General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Mark H
VICE TV
comments

Comments by "Mark H" (@markh1011) on "VICE TV" channel.

@shaundinan2951 You told a story of something you thought you saw 20 years ago when you were a kid. Can you back it up?
11
"I know in my heart that plane was shot down" Do you have a scrap of evidence to support this claim?
10
@archstanton3379 Sigh... a passport was found... on the sidewalk.. before any of the collapses... At least make a half baked effort to research before you make a fool of yourself.
9
@shaundinan2951 TV stations do not have access to military communications. " audio and video" ...which doesn't seem to exist.
8
@MrCool144 Lava is molten rock. There was no lava, or volcanos involved in 9/11.
7
@seanhorgan76 Passenger items were found at every crash site.
6
@MrCool144 Lava? lol
6
@jeremiahjohnson6082 "and I have done actual research." It doesn't show.
6
@jeremiahjohnson6082 " let's wait around for another 40 years or so" It's been 20 years and still you can't come up with any evidence.....
5
@shaundinan2951 "There's also plenty of evidence right before your eyes." Where? Show me your best evidence.
5
@shaundinan2951 " Yet it was there on my TV." Your memory isn't as reliable as you think it is. What you're claiming would never happen. It's not plausible. On top of that, there is zero evidence to support it....
5
@shaundinan2951 "Something that doesn't exist...like the black boxes am I correct?" What are you talking about?
4
@surroundedbyidiots2778 There were plenty of cameras there. They weren't set up to get footage of planes. They were set up to record people. People don't come from the sky.
3
" No luggage, seats, engines, or fuselage?!?" Parts and passenger effects were found at every crash site. There was a lot less at the towers but there is no denying that planes hit them. It's not common for planes to intentionally hit the ground at high speed. Generally pilots are trying not to die. Look at PSA Flight 1771, UA 585 and Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 though. There are similarities.
3
Nothing you said was correct or made sense.
3
Not quite. There is a pathetically small list of people who want another investigation. From the comments many of them make it appears they had done no investigation of their own on the topic. Science doesn't progress with internet lists.
3
@justmint8483 "well that's what happened to WTC 7. " There were other factors though. If all that happened on 9/11 was a fire at WTC7 then it would have been put out. But the terrorist attack next door had an undeniable effect on firefighting efforts. Can you find a comparison? Of course not However fire has caused tall buildings to collapse such as the Plasco Building and the Wilton Paes de Almeida Building.
3
@psikeyhackr6914 You seem quite frantic. Did my questions confuse or scare you? You don't seem quite right.
3
" Anyone who has ever learned to design a steel frame structure and understands statics is hurt by this news." So you've designed buildings? "Anyone who believes that an airplane can drill into a steel structure in this way" That's physics.
3
Only a couple of cameras caught anything. The frames were released. You can see a blur that fits a plane. It was 2001... it's not like everyone had camera phones.
3
@professorhoodoo "Why would he hide" Is he hiding?
3
"IT WAS A MISSILE HITTING THE PENTAGON FACT, " There is planet of evidence that a large plane hit the pentagon. There is zero evidence that a missile hit the pentagon.
2
"AND THE LIST GOES ON AND ON INTO EVERY ASPECT OF 9/11" Yes the list of aspects certainly does go on. "FIREFIGHTERS MEDICS POLICE PILOTS MEDIA MILITARY PERSONNEL POLITICIANS" Insightful....
2
Only 1 camera (2 next to each other actually) caught anything and the frames were released a long time ago.
2
@jeffafa5110 "But that only section of the pentagon had the investigation of the missing money. " That's a fantasy.
2
@mobiledutycodmr.9256 Sure. It was never missing. It wasn't accounted for. Within 6 months more than half of it was. Nothing to do with 9/11.
2
@mobiledutycodmr.9256 It's been over 20 years. Do you have 'evidence' better than that claim?
