Comments by "Brian Quigley" (@brianquigley1940) on "Race to recycle wind turbines in Denmark - BBC News" video.

(1) what idiot built "sustainable" tech that is NOT recyclable? (2) what idiot designed this kind of tech with such a brief useful lifespan? (3) why can't such workpieces be "permanent" (and not need replacing)? (4) why aren't we using more wind power? After the initial investment, it's basically free energy...
1
@voltydequa845 This isn't some kind of n2 incomplete puzzle... it's science... physics, chemistry, etc. However, lateral thinking usually does bring about breakthoughs...
1
@fastertove (1) "Prioritizing and costs" - init costs are gov subsidised. (2) "Primarily a security concern." - meaning what exactly? "It pays for itself multiple times." - eh, no it doesn't! (3) "Same reason cars break down." - note my use of quotes in my original post, specifically, I meant… easily replaceable parts, such as appliances before greedy people implemented [dispose and buy a new one]. (4) "Fossil fuels being cheaper." - i.e. short term greed foisted on consumers. "Needs appropriately placement. Varying energy production. Infrastructure" - how about a splash of intelligent design, e.g. Sweden's investment in wooden wind turbines as seen on a video today on this channel.
1
Nice news segment about Norwegian wind power.... what happened to British news? How many of these videos are about the UK? I see more news about the UK on DW, France 24, and TVP than here on the BBC channel...
1