Comments by "Sam Miller" (@sammiller6631) on "Ukraine destroys Russian pontoon bridges in Kursk" video.

  1.  @The_Orgazoid  unless money is their god
    6
  2. Tanks get destroyed in war. It's easier to replace a tank than to replace a trained tank solder. That's how real war works. This isn't Call of Duty.
    3
  3.  @theendmyfriend  Not a false dichotomy. It would cost more to decommission a 40 year old tank than it would cost to ship to Ukraine. The US saved money, and not just because those billions count the cost of the tanks as their price when new, not as the value after 30-40 years.
    3
  4.  @andrewkitchenuk  Why would Russia continue in Eastern Ukraine when 130000 Russians fled from Kursk oblast? Do the Russians care about their own border towns?
    2
  5.  @gabrielbakalarz5722  Because Mexico won't pay to build a wall on the US border.
    1
  6.  @gabrielbakalarz5722  Ukraine is the breadbasket of Europe, which could make groceries much cheaper for the rest of world if it were brought up to US farming standards rather than old Soviet era standards
    1
  7.  @gabrielbakalarz5722  US border issue existed for 40 years, but it's only brought up ever 4 years during elections. What did either Bush ever do about the border?
    1
  8.  SpetsnazGRU-Z  That's how real war works. This is not Call of Duty.
    1
  9.  @alexrz4196  Sounds like copium.
    1
  10.  @pavelzmiev1578  No, even the Russian milblogs have mentioned losses for Russia, because they openly criticise because they want Russia to improve
    1
  11.  SpetsnazGRU-Z  They understand the reality of how Russia is failing but not the why
    1
  12. It will change the war. If Russia wants Kursk back, they will have to trade Donbas back.
    1
  13.  @ВашместныйагентКГБ  It's cope because they're focused on one side and ignoring the other side. Both sides have losses. But no one has explained why Russia hasn't pushed Ukraine out of Kursk yet. Russia is supposed to have the larger army, right?
    1