Youtube comments of phothewin (@phothewin6019).

  1. 9800
  2. 1300
  3. 1200
  4. 1000
  5. 652
  6. 591
  7. 527
  8. 322
  9. 319
  10. 253
  11. 201
  12. 176
  13. 137
  14. 124
  15. 119
  16. 101
  17. 91
  18. 90
  19. 81
  20. 73
  21. 72
  22. 70
  23. 59
  24. 56
  25. 56
  26. 54
  27. 53
  28. 53
  29. 50
  30. 50
  31. 50
  32. 48
  33. 47
  34. 47
  35. 44
  36. 40
  37. 40
  38. 39
  39. 37
  40. 37
  41. 36
  42. 35
  43. 34
  44. 34
  45. 32
  46. 31
  47. 29
  48. 27
  49. 26
  50. 26
  51. 26
  52. 25
  53. 25
  54. 24
  55. 24
  56. 23
  57. 22
  58. 22
  59. 22
  60. 21
  61. 20
  62. 20
  63. 19
  64. 19
  65. 19
  66. 19
  67. 18
  68. 17
  69. 17
  70. 17
  71. 17
  72. 16
  73. 16
  74. 15
  75. 15
  76. 15
  77. 14
  78. 14
  79. 14
  80. 14
  81. 14
  82. 14
  83. 14
  84. 14
  85. 14
  86. 14
  87. 14
  88. 13
  89. 13
  90. 13
  91. 12
  92. 12
  93. 12
  94. 11
  95. 11
  96. 11
  97. 11
  98. 11
  99. 11
  100. 10
  101. 10
  102. 10
  103. 10
  104. 10
  105. 10
  106. 9
  107. 9
  108. 9
  109. 8
  110. 8
  111. 8
  112. 8
  113. 8
  114. 8
  115. 8
  116. 8
  117. 8
  118. 8
  119. 8
  120. 8
  121. 8
  122. 8
  123. 8
  124. 7
  125. 7
  126. 7
  127. 7
  128. 7
  129. 7
  130. 7
  131. 7
  132. 7
  133. 7
  134. 7
  135. 7
  136. 7
  137.  @CrutchCricket  No, Rocky is not infallible. Sometimes life hits so hard that not even Rocky Balboa can take it. That's what makes it heartbreaking, surreal, and interesting. He isn't some Mary Sue that overcomes every single obstacle on his own. He's always had his support group, people he cared about, things to live for. Be it Mick, Adrian, Apollo, Paulie, or his son. In Rocky 6, he had Paulie, his son, and the the drive to get one last fight in. He has none of that in Creed. Paulie's dead, he's at the tail end of his life, his son disowned him to the point of not even letting him see his own grandson, he's definitely too old to be doing any boxing, and now he's been diagnosed with the same disease that killed his wife - a disease he views as terminal (since she got treatment and still died). Everyone and everything has moved on from him and he's left with nothing to live for. It's a completely organic, understandable situation; his pessimism is earned. And it's a real feeling that older adults feel all the time (watching this movie gave me flashbacks to my Gerontology class and my internships doing clinical at some nursing homes), especially people who were once king of the world and had it all. Him giving up in Creed's story isn't unfaithful to the character at all, it's a natural progression that's earned. It's similar to Logan and Professor X. Both were inspiring heroes - shining beacons of hope that seemingly overcame every obstacle. Then life hit hard; harder than even they could handle. And they turned to the bitter, sad, old men we saw in Logan. And what's cool is that the movies both deconstruct and reaffirm the myth of their heroes. They once again rise from their fall. This was the story of Rocky facing his mortality at an old age and overcoming it. Rocky Balboa once again embodied the will to persevere, the idea of resilience. In the end, he was still that guy. He didn't stay down; he found the will to fight again. Drinker definitely could've used a better example than Rocky.
    7
  138. 7
  139. 7
  140. 6
  141. 6
  142. 6
  143. 6
  144. 6
  145. 6
  146. 6
  147. 6
  148. 6
  149. 6
  150. 6
  151. 6
  152. 6
  153. 6
  154. 5
  155. 5
  156. 5
  157. 5
  158. 5
  159. 5
  160. He's wrong; Rocky's personality wasn't retconned. We know Rocky's philosophy: "It's not about how hard you can hit, it's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward, about how much you can take, and keep moving forward." Except Rocky isn't infallible; he isn't some Gary Stu that can overcome every single obstacle with 0 issue. Sometimes life hits so hard that not even Rocky Balboa can take it. That's what makes it heartbreaking and surreal. Adrian's gone, Paulie's gone, his only son disowned him to the point of never even letting his kid meet him, he gets the same disease that killed his wife, he's at the tail end of his life and no one gives a sh*t about him anymore. He's in a way worse position than where he was in Rocky 6. His bitterness is earned. His pessimistic worldview is organic. It's similar to Logan and Professor X. Both were heroes; shining beacons of hope that seemingly overcame every obstacle. Then life hit hard; harder than even they could handle. And they turned to the bitter, sad, old men we saw in Logan. And what's cool is that the movies both deconstruct and reaffirm the myth of their heroes. They once again rise from their fall. Heroes like them falling isn't an inherent issue or some inconsistency in the narrative; they're not infallible, after all. What matters is if the fall is organic. Does it make sense as to why they turned out the way they did? That's the question that has to be answered. If a Mary Sue character went through what they did, do you think they'd turn out similar? Do you think they'd turn out broken? Of course not. It's a good thing they're not Mary Sues/Gary Stus.
