Comments by "Mark H" (@markh1011) on "JRE Clips" channel.

The story is bullshit. The money was never missing. It was just unaccounted for as part of an audit. It was not being audited in just the pentagon. That's made up. Within 6 months of 9/11 most of it was accounted for. Nothing to do with 9/11......no one cares about boring factual stories. They want to believe in spooky conspiracies. The 9/11 conspiracy is nonsense.
3
@davidrailton2277 "Its simple if you researched it you would see that its quiet easy explained" Then why don't you explain it?
2
I like Joe but he has been scammed, and his mind is closed. Hancock is a grifter.
2
Hancock comes across as such a pompous, bitter person. He spends half the episode cutting Shermer off, while playing the victim and ranting about scientists.
1
Gun free zones are a bad idea but this isn't an argument against better laws. You have a country with stupid laws and glorification of guns. Little arbitrary zones next to an insane amount of weapons is going to to fix the problem.... you still have an insane amount of weapons nearby... it's like putting a no-smoking section inside a larger no smoking section... it's pointless. Skimming the rest of the video I see an old man losing his marbles bragging about how smart he is.... and his answer to America's gun problem being...wait for it... more guns.... sigh....
1
Look at the angry flat earthers posting here.... the education system has failed them.
1
Craig Murphy I'm not sure if you're imitating an idiot flat earther or you are one....
1
It's pretty pathetic when Trump supports start demanding that we first establish what a lie is... as if it's a new concept to them. "..but but but what about Hilary!!!!!" ..sigh..
1
"Anyone with at least half a brain can look at the facts about 9/11 and understand that it was an inside job" Describing 9/11 truthers are people with half a brain sounds about right.
1
Why not? Humans have built plenty of large stone structures through history.....amazingly many of them happened in....the stone age.
1
"Atheist-If You ain't with us You is jest STEW-PID We have figured all this stuff out." Nice straw man. Oh wait a minute no it was lame.
1
"Now, im not saying that the government is behind it, but i can say with great confidence that they did not collapse due to fire. Maybe im wrong, but these buildings...are the first in human history to collapse into dust, because of fire." No it's happened before and since. They were the first very tall buildings to collapse from fire. ..a fairly important point as well, the towers didn't collapse due to fire... they collapsed due to 767 impact and fire...which was accelerated by jet fuel. "It's like throwing a empty can of zoda on a car!" The planes weighed over 100 tons... it's more like throwing a 130 ton beer can.. that's traveling hundreds of mph...
1
@InnerTranquility "You seem to contradict yourself." You are right. I was responding to your comment and my wording is wrong. The towers collapsed due to fire and planes.. "Do you know the weight of one tower?" I've looked it up before... I can't remember it now. What's your point? "How do you explain the molten bedrock underneath the buildings?" It wasn't bedrock....there was metal that was molten... and yes that was due to fire...
1
@InnerTranquility InnerTranquility ". Just remember, your stance might reflect your iq. " What might reflect your IQ is insulting someone who has a different opinion to you. "I like that you did not respond to the fact about the cold massive steel underneath the impact. " What are you asking for a response to? There was steel underneath the impact......and? "But again...you probably can't judge what you see with your own eyes, since you think fire caused bedrock to become smooth." I don't think that. That's your confusion sport... not mine. " and on the floors were the fire was? " That's where they were weakened by the fire yes.... the steel beneath that was smashed when the upper blocks dropped.... "You made a point about me saying that my comparison was off. Can vs car." Don't remember that...but ok...sure. You don't seem to understand this topic well so you probably got that wrong... "Yet you don't know the weight of the building, wich is amusing." 1. I don't have it memorised no. 2. I could look it up very quickly. 3. You were called out to explain what point you think you're making and THAT was your response? So you have no point.... You're a bit of a mess. "You should probably look at those pictures again." What pictures? If you're going to post at least try to make a relevant point... " By the way, say high to bob for me, would ya" sure thing crazy person!
1
@InnerTranquility "Hypocrisy sport? So it's a sport? Any good leagues?" You're not funny. "How does that effect the cold steel below the floors" That cold steel is hit by thousands of tons of concrete and steel when the upper blocks drop... " Point to anything that i said wrong." Are you kidding? In the first post. " Maybe im wrong, but these buildings...are the first in human history to collapse into dust, because of fire."" "Yes. Tell that joke to bob would you? " You're not funny. " I told you to look up stone, not a human. I wonder who is stupid?" You are if you think nukes were involved. "Look at the pictures of the smooth stone." ok smooth stone...... and? "If you think buildings like that can be turn into dust, because of a plane+fire on a couple of floors, well...then i can't help you." You lack the background and abilities to help me on this topic.