2
"Folks, when the owner of the World Trade Center stated in an interview that they, “decided to pull it”" If you look at the quote in context it cannot be about claims of demolition. He said that the FDNY decided to pull it... I assume meaning to say 'pull the pin" as in to give up. The fire department don't make decisions about demolition. The fire department do do demolitions. You can't make a decision to do a demolition of a building while its burning and then drop it the same day. None of it fits the claim.
2
@shaundinan2951 It doesn't even make sense. CNN supposedly have an audio connection to a fighter jet? ...and the response? That simply wouldn't happen. It's even more unlikely if it were some some big conspiracy. You need something better than that very sketchy story. If it were true there would be video of it..... and it would be easy to validate. It would have been exposed on the day. Didn't happen.
2
@jeremiahjohnson6082 You're contradicting yourself. You say that there is nothing but also say there is scraps. So which is it? Did you look at those other crash sites? They look similar. "where is the carnage?" Much of the plane went into the ground. Again, the area looked similar to those other crash sites. "I understand you WANT to believe" You're projecting here. You want to believe in the conspiracy and won't research or think too much. You want the conspiracy to be real.
2
Didn't I see you spouting this same thing over a decade ago? Haven't you come up with something else since then?
2
 @psikeyhackr6914 Do you think your response were rational?
2
@psikeyhackr6914 Do you have some mental health issues?
2
@psikeyhackr6914 "So you edited your post from talking about mental health. LOL" You edited your post talking about me talking about your mental health problems. ....and? I think you're providing me with the answer to my question....😉
2
@psikeyhackr6914 "Can you find where the NIST specifies the total amount of concrete" You're back to the original point. I remember you doing this song and dance over a decade ago. Haven't you come up with something else since then?
2
@psikeyhackr6914 " Where is the data on the distributions of steel " You appear to be struggling with a couple of simple questions 1. This was what you were whining about a decade ago. I think I remember you being humiliated by Ryan Mackey. Have you got anything else to say about this topic? 2. Do you have some mental health problems?
2
@psikeyhackr6914 You're dodging. Did my questions confuse or scare you?
2
Most of the plane went into the building. You can easily find photos of debris. Passenger dna and personal effects were matched and identified with the families. "Also, the angle of attack is impossible for a jetliner to achieve according to aviation experts." Show me the reputable piloting or airline associations that say that.
2
..and why is that?
2
"Find out about A team Austrian "artists" that rented 88" I have. What's your argument? " They wont be able to contain reaction for next two weeks"." Thermite burns very quickly and it's also very obvious. Two weeks worth of thermite would require a mountain.....and again it would be so obvious that everyone would have noticed.
2
" Clearly 911 was orchestrated." Yep, by Al Qaeda. "we heard the detonations go off 2 times when the buildings came down" We have plenty of footage of the towers. Show me the video with suspicious explosives going off. Take your time I'll wait.
1
@williamforrest4371 "where were the Wings from the make believe plane" Smashed in the impact of course. You can see damage to either side of the fuselage hole. You've obviously done zero research on this. "None how about the evidence of the 9mil that bush,cheney, had to destroy " That makes no sense at all. They had to destroy money? lol... I think you're trying to refer to a particular audit but you don't seem to even know what you're trying to say. There is plenty of evidence that a large jet hit the pentagon. There is no evidence that a missile hit the pentagon.
1
" can't believe how naieve people are. This was so obvious an inside job that it is absurd" Did the internet tell you that? It must be true then. Yeah it's the other people who are naive.
1
JakeFromStateFarm` You got nearly everything wrong.
1
What Josh said. It was unaccounted for as part of an audit. Different aging systems across various organisations. The usual challenges. Within 6 months of 9/11 more than half of it was reconciled. The US has had the same sort of ongoing problems tracking and reporting military spending for years. The whole thing has nothing to do with 9/11.
1
" If you think someone qualified to fly a single engine plane can fly a twin engine jet then you're delusional." The worst pilot of the group had a commercial pilots license, many hours in the air and trained on simulators specifically for the mission for months. " It's quite obvious that this was a controlled explosion which fell in a perfect footprint. " Except that the towers didn't fall into their footprint. They went mostly outside the footprint.
