Comments by "Jason Dashney" (@jasondashney) on "TED"
channel.
-
63
-
52
-
31
-
26
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
11
-
8
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Then you're just not paying attention. There are plenty of patriots in politics, but these days they are mostly on the right, and the ones that are on the left get pilloried by their own side, like Tulsi Gabard. The people at the top who control everything are just uniparty. It doesn't matter who you vote for, the outcome is roughly the same, but there absolutely are people just one or two steps below that that keep bringing up these issues in congressional meetings and trying to tackle the serious stuff but they can't get past the barrier of the establishment. Go on the Forbes, breaking news, YouTube channel and you'll see politician after politician, making very salient points and trying to hold people to a couch, but nothing ever happens. They get scolded and then go about their lives and nothing happens to them. It's like how absolutely nobody was punished for the 2008 financial crisis. In fact, Obama hired those same people and now the problem is even worse, and Trump did nothing to stop it either. The people at the top are all garbage.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Right Minded - I disagree that "wealth is created through productive work". I don't care how productive people are, if they are chasing money that their own country has created out of thin air, then "getting" more money is just inflation. That's different from increased wealth. Each new dollar makes the existing ones worth less and less. A dozen eggs equals a loaf of bread. It does today, and it did 50 years ago. The food didn't become any more valuable, we just hand over more dollars to buy it now. I just don't see how going into debt increases wealth the same as bringing in foreign assets, debt free, does. Plus, the paying off of debts with increased amounts of dollars (each having decreased values) isn't a sound strategy, it's a borderline ponzi scheme.
Maybe we just aren't connecting on what "productive" means. To me it means creating something where nothing was before. A policeman isn't "productive", and they don't contribute to government coffers because their whole paycheque came from those coffers in the first place.
I'm not sure whether we disagree, or just aren't on the same page with the semantics. Text is so cumbersome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1