Youtube comments of Roger Scott Cathey (@rogerscottcathey).

  1. 1800
  2. 371
  3. 330
  4. 327
  5. 284
  6. 224
  7. 189
  8. 185
  9. 164
  10. 152
  11. 143
  12. 139
  13. 138
  14. 109
  15. 105
  16. 82
  17. 82
  18. 81
  19. 77
  20. 72
  21. 70
  22. 64
  23. 63
  24. 57
  25. 57
  26. 55
  27. 53
  28. 53
  29. 53
  30. 52
  31. 51
  32. 51
  33. 51
  34. 50
  35. 48
  36. 48
  37. 48
  38. 48
  39. 45
  40. 45
  41. 45
  42. 45
  43. 44
  44. 43
  45. 41
  46. 40
  47. 40
  48. 39
  49. 39
  50. 38
  51. 37
  52. I believe there are options for prevention and treatment that entail two possible approaches: We know the primary avenue of attack are the lungs, and once in, they attach by means of the spicules or "spikes". Their primary target or "receptor" are the ACE-2 or angiotensin-converting enzymes, same  as that of SARS-CoV, on the epithelial cells of the lungs.  Right there is one strategy for a form of intervention using nebulized or detached bonding receptors, akin to chelators or in fact serpins, serine protease inhibitors. Beside Remdesivir, Pyridone type, and specifically an alpha-ketomide inhibiting compound "13b" will likely emerge as promising along these lines within the body. This compound disables the sars-cov-2 cleavage enzyme on the attachment spikes (TMPRSS2 transmembrane serine protease). Since this is a papain-like enzyme, the inhibitor will not affect the human serine enzymes, like trypsin, amylase, etc. It could be used externally as well to attach aerosolized virii and they'll be inactivated even if they are inhaled. Paper on Alpha-ketomide inhibitor Compound 13b: Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease provides a basis for design of improved α-ketoamide inhibitors Linlin Zhang Daizong Lin Xinyuanyuan Sun Ute Curth4, et als. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/03/20/science.abb3405.full ------- Another approach is in terms of direct digestion of the virus by hydrolases like amylase, trypsin,  chymotrypsin, carboxypetidase, lipase and most importantly RNAase. Intramuscular injections of amylase and trypsin were proven to resolve malaria very effectively by Lambelle in the early part of the 20th c. The ratio of amylase to trypsin was 2:1, and was well tolerated. His paper is available as a link below.  While malaria is not a virus, the process of infectant inhibition of native enzymes taxing the whole system is akin and the strategy of bolstering it is rational. Futhermore the glycoprotein of the viral spike is very susceptible to degradation by amylase which enables full access of the pancreatic proteases or their serum analogs. It is worthwhile to also research the potential of external nebulized colloidal silver in air systems and bound to fiber masks, as an effective means of external denaturing the virus. As for inhaled nebulized colloidals, I am aware of only one article on an inhalant or in nebulized form: Journal of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine: Viral Pathogens and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Oligodynamic Ag+ for Direct Immune Intervention Eric Rentz Do Comm Cnmo https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13590840310001594061 ---- For structure of viral components, also see: Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein Authors: Alexandra C.Walls David Veesler https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420302622 ---- A transcription I did of Dr. Lambelle's paper on malaria treatment using amylase and trypsin is available at a mirror of my old website: https://robertcathey.wordpress.com/the-utility-of-enzymes-in-malaria-by-f-w-lamballe-m-b-major-royal-army-medical-corps/ Lambelle, F. W. (1913). Journ. R.A.M.C., Vol. XXI, p. 660. John Beard's letter to Nature re Dr. Lambelle's work. (The transcriptionist at Nature misspelled Lambelle as "Lamballe".) https://www.nature.com/articles/092060c0 (edit 4/9/2020)
    35
  53. 33
  54. 33
  55. 32
  56. 32
  57. 31
  58. 31
  59. 30
  60. 30
  61. 29
  62. 29
  63. 29
  64. 28
  65. 27
  66. 27
  67. 27
  68. 27
  69. 26
  70. 26
  71. 25
  72. 25
  73. 25
  74. 25
  75. 25
  76. 25
  77. 24
  78. 24
  79. 24
  80. 23
  81. 22
  82. 22
  83. 22
  84. 22
  85. 21
  86. 21
  87. 21
  88. 21
  89. 21
  90. 21
  91. 21
  92. 21
  93. 20
  94. 20
  95. 20
  96. 20
  97. 19
  98. 19
  99. 19
  100. 19
  101. 18
  102. 18
  103. 18
  104. 18
  105. 18
  106. 18
  107. 18
  108. 17
  109. 17
  110. 17
  111. 17
  112. 17
  113. 17
  114. 17
  115. 17
  116. 17
  117. 17
  118. 16
  119. 16
  120. 16
  121. 16
  122. 16
  123. 16
  124. 15
  125. 15
  126. 15
  127. 15
  128. 15
  129. 14
  130. 14
  131. 14
  132. 14
  133. 14
  134. 14
  135. 14
  136. 14
  137. 14
  138. 14
  139. 14
  140. 14
  141. 13
  142. 13
  143. 13
  144. 13
  145. 13
  146. 13
  147. 13
  148. 13
  149. 13
  150. 13
  151. 13
  152. 13
  153. 13
  154. 13
  155. 12
  156. 12
  157. 12
  158. 12
  159. 12
  160. 12
  161. 12
  162. 12
  163. 12
  164. 12
  165. 12
  166. 12
  167. 12
  168. 11
  169. 11
  170. 11
  171. 11
  172. 11
  173. 11
  174. 11
  175. 11
  176. 11
  177. 11
  178. 11
  179. 10
  180. 10
  181. 10
  182. 10
  183. 10
  184. 10
  185. 10
  186. 10
  187. 10
  188. 10
  189. 10
  190. The current lockdowns and compulsory masking are not based on science.  Even the term "social distancing" is not science terminology, it is psy-op terminology. Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation and ostracization, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically loaded and tactical term. The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. Serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile, i.e. un-sterile, OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. (links below). Still, an obviously problematic area for controlled study. We dont need any vaccine for this politically exacerbated and stimulated scourge anyway. The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease. I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine. Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak.  Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 outbreak in the rest home. As a result of their use of Ivermectin, No resident became seriously ill. And yet! the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! All residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived. The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine. Dr. Hibberd: https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA Re: Mask, respirators, etc. Shows how equivocal the evidence is. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/ Another link resource  pointed to more for article links than over-all opinion. One must know the range of data and draw personal opinion. It is quite obvious home made cloth masks are merely appearances, need to be washed daily at least, optimally several times a day. https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy Mask redux 3: I have expanded links below in my comment for further scholarly articles. I have pointed out science literature to show, just as Fauci showed by his initial position, there is scientific uncertainty regarding this issue. If you read the following papers, you'll realize that studies and articles are plentiful. Mask wearing is not on the same level of science as sterile hand contact with internals, as in a delivery, a laparotomy or even excision of a mole. Laymen can be forgiven for ignorance of this topic and this issue, but scientists should know better. The public servants have chosen to ignore it evidently out of liability concerns more than anything else. Only it may actually do the reverse of what they expect. As for why masks are still worn in surgeries: liability issues, whether or not the operating room, instruments or personnel had anything to do with a post-op infection, the effectiveness or not of masks is irrelevant, but exists as a weak point in a defense against a tort. Here is a relevant quote: "Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/ Well other more rigorous studies were done. The Studies of Surgical Mask Efficacy -- Arthur Firstenberg http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739:BlogPost:2035264 https://muchadoaboutcorona.ca/face-masks-cause-wound-infection/ The following provide links to download pdfs of articles, no fee. Neil W.M. Orr, Six month study of maskless surgery https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/ PubMed Orr article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19310816/ Goggles more important than masks https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964349/ Springer open source article on mask study -- Tunevall https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736 Most medical journals now provide scholarly articles relating to covid free of charge at the present time. We conceived a simple way to dispense with the issue by operating with an air hose over the back through silver ion sterilizing filters, an adaptation of the solution C.L. Kervran developed for reducing carbon monoxide poisoning to welders by breathing heated air while annealing iron plates. As to double blind, placebo controlled studies, this is not needed with Ivermectin, with a proven history of effectiveness, known LD50s, optimal dosages, etc. To say nothing of the immorality of such time wasting efforts.  Dr. Borody compares that to the ridiculousness of such study on parachutes. Dead weight studies were sufficient to prove efficacy. First human tests were always done with safety protocols, over water, nets, etc. None were done for some jumping with, some jumping without parachutes or different parachutes. Linear comparatives or longitudinal studies were done of course, and improvements adopted. Regarding Ivermectin Prophylaxis, i.e. preventive efficacy: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04422561 White Board Channel re above study: https://youtu.be/TmzvDa9Un44 https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteboardDoctor Dr. Borody re: controlled study of Ivermectin: https://youtu.be/POfIMGS2D6A The British Medical Journal on Randomized, controlled study of Parachutes to prevent death and injury. Seriously, not an April 1st release! https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094
    10
  191. 10
  192. 10
  193. 10
  194. 10
  195. 9
  196. 9
  197. 9
  198. 9
  199. 9
  200.  @jimmorrison4163  : The current lockdowns and compulsory masking are not based on science.  Even the term "social distancing" is not science terminology, it is psy-op terminology. Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation and ostracization, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically loaded and tactical term. The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. Serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile, i.e. un-sterile, OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. (links below). Still, an obviously problematic area for controlled study. We dont need any vaccine for this politically exacerbated and stimulated scourge anyway. The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease. I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine. Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak.  Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 outbreak in the rest home. As a result of their use of Ivermectin, No resident became seriously ill. And yet! the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! All residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived. The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine. Dr. Hibberd: https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA Re: Mask, respirators, etc. Shows how equivocal the evidence is. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/ Another link resource  pointed to more for article links than over-all opinion. One must know the range of data and draw personal opinion. It is quite obvious home made cloth masks are merely appearances, need to be washed daily at least, optimally several times a day. https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy Mask redux 3: I have expanded links below in my comment for further scholarly articles. I have pointed out science literature to show, just as Fauci showed by his initial position, there is scientific uncertainty regarding this issue. If you read the following papers, you'll realize that studies and articles are plentiful. Mask wearing is not on the same level of science as sterile hand contact with internals, as in a delivery, a laparotomy or even excision of a mole. Laymen can be forgiven for ignorance of this topic and this issue, but scientists should know better. The public servants have chosen to ignore it evidently out of liability concerns more than anything else. Only it may actually do the reverse of what they expect. As for why masks are still worn in surgeries: liability issues, whether or not the operating room, instruments or personnel had anything to do with a post-op infection, the effectiveness or not of masks is irrelevant, but exists as a weak point in a defense against a tort. Here is a relevant quote: "Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/ Well other more rigorous studies were done. The Studies of Surgical Mask Efficacy -- Arthur Firstenberg http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739:BlogPost:2035264 https://muchadoaboutcorona.ca/face-masks-cause-wound-infection/ The following provide links to download pdfs of articles, no fee. Neil W.M. Orr, Six month study of maskless surgery https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/ PubMed Orr article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19310816/ Goggles more important than masks https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964349/ Springer open source article on mask study -- Tunevall https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736 Most medical journals now provide scholarly articles relating to covid free of charge at the present time. We conceived a simple way to dispense with the issue by operating with an air hose over the back through silver ion sterilizing filters, an adaptation of the solution C.L. Kervran developed for reducing carbon monoxide poisoning to welders by breathing heated air while annealing iron plates. As to double blind, placebo controlled studies, this is not needed with Ivermectin, with a proven history of effectiveness, known LD50s, optimal dosages, etc. To say nothing of the immorality of such time wasting efforts.  Dr. Borody compares that to the ridiculousness of such study on parachutes. Dead weight studies were sufficient to prove efficacy. First human tests were always done with safety protocols, over water, nets, etc. None were done for some jumping with, some jumping without parachutes or different parachutes. Linear comparatives or longitudinal studies were done of course, and improvements adopted. Regarding Ivermectin Prophylaxis, i.e. preventive efficacy: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04422561 White Board Channel re above study: https://youtu.be/TmzvDa9Un44 https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteboardDoctor Dr. Borody re: controlled study of Ivermectin: https://youtu.be/POfIMGS2D6A The British Medical Journal on Randomized, controlled study of Parachutes to prevent death and injury. Seriously, not an April 1st release! https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094
    9
  201. 9
  202. 9
  203. 9
  204. 9
  205. 9
  206. 9
  207. 9
  208. 9
  209. 9
  210. 9
  211. 9
  212. 9
  213. 9
  214. 9
  215. 9
  216. 9
  217. 9
  218. 9
  219. 9
  220. 9
  221. 9
  222. 9
  223. 9
  224. 9
  225. 9
  226. 8
  227. 8
  228. 8
  229. 8
  230. 8
  231. 8
  232. 8
  233. 8
  234. 8
  235. 8
  236. 8
  237. 8
  238. 8
  239. 8
  240. 8
  241. 8
  242. 8
  243. 8
  244. 8
  245. 8
  246. 8
  247. 8
  248. 8
  249. 8
  250. 8
  251. 8
  252. 8
  253. 8
  254. 7
  255. 7
  256. 7
  257. 7
  258. 7
  259. 7
  260. 7
  261. 7
  262. 7
  263. 7
  264. 7
  265. 7
  266. 7
  267. 7
  268. 7
  269. 7
  270. 7
  271. 7
  272. 7
  273. 7
  274. 7
  275. 7
  276. 7
  277. 7
  278. 7
  279. 7
  280. 7
  281. 7
  282. 7
  283. 7
  284. 7
  285. 7
  286. 7
  287. 7
  288. 7
  289. 7
  290. 7
  291. 7
  292. 6
  293. 6
  294. 6
  295. 6
  296. 6
  297. 6
  298. 6
  299. 6
  300. 6
  301. 6
  302. 6
  303. 6
  304. 6
  305. 6
  306. 6
  307. 6
  308. 6
  309. 6
  310. 6
  311. 6
  312. 6
  313. 6
  314. 6
  315. 6
  316. 6
  317. 6
  318. 6
  319. 6
  320. 6
  321. 6
  322. 6
  323. 6
  324. 6
  325. 6
  326. 6
  327. 6
  328. 6
  329. 6
  330. 6
  331. 6
  332. 6
  333. 6
  334. 6
  335. 6
  336. 5
  337. 5
  338. 5
  339. 5
  340. 5
  341. 5
  342. 5
  343. 5
  344. 5
  345. 5
  346. 5
  347. 5
  348. 5
  349. 5
  350. 5
  351. 5
  352. 5
  353. 5
  354. 5
  355. 5
  356. 5
  357. 5
  358. 5
  359. 5
  360. 5
  361. 5
  362. 5
  363. 5
  364. 5
  365. 5
  366. 5
  367. 5
  368. 5
  369. 5
  370. 5
  371. 5
  372. 5
  373. 5
  374. 5
  375. 5
  376. 5
  377. 5
  378. 5
  379. 5
  380. 5
  381. 5
  382. 5
  383. 5
  384. 5
  385. 5
  386. 5
  387. 5
  388. 5
  389. 5
  390. 5
  391.  @sueyoung2115  : At the risk of harping, I'll add a comment to the news release yesterday by the President. The President had to take the position he did regarding the vaccines, but it is a political sop, to appease the maniacal, dogma ridden, hypnotized press and so-called "health authorities", who have brow beat and cowered anyone with questions as to the probity of their approach, the way they calculate statistics or interpret their testing methodology. We have seen big and small pharma rushing towards bankruptcy since 2008 according to my research terms. This pandemic is seen as a life saver to pfizer, moderna and other vaccination pushers. The big snag for them now is the fantastic success of combination and nutritional component therapies like Borody's ivermectin, zinc, doxycycline, vit. D and C. These protocols will see big pharma either changing their tactics or going bankrupt as well. https://biopharmguy.com/links/company-by-name-defunct.php The results thus far show conclusively that IVM outperforms all other non-vaccine therapies hands down. This video from White Board Doctor, (WBDR) a resident physician, details IVM studies to date. You can update your IVM data pretty well via his channel and Trial Site News as well. WBDR https://youtu.be/C0pCz3NrlBc https://youtu.be/2LjIMX_qwZ0 Covexit News: https://youtu.be/6R-FtOK7JKo Trial Site News on Israel ivermectin study: https://youtu.be/rrlS1Mt8rQ8 Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA And the most convincing fact, an entire nursing home saved by ivermectin alone. https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Author contact: https://m.facebook.com/rogerscottcatheyii reply here to request email.
