Comments by "Jason Dashney" (@jasondashney) on "Sky News Australia" channel.

  1. I'd like to know more because that footage showed nothing. It just showed people being arrested. It didn't show what the person did or how they were acting.
    1
  2.  @jmerced  They did. She doesn't work there anymore.
    1
  3.  @alenakralova9868  she's actually really smart, and that's the scary part. I watched that show quite regularly and on certain topics she was very insightful and rational and on other ones she was an absolute lunatic idiot. She most certainly has a higher than average IQ, yet absolutely no common sense. It's the strangest thing. This is an extremely common trait among high achieving academics.
    1
  4. The smug look on this woman's face before she even started talking drives me nuts. Typical BLMSJW. People on the far left always have that arrogant look at it drives me nuts.
    1
  5. Time magazine has been bashing Trump this whole time. But it's not even up for debate that he has been the most impactful person, the most newest generating person of the year. Nobody cancelled their subscripiton when Vladimir Putin was on the cover. Same with Adolf Hitler. Wanting Taylor Swift, the person who was already on it last year, to be the person of the year again, considering she's just a rockstar, is insane
    1
  6. To be honest I don't actually have much of a problem with her doing that. I can't stand weed. I hate it with the fire of 1000 suns but I made a bunch of money off weed stocks because they were going up whether I wanted it to be legal or not. If I avoided those stocks just because I can't stand weed, then I would lose, and for no gain whatsoever.
    1
  7.  @lala-ct9ir  How do I plan to take religion out? I don't, and they won't. Let them duke it out, just don't send my tax dollars over there when there are people down the street that could really use it.
    1
  8.  @lala-ct9ir  it’s 100% about books. Religious texts. Take religion out of the region and they still wouldn’t be fighting the same damn fight thousands of years later.
    1
  9. Release all of it from both sides. Israel has done stuff they aren’t proud of either, and I’m willing to bet that’s why they won’t release the footage. That whole area is such a gong show. All of these people arguing over books.
    1
  10. 14:36. This is where their arguments go from valid to right off the rails. They will deem everything they don't like, and often resort to reading between the lines to do so, as somehow sexist, racist, blah blah blah. So their "consequences" are their own punishments given out those who THEY "decide" are bad. It's a gross circular logic. 25:30. So you haven't even talked to them about it until right now? THAT'S the problem. The progressives will not allow discussion. They won't engage the other side. She openly admits she doesn't understand her enemy yet has a fully formed opinion and is smug about it. It's hatred with a halo.
    1
  11.  @PickledGopher  They for sure planted some, and I'm far from the tinfoil hat type. But given the extremely sparse main stream media presence there, I highly doubt they just flipped out and happened upon these people with the flags by chance. They were lone wolfs and promptly left when called out by the protesters. All of it is incredibly suspect. I'm sure out of the masses there were a few nutters, but the coverage was way too convenient.
    1
  12.  @korndog81  30%? That's of people who actually voted. He only got 20.3% of the eligible voters. One in 5 adults you see on the street actually voted for him.
    1
  13. Down vote for the Clickbait title. I didn't hear a creepy joke. I heard a reference to knowing somebody since she was one age and he was another. That's not what a creepy joke is. I'm sorry, I always down vote Clickbait, no matter what..
    1
  14. No different than Putin's #1 rival being assassinated and Putin's all "I'll personally lead the investigation". I wish Joy would go on Rogan. The fact Whoopi was friends with Trump and the hosts in 2015 loved him says it all. Trump never changed.
    1
  15.  Michael RedCrow  I'm not saying you are right, but I am saying I have yet to see anybody who seriously talks about gender fluidity that was in absolutely every other respect logical and pragmatic. Not saying they don't exist or that gender fluid isn't a real things, I'm just saying the voices I've heard so far have been a little "off".
    1
  16. The vast majority, in the 70-80% range of young men who call themselves trans eventually end up run of the mill happy gay adults. This isn't my opinion, you can look it up. At puberty? Would you let someone just hitting puberty to run the household finances? Run for public office? Drive a car? Go to jail for life for a crime? Then why is a permanent physical change something that's "of course there are no possible (probably) consequences"? Also, it's well established your brain isn't even fully formed until you are in your mid 20's. That's been accepted fact for years so why on earth would someone who in every single other capacity would not be in a position of ultimate responsibility somehow have ultimate mastery over this one single aspect of life (especially since studies have shown most "grow out of it" as they age? Please help me understand because there's no logical basis I can see why you see trans as different from any other form of responsibility/accountability. And hormone blockers certainly are not just a light switch. You can't have a 19yr old who's been hormonally "blocked" for 7 years suddenly come out of it and and develop as if it never happened. As Blair said, how the fuck can saying "the trans person can do what they want, just like I did, when they are old enough to make that decision" be dangerous? That's just sick. You are fucking sick.
