Comments by "Mark H" (@markh1011) on "Eyewitness News ABC7NY" channel.

  1. It was a combination of 1. Impact from the planes damaging columns 2. Impact from the planes affecting the spray on fire resistant coating on the steel. 3. The fires that were started quickly with the jet fuel. It took very little time for the fires to get to the temperatures that weaken steel.
    2
  2. "That is an explosion. Pretty plain to see." That sounds like a destructive top down collapse.
    2
  3. You're lying. Post what he really said.
    2
  4. You don't know what he said do you?
    2
  5.  @Giovanni-i9u  Yeah I think so too. The psychology of conspiracy theorists interests me. I think they feel smarter than everyone else because they watched a video of some conspiracy theory and believed it without really checking what it says. Most 9/11 conspiracy theorists I come across actually have very little idea about the topic. But they still want to tell everyone about it and don't care about whether they are being disrespectful.
    2
  6.  @Giovanni-i9u  Agreed.
    2
  7. It's been over 20 years and no one can find any evidence to support those claims...
    2
  8. The buildings did not turn entirely to dust.
    1
  9. The planes weighed over 100 tons...and were loaded with jet fuel....
    1
  10. "never forget his was controlled demolition" It's been over 20 years and there is still no evidence for that.
    1
  11.  @Giovanni-i9u  What is disrespectful? The conspiracy claims?
    1