need hospitalists, druggists and drugs to be whole. The biggest lie had to be engrained at the earliest inception of thinking. Blended into the background, other issues are promoted: best insurance, co-pays, which drug, but never no drug at all. Read A World without Cancer by G. Edward Griffin for a primmer on this insidious chapter of medical science, which isn't even true science. The cure for all cancers and infections both have been understood well enough since 1910 to eliminate this false dependency on corporate medicine, but that knowledge has been castigated and erased several times. Fortunately, the castigations themselves preserved the information so that it is recoverable. The greatest laboratory in the world is the human form itself. And it's strength is entirely dependent on nutrition. There has never been a drug deficiency disease. Not one chronic, metabolic disease has ever been resolved by anything but factors normal to the animal economy: air, water, good nutrition, etc. And populations fully satisfying these criteria also exposed to otherwise lethal viruses, never experiencing such mortality: they are the ones to study.
    1
  7. Dr. Dowdye would not agree.
    1
  8. Very nice. My method of ranking of intelligence of physicists is directly in proportion to their usage of five or six terms as tenets or topics in which they vouchsafe belief: big bang, black holes, gaseous stars, dark matter, dark energy and universality of Kirchhoff's "law". Since these are all specious, based on hypothesis only, they are beliefs only, and not truly based on experiment or established scientific facts. As a careful physicist would not venture them as a means of obtaining probity for other things he may feel as viable or believable or proffer as worthy of investigation, it is better to leave such numinous areas out of conversation. Otherwise, going by popular opinion of the numerous other physicists who wholeheartedly endorse those factors as established, anyone claiming physicist as his trade, has merely established his opinion as the subject of majority rule rather than proven fact. Facts are not candidates for election, they are compulsory realities established by strict tests. Eliminating the impossible, accepting the reality, however improbable. But those six terms belong in the former. Not the latter. And the Achilles heel of them all is with Kirchhoff.
    1
  9. Adair doesnt do interviews that might discredit his story. Nobody can confirm any of his claims beyond his garage rocket stories.
    1
  10.  @ricodamore  : He did have a website for a while. Theorangepapers which was a vast collection of his research on AA and how it was basically a religion. I think it is mirrored somewhere, but after he moved I lost contact.
    1
  11.  @ricodamore  : Actually, I met him in '95 or so, and he had left some time before, so you wouldnt have met.
    1