Comments by "phothewin" (@phothewin6019) on "Universal Pictures" channel.

  1. The Dunkirk Cinematic Universe is really taking off I see.
    9800
  2.  @kevinconboy7387  And Iron Man 1 happened in the 2000's while Captain America 1 happened during WW2. What's your point?
    12
  3. Here because Ja wants to be Clarence so bad
    7
  4.  @kennyma4904  Which is irrelevant to the joke of 17 and Dunkirk being the same cinematic universe.
    7
  5. They don't make comedies like this anymore. ...Heck, they don't seem to make comedies anymore period lol.
    5
  6. This movie being nearly a decade old makes me feel so old...
    4
  7.  @kevinconboy7387  Which is completely irrelevant to the point.
    3
  8. Raidion So??? You do realize that events in a cinematic universe don't have to take place at the same time, right? You can have Captain America take place in WW2 amd have Iron Man 1 take place in the 2000's. Guys this isn't that hard to understand lol.
    3
  9. Dunkirk Cinematic Universe
    2
  10. A movie starring Tony Stark and Harambe? Sign me up.
    2
  11.  @lilweedsea  Yes, there can be. Studios can do whatever they want lol. And the Dunkirk Cinematic Universe was obviously a joke. But the point stands that realistic events can share a cinematic universe. There's no reason they can't.
    2
  12. Yes, I'm well aware that these are 2 different wars. They can still exist in the range cinematic universe regardless.
    1
  13. Rez090 >Implying your preferences for humor are some be-all end-all metric for identifying jokes Just because you don't laugh, doesn't mean there isn't a joke.
    1
  14. Humbert Humbert Which doesn't matter for the joke. Two different events can exist in a cinematic universe.
    1
  15. Peter Nguyen Which doesn't matter. They can both exist in a cinematic universe.
    1
  16. voiceless glottal fricative Which doesn't matter.
    1
  17. voiceless glottal fricative No, it doesnt matter because two different events can exist in the same cinematic universe. You can have Captain America 1 take place in WW2 and have Iron Man 1 take place in the 2000's and they can still exist in the same cinematic universe. Why is this so hard for people to comprehend?
    1
  18. voiceless glottal fricative Not every movie in a cinematic universe has to have a direct relation to the other movies.
    1
  19.  @peternguyen1085  You do know WW1 and WW2 both happened in the same universe, right?
    1
  20.  @peternguyen1085  You idiot, what makes you think that I'm saying they're occurring at the same time? Where? Show me. I explicitly gave the example of Captain America 1 and Iron Man 1 to communicate the idea of events happening at SEPARATE times while also being in the same universe. Please read carefully next time.
    1
  21.  1banana2kiwis  Doesn't matter, son.
    1
  22.  @lilweedsea  > Implying there can't be a cinematic universe based on real events
    1
  23.  @lilweedsea  Yes, I'm well aware lol. Nothing I've said goes against that; that's not my point. I already stated the Dunkirk thing was a joke. All I'm saying is that there's no reason real events can't be in a cinematic universe if a studio wants.
    1
  24.  @switchdiagram  THANK YOU.
    1
  25.  @aggressionsessions7839  Iron Man 1 was in 2008, Captain America 1 was during WW2.
    1
  26. cameronsmith53 , Which doesn't matter, you dunce.
    1
  27.  @Abbertown  It doesn't matter that they're from different wars.
    1
  28.  @Abbertown  No, it doesnt matter because two different events can coexist in a cinematic universe. It doesnt matter if they happened in different points in time. You can have Captain America 1 occur in WW2, and Iron Man 1 occur in 2008. The same applies here.
    1
  29.  @maxreid9186  Movies based on real events can still have their own cinematic universe.
    1