    5
  392. 5
  393. 5
  394. 5
  395. 5
  396. 5
  397. 5
  398. 5
  399. 5
  400. 5
  401. 5
  402. 5
  403. 5
  404. 5
  405. 5
  406. 5
  407. 5
  408. 5
  409. 5
  410. 5
  411. 5
  412. 5
  413. 5
  414. 5
  415. 4
  416. 4
  417. 4
  418. 4
  419. 4
  420. 4
  421. 4
  422. 4
  423. 4
  424. 4
  425. 4
  426. 4
  427. 4
  428. 4
  429. 4
  430. 4
  431. 4
  432. 4
  433. 4
  434. 4
  435. 4
  436. 4
  437. 4
  438. 4
  439. 4
  440. 4
  441. 4
  442. 4
  443. 4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. 4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. 4
  450. 4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 4
  468. 4
  469. 4
  470. 4
  471. 4
  472. 4
  473. 4
  474. 4
  475. 4
  476. 4
  477. 4
  478. 4
  479. 4
  480. 4
  481. 4
  482. 4
  483. 4
  484. 4
  485. 4
  486. 4
  487. 4
  488. 4
  489. 4
  490. 4
  491. 4
  492. 4
  493. 4
  494. 4
  495. 4
  496. 4
  497. 4
  498. 4
  499. 4
  500. 4
  501. 4
  502. 4
  503. 4
  504. 4
  505. 4
  506. 4
  507. 4
  508. 4
  509. 4
  510. 4
  511. 4
  512. 4
  513. 4
  514. 4
  515. 4
  516. 4
  517. How can Biden feel safe once Americans get it they've been had? lol It is no longer just an inkling of many that these baddies are appointed, not elected. It would appear it has become a genuine and general near certainty in people's minds, their vote has not really counted for perhaps 60 years. Certainty, for some, that many never won an honest election except by Tom Foolery. They feel e.g. Old horn tootin' billy C didnt, "dubbya" didnt, barry - I'm no muslim I'm a marxist - didnt . . and after this year that maybe they were indeed "appointed" by a cabal. When Trump came along, this elite cabal evidently thought, no sweat, no need to cheat for their chosen one, hilary -throw all dead beat dads in jail - rodham . . . but! He won! Gasp! Yes! Trump slipped by their "cleverer" anointed! From that minute on, it was high gear for 2020. They tried to characterize him just a clown. A damn popular clown, a lucky clown. He may be turning into their nightmare "clown." Especially now. China might be right after all. The virus could very well have originated in some remote lab in the States and was dropped in someone's tea cup in Hubei or Wuhan. Maybe from some covert lab in Montana even. But nobody's seriously snooping around there trying to find out. Let's just say that would have been a good plot for a Crichton or Cook novel. What cannot be denied is, the pandemic was a boon for the plotter's onslaught. Nothing in the President's actual record earns a vote of no confidence by Americans. It is all manufactured negative perception, fashioned by a bought and owned press, media, big tech and even pols. And it doesnt hurt to have backing of the slave money of ccp. Now there is the supposed non-fake news out of Australia saying a "complete list" of names of commie insurgents and operatives around the world, and in U.S. -- in Companies, Perhaps Consulates, Departments, Government at all levels -- was leaked. I dont believe anything at first blush. Could be another possible distraction. It may not be. I investigate. I know about "active measures," innovated by Americans and perfected by Soviets, and handed down to the Ccp:  Keep people distracted, doubtful, double-minded, divided, half-truthed, demoralized, fighting with or against each other. Then conquer them. Take it all, if you can. This would be impossible by a foreign power over America. But not for the slick American cartel, founded by Rockefeller and others -- actual globalists.  Because JDR, the first psych out master of recent times learned from his PR guy, Ivy Ledbetter Lee, the best cover.  John - Here's a dime for you sonny - D. - who never saw a profit he wouldnt kill for - "Competition is a sin" - Rockefeller. Ivy Ledbetter Lee learned the Soviets too. For those he and JDR mentored, taking it all is an attainable goal they salivate for, the ravenous foxes that they are. Rarely mentioned by name, not famous, the real snakes in the grass mostly dont advertise. Red Pill University goes into this very deeply. G. Edward Griffin. His interview with Bezmenov on active measures delineates how this process progresses and the means of frustrating them, embodied by Reagan and now Trump. JFK started to, and might have, were he more moral and focused, but the same cabal that killed him off, are behind pelosi and schumer and snortin' joe. G. Edward Griffin, I love that guy. Internationalist bankers are master leveragers. American globalists the most powerful, but the most vulnerable. Because they're surrounded by the deadliest enemy of all. Honest Americans. In this case cheating and conspiracy cannot be denied. Chinese collusion, insurgency and American betrayal by Americans, are both true. But the deniers out themselves. The strategy against the swamp creatures was very expertly thought out. The core strength in America's behalf is standard U.S. Military training: Be Prepared. Personal, first hand investigation is the only way truth is discerned. Sifted from chaff. Then the written word is, and word of mouth are the most potent of weapons from the hand and lips of an informed, enlightened investigator.  A sleuth, basically. In simple, plain English. Based on full truth, not half or three quarter "truths". Which is why calm, patient, scientific method, methods of intelligence, are the surest leverage to pry out the ugly facts and establish the liberating beauteous truth. As Conan Doyle said, via Sherlock Holmes, "Eliminate the impossible, and whatever remains, however improbable, must be true. https://amp.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/chinese-communist-party-ghosts-in-the-global-machine/news-story/d4c2af18e984c43a025486159043e873 Sky News re Ccp data base leak: https://youtu.be/OZLY-h3kGJM https://nypost.com/2020/12/13/us-companies-riddled-with-members-of-chinese-communist-party/ https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/news/a-data-leak-shows-that-over-two-million-chinese-communist-party-members-were-secretly-embedded-in-organizations-around-the-world/articleshow/79720017.cms Ivy Lee kindly overview -- still selling a bill of goods https://www.nku.edu/~turney/prclass/readings/3eras2x.html https://timeline.com/rockefellers-hired-militias-to-shoot-at-strikers-in-ludlow-massacre-115ae488164c A virtual time-line slide show re Ivy Lee https://www.sutori.com/story/copy-of-ivy-lee-father-of-public-relations-timeline--zBCTE58Q7MjSgvUASP1MR4Ki Seitel on Ivy Ledbetter Lee https://youtu.be/gAIumVbCAdM On Ida Tarbell, Muckraker of J.D. Rockefeller https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-woman-who-took-on-the-tycoon-651396/ G. Edward Griffin A World Without Cancer https://realityzone.com/product/world-without-cancer-book/ World Without Cancer Video: https://youtu.be/ZLSLh8Qw4T0 G. Edward Griffin, the Rockefeller-Carnegie collusion with Big Pharma to promote the I.G. Farben Cartel model of medical education https://youtu.be/L9P07Jswxmc G. Edward Griffin interview with ex-Soviet KGB Agent on Active Measures, and methods of demoralization Yuri Bezmenov https://youtu.be/iBRTHSQ2E-o
    4
  518. 4
  519. 4
  520. 4
  521. 4
  522. 4
  523. 4
  524. 4
  525. 4
  526. 4
  527. 4
  528. 4
  529. 4
  530. 4
  531. 4
  532. 4
  533. 4
  534. 4
  535. 4
  536. 3
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543. 3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. 3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. 3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 3
  555. 3
  556. 3
  557. 3
  558. 3
  559. 3
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. 3
  563. @William Verhoef  : Your Ultra -conservative approach might pass muster for any regular year and has been used over and over by apologists for the cut, burn and poison policy in cancer for decades, even after many devastating analyses by multiple doctors and statisticians over the years since Nixon's "declaration" of "the war on cancer".  Nevertheless their approach has killed thousands and thousands more people than it has ever saved from cancer. It has been a free-for-all of human vivisection. Your approach, what you are arguing, is that it is better to let thousands suffocate from cytokine storms than prophylactically utilize a drug whose estimated Human Equivalent Lethal Dose is 8mg/kg. No one is ever dosed prophylactically more than little as 200 MICROGRAMS/Kg, and as much as 300, 400, and 800 mcg/kg have been seen, orally, and little more than annoyance factors. The so-called LD cases attributed to IVM, 4, all had comorbidities. That is out of 3+ BILLION users. You really have not studied this. I am not answering you so much as I sense you are obstinately and willfully ignorant and trying to discourage readers from taking the I-MASK and Madagascar and other protocols that work seriously. We know Taiwan is utilizing it, as they were among the earliest to recognise the significance if the MONASH institute study. They consulted with Dr. Borody and others and that was in May. Madagascar implemented it in April. We have all their data, though Taiwan is very tight lipped, the Madagascar data is all out there. Dr. Borody, Dr. Abreu and Dr. Marik and others go over all your objections, which is how I know you are not serious in your refutation attempts, or you would save your breath. I dont know what your game is, but it is a waste of my valuable time attempting to convince you to question your own evident certainty that you know better by shallow research than doctors devoting their lives to saving lives. I am looking forward to your spending time to bring back to this arena at least an informed opinion and yet, the objections as yet are meritless. >>> The multitargeted drug ivermectin: from an antiparasitic agent to a repositioned cancer drug Mandy Juarez, Alejandro Schcolnik-Cabrera, and Alfonso Dueñas-Gonzalez <<< https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835698/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259386216_Rethinking_the_war_on_cancer https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/sorry-but-so-far-war-on-cancer-has-been-a-bust/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/cancer-medicine-is-failing-us/ https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04425863 IVM LD, rats: 50 mg/kg IVM LD, HED: 8 mg/kg That dose is actually estimated, not proven. Naturally. https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00602 https://www.controlsolutionsinc.com/news/what-you-need-to-know-about-toxicity-ratings/ "Let’s look at some specific examples: "The LD50 value for common table salt is approximately 3000 mg/kg when administered orally. In comparison, the LD50 value for aspirin is 200 mg/kg when administered orally. "So, which common household substance, salt or aspirin, is more toxic? "In this case, aspirin is much more toxic than salt. In fact, the LD50 for aspirin is 10 times lower than standard table salt and therefore considerably more toxic of a substance." The multitargeted drug ivermectin: from an antiparasitic agent to a repositioned cancer drug Mandy Juarez, Alejandro Schcolnik-Cabrera, and Alfonso Dueñas-Gonzalez https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5835698/ 🔔🔔🔔🔔🔔🔔 Taiwanese, Australian scientists join forces to test Ivermectin to fight coronavirus Taiwanese, Australian researchers to study effectiveness of Ivermectin against Wuhan coronavirus By Keoni Everington, Taiwan News, Staff Writer >>>2020/05/15 11:56<<< https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3934401
    3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576. 3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. Eddie: Trump is doing exactly that. Johnson didnt, Nixon didnt, Carter didnt, Reagan didnt, neither Bush did, Clinton and Obama sure as hell didnt. Trump is labeled Republican, but he is no typical Republican. I wouldnt have voted for him if he had been. I was a registered democrat from 1976 until after Obama, and registered Independent. I do my research. I see the things he actually does, what he has done in these past three plus years which the media giants to a man have ignored or relegated to a footnote or buried 12 pages deep in the paper, like his peace brokering, his success with Sudan for example, which would have gotten any other President front page coverage or prime time leading mention. But no, the media have colluded to promulgate disrespect, magnify peccadillos like his tweeting, etc. and those things lead. Obvious b.s. When I saw that,I thought, what is going on there. Because before, I pretty much ignored it all, and held Washington and politics in contempt and derision. So thanks to that blatant bias, I looked deeper and did research to find out what was going on. Actually going on. This fellow is a genius, he has his quirks like all geniuses have, and there is even a certain naïveté he has, but is the kind you want in a good person. He relies on his advisors for science. Unfortunately his medical science advisor was an utter idiot. By March the world should already have known about Ivermectin, zinc, vit. D, doxycycline and the utter sham that was WHO, Fauci, and that snake pit pharma drug pusher Gilead who intentionally screwed up the HCQ study. Trump should have paid Dr. Thomas Borody or Dr. Zelenko or the husband wife team the Dr.s Rajter for his advisors. Both have had 100% success treating corona viral infection in early stages and both their protocols are preventative. Trump is doing good. No question.