1
"They made it twice in mid sections no less ...And a pentagon building " You couldn't get bigger targets.
1
@freakyflow "And 23 feet of the 77ft height of the pentagon " You don't know that he was even aiming to do that.
1
You can find photos of plane parts with 20 seconds of searching.
1
@proteg3881 What does that even mean? Make a worthwhile point.
1
@surroundedbyidiots2778 It's hardly surprising at all. The evidence that a large jet hit the pentagon makes it undeniable however.
1
@jason8952 "What evidence, Mark? " Passenger DNA matched with families. Passenger personal effects identified by families. The FDR. Image from the security footage with a shape that fits a large plane. Light poles knocked down on the way into the impact. Plane wreckage photographed. over 100 witnesses who saw a plane hit the pentagon.... But you're all confused about the plane going into the building so apparently there is no evidence... 🤦‍♂ You can even find a photo of part of an engine. You're hopeless.
1
@DrunkedMunk Show me where the government said that.
1
@jamestee8852 "Because it was a missile same as Pennsylvania" Plenty of evidence that a large plane hit the pentagon. Zero evidence that a missile hit the pentagon.
1
@surroundedbyidiots2778 "you’re a poster boy for your good old crooked government." I'm not even American. " But after researching the governments track record in past history, they have 0 credibility." So because governments lie that makes all the conspiracies true? So the earth is flat too huh? "Maybe one day your eyes will open up." Yep that's what the flat earthers tell me. You appear to be no different.
1
@surroundedbyidiots2778 So I raise facts you don't like and you accuse me of being American. I point out that I'm not and you say I'm waving a patriotic flag. Can you do better than these poor responses? I don't think you can.
1
@surroundedbyidiots2778 I have referenced many facts in this thread. You have no response. You cannot defend your conspiracy. All you can do is evade and make silly claims about my nationality. Hopeless.
1
@mobiledutycodmr.9256 No. Here is what happened. Some time before 9/11 there was an audit done, as happens regularly. But some of the finances couldn't be accounted for. This was due to records not being available, different systems, old systems etc. Within 6 months of 9/11 most of it was reconciled. End of story. Nothing to do with 9/11 or the pentagon crash. The US has had ongoing problems reconciling military spending.
1
@mobiledutycodmr.9256 "some 2.8 trillion there are either idiots running our country or they are in on it " As with most governments its mostly the former.
1
@mobiledutycodmr.9256 "right he just announced it the day before stop" ...and within 6 months of that announcement more than half of it was reconciled. Similar problems have happened in the years following. It has nothing to do with 9/11.
1
"Well ... on the hierarchy of scientific disciplines, the structural engineers were beneath us physicists - that's me." You're not a physicist. I've had to explain basic physics concepts to you. "You cannot have an in-tact, smaller and weaker block pulverizing its way down to the bottom of these massive and stable structures. " You don't understand the progressive collapse. The collapses started with 15-20 floors falling into one weakened floor then you have 21 floors falling onto the next then 22 falling into the next and so forth. Halfway through the collapse you have half the building smashing the floors below it. You don't even understand the basic mechanics of the progressive collapse. "You cannot have an in-tact, smaller and weaker block pulverizing its way down to the bottom of these massive and stable structures. " WRONG. Structural engineers learn that the strength of building materials doesn't scale proportionally with size. So it's not to simple to just build a little representative model of the towers to test the collapse behavior. ". But it could not, because Bazant's "theory" is so absolutely and absurdly ridiculous" As demonstrated, you don't even understand it. " even the boys at NIST under the crack of the government whip could not support that moronic absurdity." NISTs findings were entirely consistent with Bazants and others who performed analysis. Seffen, Zhou, Greening etc.
