Comments by "Nicolae Crefelean" (@kneekoo) on "Tech Chasm"
channel.
-
50
-
24
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Welcome back, both of you! :) And nice bow, Jixuan. My wife approved it too. 😄
10:12 The guy wears a duck mask and the lady next to him wears TWO masks (duck + a black one on top). 🤣🤣🤣
> Imaginary plan following:
Senator 1: - We're kind of screwed, SpaceX will beat everyone, what do we do?
Senator 2: - LOL, I know how to mess them up. 🙃 Let's only give NASA a smaller budget than SpaceX actually needs. SpaceX are so eager to prove themselves that they might just take it. Then the others file protests and we'll give NASA the rest of the money to fully fund "another" winner. 😉
Senators 3, 4, 5, 6...: - LMFAO! 🤣 Genius move, crappy budget approved. ✔️ In your face, SpaceX! 🥸
2
-
2
-
2
-
Mispronouncing stuff is normal, as people don't have their tongues and mouths trained for all languages. What makes no sense, though, is intentionally mispronouncing words when the goal is not comedy or insult. The easiest way to get a proper feel of why intentionally mispronouncing words is not really a great idea is hearing others constantly mispronouncing your own name. Many people actually care.
But then it also makes sense to try to pronounce it as correct as possible because it's easier for people to understand it, instead of trying to figure out what that was, while losing track on the words following some mispronunciation, which leads to rewinding a bit, just so you catch the whole idea/sentence. This is why you can't do this with a live audience, because you will definitely lose a few on the way. So it's not about people giving anyone a hard time, but rather making sure you pass the message in a way that makes it easy for everyone to follow. And it's also hard work to make sure you pronounce everything correctly and clearly, so this shouldn't be taken lightly. But the effort is worth it and it pays in time.
2
-
2
-
Historians are supposed to be experts about the past, not the future. I initially thought "NASA historian" was ironic and funny, but then the joke kept dragging to weird levels. 😂
No problem, though, it's ok when people have opinions and are willing to stand by them. It's just that not everyone can be right. And considering how much progress SpaceX has done with Starship, I expect it to see it tested in orbit and then around the Moon in 2022. A test mission to Mars will probably follow in late 2024.
No one else has anything better than Starship, even in its current form, so I don't see how any other rocket would reach Mars before SpaceX. Rocket engineering is not the kind of field that you can easily leapfrog development stages. It takes a lot of money, talent and time - all highly important.
And considering SpaceX will soon make a lot of money with Starlink, that will enable the acceleration of their development, because they have a silly amount of talent just waiting for bigger budgets to get results faster. More money will enable them to easily test more advanced materials and manufacturing techniques, which is something governments can't afford and something that other private companies don't do simply because they sit on their hands and wait for governmental contracts or they lack the vision/talent to execute.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
So what was wrong with "Eskimo Nebula" and "Siamese Twins"? I looked into it.
Here's what NASA [1] says: «“Eskimo” is widely viewed as a colonial term with a racist history, imposed on the indigenous people of Arctic regions.»
Here's what Canada [2] says: «"Eskimo" is the term once given to Inuit by European explorers and is now rarely used in Canada. It is derived from an Algonquin term meaning "raw meat eaters," and many people find the term offensive.»
Ok, that makes sense. It's not a racist word, though. But being non-sense and tied to nasty wrongdoings, I see why they stopped using it.
As for the "Siamese Twins", NASA didn't say anything but Wikipedia [3] says this:
«Chang and Eng Bunker (1811–1874), Thai brothers born in Siam, now Thailand, traveled widely for many years and were labeled as The Siamese Twins. Chang and Eng were joined at the torso by a band of flesh, cartilage, and their fused livers. In modern times, they could have been easily separated. Due to the brothers' fame and the rarity of the condition, the term "Siamese twins" came to be used as a synonym for conjoined twins.»
There you go, I learned something new. I never knew where that word came from. Now I see why it makes no sense to use it for conjoined twins. But for a pair of galaxies, why not? That would be an honor for the actual Siamese twins. What am I missing?
[1] https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-to-reexamine-nicknames-for-cosmic-objects
[2] http://www.publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/R2-236-2002E.pdf
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjoined_twins
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1