1
@InnerTranquility "Eh, are you telling me concrete destroyed the steel?" I'm saying when thousands of tons of concrete and steel...smashing down on other steel will destroy the structural integrity of those floors. " So when steel collides with steel, it get's pulverised? " If enough mass with it... yeah. That should be obvious to you... "Amazing, i guess demolition experts are not needed anymore" What a stupid statement. Your reasoning for that statement was confusion about the force of the impacts... then you don't seem to even understand what demolition experts do... and that's control the demolition so that other buildings are not damaged... unlike the WTC collapses. "Eh, you tell that joke to Bob, at the "bureau"." You're still not funny. "Well? Any conclusion on how that might happen?" How what might happen? "Aha, and what is your backround?" So turning on me now because your arguments are falling apart huh?
1
@InnerTranquility "The rest of the building did not show any resistance when it started to collapse." It showed some resistance because debris falling away fell faster than the dropping building... but then again you get pretty much everything wrong ... "Okay, so you are saying that steel collided with steel, then pulverised it?" How fucking stupid are you? When 20 floors falls on the floor directly beneath it... concrete and steel hit concrete and steel. Apparently this concept has you frazzled... it's too much for you to compute... perhaps you could get a child to explain it to you? "g. If buildings can go down like that from a plane+fire then their knowledge of bringing buildings down means nothing then." Try that sentence again but this time try to make sense. "You know they plan for weeks, months even to pull buildings down like that. " Yes...so that other buildings aren't damaged... I explained this in the last post but you seem to struggle with basic concepts... perhaps there are too many words in my sentences I don't know.... and nor do I care. "What about building 7 then? " Ah the standard subject change.... "Only a couple of fires on some floors" Oh so you think the FDNY are liars then? "Oh it's funny from my point of view..." Well simple things small minds. "So i wondered what your background is?" Of course you did. You're not doing very responding to my points and you're looking for something you can attack. If I say anything other than "structural engineer" you're use that as an out... its a desperate, lame appeal to authority.
1
@InnerTranquility "So steel got weakend, to the point where they just snapped? Then the top just rams through everything like butter? Since the top is lighter compared to everything that is under, (Heavy massive cold steel) that wouldn't happend." Again your ignorance is on display... you don't understand the mechanics of the progressive collapse... Consider 20 floors coming down on 1 weakened floor.. the upper block continues...then you have 22 coming down on the next...23 24 25 and it continues... gaining velocity...the amount of material coming down like a hammer also increases.. . "Again, if you think steel and concrete, hitting steel and concrete can get pulverised like it did that day, then you are the stupid one." No kid that's your mental limitations in action. I guess you don't understand gravity... when you go to high school you may learn about it... "Ah the standard i don't understand trick..." lol....how about you just explain what you thought you were saying.... the trick here is that you have dodged the point... I guess you had no confidence in what you were trying to say. " Are you from a bureau outside of USA? Say hi to Diego from me! Nah, im good...not that many words anyway, maybe from your point of view." You have no point... you keep making this stupid joke...it's odd that you continue with it.. "IHow do you explain the collapse of building 7?" Oh that's right the desperate subject change... wtc7 burned away freely all day and collapsed....the FDNY thought it was so unstable that it would collapse...they were right. " I never mentioned anything about the fire department." You are directly contradicting them.... and what they said about the fires at WTC7...so are you saying they lied? "Ask bob, or Diego, or someone at the "bureau"." It actually gets less funny... "Wow how defensive." but I'm pretty much spot on aren't i?
1
@InnerTranquility "So i guess demolition experts should just blow up the columns on upper floors then from now on?" Actually they do that sometimes... it's called the verinage technique. ". Doesn't explain how steel can pulverise steel." Actually gravity does explain it.. That's exactly what caused the force... "Oh you know what im talking about...don't eat too many donuts at the bureau." I have no idea what that's meant to mean... i assumed it was a joke but I don't even get it....then you repeated it like 6 times... You just sound lame... What specifically is your confusion about the upper blocks and the progressive collapse? You're just dismissing it with vague statements. "The collapse of building 7 happend on the same day, how is that a subject change? " Lots of things happened on that day....and there are lots of claims... It's standard conspiracy theorist practice to move from one to the next as the arguments fail. "Not the whole day, for around 7 hours, " Semantics... I'm making the point that it burned for a long time...starting when one of the towers collapsed to about 5 in the afternoon. "Building 7 is the first building to collapse due to fire, and only fire." Actually no it wasn't....other buildings had...such as the kader toy factors...and others have since such as the Plasco building. "I have seen whole buildings on fire, (almost every floor) yet they did not collapse." Buildings with concrete cores....You need to understand why buildings collapse... some do...some don't...it depends on various factors. ". I'm getting warmer though...hm.....Israel?" ? What?