1
" Just like when NIST modeled sections of the floors and blasted them with temperatures beyond anything that could have possibly been achieved from the available fuels" Prove it. Support your claim. Go on. "No fudging any experiment or model on any scale could support Bazant's ridiculous thesis." Prove their was fudgling.
1
"Bazant is either a moron," It just becomes comedy when someone like you says that and you don't even understand his analysis. 😂😂
1
Debunked again.
1
Oh and are you actually trying to present yourself off as a physicist? You don't understand basic physics. Why are so many conspiracy theorists dishonest?
1
@lebergerdesphotons4565 Weak insults because you can't address the argument.
1
@lebergerdesphotons4565 Wow you copy pasted a quote. That will really make up for the lack of an argument. ...
1
"Anyone who has any discernment knows 9-11 was an inside job. T" Can you prove this?
1
"The whole thing was AN INSIDE JOB!" It's been over 20 years and still no evidence to support that claim.
1
You're referring to Jamie McIntyre who was just trying to make the point that the plane went into the building. He said later on about attempts to quote mine him - “Having been there on September 11th, having seen the plane wreckage and photographed it myself personally, I can tell you that’s nonsense…Click here for sound clip I had a camera with me, I took pictures of some of the wreckage, some of the parts of the fuselage of …a part of the cockpit, until they told us we had to move back away from the scene…” Conspiracy theorists are dishonest.
1
"USAF pilot interviewed THAT DAY described shooting down the plane." Where is your evidence for this? " A farmer was interviewed THAT DAY and described seeing the plane shot down by USAF" Evidence please. " A farmer was interviewed THAT DAY and described seeing the plane shot down by USAF" It was 80 something and the contents were made known at the Moussaoui trial. Only 2 (next to each other) were pointed at a section of wall. "Read April Gallop's testimony. " she has nothing of interest to say about it. " Jet engines weigh 7-8 tons EACH. Where are they?" They went in the pentagon. You can find a photo of part of one.
1
@christopherh2336 "everyone knows it was a missile" Zero evidence for that. "There is zero plane wreckage" It takes 20 seconds to do a search and find photos of plane wreckage at the pentagon.
1
Actually, every WTC building collapsed or partially collapsed as did some other surrounding buildings.
1
@kurtcameron723 Judy Wood's theories are even worse than the absurd demolition claims.
1
"No planes could have cut through the MASSIVE STEEL construction of the World Trade Towers. " So I guess you don't understand physics huh? " explain how a Hollow tube of aluminum that a bird hit can take out cut into tbe Towers like a cartoon, " Think about that. At high speed even something as light and soft as a bird can do serious damage. Now consider the damage from planes that weigh over 100 tons. "The big nose of these planes is made of plastic." So what? The nose didn't do the damage. "A field energy weapon disintegrated these buildings," That's a science fiction fairy tale. "Where is the rubble?" The pile that took over 6 months to clean up.....
1
"everyone interviewed said they heard something like a missile, or saw missiles in the air as well as fighter jets over and near Shanksville, PA." Who said this? "I witnessed another airplane crash and the debris and impact crater" Was that an intentional crash at high speed?
1
With a few minutes of searching you could have found a picture of part of an engine at the pentagon. There is plenty of evidence that it was flight 77. There is zero evidence that it was a missile.
1
@jeremiahjohnson6082 "You MUST be one of those that actually believe the single bullet theory of JFK" I'm not interested in your subject changes. "In Shanksville, I saw no wreckage from a plan" People who were there did. I guess you know better than the first responders huh? With 20 seconds of searching you can find pictures that have wreckage in it. Look up the crashes of PSA Flight 1771, UA 585 and Ethiopian Airlines flight 302. They have similarities to the Shanksville crash.
1
@kevinbrown1893 ":Obviously, if you had known anything about high school level physics then this would come as no surprise." Actually, if you knew anything about high school physics you wouldn't be so surprised that fire can cause a building to totally collapse. "must have been quickly reprimanded by our government as " 🤦‍♂ "BBC reported that day that WTC 7 had already collapsed before it had actually collapsed!" There various incorrect reports that day. That was just one of them. It's not hard to see how they got that wrong considering the fire department thought it was going to collapse long before it did.