    3
  581. 3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. 3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 3
  606. 3
  607. 3
  608. 3
  609. 3
  610. 3
  611. 3
  612. 3
  613. 3
  614. 3
  615. 3
  616. 3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 3
  620. 3
  621. 3
  622. 3
  623. 3
  624. 3
  625. 3
  626. 3
  627. 3
  628. 3
  629. 3
  630. 3
  631. 3
  632. 3
  633. 3
  634. 3
  635. 3
  636. 3
  637. 3
  638. 3
  639. 3
  640. 3
  641. 3
  642. 3
  643. 3
  644. 3
  645. 3
  646. 3
  647. 3
  648. 3
  649. 3
  650. 3
  651. 3
  652. 3
  653. 3
  654. 3
  655. 3
  656. 3
  657. 3
  658. 3
  659. 3
  660. 3
  661. 3
  662. 3
  663. 3
  664. 3
  665. 3
  666. 3
  667. 3
  668. 3
  669. 3
  670. 3
  671. 3
  672. 3
  673. 3
  674. 3
  675. 3
  676. 3
  677. 3
  678. 3
  679. 3
  680. 3
  681. 3
  682. 3
  683. 3
  684. 3
  685. 3
  686. 3
  687. 3
  688. 3
  689. 3
  690. 3
  691. 3
  692. 3
  693. 3
  694. 3
  695. 3
  696. 3
  697. 3
  698. 3
  699. 3
  700. 3
  701. 3
  702. 3
  703. 3
  704. 3
  705. 3
  706. 3
  707. 3
  708. 3
  709. 3
  710. 3
  711. 3
  712. 3
  713. 3
  714. 3
  715. 3
  716. 3
  717. 3
  718. 3
  719. 3
  720. 3
  721. 3
  722. 3
  723. 3
  724. 3
  725. 3
  726. 3
  727. 3
  728. 3
  729. 3
  730. 3
  731. 3
  732. 3
  733. 3
  734. 3
  735. 3
  736. 3
  737. 3
  738. Covering this NYT? You were notified months ago, before the press conference. You didnt attend. Why not? At the FLCCC Alliance press conference in Houston, Texas on Friday, December 4, 2020, at 10:30 am (CST), critical care doctors stated that IVERMECTIN  prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 WILL IMMEDIATELY alter the trajectory of the sars-coV-2 pandemic. They already informed all relevant experts and agencies of their findings months ago and received NO RESPONSE. They urged policymakers to finally take action. All the relevant evidence and needed steps to take can be found on their website linked below. https://covid19criticalcare.com/ Trial Site News video of press conference. https://youtu.be/4V3yxrJwJQs Ivermectin is a very old drug that has been distributed for free by Merck to millions of people in Africa and Asia suffering from sever epidemics of parasitical diseases like River Blindness disease. Dr. Thomas Borody developed the most successful combination therapy using Ivermectin, Zinc and Doxycycline to reverse covid symptoms from mild to severe. Ivermectin costs pennies compared to other drugs. It can be prescribed anywhere in the US right now. Be sure to watch the press release by the FLCCC Dr.s and they lay out all the steps. We can stop the lock downs in weeks to a month if everyone steps up to help urge this and knock it into the heads of governors and health authorities they are being remiss in their duties. Dr. Borody on Ivermectin combination therapy: https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA
    3
  739. 3
  740. 3
  741. 3
  742. 3
  743. 3
  744. 3
  745. 3
  746. 3
  747. 3
  748. 3
  749. 3
  750. 3
  751. 3
  752. 3
  753. 3
  754. 3
  755. 3
  756. 3
  757. 3
  758. 3
  759. 3
  760. 3
  761. 3
  762. 3
  763. 3
  764. 3
  765. 3
  766. 3
  767. 3
  768. 3
  769. 3
  770. 3
  771. 3
  772. 3
  773. 3
  774. 3
  775. 3
  776. 3
  777. 3
  778. 3
  779. 3
  780. 3
  781. 3
  782. 3
  783. 3
  784. 3
  785. 3
  786. 3
  787. 3
  788. 3
  789. 3
  790. 3
  791. 3
  792. 3
  793. 3
  794. 3
  795. 2
  796. 2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. 2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. 2
  814. 2
  815. 2
  816. 2
  817. 2
  818. 2
  819. 2
  820. 2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. 2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. 2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. Lockdowns are anti-science put forth as science in politics. Every part of it loads every state word on epidemic with political importance first, science fact last if at all. Take "social distancing." A normal, educated person would naturally assume one meant isolation or even ostracizing. Snubbing. Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically tactical term. The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. I mean serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. We dont need any vaccine for this politically exacerbated and stimulated scourge anyway. The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease. I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine. Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak:  because Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 showing up in the rest home! No resident became seriously ill. And yet the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! And all residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived. The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine. Dr. Hibberd: https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA
    2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. 2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. 2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically loaded and tactical term. The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. I mean serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. We dont need any vaccine for this politically exacerbated and stimulated scourge anyway. The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease. I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine. Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak:  because Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 showing up in the rest home! No resident became seriously ill. And yet the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! And all residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived. The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine. Dr. Hibberd: https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA
    2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. People dont know the origin or meaning of fascism. The better term is gentilism, after Giovanni Gentile, the father of the philosophy of "fasces". The fasces is a Roman symbol of a bundle of sticks bound around the battle axe or so-called ceremonial axe. A symbol once portrayed on the back of the U.S. Dime, and rightfully disdained by wiser heads over at the mint. There is a difference from the Musketeer motto of All for One, One for All however imbedded in the fasces concept: violence. Communism, marxism and fascism all employ the misleading idea of unity as a strength while employing that strength against those who subscribe to their rule. Dissent is not allowed in their meaning of unity. Violence is employed to insure adherence to what basically falls into a system run by elites. The insider deciders. These systems employ the term "social" and "socialism" as a buffer to what they actually mean: iron handed rule over a powerless constituency. War against the populace first, then the world. Take Chile. The protests there were sparked, they say, by a four cent rise in bus fare. From ~$1.12 to $1.16. Global says it was the "last straw". Doubtful. It was spurred and aggravated by the marxist/communist insurgents in Chile.  They are not protesting about anything of principle. The disruptions are for the purpose of instigating national forces to restrain it and then induce a nationwide revolt with communist take over as the end aim.  The instigators are provocateurs. Saboteurs, they start things then duck and cover while they watch from afar. Because they are cowards. Dont be patsies. Dont rebel under the wrong impression that by insidious means anyone accomplishes good ends. If they do, they will become servants of a system of elites who see them as mere fodder. Then an IRON HAND will fall on them, their "unity" will be as peons while the communist instigators become elites. Violence is their favorite tool. Communist/marxist Patsies dont know oppression. They will.   Purge the communist agenda, peace will return.
    2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338. 2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346. 2
  1347. 2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. 2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 2
  1359. 2
  1360. 2
  1361. 2
  1362. 2
  1363. 2
  1364. 2
  1365. 2
  1366. 2
  1367. 2
  1368. 2
  1369. 2
  1370. 2
  1371. 2
  1372. 2
  1373. 2
  1374. 2
  1375. 2
  1376. 2
  1377. 2
  1378. 2
  1379. 2
  1380. 2
  1381. 2
  1382. 2
  1383. 2
  1384. 2
  1385. 2
  1386. 2
  1387. 2
  1388. 2
  1389. 2
  1390. 2
  1391. 2
  1392. 2
  1393. 2
  1394. 2
  1395. 2
  1396. 2
  1397. 2
  1398. 2
  1399. 2
  1400. 2
  1401. It is ridiculous to argue "getting away with doing evil things" versus being honest and not a liar. Treating others as equals and wishing them well is the basis of civil society. Using others, abusing others invites quite the opposite: it is an invitation to war. The principles of diplomacy existed long before the Christian era. The Mahabharata tells of the rules of diplomacy that were already age old ere it itself became anything like a "traditional text". Such is practical knowledge and wisdom. Even Genghis Khan knew this and encoded rules for civil harmony (Yassa). Look at Black's Law Dictionary. The Golden Rule is the very foundation of Equity Law. When others misuse or abuse their neighbors, it becomes a tort. Basis of suit. Where justice prevails, by means of assizes and legal enquiries, room is left to settle disputes by compromises or assessment of damages. I mentioned the record of Mahabharata, wherein the steps of diplomacy are clearly spelled out: Discussion Bribery or some form of compromise Embargo War These exact same things obtain today, however, we see today a rush to war. As if threats of violence somehow represents some kind of efficiency for resolving problems. In fact such short cut only exacerbates problems and encourages acts of revenge, because they are in fact unjust. The Golden Rule, if truly respected and honored as being the root of Diplomacy, allows for a softer landing at a solution to all difficulty. Instead we see that the greedy seek temporally quicker solutions. And such involve blackmail, threats and murder. It isn't "not murder" because done under the aegis of a government. It is crime and murder all the same, because it ignores both the Golden Rule and the principles of Diplomacy. In fact, such crimes require the complete abnegation of human feeling and moral content whatever. In other words, lower than even an animal.
    2
  1402. This surgical gymnastics sounds like a good alternative for now from cut, burn and poison alright. But it is akin to "fecal transplant". There HAS to be a better way. For cancer there is the much simpler Lambelle treatment of IM injection of amylase and trypsin. The cancer cell is protected from white blood cells by electronegative sialylated proteins. The glycoprotein is well known: chorionic gonadotrophins, or hCG. White blood cells carry the same charge, they cannot approach. However amylase immediately deactivates hCG by direct digestion or hydrolyzation of the sialylated carbohydrate moiety of hCG. Trypsin, tryptase and RNAse also set to work thereafter. The hCG cell wall motif is characteristic of only one normal cell in the life cycle: trophoblasts. That is how we know cancers are trophoblastic, as fully confirmed by thousands of biopsies and clonal cultured cell lines by flow cytometry analysis, and genotyping. See the seminal article on this by Hernan Acevedo in the 1995 issue of Cancer, if memory serves. As all cancers, regardless of type or origin are trophoblastic, we know they have only one source: diploid totipotent cells, i.e., stem cells. Outside pregnancy, stem cells are only active in regeneration and healing. They are most active in the gut, pancreas and liver, but are obviously active wherever cancer can be observed. Even brain contain active stem cells. When trophoblastic differentiation arises normally in the life cycle, it is as placenta. It mediates the nutrition of the stem cell package. In healing it obviously must play a role in regeneration. If hayflick limited cell lines need replacing it is not enough to have cells crowd them out, the old cells need removal. White blood cells only remove dead and apoptotic signaling cells. Only trophoblasts are known to do this. They are highly mobile, invasive and thus metastatic by nature. They cannot dedifferentiate, they are the most primal differentiated cell and the least pluripotent cell. The stem cell can evoke trophoblast to accomplish its needs, but trophoblast cannot evoke stem cells. In the normal model of function, trophoblast begin to be degraded in the 8th or 9th week of pregnancy, at the onset of fetal pancreatic function. The fetal pancreas secretes no amylase, but his mother's amylase titers continuously increase until parturition. The dual action of fetal and maternal amylase and the serine proteases degrade the trophoblast hold on the syncytium in the limb of uterus until it releases. The hypoxic conditions of syncytiotrophoblasts in the interface induces anaerobic metabolites to permeate soma inducing the oxytocin cascade inducing contraction to expell. The clues to cancer resolution need only mimic the normal precedent in the cause of birth.
