General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Mark H
7 News Spotlight
comments
Comments by "Mark H" (@markh1011) on "7 News Spotlight" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
"His iq is of a child for God sakes." He travelled a lot on his own. He was smart enough to work that out. You don't need to be a genius to point guns at people and fire.
15
@frankwoods4179 YOU yourself gave me witnesses supporting the official story. When I point this out to you, you get all evasive. When I ask you for a reference to the testimony you get all evasive. When I ask you about the implausibility of the conspiracy you get really evasive.
6
"Martin has never practised shooting before that dreadful day ," Neighbours said that Martin always carried an air gun with him. "yet many victims were shot in the head ." Some were. When the shooting started in the cafe people were sitting down and he was shooting from the hip.
6
@frankwoods4179 Lots of witnesses do.
5
@Noneed- " but even I know that if you take that many guns away from people, they won't have anything to protect themselves with." Countries with smarter gun laws don't have out of control crime rates.
5
1. He was smart enough to travel the world on his own. He was smart enough to point a gun. 2. Can you prove this? 3. Why?
5
"A child mentally who was supposed to have shot people using tactics that an ACE shooter " Don't be ridiculous. He shot a lot of people close range. He still missed people. Many people were wounded but not shot. The cafe and gift shop were very small and the people had nowhere to go. He was also smart enough to travel the world on his own. You don't need to be a genius to point a gun.
5
@frankwoods4179 Me - Tell me what you think really happened. You - I don't want to talk about the conspiracy. Me - Tell me what you think really happened. You - You're too scared to talk about the official records. Me - I'm asking about that. Explain the conspiracy. Tell me what you think really happened. You - You're too scared to talk about the official records. Me - But I'm asking about that. Explain the conspiracy. That's part of it. Tell me the errors and lies. Tell me what you think really happened. You're dodging. You - Not dodging. You're too scared to talk about the official records. Me - But I'm asking about that. Explain the conspiracy. That's part of it. Tell me the errors and lies. Tell me what you think really happened. You're dodging. You - You're too scared to talk about the official records. 🤦♂ You're running in circles. 😂
4
@frankwoods4179 If that vague nonsense is your best list of anomalies then you're actually undermining your own argument. What actual evidence do you have... .of anything to support a conspiracy that you're too scared to even explain...😂
4
@frankwoods4179 You were issued with this challenge. What do you think really happened and where is your evidence? Answer in the next post or it will be embarrassing for you. ...and big surprise.... you dodged. Anyone can see me answering your questions. While you are evading.
4
The people were trapped in the small cafe and gift shop. They had nowhere to go. No the deaths were not all head shots.
4
@frankwoods4179 " Just go through the questions I have posted here and provide a sensible response." I've done this to many of them but you just insult me for not going along with your hints at a conspiracy. You don't appear to be able to back up anything you claim.
4
@frankwoods4179 You're dodging. I'm here asking questions. I want to know more. This is your main hobby in life. Why are you dodging?
3
@frankwoods4179 A poor excuse because after all this effort you have no solid evidence of anything. This is your main hobby in life and you fail at it.
3
@frankwoods4179 "Yes there were mass shootings and thankfully they are in decline however firearms related deaths have been trending down for the last 53 years" You're diverting from the point constantly. I will repeat - the trigger for the change in laws was mass shootings. They were brought in as a result of mass shootings. You keep talking about something other than mass shootings. " I don’t think the laws were to address mass shootings alone" That was obviously the trigger as the laws changed as a result of one AND the laws coincided with a change in the trend of mass shootings. You're diverting to other things. "The is no conclusive evidence that the new laws made any material difference" They were brought in due to mass shootings and they appear to have clearly made a difference when it comes to mass shootings. You can't say that they made no difference when they clearly did - on mass shootings.
3
@frankwoods4179 " Why has the shooting at the toll-booth and the shooter’s interaction with the occupants of the BMW never been fully explored or explained?" So the shooter spoke to people before killing them. ..... and? Is this the best you have?
3
@frankwoods4179 " It would be common for police to have this." Not at all. Lacking paperwork for a gun used in a crime would be common. "Some reports suggest that it was first discovered by emergency workers not the police." I'm asking questions and you're starting to throw tantrums again. This topic is your whole life. I ask a few questions and you break down and cry. Why do questions concern you so much?
3
@frankwoods4179 You're insulting me because when actually pressed, you can't come up with anything. I can see you've put a lot of effort into this and really have nothing. Then when asked about the conspiracy you run a mile.
3
@frankwoods4179 Many witnesses identified him. He was caught at the scene. He admitted doing it. You have no answers to these... but you deflect to a lot of irrelevant questions.
3
You tell us. What is your theory?