1
You contributed another post full of errors and ignorance. I pointed out your errors. You got mad, ran away and complained about me. You " I wonder if that's a coincidence or a conspiracy." Yeah man I'm totally reading your mind.
1
@lebergerdesphotons4565 You're still throwing a tantrum about me because you can't address my arguments.
1
@lebergerdesphotons4565 Again - more tantrums because you cannot address the arguments.
1
@lebergerdesphotons4565 " Maybe if you can explain the 8 second seismic signatures" Already done so. 1. They were longer than 8 seconds. Look at the seismic data. 2. You can't determine collapse times from seismic data because you don't get a disturbance at the point where the collapse starts, and you don't get a clean end of disturbance when the collapse ends. Explained. Can you refute this? Of course not.
1
@lebergerdesphotons4565 " and the lack of wingtip vortex then" Oh and I missed this. 5 Factors That Affect The Strength Of Wingtip Vortices "1) Aircraft Speed As the velocity of an aircraft increases, the strength of the vortices is typically reduced. That's because flying faster typically requires a lower angle-of-attack. It's also why takeoff and landing are critical times to pay attention to the flight path of large aircraft around you, because they're going relatively slow and creating large vortices."
1
@lebergerdesphotons4565 ”So you got it right and Judy Wood got it wrong?” Judy Wood seems to get everything wrong. I’m going straight from the seismic data. You are denying it. ”She's been working successfully as an engineer.” A weak appeal to authority. Her qualifications don’t change the data.
1
@lebergerdesphotons4565 “So you're saying that a 110 story building falls to the ground and that can't be cleanly differentiated from the moments before and after when no such event was occurring?” You’re not getting it. You never do. The seismic data doesn’t start to record anything until the collapse is so destructive that creates a disturbance. This may even be when the first debris hits the ground. Is that the beginning of the collapse? This isn’t hard to understand. ”how about her comparison with the seismic data from the kingdome.” Blown up with explosives. The explosives caused the collapse and would have registered the disturbance straight away. Again – this isn’t hard to understand.
1
@lebergerdesphotons4565 " leaves the need to explain why they fell down. " The explanation has been given over and over. Do I need to sit you down like a little child and explain it to you again?
1
@lebergerdesphotons4565 "Was it the "airplane" which entered the building entirely disappearing without decelerating or deforming? " 🤦‍♂ 1. They came to a stop in the building. So they decelerated. Basic physics You don't know basic physics 2. They would have been torn apart in the collisions. ..hence the explosions. Sigh. These are such basic errors....
1
"were not COMMERCIAL airliners but dark colored SILENT missiles Do you have a vision problem? "also came down as the results of well placed bombs" Why do you need bombs if you're firing missiles? " which caused the steel beams to TURN INTO DUST in mid air ." That didn't happen... but either way, bombs and missiles don't do that. Nothing you say makes sense or reflects reality.
1
Silverstein was rich before 9/11. He spent a fortune on legal bills and renting an empty site. He was paid less than what it cost to rebuild. The idea that 9/11 was an insurance scam is absurd.
1
@twistedbunny If that's all you could come up with as a response then no you can't debate me.
1
@twistedbunny So still nothing....? Did my post confuse you? How about this... you bring some evidence to support claims that the government did it. Or keep dodging... buddy.
1
@twistedbunny "The problem with you if you're asking for evidence is that you hope for me to pull out the whole "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" argument " I recommend you don't try to guess what I'm going to say..... " there's more than one resource containing any information you might want that shows that the government did it " I'm waiting to hear your evidence. " They staged the gulf of tonkin " So that proves 9/11 was done by the government? Logic isn't your thing. That's like me pointing to a terrorist attack from Al Qaeda, such as the USS Cole Bombing or the foiled Bojinka plot as evidence for them doing 9/11. You have to do better than that buddy.