    2
  1403. 2
  1404. 2
  1405. 2
  1406. 2
  1407. 2
  1408. 2
  1409. 2
  1410. 2
  1411. 2
  1412. 2
  1413. 2
  1414. 2
  1415. 2
  1416. 2
  1417. 2
  1418. 2
  1419. 2
  1420. 2
  1421. 2
  1422. 2
  1423. 2
  1424. 2
  1425. 2
  1426. 2
  1427. 2
  1428. 2
  1429. 2
  1430. 2
  1431. 2
  1432. 2
  1433. 2
  1434. 2
  1435. 2
  1436. 2
  1437. 2
  1438. 2
  1439. 2
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530.  @sylviaelse5086  : Contraindications Serious Neurological Adverse Events after Ivermectin—Do They Occur beyond the Indication of Onchocerciasis? Rebecca E. Chandler https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5929173/ Dr. Borody and Dr. Marik are well trained in Tropical medicine, and the literature you can be sure, and Marik on the ground in Tropical practice. Both he and Dr. Borody are renowned physicians, not patzers or dabblers, or fringe. Dr. Borody and Dr. Kory are cutting edge. You may not know their renown in the millions of cases they are responsible for curing of helicobacter pylori induced ulcer. It is made patently clear pregnant moms are not recipients because the drug crosses the blood brain barrier (bbb) and drug v drug interactions are well characterised.  The two cases you mention, one 64, the other 89, both having co-morbidities, and more than a few drugs "confounding" as she puts it, direct attribution. It is in fact irresponsible to dial in a direct connection despite a correlation. As a physician she should have known better. The finding of IVM in brain tissue was already known. This was not the paper that broke that news. Addressing the issues with the 69 year old, a patient to wit below: Persistent coma in Strongyloides hyperinfection syndrome associated with persistently increased ivermectin levels David J van Westerloo et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jan. "TO THE EDITOR—We share an interesting clinical case that impacts on the treatment of Strongyloides hyperinfection syndrome. A 64-year-old man was admitted to our intensive care unit for postoperative care after aortic valve replacement. His previous medical history was relevant for giant cell arteritis for which he was using prednisone. Three days postoperatively, severe sepsis with multiorgan failure developed. Sputum was collected, and high numbers of mobile Strongyloides stercoralis larvae were observed and a diagnosis of …" https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24065325/ Need I add more? The 81 yr old.  These two cases cover what today we would call OVERDOSING, but especially this one at 22 mg/day for 7 days? So they stop at comatosity! Five days later, what a surprise, but still not directly attributable. Malpractice is what this was. I'll pick up in a bit with the drugs both were on, besides the co-infections with the case with onchocerciasis, River Blindness, as well as L. loa, and in the aortic transplant, digoxin, adjusting blood pressure, which is known for higher incidence of bbb  incursion. OD,s is not the drugs fault. They did that with fatal cases of HCQ as well. This is the second time I've written this, as the damn yt updated version doesnt like switching windows and wont save my place, but just shuts the reply off and reboots to home. I think your remark shows you dont take this seriously, or youre one of those premed school coasters who bait other students into doing their homework for them.  In any case, I appreciate your interest.
    1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. Fauci, the CDC and WHO know the current lockdowns and compulsory masking are not based on science.  Even the term "social distancing" is not science terminology, it is psy-op terminology. Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation and ostracization, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically loaded and tactical term. The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. Serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile, i.e. un-sterile, OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. (links below). Still, an obviously problematic area for controlled study. Hand washing is the surest protection and cleanliness. We dont need any vaccine for this politically exacerbated and stimulated scourge anyway. The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease. I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine. Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak.  Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 outbreak in the rest home. As a result of their use of Ivermectin, No resident became seriously ill. And yet! the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! All residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived. The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine. Dr. Hibberd: https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA Re: Mask, respirators, etc. Shows how equivocal the evidence is. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/ Another link resource  pointed to more for article links than over-all opinion. One must know the range of data and draw personal opinion. It is quite obvious home made cloth masks are merely appearances, need to be washed daily at least, optimally several times a day. https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy Mask redux 3: I have expanded links below in my comment for further scholarly articles. I have pointed out science literature to show, just as Fauci showed by his initial position, there is scientific uncertainty regarding this issue. If you read the following papers, you'll realize that studies and articles are plentiful. Mask wearing is not on the same level of science as sterile hand contact with internals, as in a delivery, a laparotomy or even excision of a mole. Laymen can be forgiven for ignorance of this topic and this issue, but scientists should know better. The public servants have chosen to ignore it evidently out of liability concerns more than anything else. Only it may actually do the reverse of what they expect. As for why masks are still worn in surgeries: liability issues, whether or not the operating room, instruments or personnel had anything to do with a post-op infection, the effectiveness or not of masks is irrelevant, but exists as a weak point in a defense against a tort. Here is a relevant quote: "Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/ Well other more rigorous studies were done. The Studies of Surgical Mask Efficacy -- Arthur Firstenberg http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739:BlogPost:2035264 https://muchadoaboutcorona.ca/face-masks-cause-wound-infection/ The following provide links to download pdfs of articles, no fee. Neil W.M. Orr, Six month study of maskless surgery https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/ PubMed Orr article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19310816/ Goggles more important than masks https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964349/ Springer open source article on mask study -- Tunevall https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736 Most medical journals now provide scholarly articles relating to covid free of charge at the present time. We conceived a simple way to dispense with the issue by operating with an air hose over the back through silver ion sterilizing filters, an adaptation of the solution C.L. Kervran developed for reducing carbon monoxide poisoning to welders by breathing heated air while annealing iron plates. As to double blind, placebo controlled studies, this is not needed with Ivermectin, with a proven history of effectiveness, known LD50s, optimal dosages, etc. To say nothing of the immorality of such time wasting efforts.  Dr. Borody compares that to the ridiculousness of such study on parachutes. Dead weight studies were sufficient to prove efficacy. First human tests were always done with safety protocols, over water, nets, etc. None were done for some jumping with, some jumping without parachutes from thousands of feet up in the air. Nor different parachutes, one known safe the other unsure. Linear comparatives or longitudinal studies were done of course, and improvements adopted using dummies. Just like seat belt effectiveness in crashes. Regarding Ivermectin Prophylaxis, i.e. preventive efficacy: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04422561 White Board Doctor (WBDR) Channel re above study: https://youtu.be/TmzvDa9Un44 WBDR channel home (Buy them a cup of coffee! $3, They earn it!) https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteboardDoctor WBDR on placebo controlled DB study of Ivermectin (IVM), Hydroxycycline (HCQ) and control. https://youtu.be/AkxzeIOSDCg Dr. Borody re: controlled study of Ivermectin: https://youtu.be/POfIMGS2D6A The British Medical Journal on Randomized, controlled study of Parachutes to prevent death and injury. Seriously, not an April Fools Day paper release! (Dec.) https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094
    1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. The sooner Australia, New Zealand and Hawaii start demanding, DEMANDING Universal Ivermectin distribution and implementation as PREVENTATIVE AND CURATIVE, the sooner you get back to normal. They have justification for 21+ quarantine in their minds. But If every 21+ year old is on voluntary Ivermectin (IVM) + zinc, vit. D & C protocols, the sooner life returns to normal. No need even for a vaccine. The I-MASK PROTOCOL is saving 1000's NOW, preventing deaths NOW. https://covid19criticalcare.com/i-mask-prophylaxis-treatment-protocol/i-mask-protocol-translations/ Ivermectin, Famotidine, and Doxycycline: A Suggested Combinatorial Therapeutic for the Treatment of COVID-19 (7/19/2020) Parth Sarthi, Sen Gupta and Malay Kumar Rana https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsptsci.0c00140 Another possible combinatorial (cmb+) component Bromhexine hydrochloride. Effect of bromhexine on clinical outcomes and mortality in COVID-19 patients: A randomized clinical trial Khalil Ansarin, Ramin Tolouian, [...], and Kenneth R. Chapman (Bioimpacts. 2020;10(4): 209-215.) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7502909/ Keywords: Bromhexine hydrochloride, COVID-19 disease, SARS-CoV2, TMPRSS2, COVID-19 pneumonia, COVID-19 treatment The early administration of oral bromhexine reduces the ICU transfer, intubation, and the mortality rate in patients with COVID-19. This affordable medication can easily be administered everywhere with a huge positive impact(s) on public health and the world economy. Altogether, the verification of our results on a larger scale and different medical centers is strongly recommended. Nutritional sufficiency versus deficiency in preventing covid-19 MedCram Medical Studies Explained https://youtu.be/ha2mLz-Xdpg WBDR studies for Vit. D to prevent sarscov2 disease (covid-19) https://youtu.be/2_vINSkMjRI Zinc, flavinoids (quercetin), vit. C, glutathione, etc. Dr.Dave DC, DACBN (Diplomate American Clinical Board of Nutrition) https://youtu.be/2pRe_luOuRw EDUCATE YOURSELVES. FIRE IRRESPONSPIBLE BIG PHARMA WHORES RUNNING YOUR COUNTRY. THERE IS ZERO NEED FOR DEATH RIGHT NOW WITH IVERMECTIN. WHILE WAITING ON A SAFE VACCINE (🤣🤣🤣😥) YOU HAVE A HELP NOW. USE IT FOOLS.
    1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760.  @LindsayLoo-q5d  : John Beard compiled the numerous articles and letters he wrote to the New York Medical Record and Lancet in 1911. Titled: The Enzyme Treatment of Cancer and Its Scientific Basis. Dr. Hernan Acevedo in 1990 published in the Journal Cancer proof that Beard's observations and deductions were fact: all cancers regardless of type or origin were trophoblasts, expressing a universal biomarker identical to the trophoblast glycoprotein hCG. The chorion is 100% syncytiotrophoblast derived by differentiation from cytotrophoblast, the very first pluripotent differentiated cell in the life cycle. Only totipotent cells can give rise to trophoblasts, no differentiated cell can do that. The obvious deduction to derive from this is, if cancer can arise at later stages of the life cycle, then we know "fetal stem cells" must be present. Even without manifest cancer, the fact that sperm and egg can be generated by reduction division is proof as well. Only totipotent cells can undergo meiosis. Aberrant proofs have been recorded, with muscle tumors including teeth, eyes, nerve tissue. These are not the result of an "absorbed twin". This is the result of an incomplete regeneration cycle with a motile transport by trophoblast of totipotent cells that were unsuccessful in ablating the residuum of trophoblasts. The digestive enzymes were deficient or defective for reasons related to incomplete diet of the essential cofactors and coenzymes . . . all must be present at once or the system fails.
    1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. Get with the Ivermectin tritherapy Japan! Dont be vaccine fools. I'm serious. Here: The current lockdowns and compulsory masking are not based on science.  Even the term "social distancing" is not science terminology, it is psy-op terminology. Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation and ostracization, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically loaded and tactical term. The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. Serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile, i.e. un-sterile, OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. (links below). Still, an obviously problematic area for controlled study. We dont need any vaccine for this politically exacerbated and stimulated scourge anyway. The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease. I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine. Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak:  because Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 showing up in the rest home! No resident became seriously ill. And yet the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! And all residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived. The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine. Dr. Hibberd: https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA Re: Mask, respirators, etc. Shows how equivocal the evidence is. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/ Another link resource  pointed to more for article links than over-all opinion. One must know the range of data and draw personal opinion. It is quite obvious home made cloth masks are merely appearances, need to be washed daily at least, optimally several times a day. https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy Mask redux 3: I have expanded links below in my comment for further scholarly articles. I have pointed out science literature to show, just as Fauci showed by his initial position, there is scientific uncertainty regarding this issue. If you read the following papers, you'll realize that studies and articles are plentiful. Mask wearing is not on the same level of science as sterile hand contact with internals, as in a delivery, a laparotomy or even excision of a mole. Laymen can be forgiven for ignorance of this topic and this issue, but scientists should know better. The public servants have chosen to ignore it evidently out of liability concerns more than anything else. Only it may actually do the reverse of what they expect. As for why masks are still worn in surgeries: liability issues, whether or not the operating room, instruments or personnel had anything to do with a post-op infection, the effectiveness or not of masks is irrelevant, but exists as a weak point in a defense against a tort. Here is a relevant quote: "Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/ Well other more rigorous studies were done. The Studies of Surgical Mask Efficacy -- Arthur Firstenberg http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739:BlogPost:2035264 https://muchadoaboutcorona.ca/face-masks-cause-wound-infection/ The following provide links to download pdfs of articles, no fee. Neil W.M. Orr, Six month study of maskless surgery https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/ PubMed Orr article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19310816/ Goggles more important than masks https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964349/ Springer open source article on mask study -- Tunevall https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736 Most medical journals now provide scholarly articles relating to covid free of charge at the present time. We conceived a simple way to dispense with the issue by operating with an air hose over the back through silver ion sterilizing filters, an adaptation of the solution C.L. Kervran developed for reducing carbon monoxide poisoning to welders by breathing heated air while annealing iron plates. As to double blind, placebo controlled studies, this is not needed with Ivermectin, with a proven history of effectiveness, known LD50s, optimal dosages, etc. To say nothing of the immorality of such time wasting efforts.  Dr. Borody compares that to the ridiculousness of such study on parachutes. Dead weight studies were sufficient to prove efficacy. First human tests were always done with safety protocols, over water, nets, etc. None were done for some jumping with, some jumping without parachutes or different parachutes. Linear comparatives or longitudinal studies were done of course, and improvements adopted. Regarding Ivermectin Prophylaxis, i.e. preventive efficacy: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04422561 White Board Channel re above study: https://youtu.be/TmzvDa9Un44 https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteboardDoctor Dr. Borody re: controlled study of Ivermectin: https://youtu.be/POfIMGS2D6A The British Medical Journal on Randomized, controlled study of Parachutes to prevent death and injury. Seriously, not an April 1st release! https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094
    1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. Yes but what allowed survival and the resistance in the first infection has not been nailed down. It is all assumed to be contact cell competency. No study of diet, no blood stream and lymphatic system assay of hydrolase enzymes titres. No, only a simplistic concept of contact cells, white blood cells, lymphocytic and phagocytic cells. The analysis of exactly what constitutes robust health and resistance to infections and cancers both has next to zero research combinatorially. The reason I think is simple: it would devolve upon adequate nutrition, something proprietary drug pushers don't want talked about too loudly . . . will not fund research for, and do not endow universities to provide education upon. Furthermore, essential nutritional elements not as yet generally recognized, though proven long ere now proven scientifically to be essential, will be continued to be ignored. One such being hydrocyanic acid. Yet we know it is essential because it is part and parcel to resistance to viruses in the respiratory epithelium of the lungs utilizing isothiocyanate, which can only be derived from HCN, hydrocyanic acid. "Hypothiocyanite produced by human and rat respiratory epithelial cells inactivates extracellular H1N2 influenza A virus" "Objective and design Our aim was to study whether an extracellular, oxidative antimicrobial mechanism inherent to tracheal epithelial cells is capable of inactivating influ­enza H1N2 virus. "Material or subjects: Epithelial cells were isolated from tracheas of male Sprague–Dawley rats. Both primary human and rat tracheobronchial epithelial cells were dif­ferentiated in air–liquid interface cultures. "Treatment A/swine/Illinois/02860/09 (swH1N2) influ­enza A virions were added to the apical side of airway cells for 1 h in the presence or absence of lactoperoxidase or thiocyanate. "Results Our data show that rat tracheobronchial epithelial cells develop a differentiated, polarized monolayer with high transepithelial electrical resistance, mucin production and expression of dual oxidases. Influenza A virions are inactivated by human and rat epithelial cells via a dual oxidase-, lactoperoxidase-and thiocyanate-dependent mechanism." Inflamm. Res. (2016) 65:71–80 DOI 10.1007/s00011-015-0892-z
    1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. All pharmacology in the large mega corporation tier of things are recipients of a philosophy adopted by Rockefeller and incorporated into medical education endowed and basically owned by Rockefeller. Following the guidelines provided by Ivy Ledbetter Lee, all contrary modes of thought by healers and nutritionists were nominalized and given the label "quackery", and eventually prosecuted by medical licensing boards, also set up by those trained in the Standard Oil modus operandi of dealing with anyone hurting their profits. It was never, and is not now, about good science versus pseudoscience. It is profitable versus competition. Rockefeller's motto was: competition is a sin. This systematic co-opting of medical education and hospitalism required attempts at monopoly and the second best thing, cartelization. AMA, FDA, NIH, CDC, WHO, members all sitting on boards of big pharma corps., even of competitors, like the mafioso dividing up territories to minimize friction so they could all enjoy profiting on the common person's needs. And that was a key doctrine they need to install in the minds from the earliest age, that they need hospitalists, druggists and drugs to be whole. The biggest lie had to be engrained at the earliest inception of thinking. Blended into the background, other issues are promoted: best insurance, co-pays, which drug, but never no drug at all. Read A World without Cancer by G. Edward Griffin for a primmer on this insidious chapter of medical science, which isn't even true science. The cure for all cancers and infections both have been understood well enough since 1910 to eliminate this false dependency on corporate medicine, but that knowledge has been castigated and erased several times. Fortunately, the castigations themselves preserved the information so that it is recoverable. The greatest laboratory in the world is the human form itself. And it's strength is entirely dependent on nutrition. There has never been a drug deficiency disease. Not one chronic, metabolic disease has ever been resolved by anything but factors normal to the animal economy: air, water, good nutrition, etc. And populations fully satisfying these criteria also exposed to otherwise lethal viruses, never experiencing such mortality: they are the ones to study.