    5
  161. 5
  162. 5
  163. 5
  164. 5
  165. 5
  166. 5
  167. 5
  168. 5
  169. 5
  170. 5
  171. 5
  172. 5
  173. 5
  174. 5
  175. 5
  176. 5
  177. 5
  178. 5
  179. 5
  180. 4
  181. 4
  182. 4
  183. 4
  184. 4
  185. 4
  186. 4
  187. 4
  188. 4
  189. 4
  190. 4
  191. 4
  192. 4
  193. 4
  194. 4
  195. 4
  196. 4
  197. 4
  198. 4
  199. 4
  200. 4
  201. 4
  202. 4
  203. 4
  204. ​ @catastrophucked  "so naturally there's not going to be any build-up to his decision, nor is there a giant need for it to be built up with the same amount of effort. They're two completely different scenarios functioning under a completely different set of rules." Right, this is what I'm getting at. Fundamental decisions that made one team-up more effective than the other. Peter and Harry's relationship and conflict is something that was built up and developed throughout the course of 3 movies. It's a dynamic that has more emotional weight than 2 guys who essentially just met each other in one film and hated each other for completely different reasons. A team-up feels less special, less-earned when there's little to no emotional weight to it. It's less satisfying when there's substantially less depth to it. The characters went from strangers who hated each other to superhero pals at the flip of a switch. Their dynamic and conflict were established and resolved in a single movie (a movie that was the first appearance of one of those guys, and just the 2nd film in that universe overall). It was never given a chance to actually cook. Part of what made their conflict great in TDKR is that they've already been friends, comrades for decades at that point. They have an established relationship/dynamic, emotional stakes are at play. Their conflict is based on a direct philosophical disagreement about the same issue, not because of 2 different things that have no direct relation to the other. Another part of what makes BvS' team-up less earned is that the conflict resolution doesn't make much sense. While Harry's butler knowing the truth for years and never telling him is silly, the underlying idea - that Harry would be more inclined to help Peter if he knew he was innocent - still makes sense. Harry learning to let go of the past and reconciling with Peter also ties into the 3rd's theme of forgiveness, since their conflict was also more than just about Norman. I'm sure you're ready to defend "Martha", and I'm all here for it. "but everybody just ignores the SHIT out of that as if it isn't the trilogy's defining pothole" It's literally one of the film's most famous criticisms. It literally isn't ignored by "everybody" lol. And it's not really a plot hole, but more of a plot contrivance. But I digress. "so no it wasn't "earned", no matter how much emotion you try to shove into that vague ass comparison." Yes, it was earned, as I've gone over above. "but it is at least internally consistent, and wraps up the conflict without leaving gaping holes in the story." Completely disagree. I think the film's a giant mess in a multitude of ways. "Batman v Superman earned it's conflict resolution" Not at all. Like I described above, it lacks depth, emotional stakes, development, and is resolved in an illogical manner. "which is why it CONSISTENTLY gets praised, unlike this dogshit film," BvS gets consistently panned lol. Far more than even Spider-Man 3. You're free to enjoy the film and defend it, but don't do some revisionist history nonsense lol. It doesn't help your argument. "with its gaping plothole that is regularly mocked and memed by fans in other videos." So first you claim that it's ignored by everybody ("but everybody just ignores the SH*T out of that"), but now you're saying it's regularly mocked? Which is it lol?