    1
  17. I'd give anything to have a Canadian version of this. Fox is too "Rah rah, 'murica!" for my tastes. These guys are a lot more rational and down the middle. I've seen trans people on their panels, and they are respectful to everybody.
    1
  18. It's so gross people have to self censor in order to not get crucified by the phoney SJW's. It's a sickness. To say you are a bigot because you prefer the thing your hormones say you are attracted to is terrible, yet at the same time be okay with absolutely hating people you'd otherwise want to bang simply because they feel slightly differently than you do about political issues is batshit crazy. I hope the grow out of it and see the light.
    1
  19. She didn't shame you. Stop playing victim. She just said she did it on her own. She's saying that because people on the far right freak out like "I'm not paying tax dollars for some queer to chop his nuts off" type deal and she'd rather not have to deal with that, and also because she's proud of working hard to pay for it herself and she should be. That's different than shaming.
    1
  20.  @peestorage6110  Show me one. Show me one single credible source. They've tried and tried to find a gay gene, without success. Again, find me one proper empirical source for this. There are however, credible studies done that show the majority of trans people grow up to be happy, normal gay adults.
    1
  21. I'm not a big fan of Alex, he's too much of a smug hardliner for me but he's bang on here. The fact that people will tell the young people that their existence will be wiped out due to climate change, and then they get angry that the kids are full of anxiety and it gets blamed on "climate deniers" is breathtaking.
    1
  22. She says words, and those words mean things. The words….mean things. And that means she means things. Things that have meanings. Her words are not only meanings, they are things and that’s important.
    1
  23. It is super nutty that you can have a democratically elected president that nobody voted directly for. Then again I’m Canadian and we don’t vote for any leader. We vote for the person in our own writing who represents that leader so by electing somebody close to home we are helping to elect the Prime Minister. It’s the stupidest system ever because it assumes that if you like one you like both and vice versa.
    1
  24. "Trying to ruin someone's life" should be punishable by 10yrs behind bars.
    1
  25. C'mon guys, I really like your channel and I wish we had something like it in Canada, but I've downloaded this video for both the silliness and hypocrisy of it because you guys have a rightly called out tons of stuff on the left and use language like this over and over and over. Some of the examples you gave were just somebody asking a question and that is absolutely OK. If this video called out all biased, editorial reporting I'd be okay with it so long as you didn't pretend to be above it, but you guys are clearly on one side of the aisle so be careful about casting stones. You guys don't seem to be nearly as far right as these people in the video are left (thankfully), but let's not pretend there's no bias going on with your channel either. Perhaps cast a pebble as opposed to a stone. The comments Laura Southern made at the end of this video are every bit as charged as what the talking heads at ABC said. You guys are better than this.
    1
  26. I recently saw a chart showing wear his votes came from and it's insane that the vast majority came from the Toronto area. At was enough to get him elected three times so it makes sense that he wouldn't care about the West in any capacity. He knows he will get some votes from Vancouver and Victoria and that's enough to keep him in power. I wish Alberta was able to block oil money from going to Ottawa. The stones on these people to treat oil the way they do but still take the money. Not only that but they blame the oil companies were being too greedy. When's the last time the government refused some of that sweet sweet money?
    1
  27. Why does this have more downvotes than upvotes? I saw a reasonably respectful debate. That's wonderful. If everybody agreed it would just be an echo chamber. Go to CNN and see 6 people all interrupting each other and insulting each other, THEN come back here and appreciate what you've seen.
    1
  28. That's not a blanket argument. You do not believe it's a blanket argument so stop being obtuse. It's not meant to be taken literally. If you didn't have SOME restrictions, then you'd literally have anarchy. You agree that some laws need to be on the books. Now it's just a matter of degrees.
    1
  29. The party of tolerance and inclusion indeed
    1
  30. She wasn't even an afterthought in the POTUS running, yet she's next in line due to an undemocratic process. Interesting. Oddly enough she was torpedoed by Tulsi who could've defeated Trump, but was then torpedoed by the Dems themselves. Then again the other side could come up with nobody better than Donald Trump. Imagine being able to go from having zero governing experience to leader of the free world because you win a popularity contest. Politics is so fucking gross.
