Comments by "Jason Dashney" (@jasondashney) on "How Will Earth Change If All the Ice Melts?" video.

  1. No. That ice wall thingy will hold it in. Or the firmament or something.
    19
  2. Notice how all you said was "It's not settled 100%" and these people lose their shit like "Wake up you fucking idiot" yet nobody actually provides any evidence of what IS happening 100% for known reasons? That's because climate models are unbelievable complicated and anyone who says they have all the answers is just ignorant. If the science was settled, we'd know EXACTLY how much of the rise we are causing and be able to forecast exactly what our impact will be, yet estimates vary wildly. If estimates vary wildly, then we don't fucking know, do we?
    6
  3. Here are actual quotes from some of the people literally included in that 97% study: The 97 percent claim is a deliberate misrepresentation designed to intimidate the public—and numerous scientists whose papers were classified by Cook protested: “Cook survey included 10 of my 122 eligible papers. 5/10 were rated incorrectly. 4/5 were rated as endorse rather than neutral.” —Dr. Richard Tol “That is not an accurate representation of my paper . . .” —Dr. Craig Idso “Nope . . . it is not an accurate representation.” —Dr. Nir Shaviv “Cook et al. (2013) is based on a strawman argument . . .” —Dr. Nicola Scafetta So everybody knows it's 97% even though some of those actual 97% say they were misrepresented? C'mon now.
    3
  4. Because NASA. Or was the the Illuminati? The Freemasons? I can't keep up.
    3
  5. 97% of them DO agree, eh? You are basing this stat on what? Did you talk to them all? Here's what a few of the actual quoted scientists in the 97% has to say: The 97 percent claim is a deliberate misrepresentation designed to intimidate the public—and numerous scientists whose papers were classified by Cook protested: “Cook survey included 10 of my 122 eligible papers. 5/10 were rated incorrectly. 4/5 were rated as endorse rather than neutral.” —Dr. Richard Tol “That is not an accurate representation of my paper . . .” —Dr. Craig Idso “Nope . . . it is not an accurate representation.” —Dr. Nir Shaviv “Cook et al. (2013) is based on a strawman argument . . .” —Dr. Nicola Scafetta Now please cite your sources that can refute the actual words of some of the actual "97%" themselves.
    2
  6. I'm amazed that people are still upvoting your comment after I give proof that at least some of that 97% claim was bullshit. I don't give a flying fuck either way if climate change is man made or not, I just care about being accurate and that 97% stat comes from one single study that has irrefutable evidence (quotes from some of the actual scientists themselves) of being at least somewhat falsified. Even if it's only those 4 that I quoted, it's still misrepresentation. I don't care if 99% of them really do believe the whole deal and somehow the author found these 4 who think differently, that doesn't change the fact that the report is at least a little bit inaccurate, end of story. Unless you have done your own study or have read all the existing ones, you might want to think about quitting the assumptions.
    1
  7. I've seen so many reports/videos/new stories about global warming but I have yet to see how it does anything more than shift coastlines cause inward migration and a few more storms. I don't understand what all the fuss is about. I'm not saying not to do anything about it, but people act like it's the fucking apocalypse but the cries are usually extremely vague. Nature abhors a vacuum so for every species hurt, others will take their place. I'm not even saying the hype is unfounded, I'm just saying that people keep trumpeting "the end is nigh" but they offer next to nothing with anything concrete about why it's catastrophic for anyone besides people with a house next to the waves. Most of the talk is just anger at people like myself who have yet to fully jump on board. I think it's group think and it's scary to me when nobody is even allowed to ask questions. Ask one and it's "OMFG, there's a ton of evidence you ignorant asshole". In many years of this, I'm still waiting to see something tangible that doesn't have counter arguments.
    1
  8. I can't stand when people say climate change hurts The Earth. How? It'll hurt human populated coastal areas for the humans, and humans will migrate inland causing habitat loss but how the fuck will something natural hurt the actual earth itself? Yeah yeah yeah, slight ocean acidification etc but overall the earth will not give a flying fuck what we do in the long run, no matter how important we think we are.
    1
  9. So this global warming video is sponsored by a global warming movie and the second stat it uses is false? Downvote. Some of the scientists quoted in that 97% study are on record saying they were misrepresented.
    1