Comments by "Jason Dashney" (@jasondashney) on "My Comments Section is a Dumpster Fire (Harvard Fake Data Scandal)" video.

  1. "Anti vaxxers" who question Pfizer? If this video was maybe mid 2021 I can possibly forgive that, but there's no excuse for saying something like that in mid 2023. They didn't do any studies at all about transmissibility love the vaccine. Nobody did, yet false claims went out about how it stops transmission. That's fraud! Even the term vaccine in and of itself is a type of fraud because they literally aren't vaccines. They are gene therapy. This type of thing was controversial to say in mid 2021, but it is not controversial to say now. It blows my mind how a select group of ideologues still call anybody who does not like this specific "vaccine" an anti-vaxxer. It's literally beyond belief to me. There are countless people who are publicly, stating that they think vaccines are one of the greatest things mankind has ever developed, but this one specific one was absolutely tainted and fraudulent and reprehensible, and somehow, that means they are against them as a whole. I came to your channel and I liked it, and I subscribed, but the last couple of videos you were very clearly inserted, political bias, and in this one you are calling out people who called out nine cents and I just don't get it. I think I'm going to unsubscribe because this is three videos in a row. Dad either show something kind of silly or show, definite political bias. I do appreciate that this one lady being fraudulent has nothing to do with vaccine research at all and that is obviously correct, but it was the term anti-VAX her that got me because that's where you showed your hand. And of course the next thing you mentioned was climate change, as if none of that can be questioned either. Basically, everything you used as an example was one of the stereotype, main stream, narratives, and it blows my mind that we have so many of those crashing down yet so many people still adhering to all of them without question. What this indicates is that this channel is not going to be full of interesting and objective data. It is going to parrot mainstream, ideas and mainstream ideas only. I will bet my entire net worth that I know exactly how you vote and when people are that easy to spot, you know that what they're talking about is coming from a place of bias, and in the sciences, I think that's unacceptable. The sad part is I guarantee that you'll read this and think I'm just some right wing contrarian or something, even though I haven't even hinted in the very least about where my beliefs lay. Unsubscribed.
    2