    1
  31. Did you lot listen to the first few seconds before commenting? The ice is breaking up beneath their feet before the babies have a chance to grow their waterproof feathers. What does that have to do with the distance their parents go for food?
    1
  32. So you don't want to hear about anything on earth other than the single most pressing issue? Then when that is solved you would like to hear about the next biggest issue and so on down the line? You'd literally be the most ignorant person alive if you only ever heard about the biggest issue and nothing else.
    1
  33.  @ivaketiv  The Reason TV YouTube channel is also great for interviews.
    1
  34.  @katepanthera7265  "I would be interested in knowing what you consider hard left 'woke' ideas. People on the right throw the term 'woke' around all the time, but never define what 'woke' means to them" Has that been your experience? I think it's very clear and well defined by pretty much everyone. Woke is when something goes from "I like X" to "X is morally righteous and everything else is morally wrong be definition and shouldn't be allowed to even be uttered". Conservatives don't feel that "traditional" gay rights messages were Woke because they were just people expressing their ideas. It doesn't become Woke until they try to silence you and bully and harass you because you are morally reprehensible. The Wokeness is an expression of an assumed moral virtue that cannot be questioned, and if it is, the goal is not to educate, but to harass and deplatform and insult. Very, very few conservatives feel there's no place for liberals. Most conservatives feel there's no place for the Woke.
    1
  35. It must really confuse you when people call him awful things. You are the reason he does what he does. His life's mission is to help people. Lucky for him his life's mission also turned out to be very, very lucrative. May we all get so lucky haha.
    1
  36.  @edenbennell1216  And the left never make cogent arguments. They just go ad hominem like intellectual cowards.
    1
  37. In Canada and America, we get slammed with progressive propaganda all the time. Most of the media, big corporations, everything, just like you guys. Yet half the time we vote conservative. That means the majority of people are actually conservative because we still vote that way half of the time, even though almost all of the messaging is in the other direction. Imagine if all of the media was as biased to conservatives as they are to liberals. Conservatives would win 80% of the time. It's a rigged game. And I think liberals are very important, and they are absolutely required as a counter balance, but the game shouldn't be rigged in their favour.
    1
  38.  @jrwstl02  I mean the distance as far as ice ages over thousands of years, averaged out. The output varies and goes up and down from the sun? Interesting. I'd have assumed it would only be what it is, then go down due to eventually burning out.
    1
  39. That last sentence needs clarification. If the sun controls it and the sun stays a relatively constant temperature and we stay the same distance away, why the massive heat/cold periods?
    1
  40. This wasn't a very good clip. It was so short on specifics as to be essentially useless. You paint the picture that it is ominous but unless you provide even a tiny bit of evidence then it basically just reads as fear mongering. The guest did not get into any specifics whatsoever. Short of that, it's just buzz phrases.
    1
  41. This is how reporting is supposed to be. It comes across completely impartial even though I know the anchor absolutely loves it. This is old-school reporting and I wish everybody would go back to it.
    1
  42. The main point is that the VAST majority of people are not on board with this to varying degrees. It's an extreme minority that are completely on board with all of the facets of the woke movement
    1
  43. Hillary called 1/2 of the Trump supporters deplorable. That means she insulted 1/4 of the country. People really eed to stop saying she called half the country deplorable. Accuracy is important.
    1
  44. Speak softly but carry a big stick.
    1
  45. 1:45. Yes it's money America doesn't have, but then again it's money that millions of people REALLY don't have. Right here, right now. It's easy to say no when your rent isn't the bill that's overdue. I see both sides and I'm glad I don't have to make the call.
    1
  46. I wonder what % of people are going to dismiss this simply because it's Project Veritas, even though it's literally direct video of the guy saying it over and over. It's not like this is twisted or out of context unless he was saying "Here's what they are saying about us" but I very highly doubt it.
    1
  47. So she's independent who is part of a group of independents who are dealing with the world economic forum. Riiiiight...
    1
  48. The FBI should be raiding all kinds of people. Unfortunately they only will go after the "right" people. They never raid politicians or former politicians of that stature. Why now? Gee, I wonder.
    1
  49. You clearly don't use Adobe products, haha.
    1
  50. I'm in the same boat as you, but I'll take Piers over most of the left media because at least he does have parts of him that want to be objective.
    1