1
@InnerTranquility "Yea, they do. The keyword is "Sometimes"." You're backpedaling... you're trying to imply they don't do it because it doesn't work.... but I have educated you that they do do it..and it DOES WORK so your position is not valid. "So if i sever the top part, with your logic, it would almost free fall through the rest of the building? " You're inventing some scenario where you take a lot of the mass out of the building.. your scenario is not relevant. ". To bring down such massive buildings, you cannot only rely on the verinage technique. " Of course you can.. I have explained why...you've not provided valid reasoning why it can't... ". That doesn't concern me, since im not a "conspiracy theorist"." You're here arguing that the collapse was planned by someone other than the hijackers..... so yeah you're a conspiracy theorist. " Big difference between 24 hours and 7 though," I didn't say 24 hours though... I just said it burned all day... I didn't say all day and night... I didn't say a full day.... it's not a good sign that you want to quibble about this... "You seem to be using a translator" No I just type a million miles an hour and don't even read what I'm typing... Im busy and it's not worth my time...expect lots of mistakes... Oh and I notice that you again just skipped around another of your errors.... "Exactly. Some do, some don't. " But you don't seem interested in why... People have been shot multiple times and lived. Does that mean bullets shouldn't kill you? As with the buildings, one case isn't the same as the next. "How big is your server room by the way?" You seem to be a paranoid weirdo..... Spend a lot of time by yourself in the basement?
1
@InnerTranquility "Are you drunk again? " Are you projecting your problems? " Demolition experts use that technique, but only sometimes. " I can't believe I need to explain this again... This comment "So i guess demolition experts should just blow up the columns on upper floors then from now on?"" Showed you didn't think it possible... and didn't know that it happens... I educated you. Now you're trying to act like you didn't mean it like that. " My point is that it would not happend like that, if you sever only the top part of a structure" I have explained why your reasoning is flawed. You don't understand the mechanics of the collapse. "The towers were not made out of pure concrete you know." Silly comments like this aren't helping you. "By the way, that technique is used with explosives, are you saying they used explosives that day? " ? What could possibly make you think that? "Nope. Never said that. Point to where i said that?" Said what? "All day, where i come from, means the whole day." ...sigh... your desperate need to argue semantics is a sign that you have no real argument. "Out of curiosity. Where are you from? " Have I given you some indication that we are becoming good friends? Why on earth would I tell you about myself? You've not given me any reason to...
1
@InnerTranquility "I say again: Demolition experts use that technique, but only sometimes. Keyword is sometimes." Still backpedaling... I really don't care... you obviously didn't know about it... you obviously tried to imply it wasn't possible... at least show some integrity about it... "Nope, you have not educated me on anything thus far." Your denials are pointless as I have educated you about several things so far... You don't like it of course... "You don't seem to understand basic physics." LOL.. and here I am trying to explain the mechanics of the collapse to you ... in simple terms because you clearly don't have a fucking clue about physics. So didn't know about verinage. You didn't know about fire causing collapses in other buildings. You don't understand the basic mechanics of the collapse. I've had to teach you... and because you don't like getting a public education you just deny deflect ... zzzzz . I don't really care about your attempts to soothe your ego. "Difference in hours when talking about fires, is not semantics. " I made no claim about hours. You're confused....about most things it seems. "Bozo, you have not answered how big your server room is?" Your post was a mess with confusion... evasions... pointless blather and you end it with some unfunny joke I don't even understand. Your posts are shit. You're obnoxious. You're boring. You're getting schooled. Come up with some substance dippy or go play with your trains.
1
"Look at the pentagon and the damage doesn’t match up to the Towers! " One was a skyscraper the other was a military instillation with thick concrete walls. Of course they don't match. " When the fire was put out you can see desks with books not burned at all" The buildings collapsed before the fires were out. "Also Pennsylvania crash there’s just a big giant hole with no plane? " The plane smashed into little pieces on impact... "They never found any of the 4 black boxes as well" They didn't find the black boxes of the planes that hit the towers...which isn't such a surprise. The other 2 they found.
1
There is no evidence that a missile hit the pentagon. There is plenty of evidence that a plane did.
1
I'm constantly amazed by the stupid shit conspiracy theorists believe.
1
it had a concrete core. the steel collapsed at the top leaving the concrete standing. the debris collected on the concrete safety floor, which was there to provide strength. Note that the steel weakened and collapsed... like on 9/11.
1
"Are there still anyone defending Dibble in here?" I'm not defending Dribble but Hancock admitted he lost this debate.
1
"Did Dibble go to the Billy Carson school for grifters? I " You're confused. Graham Hancock did. He was the principal.
1
They aren't better. Extreme skinny and extreme overweight is unhealthy.
1
There is zero evidence for that claim.
1