    1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159.  @robertharison1945  : Thanks for sharing. Let me do the same: The current lockdowns and compulsory masking are not based on science.  Even the term "social distancing" is not science terminology, it is psy-op terminology. Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation and ostracization, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically loaded and tactical term. The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. Serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile, i.e. un-sterile, OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. (links below). Still, an obviously problematic area for controlled study. We dont need any vaccine for this politically exacerbated and stimulated scourge anyway. The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease. I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine. Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak:  because Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 showing up in the rest home! No resident became seriously ill. And yet the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! And all residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived. The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine. Dr. Hibberd: https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA Re: Mask, respirators, etc. Shows how equivocal the evidence is. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/ Another link resource  pointed to more for article links than over-all opinion. One must know the range of data and draw personal opinion. It is quite obvious home made cloth masks are merely appearances, need to be washed daily at least, optimally several times a day. https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy Mask redux 3: I have expanded links below in my comment for further scholarly articles. I have pointed out science literature to show, just as Fauci showed by his initial position, there is scientific uncertainty regarding this issue. If you read the following papers, you'll realize that studies and articles are plentiful. Mask wearing is not on the same level of science as sterile hand contact with internals, as in a delivery, a laparotomy or even excision of a mole. Laymen can be forgiven for ignorance of this topic and this issue, but scientists should know better. The public servants have chosen to ignore it evidently out of liability concerns more than anything else. Only it may actually do the reverse of what they expect. As for why masks are still worn in surgeries: liability issues, whether or not the operating room, instruments or personnel had anything to do with a post-op infection, the effectiveness or not of masks is irrelevant, but exists as a weak point in a defense against a tort. Here is a relevant quote: "Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/ Well other more rigorous studies were done. The Studies of Surgical Mask Efficacy -- Arthur Firstenberg http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739:BlogPost:2035264 https://muchadoaboutcorona.ca/face-masks-cause-wound-infection/ The following provide links to download pdfs of articles, no fee. Neil W.M. Orr, Six month study of maskless surgery https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/ PubMed Orr article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19310816/ Goggles more important than masks https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964349/ Springer open source article on mask study -- Tunevall https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736 Most medical journals now provide scholarly articles relating to covid free of charge at the present time. We conceived a simple way to dispense with the issue by operating with an air hose over the back through silver ion sterilizing filters, an adaptation of the solution C.L. Kervran developed for reducing carbon monoxide poisoning to welders by breathing heated air while annealing iron plates. As to double blind, placebo controlled studies, this is not needed with Ivermectin, with a proven history of effectiveness, known LD50s, optimal dosages, etc. To say nothing of the immorality of such time wasting efforts.  Dr. Borody compares that to the ridiculousness of such study on parachutes. Dead weight studies were sufficient to prove efficacy. First human tests were always done with safety protocols, over water, nets, etc. None were done for some jumping with, some jumping without parachutes or different parachutes. Linear comparatives or longitudinal studies were done of course, and improvements adopted. Regarding Ivermectin Prophylaxis, i.e. preventive efficacy: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04422561 White Board Channel re above study: https://youtu.be/TmzvDa9Un44 https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteboardDoctor Dr. Borody re: controlled study of Ivermectin: https://youtu.be/POfIMGS2D6A The British Medical Journal on Randomized, controlled study of Parachutes to prevent death and injury. Seriously, not an April 1st release! https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094
    1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. Cancer cells are facultative anaerobes, and in their most energetic phase are aerobic. In the case they encounter free hydrocyanic acid, they will undergo transformation to anaerobic respiration. This is survival mode wherein they begin to multiply nuclei for greater production of the glycoprotein hCG, which inhibits the immune hydrolases that would digest them. Here Hydrocyanic Acid plays an important role in reactivation of such inhibited hydrolases, and furthermore, accelerates digestion. This is an example of the abysmal ignorance there is regarding the co-enzyme fact of Hydrocyanic Acid. Defining it as a poison makes as much sense as defining vitamin A as a poison, though in inordinate amounts will also kill. Dietary vehicles of vitamin levels of Hydrocyanic Acid include Lima beans, alfalfa sprouts, Chia sprouts, yams, chickpeas, lentils, bamboo shoots, fava beans, kidney beans, millet, flax, buckwheat, papaya . . . In fact it was in 1910 that Mendel and Blood at a Yale laboratory discovered the co-enzyme fact of HCN while studying the digestive potency of papain, the protease in papaya. Without HCN, papain is practically inactive. Cancer cells were proven definitively to be trophoblasts in the late 80s and 90s by Dr. Hernan Acevedo, who's research was published in the Journal Cancer. Anyone can look it up and see that all cancers, regardless of type or origin express the glycoprotein hCG, or human chorionic gonadotropin, having both subunits alpha and beta. Only trophoblasts are capable of secreting that glycoprotein. How is trophoblast controlled in its normal canalized function? It's normal role is in pregnancy, is the formation of the placenta.
    1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. Here, research away. The current lockdowns and compulsory masking are not based on science.  Even the term "social distancing" is not science terminology, it is psy-op terminology. Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation and ostracization, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically loaded and tactical term. The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. Serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile, i.e. un-sterile, OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. (links below). Still, an obviously problematic area for controlled study. We dont need any vaccine for this politically exacerbated and stimulated scourge anyway. The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease. I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine. Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak.  Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 outbreak in the rest home. As a result of their use of Ivermectin, No resident became seriously ill. And yet! the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! All residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived. The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine. Dr. Hibberd: https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA Re: Mask, respirators, etc. Shows how equivocal the evidence is. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/ Another link resource  pointed to more for article links than over-all opinion. One must know the range of data and draw personal opinion. It is quite obvious home made cloth masks are merely appearances, need to be washed daily at least, optimally several times a day. https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy Mask redux 3: I have expanded links below in my comment for further scholarly articles. I have pointed out science literature to show, just as Fauci showed by his initial position, there is scientific uncertainty regarding this issue. If you read the following papers, you'll realize that studies and articles are plentiful. Mask wearing is not on the same level of science as sterile hand contact with internals, as in a delivery, a laparotomy or even excision of a mole. Laymen can be forgiven for ignorance of this topic and this issue, but scientists should know better. The public servants have chosen to ignore it evidently out of liability concerns more than anything else. Only it may actually do the reverse of what they expect. As for why masks are still worn in surgeries: liability issues, whether or not the operating room, instruments or personnel had anything to do with a post-op infection, the effectiveness or not of masks is irrelevant, but exists as a weak point in a defense against a tort. Here is a relevant quote: "Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/ Well other more rigorous studies were done. The Studies of Surgical Mask Efficacy -- Arthur Firstenberg http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739:BlogPost:2035264 https://muchadoaboutcorona.ca/face-masks-cause-wound-infection/ The following provide links to download pdfs of articles, no fee. Neil W.M. Orr, Six month study of maskless surgery https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/ PubMed Orr article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19310816/ Goggles more important than masks https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964349/ Springer open source article on mask study -- Tunevall https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736 Most medical journals now provide scholarly articles relating to covid free of charge at the present time. We conceived a simple way to dispense with the issue by operating with an air hose over the back through silver ion sterilizing filters, an adaptation of the solution C.L. Kervran developed for reducing carbon monoxide poisoning to welders by breathing heated air while annealing iron plates. As to double blind, placebo controlled studies, this is not needed with Ivermectin, with a proven history of effectiveness, known LD50s, optimal dosages, etc. To say nothing of the immorality of such time wasting efforts.  Dr. Borody compares that to the ridiculousness of such study on parachutes. Dead weight studies were sufficient to prove efficacy. First human tests were always done with safety protocols, over water, nets, etc. None were done for some jumping with, some jumping without parachutes or different parachutes. Linear comparatives or longitudinal studies were done of course, and improvements adopted. Regarding Ivermectin Prophylaxis, i.e. preventive efficacy: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04422561 White Board Channel re above study: https://youtu.be/TmzvDa9Un44 https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteboardDoctor Dr. Borody re: controlled study of Ivermectin: https://youtu.be/POfIMGS2D6A The British Medical Journal on Randomized, controlled study of Parachutes to prevent death and injury. Seriously, not an April 1st release! https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094
    1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. The patent medical philosophy is age old ignorance underpins making a buck off the sick. Nutritional education cuts into that business, which is why that is education was never compulsory or only cursory in medical schools. Until the internet and video platforms became established, nutrition focused tv series were a rarity. Talk show might do a blurb, a food focus as preventative once in a rare while. Antibiotics and vaccinations are both scam monsters people need to get past. At the very best they are emergency resources with well known negatives, always. Our understanding of immunity, what actually constitutes the bulk of it is backwards and conducive to morbidity, to death. The key to immunity are the digestive enzymes system. Circulating hydrolases primarily issuing from the pancreas, secreted parenterally and recycled from the intestinal action. They are highly conserved because they are vital to immunity, long before the contact cells can mount a defense. Doubly important bare all the enzyme cofactors and coenzymes: among these especially those that reactivate our enzymes when inactivated by parasitic or viral inhibitors. Among such glutathione, sulfides but centrally hydrocyanic acid, the simplest of the B vitamins. This vitamin has been sequestered by nutritionists and medical people for over 100 years, despite the fact it was proven to be a coenzyme in 1910 at a Yale laboratory by Mendel and Blood, published in the prestigious Journal of Biological Chemistry. Food is your best medicine. Not just an old saw, it is a fact.
