Comments by "Mark H" (@markh1011) on "National Geographic" channel.

  1.  @jason8952  Sure sure...you're a wizard and dungeons & dragons is real life... sure sure.
    2
  2. 🥜🌰
    2
  3. "So many keyboard experts here with zero Quals," So what are your "Quals".....? From the other thread, you don't seem to know much about what happened....
    2
  4.  @darlenehowell2274  "The fires at the impact floors were smothered when the so called collapse began. So, cancel that." No then extremely hot material was just introduced to more combustible material in the pile. "Which, were the highest temperatures recorded in the basement." No one recorded any such temp in the basement. "Molten metal reacting to low yield nuclear fission would generate those temperatures." 🤣🤣🤣🤣 You don't have a clue...
    2
  5. The small problem with that claim is that it's completely false. Bush was never in charge of security of any building. The company that gets thrown up, Securacom, weren't even in charge of the WTC security. Bush had no connection with them at the time. He was apparently on the board a few years earlier. Either way, you're spreading lies.
    2
  6.  @darlenehowell2274  Do you need to a box of tissues to help with your meltdown?
    2
  7.  @darlenehowell2274  Your posts contain no useful information or even humour.
    2
  8. "there's absolutely no way a plane crashing into buildings, then office fires cause a building to uniformly, symmetrically telescope into it's own footprint." The buildings didn't fall symmetrically or into their own footprint. Most of the debris went outside the footprint. You seem to get everything wrong in your posts.
    2
  9.  @darlenehowell2274  "Again with the BS! The buildings did fall symmetrically. " Both buildings leaned towards the side of the collapse initiation during the collapse. Debris fields were not evenly distributed. "Some of the debris was outside of the foot print." More was outside the footprint than in the foot print. You get everything wrong. You're completely clueless about this subject. Stick to your harry potter stories.
    2
  10.  @darlenehowell2274  "Why did each tower shake violately before each collapse?" They didn't. They shook when the collapses started.
    2
  11. We have videos of the collapses.... there are no mysterious explosions on any of them. Prove me wrong.
    2
  12.  @c.augustedupin2559  Try again.
    2
  13.  @c.augustedupin2559  You're projecting. Try again.
    2
  14.  @c.augustedupin2559  Yes it was a question. Good job! You're projecting your insecurities and confusion with your question. Try again.
    2
  15. First responders described plane wreckage and saw body parts. DNA identification made it quite conclusive.
    2
  16.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "The Coroner said there was nothing there" He never said any such thing. Wally Miller personally identified several of the victims and is on record dismissing the conspiracy claims.
    2
  17.  @sammyd9564  "One day you may wake up." Tired old conspiracy theorists lines don't compensate for evidence. "There is absolute proof...molten steel is seen pouring outta both towers during the collapse." Molten metal is seen coming out one tower before collapse. Once again you seem to get nothing right. ". This is usually consistent with an oxygen starved building fire" Ah that old chestnut! Haven't heard that one in a while.... It's an idiotic statement. I think it came from David Ray Griffin who is a moron....and gullible conspiracy theorists keep repeating it. Look at an oil fire... or tire fire.... the black smoke is due to petrochemicals burning... it doesn't mean the fire is oxygen starved.... the oxygen didn't disappear from this building with hundreds of windows smashed and a plane sized hole on one side. "Days later first responders still found many pockets of molten steel still evident in the rubble. " There are reports of molten metal...glowing metal...and even a few of molten steel...but no one actually confirmed that it was steel...and not one of the other metals present, notably aluminium.... at this point the conspiracy theorist conflates the video of the molten material with the testimony and tries to claim that the testimony was all consistently describing material that couldn't be aluminium which is false. "Take a breathe...let go of your naivete " Do you understand the word 'irony' ? "and look into it" ..says the guy who gets everything wrong... and clearly hasn't done research beyond watching a YouTube video.
    2
  18.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "Best if you read John Lear's Jan 2008 affidavit." No one cares about the ranting of a madman.
    2
  19.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "You have never challenged John Lear's affidavit and I know you never will." No one cares about the ranting of a madman.
    2
  20.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "No downward force can destroy such a core. T" Just because you don't understanding it doesn't make it impossible.
    2
  21. "Not a single spot of blood, bone, teeth, skin, organ, nothing." Most of the victims have been identified through dna matching families. You get everything wrong.
    2
  22.  @perkins4253  "Actually, it is impossible for the steel frame buildings to completely fail due to a fire since the temperatures in the building fires are way under the necessary temperatures and durations for the weakening of the steel." Incorrect. Independent testing confirms the temps that fires reach. We know the fires were hot enough to weaken the steel as we have photos of it gradually weakening in the fire areas. We have photos of bending and sagging steel leading to the collapses.
    2
  23.  @TheAaronRodgersTao  The buildings didn't fall at free fall.
    2
  24.  @c.augustedupin2559  Lame.
    2
  25.  @MrYourfriendbutters  " the concrete the wrapped the steel columns" The steel columns were not covered in concrete.