1
@twistedbunny " I'm not here to change your mind" You were challenged to provide evidence and I'm seeing a lot of excuses. "They later released only five frames of the incident but from their Southside security checkpoint and you couldn't see any plane whatsoever " You're being disingenuous. You can see a object that fits the size of a plane. It's blurry but it's definitely there. " and even a hint of anything from the sky hitting Pentagon was non existent." Oh dear. Let's have a quick look at some of the evidence... Passenger DNA matched with families. Passenger personal effects identified by families. The FDR. Image from the security footage with a shape that fits a large plane. Light poles knocked down on the way into the impact. Plane wreckage photographed. over 100 witnesses who saw a plane hit the pentagon.... Yeah... non-existent...🙄
1
@twistedbunny "I could go on with the infamous" With a list of claims that were debunked 15 years ago...? Do go on. "by the BBC," Just one of the errors from the day. It's not hard to see how the error was made considering that the FDNY were the ones who predicted it would collapse because it looked so unstable. The idea that a national media company from the UK were involved and reading from a script is absurd as the whole insurance scam idea. What was the pentagon crash for then? Flight 93? Just part of the insurance scam? It makes no sense. "The list is endless, a" It's so endless that you can't seem to come up with anything of substance.... 🙄 "go read the documents Assange published" You're supposed to be bringing evidence. All I've seen so far is excuses, old debunked claims and requests for me to do the work for you.
1
@twistedbunny I'm scanning your post.... excuses... whining... excuses... You realise you're out of your depth and you're panicking. Your weak claims were dismantled in front of you and now you're fleeing. But like most people on the internet with a fragile ego.. you're going to throw some playground insults while you run away and hide. Well this has clearly been an awkward lesson for you kid. Get back to me when you're capable of defending anything you say.
1
@twistedbunny I'm scanning your post.... excuses... whining... excuses... You realise you're out of your depth and you're panicking. Your weak claims were dismantled in front of you and now you're fleeing. But like most people on the internet with a fragile ego.. you're going to throw some playground insults while you run away and hide.
1
@twistedbunny I'm scanning your post.... excuses... whining... excuses...
1
@twistedbunny You realise you're out of your depth and you're panicking. Your weak claims were dismantled in front of you and now you're fleeing. But like most people on the internet with a fragile ego.. you're going to throw some playground insults while you run away and hide.
1
@twistedbunny You realise you're out of your depth and you're panicking. Your weak claims were dismantled in front of you and now you're fleeing.
1
@twistedbunny But like most people on the internet with a fragile ego.. you're going to throw some playground insults while you run away... Well this has clearly been an awkward lesson for you. Get back to me when you're capable of defending anything you say.
1
@twistedbunny Get back to me when you're capable of defending anything you say.
1
@twistedbunny Well this has clearly been an awkward lesson for you kid.
1
@twistedbunny "Old man, the juice isn't always worth the squeeze," Kid you're putting so much effort into your excuses... it's hilarious. You apparently can't be bothered... it's too hard... or something but then you write out a page of whining and whimpering excuses..
1
@twistedbunny You've obviously got no idea. Just go kiddo... don't hang around trying to recover some dignity... that's only making it worse.
1
@twistedbunny See my comment about hanging around trying to recover your dignity.... lol
1
@twistedbunny " getting your diGNiTy off of stupidly arguing with teenagers" Dignity off? What are you even babbling about child? You've been schooled and you're falling apart.... lol
1
@twistedbunny " "lack of credible arguments" made you orgasm " Dude... weird.
1
@twistedbunny "I'm worried if you actually have a family, poor kids" I must have really struck a nerve with the humiliating lesson. You're desperate to get back at me.
1
@twistedbunny " I'm stress free typing this out" Your obsession with getting back at me for schooling shows otherwise. Every response now shows otherwise. 😂
1
@twistedbunny "I'm trolling you at this point," 🤣🤣 Proving my point. It must have really cut you to get schooled like that.
