Comments by "Sam Miller" (@sammiller6631) on "Attrition is beginning to bite" video.

  1.  @tylerisnthere2922  That grain deal ended 17 July 2023, so there was no "executive orders" there. It looked like a ChatGPT blurb fail. You didn't explain why the shipments aren't stopped since 17 July 2023.
    5
  2.  @tylerisnthere2922  You're not answering the question. Your "one quick google search" is like saying "water is wet"
    3
  3.  @wolfswinkel8906  No one is backtracking. Just because you don't agree with something doesn't make it "propaganda". Your all or nothing mentality shows what kind of person you are.
    3
  4.  @williamzk9083  Is the F-16 the only option? JAS 39 Gripen was designed to be used with invasion in mind with austere environments.
    3
  5. Russia is continually falling back in the Black Sea. Why can't the Black Sea Fleet push them back or at least stop the grain shipments?
    2
  6.  @cameronspence4977  "neither side is technologically advanced enough to use them" is total bullshit. You don't need to be technologically advanced to use combined arms tactics.
    2
  7.  @romailto9299  Having nukes isn't better. Nukes didn't help the US win in Afghanistan, or the Soviets in Afghanistan during the 80s.
    2
  8.  @nikolaypetrov9789  where's the modern weapons? Where's the T-14 Armata? Where's the Su-57? Where's the combat ready force if it's relying on North Korea to supply it? They replaced General Armageddon with Gerasimov. That's a step backward.
    2
  9.  @hegulikekuli  Those NATO countries are actually OBLIGED by Article 3 to spend enough on their own defence, but how many are actually spending their 2% of GDP on defence? If they want Article 5 protection, they need to uphold Article 3 expenditures.
    2
  10.  @misterpinkandyellow74  "Russia out produces NATO. 😂😂😂 Even NATO admits it" is pure copium. You can't claim "...admits it" just by saying it. You need actual quotes from real people.
    2
  11.  @frankrenda2519  US spent less than 5% of its defence budget on Ukraine aid, and it still put Russia at a stalemate for 3 years. Why don't you admit that Russia is struggling against countries that aren't even spending 2% of GDP on defence?
    2
  12.  @nikolaypetrov9789  Begging for old shells from North Korea and drones from Iran is still begging. Why is Russia begging?
    2
  13.  @nikolaypetrov9789  Russia has fought in Donbas for ten years now and still hasn't won. Russia can't protect its navy in the Black Sea or protect its borders near Kursk. Supplies from the West continue to increase. If Russia doesn't have a big breakthrough soon, they will run out of money in two or three years.
    2
  14.  @GregJ-ft5qk  Russia isn't taking ground in the Black Sea. Don't cherrypick one small area and ignore the other fronts.
    1
  15.  @GregJ-ft5qk  The more ground Russia takes, the more spread out Russia forces become. Russia is slowly but surely thining their ranks until their supply lines are overstretched. Have you forgot the 40 mile stuck convoy to Kyiv?
    1
  16.  @michaelotieno6524  The more land Russia takes, the more spread out they become. The longer their supply lines become, the longer it takes to supply. Third, Russia lacks the manpower, soldiers are deserting in droves and a huge male refugee population refuses to return home and fight.
    1
  17.  @misterpinkandyellow74  Russia is using north Korean soldiers. Russia has admitted this.
    1
  18.  @michaelotieno6524  The size of the Western economies is VERY relevant. Artillery is still the King of Battle. 8 million shells will shift the needle. It's lack of munitions, not lack of manpower, that is slowing Ukraine. Korea has the largest artillery stockpiles in the world.
    1
  19.  @michaelotieno6524  Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan are COIN conflicts, not LSCO wars.
    1
  20.  @Jimbo2193  "Experts say" is typical propaganda. Appeal to vague authority is a logical fallacy for a reason.
    1
  21.  @evgeniya7853  Global South isn't an economic bloc. They're unaligned states.
    1
  22.  @evgeniya7853  The Soviet Union waged war for FOUR years in the Soviet-Ukraine War of 1917-1921, but was saved by German aid from the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. Russia can't win without outside help, be it Germany then or the US during Lend-Lease or NKorea today. Your claim that Lend-Lease weapons were only enough for one year ignores the fact that more weapons would continue to flow as long as the war lasted.
    1
  23.  @Jimbo2193  If you can, why haven't you?
    1
  24.  @lqr824  Your longer comment is garbage. You should be ashamed of how muddled it is. You need to communicate more clearly.
    1
  25.  @Mikilangelo  All sides lose men in wars. This is real life, not a GI Joe episode where the bullets zoom past everyone so they can continue giving speeches and one-liners.