    1
  2474. 1
  2475. 1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. 1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548.  @colfaxschuyler3675  : i have talked with Kory on LinkedIn, I have corresponded with Marik, Dr. Barnard, White Board Doctor, some listen, some do not. Dr.Mobeen Sayed, "Drbean" ignored our data. Thus far only Dr. Jennifer Hibberd, Dr. José Luis Abreu, Dr. Wallach and G.Edward Griffin of Red Pill University have recognised the importance of our deductions. And we are relying more on Bayesian analyses than seeking double blind, placebo controlled trials. Where ever we see an HCN rich dietary, all other essentials being met, we see low to zero incidence of both flus and cancers, morning sickness, etc. Also, we noted that available data suggests the dispersal of small pox among Native Americans affected those Indians who had abandoned their traditional dietary, not those true to the traditional ways which would have included pemmikin, typically made with dried cherry and their HCN-rich pits, lderberry, huckleberry and their seeds ground to powder with dried meats including fatty "sweet bread" or bison pancreas and limb meat. These extrinsic or dietary enzymes afe absorbedvand conserve the intrinsic enzymes, are part and parcel to the true front line defense of the mammalian form as blood and lymph circulating, weakly inhibited surveilant digestors of invasive agents or pathogens. Cellular immunity acts last, not first. This was acknowledged by the fathers of immune theory Metchnikov and his closest associate Metalnikoff, by Bechamp and at the end Pasteur as well. Curie and Bagshawe also showed this was the case, and that typical M.O.s of pathogens is to utilize enzyme inhibitors similar to hCG, the pregnancy hormone, a glycoprotein termed a SERPIN, or serine enzyme inhibitor. The pancreatic hydrolases are serine types, yet hydrocyanic acid accelerates and reactivates amylase as well and we are preparing to run kinetic tests on RNase in the presence of HCN as well. Such lab tests are a far cry from RCTs but alert reasonsble people realize that there can be absolutely no GOOD reason to ignore the info and even to encourage people to incorporate it in dietary.HCN is the missing, villified coenzyme, discovered by Drs Blood and Mendel in 1910. Understabding the dietary rationales increases the respect and the degree the vitalness and importance of them are taken seriously. Our overwhelming experience has been, most MDs are flippant and dismissive. Especially American educated doctors. It has improved as many are utilizing CME with reschooling as NDs, since the population at large have lost faith and dollars going to "regular" docs. This has also seen the big pharmas tanking as well. NEJM reported these datums in the 1980s, and in 2015 all were nigh on bankrupt, especially their mother parasite, the federal reserve corp. So resorting to the rosier picture presented by Nutritionists and Naturopathics has helped, but even these are woefully ignorant of Immuno-Enyme rationales: methods of therapy and the simple, pragmatic ways all doctors addressing such can be fired.
    1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. Vaccinating is a pseudo-philosophical issue. When x-ray was being promoted as a form of medical treatment and later radioactive substances and linear accelerators, any treatment that cut into their profits was automatically attacked as quackery. It isn't even an issue of the pot calling the kettle black, because after years of these exotic treatments of burn and poison, they have zero sum effect to continue their applications, hence they were the actual quack procedures. They utilized the psychology of Rockefeller's chief PR, Ledbetter to justify bad things as actually good things, a procedure executed thoroughly via various frauds like Fetzner and Fishbein. Millions were invested in putting their "philosophy" into medical education, declearing war even on nutritional science as secondary or merely peripheral when looking to cure vitamin deficiency diseases. Mandates are crossing the boundaries of self determination and in fact are un-Constitutional. More importantly, the strict science of immunity was assaulted when the white blood cells were labeled as the primary and only form in the body, when in fact the chief component are the circulating digestive enzymes . . a finding that was broadly confirmed but castigated as "fraud" by pharma-business complex. The circulatory enzyme competency is based strictly on nutrition, and the methods of testing the health of that system aren't even among standardized processes. Yet when robust, any question of vaccine necessity becomes moot. Vaccines are not part of any evolutionary mandate. It is strictly business.
    1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. I believe there are options for prevention and treatment that entail two possible approaches: We know the primary avenue of attack are the lungs, and once in, they attach by means of the spicules or "spikes". Their primary target or "receptor" are the ACE-2 or angiotensin-converting enzymes, same  as that of SARS-CoV, on the epithelial cells of the lungs.  Right there is one strategy for a form of intervention using nebulized or detached bonding receptors, akin to chelators or in fact serpins, serine protease inhibitors. Beside Remdesivir, Pyridone type, and specifically an alpha-ketomide inhibiting compound "13b" will likely emerge as promising along these lines within the body. This compound disables the sars-cov-2 cleavage enzyme on the attachment spikes (TMPRSS2 transmembrane serine protease). Since this is a papain-like enzyme, the inhibitor will not affect the human serine enzymes, like trypsin, amylase, etc. It could be used externally as well to attach aerosolized virii and they'll be inactivated even if they are inhaled. Paper on Alpha-ketomide inhibitor Compound 13b: Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease provides a basis for design of improved α-ketoamide inhibitors Linlin Zhang Daizong Lin Xinyuanyuan Sun Ute Curth4, et als. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/03/20/science.abb3405.full ------- Another approach is in terms of direct digestion of the virus by hydrolases like amylase, trypsin,  chymotrypsin, carboxypetidase, lipase and most importantly RNAase. Intramuscular injections of amylase and trypsin were proven to resolve malaria very effectively by Lambelle in the early part of the 20th c. The ratio of amylase to trypsin was 2:1, and was well tolerated. His paper is available as a link below.  While malaria is not a virus, the process of infectant inhibition of native enzymes taxing the whole system is akin and the strategy of bolstering it is rational. Futhermore the glycoprotein of the viral spike is very susceptible to degradation by amylase which enables full access of the pancreatic proteases or their serum analogs. It is worthwhile to also research the potential of external nebulized colloidal silver in air systems and bound to fiber masks, as an effective means of external denaturing the virus. As for inhaled nebulized colloidals, I am aware of only one article on an inhalant or in nebulized form: Journal of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine: Viral Pathogens and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Oligodynamic Ag+ for Direct Immune Intervention Eric Rentz Do Comm Cnmo https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13590840310001594061 ---- For structure of viral components, also see: Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein Authors: Alexandra C.Walls David Veesler https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420302622 ---- A transcription I did of Dr. Lambelle's paper on malaria treatment using amylase and trypsin is available at a mirror of my old website: https://robertcathey.wordpress.com/the-utility-of-enzymes-in-malaria-by-f-w-lamballe-m-b-major-royal-army-medical-corps/ Lambelle, F. W. (1913). Journ. R.A.M.C., Vol. XXI, p. 660. John Beard's letter to Nature re Dr. Lambelle's work. (The transcriptionist at Nature misspelled Lambelle as "Lamballe".) https://www.nature.com/articles/092060c0
    1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793.  @noway3795  : Hydrolase action is inhibited, there's no breakdown of hydrolases by spike glycoprotein. "Animated", did you mean while alive or intend "antemortem"? This issue of putting things in the body supposedly intending to "educate" contact cells or memory cells to tag these as a problem is naïve. Immunity is based on digestion of offenders first and foremost. The specialized contact cells system is primarily devoted to the limbs of the digestive tract, because the enteric hydrolases are at work on food and whatever comes with it, including bacteria. The parenteral digestive system at that limb circulate conjoined with alpha-2 macroglobulins, but are fully active and unsuitable to act at that limb, so macrophages, the phagocytes , white blood cells are intermediation flanks. In the lymphatic system and blood stream the hydrolases can dissociate from the macroglobulins in the presence of suitable substrates. Indeed it seems likely most of them are not macroglobulin-bound. Coenzymes are required to reactivate inhibited hydrolases, and one such essential coenzyme is hydrocyanic acid. Determined in 1910 to be a B vitamin or coenzyme. The simplest of the B series and essential as the backbone of all amino acids in the natural world of our foods. The neglect of this fact is one reason the science of immunity is retarded, because it is categorized only as a "poison". If it were truly a poison an abundance of foods would be outlawed, from Lima beans and lentils to nectarines
    1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. How can Biden be safe once Americans get it they've been had? lol It is no longer just an inkling of many that these baddies are appointed, not elected. It would appear it has become a genuine and general near certainty in people's minds, their vote has not really counted for perhaps 60 years. Certainty, for some, that many never won an honest election except by Tom Foolery. They feel e.g. Old horn tootin' billy C didnt, "dubbya" didnt, barry - I'm no muslim I'm a marxist - didnt . . and after this year that maybe they were indeed "appointed" by a cabal. When Trump came along, this elite cabal evidently thought, no sweat, no need to cheat for their chosen one, hilary -throw all dead beat dads in jail - rodham . . . but! He won! Gasp! Yes! Trump slipped by their "cleverer" anointed! From that minute on, it was high gear for 2020. They tried to characterize him just a clown. A damn popular clown, a lucky clown. He may be turning into their nightmare "clown." Especially now. China might be right after all. The virus could very well have originated in some remote lab in the States and was dropped in someone's tea cup in Hubei or Wuhan. Maybe from some covert lab in Montana even. But nobody's seriously snooping around there trying to find out. Let's just say that would have been a good plot for a Crichton or Cook novel. What cannot be denied is, the pandemic was a boon for the plotter's onslaught. Nothing in the President's actual record earns a vote of no confidence by Americans. It is all manufactured negative perception, fashioned by a bought and owned press, media, big tech and even pols. And it doesnt hurt to have backing of the slave money of ccp. Now there is the supposed non-fake news out of Australia saying a "complete list" of names of commie insurgents and operatives around the world, and in U.S. -- in Companies, Perhaps Consulates, Departments, Government at all levels -- was leaked. I dont believe anything at first blush. Could be another possible distraction. It may not be. I investigate. I know about "active measures," innovated by Americans and perfected by Soviets, and handed down to the Ccp:  Keep people distracted, doubtful, double-minded, divided, half-truthed, demoralized, fighting with or against each other. Then conquer them. Take it all, if you can. This would be impossible by a foreign power over America. But not for the slick American cartel, founded by Rockefeller and others -- actual globalists.  Because JDR, the first psych out master of recent times learned from his PR guy, Ivy Ledbetter Lee, the best cover.  John - Here's a dime for you sonny - D. - who never saw a profit he wouldnt kill for - "Competition is a sin" - Rockefeller. Ivy Ledbetter Lee learned the Soviets too. For those he and JDR mentored, taking it all is an attainable goal they salivate for, the ravenous foxes that they are. Rarely mentioned by name, not famous, the real snakes in the grass mostly dont advertise. Red Pill University goes into this very deeply. G. Edward Griffin. His interview with Bezmenov on active measures delineates how this process progresses and the means of frustrating them, embodied by Reagan and now Trump. JFK started to, and might have, were he more moral and focused, but the same cabal that killed him off, are behind pelosi and schumer and snortin' joe. G. Edward Griffin, I love that guy. Internationalist bankers are master leveragers. American globalists the most powerful, but the most vulnerable. Because they're surrounded by the deadliest enemy of all. Honest Americans. In this case cheating and conspiracy cannot be denied. Chinese collusion, insurgency and American betrayal by Americans, are both true. But the deniers out themselves. The strategy against the swamp creatures was very expertly thought out. The core strength in America's behalf is standard U.S. Military training: Be Prepared. Personal, first hand investigation is the only way truth is discerned. Sifted from chaff. Then the written word is, and word of mouth are the most potent of weapons from the hand and lips of an informed, enlightened investigator.  A sleuth, basically. In simple, plain English. Based on full truth, not half or three quarter "truths". Which is why calm, patient, scientific method, methods of intelligence, are the surest leverage to pry out the ugly facts and establish the liberating beauteous truth. As Conan Doyle said, via Sherlock Holmes, "Eliminate the impossible, and whatever remains, however improbable, must be true. https://amp.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/chinese-communist-party-ghosts-in-the-global-machine/news-story/d4c2af18e984c43a025486159043e873 https://nypost.com/2020/12/13/us-companies-riddled-with-members-of-chinese-communist-party/ https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/news/a-data-leak-shows-that-over-two-million-chinese-communist-party-members-were-secretly-embedded-in-organizations-around-the-world/articleshow/79720017.cms Ivy Lee kindly overview -- still selling a bill of goods https://www.nku.edu/~turney/prclass/readings/3eras2x.html https://timeline.com/rockefellers-hired-militias-to-shoot-at-strikers-in-ludlow-massacre-115ae488164c A virtual time-line slide show re Ivy Lee https://www.sutori.com/story/copy-of-ivy-lee-father-of-public-relations-timeline--zBCTE58Q7MjSgvUASP1MR4Ki Seitel on Ivy Ledbetter Lee https://youtu.be/gAIumVbCAdM On Ida Tarbell, Muckraker of J.D. Rockefeller https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-woman-who-took-on-the-tycoon-651396/ G. Edward Griffin A World Without Cancer https://realityzone.com/product/world-without-cancer-book/ World Without Cancer Video: https://youtu.be/ZLSLh8Qw4T0 G. Edward Griffin, the Rockefeller-Carnegie collusion with Big Pharma to promote the I.G. Farben Cartel model of medical education https://youtu.be/L9P07Jswxmc G. Edward Griffin interview with ex-Soviet KGB Agent on Active Measures, and methods of demoralization Yuri Bezmenov https://youtu.be/iBRTHSQ2E-o
    1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. Actually, I think the same thinking of editors of the National Enquirer and the Weekly World News writers took their cues from headline grabbers from as far back as the Revolutionary war years. Trying to sift fact from fiction from newspapers is like arguing with Seventh Day Adventists or door to door Latter Day Saints. Newspapers are about as reliable as Seances. Propaganda has been around as long as so-called historians. Remember the rubric: the winners of wars write the history . . . If you choose to believe it, that's all on you, versus doing your own research. Un-disprovable written stories are just stories. What about oral traditions? Are they testable? What if oral traditions exist over vast territories? How can such accounts exist? Are we to suppose myths have continental effect, like a game of Post-Office? Shouldn't such tales vary enough to become incredible, that is to say, no longer credible? Actually, the Grand Canyon myth of Egyptian galleries carved into the stony walls hasn't any traditional lore or evidence to support any credibility to it. The greater mystery is why people populating the vastness of the Grand Canyon created seed granaries high up among the cliffs, and why they evacuated the area completely. Our understanding of the Grand Canyon is also extremely deficient. We think the diameter of Earth has been fixed for billions of years. There exists scientific reasoning to consider that this globe periodically expands. That gravity itself changes. That ancient humans exist unto this day we would hardly recognize. Scientific method requires of us to not be hasty. To reserve judgement. To explore all records. To integrate new findings before jumping to conclusions. "Science", as a body of "knowing", once concluded neither man nor bumble bees could fly.