1
That's nonsense. Show some evidence for that. How would that even make sense? If Bush was behind it, why would he talk to kids about it?
1
@timshea4279 "Maybe the kids were in on it? " 😂😂
1
@wiwalk6611 "Fuel physically can not melt steal." Irrelevant. The jet fuel only started the fires. The steel weakened, it didn't melt.
1
@wiwalk6611 ".the buildings where designed to with stand plane strikes and earthquakes" Leslie Robertson clarified that they considered a slow flying 707 and did not consider all the follow on effects of the jet fuel. Oh and you won't know who he was of course, but he was one of the people who designed the towers.
1
@wiwalk6611 "go and google image bird strikes on planes and look at damage to plane" You're destroying your own position. If a little fragile, light bird can do damage to a plane then an object weighing over 100 tons can get through some steel columns.
1
@wiwalk6611 "then you have biulding 7. Come down co trolled demolition. No planes hit?" It was hit by part of a skyscraper and burned away all day. The fire department thought it looked unstable and would collapse. They were right. The end.
1
@wiwalk6611 ...oh and you didn't respond to my post... .you just ran to new claims.... that's what conspiracy theorists do... because they can't ever support their claims.
1
@wiwalk6611 Yep.... a slow flying 707. Was that it? Was that all you had as a response? 🤦‍♂
1
@wiwalk6611 Hasn't this been an awkward lesson for you lol
1
@wiwalk6611 "they where designed to with stand plane strikes." I have already addressed your confusion here. Also, they did actually withstand the strikes. "The buildings where not structurally weakened by the planes or fires." We know for a fact that the fires were weakening the structure. We have photos showing the gradual weakening.
1
@wiwalk6611 That's all you've got? You don't know anything about this topic do you sport?
1
@wiwalk6611 "ow wow you think your intelligent." You're moaning like a petulant child. You've got nothing. Take your lesson and go play with your toys.
1
@wiwalk6611 Get back to me when you've got something kid.
1
@wiwalk6611 Hopeless. 🤦‍♂
1
" Sadly we probably will never know the truth" It's been known for a long time. But reality can be boring for some people and like they mysterious conspiracies more.
1
@bazzledust2912 The details of 9/11 are quite well established, from the Hamburg cell to the events of the actual day....including the collapse of the towers.
1
There is zero evidence to support that claim. It also makes no sense at all.
1
@kurtcameron723 Prove it.
1
@seanhorgan76 "and yet on the 11th the pentagon gets hit exactly where the paper trail of said money was at" This is pure fantasy. Within 6 months of 9/11 more than half the spending was reconciled. Nothing to do with the pentagon. But hey feel free to provide the evidence that supports your claim.
1
It was unaccounted for as part of an audit. Different aging systems across various organisations. The usual challenges. Within 6 months of 9/11 more than half of it was reconciled. The US has had the same sort of ongoing problems tracking and reporting military spending for years. The whole thing has nothing to do with 9/11. The plane did not the "the financial department". You don't make all the money disappear off all the records by hitting an office with a plane. Everything is backed up. It's all nonsense.
1
"Raging fires in skyscrapers never caused a collapse. " Except for then they have, such as the Wilton Paes de Almeida Building and Plasco Buildings. Oh and they were not hit intiontally by 767s.
1
"YET NO PLANE PARTS WERE FOUND." You can find photos of the plane parts with 30 seconds of searching.... "EVEN THE CHIEF OF FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO was THERE AT THE Scene SAID IT ON LIVE TV. HE LITERALLY SAID THERE ARE NO PLANE PARTS HERE" Nope. That never happened. If you're trying to refer to someone called Jamie Mcintire, he was deceptively quote mined. " IT LOOKED LIKE A MISSILE STRIKE" Missiles don't leave holes like that, they explode. There is no evidence for a missile hitting thempentagon.