    1
  26.  @a.brekkan4965  Are you cherrypicking Österreichs Bundesheer videos?
    1
  27.  @thijsjong  The focus is not on Gaza. The focus is on the US Election. They're not "eating the dogs, eating the cats" in Gaza.
    1
  28.  @ragnardunderdase3473  Capitalism is better suited to supplying 300k soldiers than dictatorship economics. Neither Russia nor Ukraine is sending "all your men" to war if they're only sending 27 year old men or older. Russia hasn't even started pulling middle class men from Moscow or St Petersburg.
    1
  29.  @JaroslavBrabec-iz5eb  Stop making up random bullshit.
    1
  30.  @Dicka899  Russia hasn't retaken the Black Sea or Kursk. Why so slow?
    1
  31. If Russia had enough volunteers, they wouldn't need North Korean soldiers.
    1
  32. The war is NOT about to end. "Russia’s casualties are at a low ebb right now whereas they have only been increasing for Ukraine." is wishful thinking that you have no proof for.
    1
  33.  @Nauda999  Some people seem to enjoy culture wars, but those suck too.
    1
  34.  @DrVictorVasconcelos  That's not cutting through the bullshit. That's just adding noise to a noisy internet.
    1
  35.  @Nauda999  price wars don't suck for customers
    1
  36.  @wolfswinkel8906  You are not objective.
    1
  37.  @amunra5330  If Ukraine was sent what the US sent the Soviets during Lend-Lease, Russia would lose the war, just like the Germans lost against the Red Army.
    1
  38.  @qZbGmYjS4QusYqv5  Is "migrant crysis" a new DLC patch for the upcoming Crysis 4 game?
    1
  39.  @moonstone3662  I'm guessing the statistic was pulled from a RUSI or SIPRI report. Have you read their reports?
    1
  40.  @thomasthereal4067  1974 was fifty years ago, not 40. The F-35 requires much more infrastructure to support, which limits its use, compared to JAS 39 Gripen, which was designed with good short-field performance for a defensive dispersed basing plan (Bas 90) in the event of invasion.
    1
  41.  @user-yq2wk6yg8s  Do those TV documentaries have actual names or are you just amplifying rumors?
    1
  42.  @Zedgo99  "Because capitalism" has become a thought-terminating phrase. Is everyone reduced to a mustache-twirling supervillian or NPC in your eyes?
    1
  43.  @yellowtunes2756  "vast majority of NATO countries admitted to have completely run out of equipment" doesn't actually name the countries, because you know you can't back that claim up.
    1
  44.  @Andreas-gh6is  The Ukrainian aircraft can use bombs or glidebombs. If Ukraine can get Franken-SAMs to work, they can work the same magic with other munitions. Ukraine has got generations of experience from being the heart of Soviet military production.
    1
  45.  @romailto9299  It's not Russian nukes that contain the US. It's the US election. The 1853 Crimean War didn't last 5 years and it bankrupted Imperial Russia, which sold Alaska to the United States.
    1
  46.  @richard2218188  The "west" had a choice between Ahmad Shah Massoud (who kept modern Taliban and the Soviets in the '80s out of the Panjshir) or Hamid Karzai (a ivory tower politician with no military experience). When Karzai's money dried up, his influence through corruption went with it. bin Laden was so scared of Ahmad Shah Massoud "the Lion of the Panjshir" that he would call off 9/11 if Massoud couldn't be assassinated before it.
    1
  47.  @richard2218188  Russia lost the First Chechen War. Putin had to bribe one of the opposition leaders in order to win the Second Chechen War. Even now, the son of that leader is extorting Putin for millions to keep Chechnya from breaking away again.
    1
  48.  @nikolaypetrov9789  Trump can't even build the Wall. He didn't get rid of Obamacare. He acts like he's on a reality TV show, not a leader of a country. If Trump gives up on the war, it's a sign to China that the US is weak. Expect prices to be so much more expensive from China. If Russia ended the war now, wages would collapse. So many companies depending on government contracts would go under. How many millions would leave looking for jobs?
    1
  49.  @ericp1139  The US election.
    1
  50.  @nikolaypetrov9789  No one is winning this war. Ignoring things that don't agree with what you want to see is not truth.
    1
  51.  @ari_a2764  Ukraine's biggest problem isn't manpower. It's how to adapt strategy when promised aid does not show up. You can't clear a city with promise notes.
    1
  52.  @ari_a2764  "You will find figures of shell production easily" means you can't find them. Otherwise, you'd tell us the name of the report or Org that released them.
    1
  53.  @ari_a2764  zalushnj "admitted" no such thing. You're just spin doctoring to see what you want to see.
    1