    2
  26.  @MrYourfriendbutters  " I'm confused by you long answer" You're easily confused if you think a single sentence is a long answer. Read it again and let me know what part of the sentence confuses you.
    2
  27. Yes! I made the list. What's your issue with Frontier? Why can't they be in the list of awesome people?
    2
  28.  @jason8952  "NIST is laughable as well." Still waiting for you to show me the errors in the NIST report on the towers. Oh and "everything" is not an answer.
    2
  29.  @darlenehowell2274  "There's the oral history of the FDNY," All consistent with the official story. "the many interviews with eye witnesses" Their testimony all consistent with the official story. I doubt you've even read any of the testimony. " the analysis of A&ETRUTH, UFA, FF for 911 truth." Analyses that are discarded by the scientific community because they are so bad. ". Then there's Franklin Square/Munson District and the 911 Families that want a new investigation." Except there isn't and even if there were, that isn't evidence. " How about the obvious violation of the laws of physics and the evidence" Present these violations. Go on. ". Than there's the fact that the Deep State is run by Luciferian Practitioners of the Clandestine Way." Your fantasies about wizards and magic are not evidence of a CD. "The historical record of the U.S. Gov's use of propaganda to gain support for war ect.." That's just another claim. Still not evidence of a CD. ". All of these are evidence" You presented no evidence whatsoever. You've got nothing apparently.
    2
  30. Passenger items were found at every crash site. An airline seat cushion was found on the sidewalk in NY. If a seat cushion could make it to the ground then so could a passport.
    2
  31.  xxxod  The report was that it was found and handed to a policeman.
    2
  32.  @jeffsundeen1680  "thats when they decided to pull it" The "they" he's referring to is the FDNY. The fire department don't blow up buildings. You don't make the decision to blow them up while they are on fire. The fire department lost hundreds of people that day. It's absurd to think they are part of the conspiracy. I recommend you read the quote properly. It debunks claims about explosives.
    2
  33.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  Are you actually denying that a plane hit the towers...? 😂🤦‍♂
    2
  34. "Well it is 2020 and there’s still only been 3 steel and concrete structures to ever succumb to fire," ......sigh....
    2
  35.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  " So weird how the Pentagon damage was where the Rumsfeld $2T missing staff were working?" That's false and more than half the money was reconciled within 6 months of 9/11.
    2
  36.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  " So weird how a plane can crash into a field and not a single body part is found? " Body parts were seen and dna was matched. Also false. "So weird how 5 ton engines all vanished?" Plane wreckage was recovered. Also false.
    2
  37.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  " So weird how a passport flew thru a plane hull, thru a steel core, thru fires, thru plate glass or steel lattice " Passenger items were found at every crash site.
    2
  38.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "Explain how a crossed braced all steel core, all 50,000 tons of it can fail as shown" Did you come back after the humiliating lesson? Ok. The cores failed when the upper blocks dropped down. The cores were not magically impervious. "Bolted to bedrock this core was going nowhere." Being bolted to the bedrock doesn't stop it getting crushed....
    2
  39.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  You dodged all the posts with insane ranting....🤦‍♂
    2
  40.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  Yet more conspiracy piffle... lol... you've got nothing.
    2
  41. "laws of physics and motion were suspended until the 12th." Prove it.
    2
  42. "Any suggestion that untrained people can just slip into a pilots seat and perform high speed stunts in a passenger commercial" They were trained. Even the worst pilot of the group had a commercial pilots license. They trained for months specifically for this mission. You are wrong. Again.
    2
  43. "Look to Dr. Judy Woods and John Leer for answers. " People who believe in death ray beams and secret bases on the moon. lol
    1
  44.  @darlenehowell2274  You think 9/11 was caused by a wizard performing a ritual..... no one takes you seriously.
    1
  45. "Why was there molten steel shooting out of the Towers and at Ground Zero for weeks" It was metal. We don't know if it was steel. "Why is there no video footage of any of the 19 hijackers?" There are photos of them at the airports and witnesses saw them. "Why where there no bodies or wreckage in Shanksville? " There were body parts. It should be obvious why they are parts. "Why was there 'Thermite' found in all of the dust samples " Completely false. "hy where there multiple explosions that went off before the collapses? " Out of context testimony. We have the collapses on video and there are no explosions. "Why did the Towers turn to dust?" They didn't. There was a lot of dust though but that's due to the destructive collapse.
    1
  46. ...that's an absurd claim that was never confirmed.
    1
  47.  @Chestermcfly420  Nope. It was claimed by a couple of conspiracy kooks. It was never confirmed. They didn't share the samples for independent verification. They didn't test if you could bring a structure down with nanothermite. They didn't verify anything.
    1
  48. 🤦‍♂
    1
  49.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "As we all know, Mr John Lear submitted to the NY High Court an affidavit that expessly states zero planes were involved in the 9'11 events" Did he also submit anything about there being millions of aliens living on the moon? That is another one of his crazy beliefs. He's a nut. No one cares what he says.
    1
  50.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  Movie? I'm talking about peer reviewed scientific papers.
    1