1
Sigh... Most of the plane went into the pentagon but you can still see wreckage. Most of 93 went straight into the dirt but you can still see wreckage. Generally in plane crashes the pilots are trying not to kill themselves and everyone else. If you look at the crashes of PSA Flight 1771, UA 585 and Ethiopian Airlines flight 302, there are similarities to the 9/11 crashes.
1
@timshea4279 I didn't know that. That's very interesting. One report I just read said he also tried to sue Bin Laden?
1
Insurance against terrorism was not uncommon. If you were renting a building that was the target of a terrorist attack a few years earlier it would be wise to insure against it. It was insured against terrorism when it was attacked then as well. The supposed dancing Israelis were released with no evidence that they knew anything.
1
Within 6 months of 9/11 more than half of it was accounted for. The story has nothing to do with 9/11.
1
Sigh.... so much wrong... The passport was never in the fires. It was ejected in the crash. The jet fuel didn't cause the high temps, it only started the fires. The steel didn't melt, it weakened.
1
@hassanbabu6200 "where was the one passport ejected to" It was found on the sidewalk before any of the collapses. It was handed to the police. An airline seat cushion was also found on the sidewalk. "explain to me how the whole building just vertically collapsed floors by floors from the top." Seriously? You don't know what happened so I have to teach you? Do you know anything about this topic?
1
@hassanbabu6200 I do know very well. Have you done any research on this topic at all? Have you watched videos of the top down collapse? Look up what a progressive collapse is.
1
@hassanbabu6200 Did you look up what a progressive collapse is?
1
@Hobojet "Larry Silverstein admitted the building was "pulled" demo term" That's not what he said at all. Post what he really said. " Demo experts were asked not knowing what building 7 was if it was controlled demo said it was clear." Nope. One guy said it. They had to go to the other side of the world to find a demo guy to say it. ...and that same guy said the towers collapsed was NOT a demo. So do you agree with him?
1
@epoen2012 "Bush sent the bin laden family out of the country via plane right after" According to snopes the claim is false.
1
"What commercial airliner in black or charcoal grey? " If you'd bothered to do a few minutes of research you'd see that United Airlines Flight 175 was dark grey. Flight 11 was grey underneath.
1
That's total nonsense.
1
"econdly where's the video and witnesses of the Pentagon so called strike??" Over 100 witnesses are on record describing a plane hitting the pentagon. "And lastly" when has anyone seen aluminum cut through steel so perfectly?" Oh do you don't know about physics.....
1
"The fact that BOTH terrorists attacks on the WTC were successful in that they both reached their target(s) makes you wonder!" 3/4 made it to their destination. So is that suspicious or expected? " Not to mention the millions of other inconsistencies! " Yeah there are a lot of debunked claims.....
1
@frederickjohnpicarello1909 "You mean like building 7 falling at freefall fn speed in its own footprin" You mean free fall acceleration. ...and no the whole building didn't fall at free fall overall. The closest you get to that was part of the building, some walls, in virtual free fall towards the end of the collapse. So you are wrong.
1
@frederickjohnpicarello1909 "Don Rumsfeld announce the day b4 9/10 that 2.3 TRILLION! " Sigh... no. Some time before 9/11 there was an audit done, as happens regularly. But some of the finances couldn't be accounted for. This was due to records not being available, different systems, old systems etc. Within 6 months of 9/11 most of it was reconciled. End of story. Nothing to do with 9/11 or the pentagon crash. No..that part of the pentagon wasn't an accounting section nor were records kept only in one place... So you are wrong there too.
1
@frederickjohnpicarello1909 "Which one of those facts were debunked?" Both. Neither was a "fact" as you stated them. Try again smart guy.
1
@frederickjohnpicarello1909 I just debunked you and showed that you haven't done your homework. Was that the best you could reply with?? 🤦‍♂
1
@frederickjohnpicarello1909 "& i said he made the announcement on 9/10 which is a known fact!" Wow inside all of your confused and false claims you got 1 snippet right. lol.... Good job!
1