3
@frankwoods4179 "I am claiming nothing but the explanation of a FACT. " So ....nothing happened? What sort of terrible evasive answer is that? lol.. Why are you too scared to answer? I will not stop asking now.
3
@frankwoods4179 " I don’t know what you are doing. " I'm asking you what you think happened at Port Arthur. You have over 1000 comments on this page but are too scared to answer this question for some reason.....
3
@frankwoods4179 " There is no forensic evidence presented to the court or available to the public to prove Bryant " He was caught at the scene. He was identified by numerous witnesses. Everything else you said was irrelevant. What's your theory on what happened? Of that's right you always dodge this.
3
He was capable enough to travel the world on his own. Travelling is actually hard work. Surely he was able to point a gun....
3
@michaelwillis373 Have you got sources for these?
3
@michaelwillis373 "Most accurate mass shooting in history," 1. Lets see your calculations for this. 2. Most of the killings happened in a small cafe and gift shop where the victims had nowhere to go.
3
@MrRecklessryan 🤣
3
Laycock also said "I only knew him as one of the local kids." and "I unlocked the door and stepped out and saw the young man and this blonde figure which I didn’t know was a female or male, because of the length of the blonde hair and the way it was flowing out and hanging loose." So he didn't know him that well. He couldn't even tell if it was a man or a woman.
3
@frankwoods4179 "Putting accurate shots on the victims with the noise, movement and chaos in the cafe was exceptional for an untrained person." The noise? You're being ridiculous. The cafe and the gift shop were small. It wasn't that hard to hit a lot of people at close range.
3
@burky5000 That you can still get guns in Australia is a fact not an opinion.
3
Have you got a source for that?
3
@eddx5758 "and obviously it was government planed" Any evidence of this?
3
@frankwoods4179 " You clearly do not want to discuss the Cheok statement" You're playing games. So much projecting. You raised Laycock's statement and now you're being all evasive about it. I don't think you've read it. I've asked what's important about *Cheok's statement and you won't answer*. " not only totally rejects the official story that the shooter acted alone " How? I keep asking you questions and you keep evading and accusing me of not wanting to discuss things. 🤡
3
@frankwoods4179 " When the Prosecution’s explanation of the toll-booth shooting is directly contradicted by an eye witness who was 15-20 metres away " Where was the contradiction? Bryant may have argued with the people before shooting them. That doesn't make it a conspiracy. "not one shred of forensic evidence from these items is presented in court to absolutely and positively identify the shooter I believe there is a problem." So they made a case from all the witnesses and him being caught at the scene.... Is this all you have?
3
@frankwoods4179 I have already given you answers on several things you've raised. I'm asking you what you think really happened. You're tap dancing around in circles.
3
@frankwoods4179 You're projecting. What do you think really happened? Why are you so scared of this question?
3
@frankwoods4179 ...so nothing then.
3
Are you still pushing this conspiracy nonsense? Is this YouTube channel your whole life?
3
He was capable of traveling the world on his own. Surely he could point a gun...?
3
@frankwoods4179 "There is a significant difference in the skills necessary to just pointing a gun and do what is alleged to have occurred at PA." Not really. Many of his victims were at close range and trapped.
3
@SuzyMcEwen "I prefer to go with my version thanks. " ....what is your version and what is your evidence?
3
@frankwoods4179 "After the first two shots the people would have been scrambling to escape or find cover. " There wasn't really anywhere to go. They were sitting ducks in the cafe and gift shop. "but we are expected to believe that he could act so calmly and professionally in the cafe." Is that really so weird that a person doping the thing they planned to do ...did the thing that they planned to do.
3
@SuzyMcEwen "And I could ask the same of you" You dodged and shifted the burden. He was identified by many witnesses and caught by the police at the scene. As I said, I'm willing to have my mind changed if someone can give me some evidence. You dodged doing so though.... That's not a good sign.
3
So what do you think really happened?
3
@frankwoods4179 Happy to address whatever that is. So what do you think really happened at Port Arthur? Haven't you looked into this?
3
@frankwoods4179 Nope. So what do you think really happened at Port Arthur?
3
@frankwoods4179 "What I think happened has not been considered in the official records." Great. So you think the official story is wrong. So what do you think happened?
3
@frankwoods4179 "nd the number of ‘coincidences’ and unexplained circumstances are ‘interesting" I keep challenging you on what they are and you've given me such minor things ... and then you get angry and evasive.
3
Are you actually serious?
3
"Was it just a coincidence that so many journalists had gathered in Hobart for a conference that weekend?" Prove there were more than expected. So reporters were allowed to see the crime scene...... and? Do you have anything solid that proves anything?
3
Previous
1
Next
...
All