Comments by "Sam Miller" (@sammiller6631) on "Ukraine advances 5km behind Russian lines in new Kursk offensive" video.

@umaruchan8828 The American taxpayer didn't waste money. Those tanks and IFVs were made 30-40 years ago, due to be scrapped. Those vehicles were designed to be used against Soviets, so they got good info to see how well they worked against modern Russians so that the next generation of military gear can be even better.
18
@JohnCSmith-lp1qr "Kursk was a trap" is copium. Russia being unable to reclaim Kursk after six months makes them look weak. "farmland vs city" is trying to distract from that harsh reality of weakness. Kursk IS the frontline.
8
@ How long will it take for Russia to retake Kursk? It's been over six months now. Not even the North Koreans have helped.
7
@JohnCSmith-lp1qr Kursk pushed Russian launch sites back, which pushed previous Ukrainian targets like cities out of range. Now they can build more city and trench fortifications without constant bombing.
6
@JohnCSmith-lp1qr Kursk is key. Just like it was in World War II. The 1943 Battle of Kursk was a turning point for the war. If Russia cannot repeat that, it will damage morale.
5
@danielk1152 So why can't Russia reclaim Kursk? It's been over six months.
5
@Robert_Class_of_73 capturing Pokrovsk does not look any more grim for Ukraine. The entire war has been real grim for Ukraine. Yet they're still out there fighting.
4
@ChristiaanHW It could be a trollbot, but they're feeding the algorithm, boosting views for "Ukraine continues to advance in new Kursk offensive" video which more people will see.
2
@bomber9912 Kursk is more important than Kupiansk or Kostantinivka or Pokrovsk. Russia didn't pull in North Korea for those.
2
@RyanBrown-w4n banderite? LOL That doesn't work. It has no emotional traction in the West.
1
@ Ukraine the Latest is a class act news source. It's the gold standard of news on the Ukraine war.
1