    1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136.  @broznkyra4853  : absolutely brilliant acting, but in terms of Holladay, he was quite lanky, and tended towards a goitrogenic facial type, such as Don Knotts, of Billy Bob Thorton. Young Senior Earp was mistakenly identified as Wyatt, thus we wondered how the chops and mustachios suddenly disappeared, and bone structure, and ven accounting for baby fat would not yield the true face of a young Wyatt Earp. My oldest brother attests it was the most accurate of the Tombstone despictions, but as a participant in crafting the photography, I can only state, that "Who's that tall glass of water yonder" scene sold me that Earp could be a chisled, squarev jawed Serbian looking chap, a fellow of the Gendarmery, Bobby, Copper, even a Ranger. That particular scene I used a wind-up Kodak ©® "Eight-25". Thanks for your interest and comments. Be sure to hit that like button and visit our various Kurt and Val and the other's FBook Fan pages, and a bonus, my nearly completed PhD-MD oral challenge thesis Synopsis: Advert 4 Roger S. Cathey Letter to my Internet Associate Research writer and Medical Doctore, Maestro de Medici Dr. Raul Vergini, Author of The Miracle of Magnesium Chloride. . . (Currently In Translation from to the original Italian. Watch this web address for release date. Hello Raul, forgive my tardiness replying or following up, but all my internet connections were hacked and assaulted visciously by insurgents or teen-agers with nothing better to do than interrupt adult activities. Clever little rascals, lol. I will attempt to retrieve my tentative final editing (lol) of my collected papers on the relevance of hydrocyanic acid. . . "LAETRILE®"/"Vitamin B17" To both the evolution of DNA and as the oldest most primitive and simplest of the B vitamins The COENZYMES, the very core of all Co-Enzymes, and it's ability to ameliorate preclampsia ("morning sickness") Eclampsia vera, as well as other blood disorders in men: over-blood production, under blood production (homeostatic balancer) the leukemias, all cancers, and susceptibility to viral and pathogen intrusions or insults, such occuring only in the deficiency states of H•CN or R•CN, where R can be an radical useful to the homeostatic balancing that the adult body must continuously perform. Naturally these CoEnzymes and all hydrolytic enzymes require sufficient WATER, for proper function . . . H•CN is highly conserved, neutralized by a sulfurase, Rhodanese (Thiosulphate transulferase), which in red blood cells also releases -CN to attach to provitamin B12, making cyanocobalamin. This also obviates the necessity of exotic treatments of the Sickle Cell anemia crises, since those are simply exacerbated cases of vitamin "B17"/H•CN deficiency. End Part 5 (Complete series to be published April, 2021 . . . hopefully, lol,🤞😬🤓) "Buy Me a Coffee" https://www.buymeacoffee.com?via=fba1&utm_source=FriendlyGAd&utm_medium=BmcAdSearch&utm_campaign=April2020&gclid=Cj0KCQiAst2BBhDJARIsAGo2ldVifBy0hyMBHuGKl11hDNaIoza-DkgAvuyuQi4f0jHeluv8eYQ24xMaAkOdEALw_wcB
    1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation and ostracization, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically loaded and tactical term. The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. I mean serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. We dont need any vaccine for this politically exacerbated and stimulated scourge anyway. The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease. I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine. Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak:  because Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 showing up in the rest home! No resident became seriously ill. And yet the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! And all residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived. The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine. Dr. Hibberd: https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA
    1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. Mask redux 3: I have expanded links below in my comment for further scholarly articles. I have pointed out science literature to show, just as Fauci showed by his initial position, there is scientific uncertainty regarding this issue. If you read the following papers, you'll realize that studies and articles are plentiful. Mask wearing is not on the same level of science as sterile hand contact with internals, as in a delivery, a laparotomy or even excision of a mole. Laymen can be forgiven for ignorance of this topic and this issue, but scientists should know better. The public servants have chosen to ignore it evidently out of liability concerns more than anything else. Only it may actually do the reverse of what they expect. As for why masks are still worn in surgeries: liability issues, whether or not the operating room, instruments or personnel had anything to do with a post-op infection, the effectiveness or not of masks is irrelevant, but exists as a weak point in a defense against a tort. Here is a relevant quote: "Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/ Well other more rigorous studies were done. The Studies of Surgical Mask Efficacy -- Arthur Firstenberg http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739:BlogPost:2035264 https://muchadoaboutcorona.ca/face-masks-cause-wound-infection/ The following provide links to download pdfs of articles, no fee. Neil W.M. Orr, Six month study of maskless surgery https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/ PubMed Orr article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19310816/ Goggles more important than masks https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964349/ Springer open source article on mask study -- Tunevall https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736 Most medical journals now provide scholarly articles relating to covid free of charge at the present time. We conceived a simple way to dispense with the issue by operating with an air hose over the back through silver ion sterilizing filters, an adaptation of the solution C.L. Kervran developed for reducing carbon monoxide poisoning to welders by breathing heated air while annealing iron plates.
    1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. Our President had to take the position he did regarding the vaccines, but it is a political sop, to appease the maniacal, dogma ridden, hypnotized press and so-called "health authorities", who have brow beaten and cowered anyone with questions as to the probity of their approach, the way they calculate statistics or interpret their testing methodology. We have seen big and small pharma rushing towards bankruptcy since 2008 according to my research terms. This pandemic is seen as a life saver to pfizer, moderna and other vaccination pushers. The big snag for them now is the fantastic success of combination and nutritional component therapies like Borody's ivermectin, zinc, doxycycline, vit. D and C. These protocols will see big pharma either changing their tactics or going bankrupt as well. https://biopharmguy.com/links/company-by-name-defunct.php The results thus far show conclusively that IVM outperforms all other non-vaccine therapies hands down. This video from White Board Doctor, (WBDR) a resident physician, details IVM studies to date. You can update your IVM data pretty well via his channel and Trial Site News as well. WBDR https://youtu.be/C0pCz3NrlBc https://youtu.be/2LjIMX_qwZ0 Covexit News: https://youtu.be/6R-FtOK7JKo Trial Site News on Israel ivermectin study: https://youtu.be/rrlS1Mt8rQ8 Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA And perhaps the most convincing fact, an entire nursing home saved by ivermectin alone. https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Author contact: https://m.facebook.com/rogerscottcatheyii reply here to request email.
    1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. We can end lock downs in weeks to a month by using IVERMECTIN. Please share this press conference release. At the FLCCC Alliance press conference in Houston, Texas on Friday, December 4, 2020, at 10:30 am (CST), critical care doctors stated that IVERMECTIN  prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 WILL IMMEDIATELY alter the trajectory of the sars-coV-2 pandemic. They already informed all relevant experts and agencies of their findings months ago and received NO RESPONSE. They urged policymakers to finally take action. All the relevant evidence and needed steps to take can be found on their website linked below. https://covid19criticalcare.com/ Trial Site News video of press conference. https://youtu.be/4V3yxrJwJQs Ivermectin is a very old drug that has been distributed for free by Merck to millions of people in Africa and Asia suffering from sever epidemics of parasitical diseases like River Blindness disease. Dr. Thomas Borody developed the most successful combination therapy using Ivermectin, Zinc and Doxycycline to reverse covid symptoms from mild to severe. Ivermectin costs pennies compared to other drugs. It can be prescribed anywhere in the US right now. Be sure to watch the press release by the FLCCC Dr.s and they lay out all the steps. We can stop the lock downs in weeks to a month if everyone steps up to help urge this and knock it into the heads of governors and health authorities they are being remiss in their duties. Dr. Borody on Ivermectin combination therapy: https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA At the FLCCC Alliance press conference in Houston, Texas on Friday, December 4, 2020, at 10:30 am (CST), critical care doctors stated that IVERMECTIN  prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 WILL IMMEDIATELY alter the trajectory of the sars-coV-2 pandemic. They already informed all relevant experts and agencies of their findings months ago and received NO RESPONSE. They urged policymakers to finally take action. All the relevant evidence and needed steps to take can be found on their website linked below. https://covid19criticalcare.com/ Trial Site News video of press conference. https://youtu.be/4V3yxrJwJQs Ivermectin is a very old drug that has been distributed for free by Merck to millions of people in Africa and Asia suffering from sever epidemics of parasitical diseases like River Blindness disease. Dr. Thomas Borody developed the most successful combination therapy using Ivermectin, Zinc and Doxycycline to reverse covid symptoms from mild to severe. Ivermectin costs pennies compared to other drugs. It can be prescribed anywhere in the US right now. Be sure to watch the press release by the FLCCC Dr.s and they lay out all the steps. We can stop the lock downs in weeks to a month if everyone steps up to help urge this and knock it into the heads of governors and health authorities they are being remiss in their duties. Dr. Borody on Ivermectin combination therapy: https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA
    1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. I have expanded links below in my comment for further scholarly articles. I have pointed out science literature to show, just as Fauci showed by his initial position, there is scientific uncertainty regarding this issue. If you read the following papers, you'll realize that studies and articles are plentiful. Mask wearing is not on the same level of science as sterile hand contact with internals, as in a delivery, a laparotomy or even excision of a mole. Laymen can be forgiven for ignorance of this topic and this issue, but scientists should know better. The public servants have chosen to ignore it evidently out of liability concerns more than anything else. Only it may actually do the reverse of what they expect. As for why masks are still worn in surgeries: liability issues, whether or not the operating room, instruments or personnel had anything to do with a post-op infection, the effectiveness or not of masks is irrelevant, but exists as a weak point in a defense against a tort. Here is a relevant quote: "Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/ Well other more rigorous studies were done. The Studies of Surgical Mask Efficacy -- Arthur Firstenberg http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739:BlogPost:2035264 https://muchadoaboutcorona.ca/face-masks-cause-wound-infection/ The following provide links to download pdfs of articles, no fee. Neil W.M. Orr, Six month study of maskless surgery https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/ PubMed Orr article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19310816/ Goggles more important than masks https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964349/ Springer open source article on mask study -- Tunevall https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736 Most medical journals now provide scholarly articles relating to covid free of charge at the present time. We conceived a simple way to dispense with the issue by operating with an air hose over the back through silver ion sterilizing filters, an adaptation of the solution C.L. Kervran developed for reducing carbon monoxide poisoning to welders by breathing heated air while annealing iron plates.
    1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. Why should they be? Ivermectin is smearing the vaccine idea off the map. The only way vaccination love affair survives is for rare instances of people sensitive to ivermectin. Though that is very, very rare. Or to keep vaxxing on top, a huge campaign of disinformation about ivermectin and other antiparasitics. The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease. I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine. Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak:  because Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 showing up in the rest home! No resident became seriously ill. And yet the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! And all residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived. The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine. Dr. Hibberd: https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA Re: Mask, respirators, etc. The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. Serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile, i.e. un-sterile, OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. (links below). Still, an obviously problematic area for controlled study. Showing how equivocal the evidence is: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/ Another link resource  pointed to more for article links than over-all opinion. One must know the range of data and draw personal opinion. It is quite obvious home made cloth masks are merely appearances, need to be washed daily at least, optimally several times a day. https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy Mask redux 3: I have expanded links below in my comment for further scholarly articles. I have pointed out science literature to show, just as Fauci showed by his initial position, there is scientific uncertainty regarding this issue. If you read the following papers, you'll realize that studies and articles are plentiful. Mask wearing is not on the same level of science as sterile hand contact with internals, as in a delivery, a laparotomy or even excision of a mole. Laymen can be forgiven for ignorance of this topic and this issue, but scientists should know better. The public servants have chosen to ignore it evidently out of liability concerns more than anything else. Only it may actually do the reverse of what they expect. As for why masks are still worn in surgeries: liability issues, whether or not the operating room, instruments or personnel had anything to do with a post-op infection, the effectiveness or not of masks is irrelevant, but exists as a weak point in a defense against a tort. Here is a relevant quote: "Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/ Well other more rigorous studies were done. The Studies of Surgical Mask Efficacy -- Arthur Firstenberg http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739:BlogPost:2035264 https://muchadoaboutcorona.ca/face-masks-cause-wound-infection/ The following provide links to download pdfs of articles, no fee. Neil W.M. Orr, Six month study of maskless surgery https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/ PubMed Orr article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19310816/ Goggles more important than masks https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964349/ Springer open source article on mask study -- Tunevall https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736 Most medical journals now provide scholarly articles relating to covid free of charge at the present time. We conceived a simple way to dispense with the issue by operating with an air hose over the back through silver ion sterilizing filters, an adaptation of the solution C.L. Kervran developed for reducing carbon monoxide poisoning to welders by breathing heated air while annealing iron plates. As to double blind, placebo controlled studies, this is not needed with Ivermectin, with a proven history of effectiveness, known LD50s, optimal dosages, etc. To say nothing of the immorality of such time wasting efforts.  Dr. Borody compares that to the ridiculousness of such study on parachutes. Dead weight studies were sufficient to prove efficacy. First human tests were always done with safety protocols, over water, nets, etc. None were done for some jumping with, some jumping without parachutes or different parachutes. Linear comparatives or longitudinal studies were done of course, and improvements adopted. Regarding Ivermectin Prophylaxis, i.e. preventive efficacy: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04422561 White Board Channel re above study: https://youtu.be/TmzvDa9Un44 https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteboardDoctor Dr. Borody re: controlled study of Ivermectin: https://youtu.be/POfIMGS2D6A As to that sham term "social distancing". Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation and ostracization, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically loaded and tactical term. And lock downs are cause for rebellion as this information above becomes general knowledge.
