Comments by "Jason Dashney" (@jasondashney) on "California law strips licenses from 'misinformation'-spreading doctors" video.

  1. 5:05 He explains why the bill ISN'T needed. It has to be malicious? If a doctor is spreading information with malicious intent then they can already be punished severely. That's already doable so why the new law? Then he has the stones to say that "misinformation" is VERY specific. Is it now? If it has to be malicious, how do you go about proving intent? That's often as murky as it gets ipso facto: not very specific nor direct. He's saying something that is untrue while introducing a bill to combat people saying things that aren't true?
    1