Comments by "Mark H" (@markh1011) on "New York Post" channel.

Jet fuel only started the fires. The contents of the buildings did the rest....and then gravity.
1
" What happened to the TRILLIONS of" Most of it was reconciled within 6 months of 9/11.
1
"Those building were built for demolition" 🤦‍♂ "the beams were cut in angles so they would fall at the right moment " No suspiciously cut beams were found. We can see that the perimeter columns bow inward more and more until they failed, triggering the collapse. We can see that the floors were sagging. None of this fits your claim.
1
Perhaps you could produce some evidence to support your claim then.... considering your comment it should be easy for you.
1
@thearch1tect249 "There is sufficient evidence out there. " That's what the flat earther say.
1
It's been over 20 years and people still can't produce evidence for those nonsense claims.
1
No you can't see "steel burning"...
1
@terryhamrick7487 That's a molten material coming out the sides. You don't know if it's steel. It's not 'burning', it's a molten material flowing.
1
"Both buildings just happen to fall the same way." You mean the two buildings that were the same and were attacked the same way.... "Like a perfect demolition. " All the nearby buildings were destroyed....what was perfect about it? "And then they hastened with removing the debris. " They did start moving debris quickly to save peoples lives. You have a problem with that?
1
@jamiemcculloch3242 The towers didn't drop at free fall. Only part of WTC7, outer walls, fell at virtual free fall for a moment after the total collapse was already in full effect. Not surprising.
1
It's been over 20 yeas and still no one can find evidence to support that claim....
1
@LEELUNK-IS-A-HUNK "YOU MUST WORK FOR THE CIA OR PENTAGON" lol yeah man I'm a secret agent. Some people will believe anything. 🤣🤣🤣
1
"It's all very strange how it was later discovered that a few of the people accused by the government and media of being the hijackers, were found to be alive " No that wasn't strange at all. In the days after the attack the FBI were trying to identify the hijackers and they apparently listed people that were wrong. This was corrected immediately. "But the government and the media never amended their official story. " It was immediately corrected.
1
The hardest people to convince are often those who say they know a physics teacher or an engineer who said it couldn't happen. So you put faith in their view at the time. Those people were wrong and not here to debate the topic.
1
"Notice the white smoke??" ...and? " The molten steal pouring out of the corner of the building?" It was a molten metal, we don't know that it was steeel. " How did all the white smoke start pouring out of the second building?" Fire. " How did all the white smoke start pouring out of the second building?" It didn't. " Both buildings??? " Both were targets. " I mean, all 3 buildings at world trade centers??" Every WTC building was destroyed as were several nearby.....and? "Recovered I beams that were cut at an angle," Cut during the clean up. "he fact, that jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel??" Irrelevant.
1
@WillCIII You tell me where you can see explosives going off.
1
@WillCIII None of the WTC buildings fell from the bottom up. What are you talking about? The towers collapsed from the top down. Get some glasses.
1
Are you actually serious..
1
"All engineers, architects and explosive experts, know for a fact this was a conspiracy, " Err no.
1
@GingerCC-he8be LOL... step off!? 🤣🤣
1
All engineers don't in fact support your bizarre claim. The ASCE openly supported the NIST findings, and they have over 100 000 members. Several analyses were conducted by engineering firms that supported NISTs findings. Many papers were published in relevant peer reviewed science journals that were consistent with NISTs findings. You're making things up.
1
@GingerCC-he8be Give me a list of all the demolition companies that support your claim. Go on. Take your time. I'll wait.
1
@GingerCC-he8be lol... you dodged everything. 🤣🤣 You were publicly refuted and all you could do was evade. 🤦‍♂
1
@GingerCC-he8be Your claim was dismantled in front of you. You were challenged. All you can do is mumble weak deflections... 🤣🤣
1
@GingerCC-he8be Perhaps you might want to do some basic research before posting and then you won't dig yourself into a hole like this. 😉
1
@GingerCC-he8be Oh I missed this gem. "spouting numbers such as 100,000 members will typically work to intimidate many." It's not a matter of intimidation. You made the claim that 'All engineers, architects and explosive experts, know for a fact this was a conspiracy'....when we can see from the work of engineers that this is not the case. You were challenged for a list of demolition companies. You dodged. You might want to stop now....
1
evidence?
1
@leelunk8235 Deflecting with upper case ranting...lol... 🤦‍♂
1
There is no evidence for thermite or nanothermite being involved. That's nonsense.
1
It looks like a molten material of some sort. People claim that it's steel but you can't know that from sight. There was certainly many tons of aluminium nearby (the plane) so it could have been a mix of aluminium and whatever else was in the offices...
1
What about it?
1
Stop believing everything you read on the internet.
1
"Building 7 also collapsed explain that " A report was released on that over a decade ago. "government said they demoed it " No. They did not.
1
" towers destroyed all five other WTC buildings but not another building around them. " what are you talking about? All the nearby buildings were destroyed. WTC 1-7 was destroyed as were others. "Why was there seismic activity four minutes before the first plane hit?" There wasn't. That's completely false.
1
" The records should be released soon and hopefully they will explain what really happened that tragic day." We already know what happened.
1
You don't know if what you're seeing is steel. No one found thermite....
1