    1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. How can Biden be safe once Americans get it they've been had? lol It is no longer just an inkling of many that these baddies are appointed, not elected. It would appear it has become a genuine and general near certainty in people's minds, their vote has not really counted for perhaps 60 years. Certainty for some many never won an honest election except by Tom Foolery. They feel e.g. Old horn tootin' billy C didnt, "dubbya" didnt, barry - I'm no muslim I'm a marxist - didnt . . and after this year that maybe they were indeed "appointed" by a cabal. When Trump came along, this elite cabal evidently thought, no sweat, no need to cheat for their chosen one, hilary -throw all dead beat dads in jail - rodham . . . but! He won! Gasp! Yes! Trump slipped by their "cleverer" anointed! From that minute on, it was high gear for 2020. They tried to characterize him just a clown. A damn popular clown, a lucky clown. He may be turning into their nightmare "clown." Especially now. China might be right after all. The virus could very well have originated in some remote lab in the States and was dropped in someone's tea cup in Hubei or Wuhan. Maybe from some covert lab in Montana even. But nobody's seriously snooping around there trying to find out. Let's just say that would have been a good plot for a Crichton or Cook novel. What cannot be denied is, the pandemic was a boon for the plotter's onslaught. Nothing in the President's actual record earns a vote of no confidence by Americans. It is all manufactured negative perception, fashioned by a bought and owned press, media, big tech and even pols. And it doesnt hurt to have backing of the slave money of ccp. Now there is the supposed non-fake news out of Australia saying a "complete list" of names of commie insurgents and operatives around the world,  and in U.S. Perhaps Consulates, Departments, Government at all levels, was leaked. I dont believe anything at first blush. Could be another possible distraction. It may not be. I investigate. I know about "active measures," innovated by Americans and perfected by Soviets, and handed down to the Ccp:  Keep people distracted, doubtful, double-minded, divided, half-truthed, demoralized, fighting with or against each other. Then conquer them. Take it all, if you can. This would be impossible by a foreign power over America. But not for the slick American cartel, founded by Rockefeller and others -- actual globalists.  Because JDR, the first psych out master of recent times learned from his PR guy, the best cover.  John - Here's a dime for you sonny - D. - who never saw a profit he wouldnt kill for - "Competition is a sin" - Rockefeller. For those he mentored, taking it all is an attainable goal they salivate for, the ravenous foxes they are. Rarely mentioned by name, not famous, the snakes in the grass mostly dont advertise. Red Pill University goes into this very deeply. G. Edward Griffin. His interview with Bezmenov on active measures delineates how this process progresses and the means of frustrating them, embodied by Reagan and now Trump. JFK started to, and might have, were he more moral and focused, but the same cabal that killed him off, are behind pelosi and schumer and snortin' joe. G. Edward Griffin, I love that guy.  Internationalist bankers are master leveragers. American globalists the most powerful, but the most vulnerable. Because they're surrounded by the deadliest enemy of all. Honest Americans. In this case cheating and conspiracy cannot be denied. Chinese collusion, insurgency and American betrayal by Americans, are both true. But the deniers out themselves. The strategy against the swamp creatures was very expertly thought out. The core strength in America's behalf is standard U.S. Military training: Be Prepared. Personal, first hand investigation is the only way truth is discerned. Sifted from chaff. Then the written word is, and word of mouth are the most potent of weapons from the hand and lips of an informed, enlightened investigator.  A sleuth, basically. In simple, plain English. Based on full truth, not half or three quarter "truths". Which is why calm, patient, scientific method, methods of intelligence, are the surest leverage to pry out the ugly facts and establish the liberating beauteous truth. As Conan Doyle said, via Sherlock Holmes, "Eliminate the impossible, and whatever remains, however improbable, must be true. https://amp.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/chinese-communist-party-ghosts-in-the-global-machine/news-story/d4c2af18e984c43a025486159043e873 https://nypost.com/2020/12/13/us-companies-riddled-with-members-of-chinese-communist-party/ https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/news/a-data-leak-shows-that-over-two-million-chinese-communist-party-members-were-secretly-embedded-in-organizations-around-the-world/articleshow/79720017.cms
    1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770. 1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. 1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. Oh, the Military and a physicist solved that one. Recruit Covid passthrough studies and Aerosolization of nanoparticle sized viruses The mystery is solved: Flushing. So you rub down down the seat with your pocket alcohol sanitizer, business over, you flush, walk to the sink, use pp towels to turn on the water, wash, toss towels, put mask back on, (if you ever took it off) grab more pp towels, use that to open the door and get ready for roll call. What you didn't realize: after you flushed, aerosolized sars-coV-2 were pluming upwardly and all about you like a fine invisible mist, landing in your hair, your mask, your eyelashes, the sclera, your itchy ear, the towel dispenser . . . your shirt, your shoes, and wafting after as you swing open the door and into the bunk hall . .  you are now a vector, buck private.  Published Online: 16 June 2020 Accepted: May 2020 Can a toilet promote virus transmission? From a fluid dynamics perspective  Physics of Fluids 32, 065107 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0013318 https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0013318 https://www.google.com/search?q=military+bootcamp+experiment+with+covid&oq=military+bootcamp+experiment+with+covid&aqs=chrome..69i57.28535j1j4&client=ms-android-att-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8 https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/coronavirus/2020/11/11/study-of-marine-recruits-finds-fever-symptom-screening-misses-many-coronavirus-cases/ . https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/11/covid-spread-among-marine-recruits-despite-quarantine https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/07/08/hundreds-of-marine-recruits-have-now-tested-positive-covid-19-boot-camp.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/16/health/coronavirus-toilets-flushing.html
    1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946. 1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. 1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. 1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016. 1
  4017. 1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028. 1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. 1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. 1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. 1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166. 1
  4167. The current lockdowns and compulsory masking are not based on science.  Even the term "social distancing" is not science terminology, it is psy-op terminology. Physical distancing is the traditional medical term used in preventive and safety measures against viral spread and is the correct terminology. "Social distancing" is a loaded term. Its advocation expresses isolation and ostracization, implies powerlessness, capitulation, obedience and fear. It is a politically loaded and tactical term. The science on masks is irretrievably divided as to effectiveness. Serious studies have shown even masks in surgeries have equivocal results. In other words, no proof mask wearing in ORs saves lives or prevents post-op infections. More likely culprits suspected are insterile, i.e. un-sterile, OR's or post-surgical infection from other sources. Indeed, one study suggests masks increase problems in ORs. (links below). Still, an obviously problematic area for controlled study. We dont need any vaccine for this politically exacerbated and stimulated scourge anyway. The greatest harm being done right now is due to the abysmal and seemingly intentional ignoring of the almost miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin against sars-coV-2 disease. I think there is little doubt this neglect and suppression of the news of Ivermectin is intentional. It competes with the bigger money maker, or the bigger tax write off, for big pharmas like Pfizer and others of their putative 90% effective vaccine. Listen to this story from Dr. Jennifer Hibberd regarding the serendipitous discovery that Ivermectin would end up saving the lives of an entire Canadian nursing home population from a covid-19 outbreak:  because Ivermectin was being used to treat an outbreak of scabbies prior to the covid-19 showing up in the rest home! No resident became seriously ill. And yet the nurses did come down ill, because they were NOT taking Ivermectin. That's how it was known sars-coV-2 was active there. It was an unintentionally controlled study! And all residents were elderly with co-morbidities. All survived. The second link below is an interview with Dr. Thomas Borody regarding the success of his tri-therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and doxycycline. But to reiterate, the Nursing home story shows that Ivermectin alone does the job just fine. Dr. Hibberd: https://youtu.be/8XCYzpHBEkI Dr. Borody on Ivermectin tritherapy. https://youtu.be/PyA_FlPCWUA Re: Mask, respirators, etc. Shows how equivocal the evidence is. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/ Another link resource  pointed to more for article links than over-all opinion. One must know the range of data and draw personal opinion. It is quite obvious home made cloth masks are merely appearances, need to be washed daily at least, optimally several times a day. https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy Mask redux 3: I have expanded links below in my comment for further scholarly articles. I have pointed out science literature to show, just as Fauci showed by his initial position, there is scientific uncertainty regarding this issue. If you read the following papers, you'll realize that studies and articles are plentiful. Mask wearing is not on the same level of science as sterile hand contact with internals, as in a delivery, a laparotomy or even excision of a mole. Laymen can be forgiven for ignorance of this topic and this issue, but scientists should know better. The public servants have chosen to ignore it evidently out of liability concerns more than anything else. Only it may actually do the reverse of what they expect. As for why masks are still worn in surgeries: liability issues, whether or not the operating room, instruments or personnel had anything to do with a post-op infection, the effectiveness or not of masks is irrelevant, but exists as a weak point in a defense against a tort. Here is a relevant quote: "Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/ Well other more rigorous studies were done. The Studies of Surgical Mask Efficacy -- Arthur Firstenberg http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649739:BlogPost:2035264 https://muchadoaboutcorona.ca/face-masks-cause-wound-infection/ The following provide links to download pdfs of articles, no fee. Neil W.M. Orr, Six month study of maskless surgery https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/ PubMed Orr article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19310816/ Goggles more important than masks https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964349/ Springer open source article on mask study -- Tunevall https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01658736 Most medical journals now provide scholarly articles relating to covid free of charge at the present time. We conceived a simple way to dispense with the issue by operating with an air hose over the back through silver ion sterilizing filters, an adaptation of the solution C.L. Kervran developed for reducing carbon monoxide poisoning to welders by breathing heated air while annealing iron plates. As to double blind, placebo controlled studies, this is not needed with Ivermectin, with a proven history of effectiveness, known LD50s, optimal dosages, etc. To say nothing of the immorality of such time wasting efforts.  Dr. Borody compares that to the ridiculousness of such study on parachutes. Dead weight studies were sufficient to prove efficacy. First human tests were always done with safety protocols, over water, nets, etc. None were done for some jumping with, some jumping without parachutes or different parachutes. Linear comparatives or longitudinal studies were done of course, and improvements adopted. Regarding Ivermectin Prophylaxis, i.e. preventive efficacy: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04422561 White Board Channel re above study: https://youtu.be/TmzvDa9Un44 https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteboardDoctor Dr. Borody re: controlled study of Ivermectin: https://youtu.be/POfIMGS2D6A
    1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. 1
  4229. 1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. 1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. 1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241. 1
  4242. 1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. There's nothing more insincere than Johnson's seeming innocent question, "Were any shots fired at me?". He knew very well there weren't. Look at the great gap between his limo and the rest of the forward cats in the motorcade. It would have remained like that for except for the fact the GG-300 didn't turn sharply enough at Elm and almost road up on the curb of the right side, whereupon in correcting the orientation it faced the South knoll, when the sniper fired right through the windshield as Altgens captured JFK's reaction the bullet into his throat. In the most pristine copy of that photo one can see the spiral in the glass next to the rear view mirror as JFK clutches his throat. You will also see the Secret Service agent opening his door just behind Johnson's limo, ready to run to his car, but in the original, you won't see LBJ. Later copies show a pasted in picture of him. Connally was shot after that shot that hit JFK's throat. It is probably likely the shot through the windshield was meant to be a head shot, but the windshield deflected it downward. The head shots to JFK came from diametrically opposite directions: one from the TSBD West side loading dock roof, one from the Terminal Annex parking lot. Both were downard slightly. The loading dock roof shot exited the same temple area the South knoll shot entered the temporal parietal sphenoid junction, passing through and to the right of the entry point of the TSBD West side loading dock shot. The South knoll shot went on to strike the pavement on the North side of Elm, the loading dock roof shot went out and struck the chrome above the windshield.
    1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. 1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277. 1
  4278. 1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. 1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. 1
  4306. 1
  4307. 1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311. 1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325. 1
  4326. 1
  4327. 1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332. 1
  4333. 1
  4334. 1
  4335. 1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. 1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351. 1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356. 1
  4357. Anyone attempting to understand cancer must familiarize themself with the work of Edinburgh embryologist John Beard and his identification of the first differentiated tissue in the life cycle: trophoblasts. Dr. Hernan Acevedo proved Beard's deductions were correct by identifying the identical biomarker of trophoblasts: hCG (human Chorionic Gonadotrophin) as shared in cancers of all types by means of flow cytometry and identification of trophoblast mRNA in those cancers. Trophoblasts can only be expressed or differentiated from diploid totipotent cells, identical to so-called fetal stem cells. Therefore understanding that since the trophoblasts are encoded in the genome as a normal component, and derived only from "fetal stem cells", it is only logical if cancer arises outside pregnancy , it is due to activation of those totipotent cells which, in turn, are activated when there's a need to regenerate senescent differentiated tissues . . tissues no longer able to replicate or having reached the Hayflick limit of division into like tissue. Totipotent cells are immortal cells. Cancer cells are as well. No mortal cell can give rise to either totipotent cells or trophoblasts/cancer cells. Yet trophoblasts are defined as temporary tissues. No part of the placenta contains somatic cells, its all trophoblasts. They encapsulate the fetal blood supply, and after birth that fetal somatic component undergoes normal apoptotic recession or elimination. Obviously regeneration of the individual is akin to regeneration of the species via internal gestation and the same modes of control of trophoblasts in gestation must apply to control of regenerative evolution of trophoblasts in the individual. Beard showed that that control was via the pancreatic enzymes or hydrolases.
    1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368. 1
  4369. 1
  4370. 1
  4371. 1
  4372. 1
  4373. 1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. 1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385. 1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397. 1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1
  4400. 1
  4401. 1
  4402. 1
  4403. 1
  4404. 1
  4405. 1
  4406. 1
  4407. 1
  4408. 1
  4409. 1
  4410. 1