    4
  205. 4
  206. 4
  207. 4
  208. 4
  209. 4
  210. 4
  211. 4
  212. 4
  213. 4
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. 3
  219. 3
  220. 3
  221. 3
  222. 3
  223. 3
  224. 3
  225. 3
  226. 3
  227. 3
  228. 3
  229. 3
  230. 3
  231. 3
  232. 3
  233. 3
  234. 3
  235. 3
  236. 3
  237. 3
  238. 3
  239. 3
  240. 3
  241. 3
  242. 3
  243. 3
  244. 3
  245. 3
  246. 3
  247. 3
  248. 3
  249. 3
  250. 3
  251. 3
  252. 3
  253. 3
  254. 3
  255. 3
  256. 3
  257. 3
  258. 3
  259. 3
  260. 3
  261. 3
  262. 3
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. The S3 was the first Android phone to give the iPhone a run for its money imo. The amount of features it had relative to its competition was crazy. In a way, the S3 is to Android, what Iron Man 1 was to the MCU lol. The best looking S phone is still the S9 imo. The front facing camera placement on the display of the S10 ruins it for me unfortunately. I'm glad they only stuck with that design for 1 year. The S20 probably was peak S-series honestly. The S20 Ultra was a BEAST! I'd throw some heavy gaming at it without charging for what felt like half a day at times, and the performance and battery were amazing. And that 16 GB of RAM was insane. Literally kept everything open for forever no problem, even my heaviest games. I wish they'd include beastly specs like that again 😼‍💹 Remembering all of these phones makes me sad that Samsung isn't innovative anymore. They've stagnated with design, hardware, and performance. Some would even argue that they've gone backwards with the S24 Ultra compared to the S23 Ultra (like in heavy performance/stress tests or camera zoom quality). The Oppo Find X7 Ultra and Xiaomi 14 Ultra are looking like the new kings of Android flagship cameras already. And I honestly don't know if Samsung will ever regain that crown. Samsung, go back to innovating, man. Go back to throwing beastly specs on the phone. Go back to giving noticeable improvements between your releases. Stop with the gimmicky AI stuff. Stop trying to be the Apple of Android. Go back to what made so many people invested in the Galaxy brand. Stop letting your competitors catch up and surpass you.
    2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. ​ @Alex5551-n5z  "rn dave and revaz aren't even top 10 on RA" Firstly, I specifically kept saying 2022 Chaffee for a reason. Of course he's not top 10 right now, but we're talking about how Morozov does against toprollers, and Dave was absolutely one of the top guys in 2022. He destroyed the guy you think is the favorite against Morozov, and Morozov beat him. Second, Revaz is absolutely top 10 right now. 1) Levan, 2) Ermes, 3) Vitaly, 4) Jerry, 5) Dzeranov, 6) Kurdecha, 7) Georgi, 8) Revaz ???, ???. Genadi has not come back from injury, and Devon isn't even a super heavyweight anymore (and he looked awful at his 105kg debut). You can put Michael, Kamil, Corey, Ferit, or whoever at the 9 and 10. It doesn't matter. Remember, Revaz gave Vitaly a WAR before his finger broke. And if you consider Morozov top 10, remember that Revaz gave him a war as well. People who are out of the top 10 are NOT going to give top guys like Vitaly and Morozov a war. "Georgi would prob still beat morozov because he would still take morozov wrist." I agree that Georgi would be the favorite if he's healthy. But as it stands, Morozov's loss against him doesn't "count", it is not definitive. "Vitaly will always beat morozov because his unhookable." Yes, we know this. That doesn't affect my point. I literally stated that he lost definitively against Vitaly in my previous comment. The point is that just because he loses to the strongest toproller after Levan, that doesn't mean he'd lose against other toprollers in the top 10. That's like saying losing to Levan in a hook means that your hook wouldn't be effective against other top super heavyweights. Of course you'd lose to Levan in a hook; he's the strongest on the planet. But that doesn't mean your hook wouldn't work against others. And I literally gave examples of his wins against top 10 toprollers like 2022 Chaffee and Revaz. His only definitive loss against a toproller is against Vitaly, who again, is 2nd to Levan. "my point is that morozov has a style disadvantage when it comes to right arm wrestlers because they can counter his hook" Out of the recent 4, only 1 was unhookable. 2 were literally beaten, and 1 match was not definitive. And again, Kurdecha is not on Vitaly''s level. Nor has he shown to be better than a healthy Georgi. Nor has he even proven to be better than Revaz. Remember, Morozov beat the guy who destroyed Kurdecha. Kurdecha only beat a sick Georgi who beat a sick Morozov.
    2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. 2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. Rocky's personality wasn't retconned. We know Rocky's philosophy: "It's not about how hard you can hit, it's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward, about how much you can take, and keep moving forward." Except Rocky isn't infallible; he isn't some Gary Stu that can overcome every single obstacle with 0 issue. Sometimes life hits so hard that not even Rocky Balboa can take it. That's what makes it heartbreaking and surreal. Adrian's gone, Paulie's gone, his only son disowned him to the point of never even letting his kid meet him, he gets the same disease that killed his wife, he's at the tail end of his life and no one gives a sh*t about him anymore. He's in a way worse position than where he was in Rocky 6. His bitterness is earned. His pessimistic worldview is organic. It's similar to Logan and Professor X. Both were heroes; shining beacons of hope that seemingly overcame every obstacle. Then life hit hard; harder than even they could handle. And they turned to the bitter, sad, old men we saw in Logan. And what's cool is that the movies both deconstruct and reaffirm the myth of their heroes. They once again rise from their fall. Heroes like them falling isn't an inherent issue or some inconsistency in the narrative; they're not infallible, after all. What matters is if the fall is organic. Does it make sense as to why they turned out the way they did? That's the question that has to be answered. If a Mary Sue character went through what they did, do you think they'd turn out similar? Do you think they'd turn out broken? Of course not. If they were Mary Sues/Gary Stus, they wouldn't be our heroes. It seems like others are disagreeing with your take on Creed, too.
    2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1