Comments by "Mark H" (@markh1011) on "Piers Morgan Uncensored" channel.

  1. Sean is telling him what he needs to hear. He's explaining why no one will take his paper seriously. It's not an attack on him - unlike Eric's emotional and childish response.
    3
  2. "Eric really made him look stupid." Are you even fooling yourself?
    3
  3.  @Justinegallows  Weinstein made a complete fool of himself.
    2
  4. Weinstein made a fool of himself.
    2
  5. lol...
    2
  6. This was a disaster for Weinstein.
    2
  7. Does anyone actually think this went well for Weinstein? He made a total fool of himself.
    2
  8. 1. That is not a description of the big bang.... 2. The quran contains errors.
    1
  9. If you don't know the answer to something you can still point out the problems with other supposed answers.
    1
  10. How does Carroll come off bad? Eric constantly complains that Carroll hasn't read his paper so can't talk about it. Carroll has and talks about it. Eric throws a tantrum and starts attacking Carroll. It was pitiful.
    1
  11. "patronizing Carroll." Let me guess, anti vaxxer, flat earther, chem trails supporter....something along those lines right?
    1
  12. He wasn't disputing or talking QM down, he was talking it up. He called it a framework of theories.
    1
  13. "It's a dog ate my homework kind of thing"... "Oh how dare you Sean" .... 😂😂😂😂 Sean exposing a fraud. So funny.
    1
  14. You're missing the point he was making. He was saying that just declaring that god is the answer only brings new problems.
    1
  15. "Why do people dislike him so much?" This video should provide answers for that.
    1
  16. Weinstein constantly complains that Carroll didn't read his paper. But he did and gives some opinion on it "Well I don't need your approval!!!" What a child.
    1
  17.  @Maxx-Rabbits  You're still crying because Dave destroyed Dan Richards. I recognise your account name sweetie.
    1
  18. lol he made a total fool of himself.
    1
  19.  @earthalchemyholisticllc333  "do you understand what a theory is? " Yes. You don't. "It's a hypothesis' No. It's not. In science, a theory and a hypothesis are not the same thing. " Of course, string theory is going to go against it because it puts it in its place. What are you even talking about? I don't think you know. " Cuz string theory is just the theory" 1. You don't understand the difference between a theory and a hypothesis. 2. String theory is debateably NOT a scientific theory. 3. Why are you talking about string theory at all? 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂
    1
  20.  @earthalchemyholisticllc333  Sigh.... Do you mean the video you're commenting on? Are you going to address anything or are you totally out of your depth already?
    1
  21.  @earthalchemyholisticllc333  Oh my god I just looked at your channel. Wow. You are definitely not ready to talk about frontier physics concepts let alone basic science...
    1
  22.  @earthalchemyholisticllc333  "That's the whole podcast. " You're deflecting from my posts. " That's what they're talking about" 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂ You're dodging my posts to tell me what you think the podcast was about. But you have no idea what's going on. Are you high?
    1
  23.  @missplinius  "Something must have existed first. And since we can distinguish an intelligence in the created, the cause must be intelligent." That doesn't follow. Something may have existed first but it didn't need to be a magical being. Just because we developed some level of intelligence doesn't mean there was a magical being who had intelligence.
    1
  24.  @Maxx-Rabbits  "Except he never did that in this video" Oh he did. He calmly undid him. Weinstein then threw a tantrum and made it worse.
    1
  25. I actually laughed out loud at that.
    1
  26.  @Maxx-Rabbits  Sweetie you're just repeating Weinstein's excuses that didn't work in the interview.
    1