Comments by "Mark H" (@markh1011) on "" video.

  1. "Why were there so many filming waiting for the planes to crash into the tower?" Only 1 camera caught the first impact. Many more caught the second because they were already filming a burning landmark. It's really not surprising. It's interesting how the lack of footage of the plane at the pentagon means its a conspiracy. That we have footage of the second impact is also means its a conspiracy?
    3
  2. "Never before or since has an airplane even come close to taking down a STRUCTURED STEEL BLDG! EVER IN HISTORY... EVER." Yes intentionally flying large jets into buildings is not a common event. "There has never ever been 5 hijackings at them same time" This was 4. But yes that's true. The rest of your post was ranting.
    2
  3. " dozens of eyewitness accounts of explosions going" There were plenty of explosions that day ...planes hitting buildings..jet fuel exploding.. multiple building fires... multiple building collapses.. If you think there were mysterious explosions then point them out on the videos of the towers. There is plenty of footage of the towers. It should be easy for you.
    1
  4.  @TFSK1ZZ3R  So your proof is 1. You saw Bush 'kinda' smile. 2. There are theories 3. He was pretty quiet after retiring. Anything to add to that?
    1
  5. Only 1 camera caught the first impact at the towers. Lots of cameras caught the second impact because everyone started filming obviously. Think about that though. In NY only 1 camera caught the first impact. With all those people. A single camera. Is it so implausible then that people didn't get the pentagon crash?
    1